Free Trial

Ambarella (AMBA) Competitors

Ambarella logo
$68.65 -1.65 (-2.35%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$68.50 -0.15 (-0.22%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:56 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

AMBA vs. COHU, ENTG, KLIC, MKSI, and MPWR

Should you buy Ambarella stock or one of its competitors? Ambarella's main competitors and comparable companies include Cohu (COHU), Entegris (ENTG), Kulicke and Soffa Industries (KLIC), MKS (MKSI), and Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "semiconductors & semiconductor equipment" industry.

How does Ambarella compare to Cohu?

Cohu (NASDAQ:COHU) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Ambarella had 1 more articles in the media than Cohu. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ambarella and 5 mentions for Cohu. Cohu's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Ambarella's score of 0.54 indicating that Cohu is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cohu
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ambarella
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Cohu has a net margin of -7.43% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -13.48%. Cohu's return on equity of -1.96% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cohu-7.43% -1.96% -1.30%
Ambarella -13.48%-10.03%-7.73%

Cohu has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Cohu is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ambarella, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cohu$452.96M7.68-$74.27M-$0.83N/A
Ambarella$390.70M7.76-$75.86M-$1.29N/A

Cohu presently has a consensus price target of $68.75, indicating a potential downside of 6.44%. Ambarella has a consensus price target of $89.56, indicating a potential upside of 30.45%. Given Ambarella's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Cohu.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cohu
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Cohu has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its stock price is 51% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.38, meaning that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

94.7% of Cohu shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Cohu shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Cohu beats Ambarella on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Entegris?

Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Entegris has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Entegris shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ambarella had 1 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ambarella and 5 mentions for Entegris. Ambarella's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Entegris' score of 0.38 indicating that Ambarella is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Entegris
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ambarella
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Entegris has a net margin of 9.18% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -13.48%. Entegris' return on equity of 12.25% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Entegris9.18% 12.25% 5.84%
Ambarella -13.48%-10.03%-7.73%

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Entegris$3.20B7.94$235.60M$1.9983.65
Ambarella$390.70M7.76-$75.86M-$1.29N/A

Entegris presently has a consensus price target of $170.89, suggesting a potential upside of 2.65%. Ambarella has a consensus price target of $89.56, suggesting a potential upside of 30.45%. Given Ambarella's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Entegris.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Entegris
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Entegris beats Ambarella on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Kulicke and Soffa Industries?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Kulicke and Soffa Industries (NASDAQ:KLIC) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Ambarella had 2 more articles in the media than Kulicke and Soffa Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ambarella and 4 mentions for Kulicke and Soffa Industries. Ambarella's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Kulicke and Soffa Industries' score of 0.38 indicating that Ambarella is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ambarella
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Kulicke and Soffa Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a net margin of 12.18% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -13.48%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries' return on equity of 14.39% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ambarella-13.48% -10.03% -7.73%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries 12.18%14.39%10.41%

Ambarella has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

Kulicke and Soffa Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kulicke and Soffa Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella$390.70M7.76-$75.86M-$1.29N/A
Kulicke and Soffa Industries$654.08M8.06$210K$2.1746.44

Ambarella currently has a consensus price target of $89.56, suggesting a potential upside of 30.45%. Kulicke and Soffa Industries has a consensus price target of $69.67, suggesting a potential downside of 30.87%. Given Ambarella's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Kulicke and Soffa Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

Kulicke and Soffa Industries beats Ambarella on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to MKS?

MKS (NASDAQ:MKSI) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

99.8% of MKS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

MKS currently has a consensus price target of $375.93, suggesting a potential upside of 34.67%. Ambarella has a consensus price target of $89.56, suggesting a potential upside of 30.45%. Given MKS's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe MKS is more favorable than Ambarella.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MKS
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.81
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Ambarella had 4 more articles in the media than MKS. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ambarella and 2 mentions for MKS. MKS's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Ambarella's score of 0.54 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MKS
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ambarella
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MKS has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MKS$3.93B4.80$295M$6.2744.52
Ambarella$390.70M7.76-$75.86M-$1.29N/A

MKS has a beta of 2.03, suggesting that its stock price is 103% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

MKS has a net margin of 10.15% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -13.48%. MKS's return on equity of 24.72% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MKS10.15% 24.72% 7.80%
Ambarella -13.48%-10.03%-7.73%

Summary

MKS beats Ambarella on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Monolithic Power Systems?

Monolithic Power Systems (NASDAQ:MPWR) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Monolithic Power Systems has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.38, suggesting that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market.

Monolithic Power Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Monolithic Power Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Monolithic Power Systems$2.79B25.35$621.48M$16.3188.27
Ambarella$390.70M7.76-$75.86M-$1.29N/A

In the previous week, Monolithic Power Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Ambarella. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Monolithic Power Systems and 6 mentions for Ambarella. Monolithic Power Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Ambarella's score of 0.54 indicating that Monolithic Power Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Monolithic Power Systems
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ambarella
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.5% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Monolithic Power Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Monolithic Power Systems has a net margin of 24.41% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -13.48%. Monolithic Power Systems' return on equity of 22.31% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Monolithic Power Systems24.41% 22.31% 18.67%
Ambarella -13.48%-10.03%-7.73%

Monolithic Power Systems currently has a consensus target price of $1,731.42, indicating a potential upside of 20.26%. Ambarella has a consensus target price of $89.56, indicating a potential upside of 30.45%. Given Ambarella's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Monolithic Power Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Monolithic Power Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.93
Ambarella
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Monolithic Power Systems beats Ambarella on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ambarella News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AMBA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMBA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AMBA vs. The Competition

MetricAmbarellaSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$3.03B$120.38B$31.98B$13.28B
Dividend YieldN/A1.60%2.75%17.33%
P/E Ratio-53.2294.0481.8326.04
Price / Sales7.7693.27590.93105.13
Price / CashN/A68.5451.1152.62
Price / Book4.8910.958.116.31
Net Income-$75.86M$2.05B$704.23M$362.16M
7 Day Performance-5.54%3.68%114.89%-1.66%
1 Month Performance9.16%9.01%73.49%-4.68%
1 Year Performance-18.43%76.53%168.05%1.57%

Ambarella Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AMBA
Ambarella
3.2779 of 5 stars
$68.65
-2.3%
$89.56
+30.5%
-18.4%$3.03B$390.70MN/A380
COHU
Cohu
2.6017 of 5 stars
$65.97
-0.2%
$68.75
+4.2%
+264.1%$3.12B$522.60MN/A2,857
ENTG
Entegris
2.2346 of 5 stars
$154.77
+2.7%
$170.89
+10.4%
+68.8%$22.97B$3.20B77.777,700
KLIC
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
3.031 of 5 stars
$93.72
+2.2%
$69.67
-25.7%
+149.8%$4.80B$654.08M43.192,592
MKSI
MKS
4.9497 of 5 stars
$266.02
+3.0%
$375.93
+41.3%
+102.5%$17.47B$3.93B42.4310,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:AMBA) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners