SDG vs. UPGS, VCP, HEAD, LIKE, ULTP, CFX, CHH, PMP, JLH, and HWDN
Should you be buying Sanderson Design Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Sanderson Design Group include UP Global Sourcing (UPGS), Victoria (VCP), Headlam Group (HEAD), Likewise Group (LIKE), Ultimate Products (ULTP), Colefax Group (CFX), Churchill China (CHH), Portmeirion Group (PMP), John Lewis of Hungerford (JLH), and Howden Joinery Group (HWDN). These companies are all part of the "furnishings, fixtures & appliances" industry.
Sanderson Design Group vs. Its Competitors
UP Global Sourcing (LON:UPGS) and Sanderson Design Group (LON:SDG) are both small-cap consumer cyclical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.
UP Global Sourcing pays an annual dividend of GBX 7 per share. Sanderson Design Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. UP Global Sourcing pays out 5,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sanderson Design Group pays out 61.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sanderson Design Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.
UP Global Sourcing has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sanderson Design Group has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, UP Global Sourcing's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Sanderson Design Group'saverage media sentiment score.
UP Global Sourcing has higher revenue and earnings than Sanderson Design Group. UP Global Sourcing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sanderson Design Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
UP Global Sourcing has a net margin of 7.71% compared to Sanderson Design Group's net margin of 4.43%. UP Global Sourcing's return on equity of 29.55% beat Sanderson Design Group's return on equity.
32.6% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.5% of UP Global Sourcing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.0% of Sanderson Design Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Summary
UP Global Sourcing beats Sanderson Design Group on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Sanderson Design Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SDG and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SDG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Sanderson Design Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (LON:SDG) was last updated on 8/27/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat All Access