HEAD vs. UPGS, VCP, LIKE, CFX, CHH, ULTP, SDG, PMP, JLH, and HWDN
Should you be buying Headlam Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Headlam Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Victoria (VCP), Likewise Group (LIKE), Colefax Group (CFX), Churchill China (CHH), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Sanderson Design Group (SDG), Portmeirion Group (PMP), John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH), and Howden Joinery Group (HWDN). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.
Headlam Group vs. Its Competitors
Headlam Group (LON:HEAD) and UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.
Headlam Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Headlam Group pays out -65.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Headlam Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
UP Global Sourcing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Headlam Group. Headlam Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Global Sourcing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
74.7% of Headlam Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Headlam Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Headlam Group's net margin of -1.98%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Headlam Group's return on equity.
Headlam Group has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, Headlam Group had 1 more articles in the media than UP Global Sourcing. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Headlam Group and 0 mentions for UP Global Sourcing. Headlam Group's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat UP Global Sourcing's score of 0.00 indicating that Headlam Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Summary
UP Global Sourcing beats Headlam Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Headlam Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HEAD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HEAD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Headlam Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:HEAD) was last updated on 8/16/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat All Access