Go Pro

Ambarella (AMBA) Competitors

Ambarella logo
$83.70 -2.30 (-2.67%)
As of 01:34 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

AMBA vs. COHU, DIOD, ENTG, KLAC, and KLIC

Should you buy Ambarella stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ambarella with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ambarella include Cohu (COHU), Diodes (DIOD), Entegris (ENTG), KLA (KLAC), and Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC).

How does Ambarella compare to Cohu?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Cohu (NASDAQ:COHU) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Ambarella has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its share price is 112% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cohu has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Cohu shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cohu shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cohu has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ambarella, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella$390.70M9.31-$75.86M-$1.61N/A
Cohu$522.60M4.35-$74.27M-$0.83N/A

In the previous week, Cohu had 13 more articles in the media than Ambarella. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Cohu and 16 mentions for Ambarella. Cohu's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Ambarella's score of 0.69 indicating that Cohu is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ambarella
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cohu
10 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ambarella currently has a consensus target price of $101.13, indicating a potential upside of 21.92%. Cohu has a consensus target price of $68.75, indicating a potential upside of 42.70%. Given Cohu's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cohu is more favorable than Ambarella.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Cohu
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Cohu has a net margin of -7.43% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Cohu's return on equity of -1.96% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ambarella-17.18% -10.94% -8.48%
Cohu -7.43%-1.96%-1.30%

Summary

Cohu beats Ambarella on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Diodes?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Diodes (NASDAQ:DIOD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Ambarella currently has a consensus price target of $101.13, indicating a potential upside of 21.92%. Diodes has a consensus price target of $113.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.50%. Given Diodes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Diodes is more favorable than Ambarella.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Diodes
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Diodes has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diodes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella$390.70M9.31-$75.86M-$1.61N/A
Diodes$1.56B2.41$66.14M$1.8444.34

Diodes has a net margin of 5.50% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Diodes' return on equity of 3.48% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ambarella-17.18% -10.94% -8.48%
Diodes 5.50%3.48%2.74%

Ambarella has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diodes has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.2% of Diodes shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Diodes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ambarella had 6 more articles in the media than Diodes. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ambarella and 10 mentions for Diodes. Diodes' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Ambarella's score of 0.69 indicating that Diodes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ambarella
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diodes
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Diodes beats Ambarella on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Entegris?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Ambarella has a beta of 2.12, suggesting that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Entegris has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Entegris has a net margin of 8.18% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Entegris' return on equity of 11.45% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ambarella-17.18% -10.94% -8.48%
Entegris 8.18%11.45%5.34%

82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Entegris shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ambarella currently has a consensus price target of $101.13, suggesting a potential upside of 21.92%. Entegris has a consensus price target of $164.22, suggesting a potential upside of 33.34%. Given Entegris' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Entegris is more favorable than Ambarella.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Entegris
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella$390.70M9.31-$75.86M-$1.61N/A
Entegris$3.20B5.88$235.60M$1.7371.19

In the previous week, Ambarella had 2 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ambarella and 14 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Ambarella's score of 0.69 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ambarella
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Entegris
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Entegris beats Ambarella on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to KLA?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $101.13, suggesting a potential upside of 21.92%. KLA has a consensus target price of $223.70, suggesting a potential upside of 24.84%. Given KLA's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KLA is more favorable than Ambarella.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
KLA
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72

In the previous week, KLA had 36 more articles in the media than Ambarella. MarketBeat recorded 52 mentions for KLA and 16 mentions for Ambarella. Ambarella's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat KLA's score of 0.60 indicating that Ambarella is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ambarella
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
KLA
13 Very Positive mention(s)
10 Positive mention(s)
14 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.7% of KLA shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 91.5% of KLA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ambarella has a beta of 2.12, meaning that its stock price is 112% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KLA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has a net margin of 35.57% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. KLA's return on equity of 87.66% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ambarella-17.18% -10.94% -8.48%
KLA 35.57%87.66%29.23%

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella$390.70M9.31-$75.86M-$1.61N/A
KLA$13.58B17.24$4.83B$3.6748.83

Summary

KLA beats Ambarella on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Kulicke and Soffa Industries (NASDAQ:KLIC) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

98.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries presently has a consensus price target of $59.25, indicating a potential downside of 33.65%. Ambarella has a consensus price target of $101.13, indicating a potential upside of 21.92%. Given Ambarella's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Kulicke and Soffa Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' return on equity of 7.29% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kulicke and Soffa Industries7.16% 7.29% 5.38%
Ambarella -17.18%-10.94%-8.48%

In the previous week, Ambarella had 4 more articles in the media than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Ambarella and 12 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Ambarella's score of 0.69 indicating that Kulicke and Soffa Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ambarella
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.12, indicating that its share price is 112% more volatile than the broader market.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kulicke and Soffa Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kulicke and Soffa Industries$654.08M7.14$210K$1.0485.87
Ambarella$390.70M9.31-$75.86M-$1.61N/A

Summary

Kulicke and Soffa Industries beats Ambarella on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ambarella News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AMBA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMBA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AMBA vs. The Competition

MetricAmbarellaSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.64B$97.99B$28.24B$12.66B
Dividend YieldN/A1.59%2.77%10.03%
P/E Ratio-51.5891.4980.8125.05
Price / Sales9.3197.59596.0979.91
Price / CashN/A62.4245.0546.71
Price / Book6.0010.067.766.18
Net Income-$75.86M$1.86B$662.12M$347.61M
7 Day Performance21.57%0.04%1.69%0.71%
1 Month Performance5.85%-10.40%-3.11%-3.75%
1 Year Performance30.13%113.41%150.57%20.17%

Ambarella Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AMBA
Ambarella
2.9453 of 5 stars
$83.71
-2.7%
$101.13
+20.8%
+34.9%$3.67B$390.70MN/A900
COHU
Cohu
4.4466 of 5 stars
$42.07
-12.0%
$63.86
+51.8%
+150.9%$1.98B$481.28MN/A2,857
DIOD
Diodes
4.3866 of 5 stars
$80.77
-6.0%
$113.00
+39.9%
+68.3%$3.71B$1.56B43.907,989
ENTG
Entegris
4.7528 of 5 stars
$118.62
-6.1%
$164.22
+38.4%
+57.3%$18.07B$3.20B68.487,700
KLAC
KLA
4.9298 of 5 stars
$190.96
-6.1%
$218.41
+14.4%
+106.2%$248.95B$12.16B53.9415,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:AMBA) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners