AFC vs. TFW, LUCE, XPP, SUP, CWR, DWHA, DWHT, IKA, DIA, and EAAS
Should you be buying AFC Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of AFC Energy include FW Thorpe (TFW), Luceco (LUCE), XP Power (XPP), Supreme (SUP), Ceres Power (CWR), Dewhurst Group (DWHA), Dewhurst Group (DWHT), Ilika (IKA), Dialight (DIA), and eEnergy Group (EAAS). These companies are all part of the "electrical equipment & parts" industry.
AFC Energy vs.
AFC Energy (LON:AFC) and FW Thorpe (LON:TFW) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, community ranking, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.
In the previous week, AFC Energy had 1 more articles in the media than FW Thorpe. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for AFC Energy and 0 mentions for FW Thorpe. AFC Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat FW Thorpe's score of 0.00 indicating that AFC Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.
AFC Energy received 126 more outperform votes than FW Thorpe when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 70.59% of users gave FW Thorpe an outperform vote while only 64.68% of users gave AFC Energy an outperform vote.
FW Thorpe has a net margin of 13.83% compared to AFC Energy's net margin of -4,502.53%. FW Thorpe's return on equity of 14.28% beat AFC Energy's return on equity.
17.3% of AFC Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of FW Thorpe shares are held by institutional investors. 16.2% of AFC Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 70.8% of FW Thorpe shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
FW Thorpe has higher revenue and earnings than AFC Energy. AFC Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FW Thorpe, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
AFC Energy has a beta of 2.96, indicating that its share price is 196% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, FW Thorpe has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
FW Thorpe beats AFC Energy on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get AFC Energy News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AFC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
AFC Energy Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:AFC) was last updated on 5/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
