Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AMBA or ADI?

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ambarella $390.70M 8.80 -$75.86M -$1.61 N/A Analog Devices $12.74B 16.18 $2.27B $6.73 62.88

Is AMBA or ADI more profitable?

Analog Devices has a net margin of 26.01% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Analog Devices' return on equity of 14.37% beat Ambarella's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ambarella -17.18% -11.02% -8.60% Analog Devices 26.01% 14.37% 10.13%

Does the media refer more to AMBA or ADI?

In the previous week, Ambarella had 4 more articles in the media than Analog Devices. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 38 mentions for Analog Devices. Analog Devices' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Analog Devices is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ambarella 17 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Analog Devices 28 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate AMBA or CSQ?

Ambarella currently has a consensus price target of $99.75, suggesting a potential upside of 27.26%. Given Ambarella's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ambarella 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 7 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.57 Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AMBA or CSQ?

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ambarella $390.70M 8.80 -$75.86M -$1.61 N/A Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $723.74M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AMBA or ENTG?

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ambarella $390.70M 8.80 -$75.86M -$1.61 N/A Entegris $3.20B 6.82 $235.60M $1.73 82.61

Is AMBA or ENTG more profitable?

Entegris has a net margin of 8.18% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Entegris' return on equity of 11.45% beat Ambarella's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ambarella -17.18% -11.02% -8.60% Entegris 8.18% 11.45% 5.34%

Does the media favor AMBA or ENTG?

In the previous week, Ambarella had 34 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 8 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ambarella 17 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Entegris 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, KLAC or AMBA?

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio KLA $12.16B 21.98 $4.06B $35.33 57.89 Ambarella $390.70M 8.80 -$75.86M -$1.61 N/A

Is KLAC or AMBA more profitable?

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Ambarella's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets KLA 35.66% 91.89% 29.21% Ambarella -17.18% -11.02% -8.60%

Does the media prefer KLAC or AMBA?

In the previous week, Ambarella had 25 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 17 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment KLA 7 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ambarella 17 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LRCX or AMBA?

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lam Research $18.44B 22.68 $5.36B $5.30 63.10 Ambarella $390.70M 8.80 -$75.86M -$1.61 N/A

Is LRCX or AMBA more profitable?

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat Ambarella's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lam Research 30.94% 66.21% 31.61% Ambarella -17.18% -11.02% -8.60%

Does the media refer more to LRCX or AMBA?

In the previous week, Lam Research had 31 more articles in the media than Ambarella. MarketBeat recorded 73 mentions for Lam Research and 42 mentions for Ambarella. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lam Research 54 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ambarella 17 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Ambarella (AMBA) Competitors

$78.38 +2.71 (+3.58%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$78.12 -0.25 (-0.33%)

As of 08:00 PM Eastern

Compare

AMBA vs. ADI, CSQ, ENTG, KLAC, and LRCX

Should you buy Ambarella stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ambarella with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ambarella include Analog Devices (ADI), Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), Entegris (ENTG), KLA (KLAC), and Lam Research (LRCX).

How does Ambarella compare to Analog Devices?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Ambarella has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Analog Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analog Devices has a net margin of 26.01% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Analog Devices' return on equity of 14.37% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ambarella	-17.18%	-11.02%	-8.60%
Analog Devices	26.01%	14.37%	10.13%

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella	$390.70M	8.80	-$75.86M	-$1.61	N/A
Analog Devices	$12.74B	16.18	$2.27B	$6.73	62.88

In the previous week, Ambarella had 4 more articles in the media than Analog Devices. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 38 mentions for Analog Devices. Analog Devices' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Analog Devices is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ambarella	17 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Analog Devices	28 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ambarella presently has a consensus price target of $99.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.26%. Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $432.71, indicating a potential upside of 2.25%. Given Ambarella's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Analog Devices.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ambarella	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Analog Devices	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	26 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.97

Summary

Analog Devices beats Ambarella on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Ambarella had 37 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 5 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ambarella	17 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ambarella	-17.18%	-11.02%	-8.60%
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella	$390.70M	8.80	-$75.86M	-$1.61	N/A
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Ambarella currently has a consensus price target of $99.75, suggesting a potential upside of 27.26%. Given Ambarella's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ambarella	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Ambarella beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Entegris?

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Entegris (NASDAQ:ENTG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Entegris has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Entegris, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ambarella	$390.70M	8.80	-$75.86M	-$1.61	N/A
Entegris	$3.20B	6.82	$235.60M	$1.73	82.61

In the previous week, Ambarella had 34 more articles in the media than Entegris. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 8 mentions for Entegris. Entegris' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Entegris is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ambarella	17 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Entegris	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ambarella currently has a consensus price target of $99.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.26%. Entegris has a consensus price target of $154.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.99%. Given Ambarella's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Entegris.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ambarella	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57
Entegris	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

Entegris has a net margin of 8.18% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Entegris' return on equity of 11.45% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ambarella	-17.18%	-11.02%	-8.60%
Entegris	8.18%	11.45%	5.34%

82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Entegris shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ambarella has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Entegris has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ambarella and Entegris tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to KLA?

KLA (NASDAQ:KLAC) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

KLA currently has a consensus target price of $1,842.19, suggesting a potential downside of 9.93%. Ambarella has a consensus target price of $99.75, suggesting a potential upside of 27.26%. Given Ambarella's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ambarella is more favorable than KLA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
KLA	0 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	20 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Ambarella	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

KLA has a beta of 1.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the broader market.

KLA has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KLA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
KLA	$12.16B	21.98	$4.06B	$35.33	57.89
Ambarella	$390.70M	8.80	-$75.86M	-$1.61	N/A

KLA has a net margin of 35.66% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. KLA's return on equity of 91.89% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
KLA	35.66%	91.89%	29.21%
Ambarella	-17.18%	-11.02%	-8.60%

In the previous week, Ambarella had 25 more articles in the media than KLA. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Ambarella and 17 mentions for KLA. KLA's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that KLA is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
KLA	7 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ambarella	17 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

86.7% of KLA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. 91.5% of KLA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

KLA beats Ambarella on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ambarella compare to Lam Research?

Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) and Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Lam Research currently has a consensus price target of $303.30, indicating a potential downside of 9.30%. Ambarella has a consensus price target of $99.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.26%. Given Ambarella's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ambarella is more favorable than Lam Research.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lam Research	0 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	27 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79
Ambarella	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ambarella has a beta of 2.15, suggesting that its share price is 115% more volatile than the broader market.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lam Research	$18.44B	22.68	$5.36B	$5.30	63.10
Ambarella	$390.70M	8.80	-$75.86M	-$1.61	N/A

In the previous week, Lam Research had 31 more articles in the media than Ambarella. MarketBeat recorded 73 mentions for Lam Research and 42 mentions for Ambarella. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Ambarella's score of 0.65 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lam Research	54 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ambarella	17 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lam Research has a net margin of 30.94% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -17.18%. Lam Research's return on equity of 66.21% beat Ambarella's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lam Research	30.94%	66.21%	31.61%
Ambarella	-17.18%	-11.02%	-8.60%

84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.1% of Ambarella shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Ambarella shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lam Research beats Ambarella on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ambarella News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AMBA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AMBA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Ambarella	ELEC COMP Industry	Computer Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$3.44B	$81.06B	$41.01B	$12.54B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.01%	3.14%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	-48.68	99.70	83.06	26.71
Price / Sales	8.80	151.23	618.89	94.04
Price / Cash	N/A	251.21	49.02	37.62
Price / Book	5.67	10.99	10.28	6.78
Net Income	-$75.86M	$847.18M	$1.06B	$337.19M
7 Day Performance	-16.23%	2.70%	5.28%	2.63%
1 Month Performance	9.53%	30.76%	12.57%	6.60%
1 Year Performance	47.44%	297.98%	174.93%	37.90%

Ambarella Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AMBA Ambarella	4.0391 of 5 stars	$78.38 +3.6%	$99.75 +27.3%	+46.3%	$3.44B	$390.70M	N/A	900	Earnings Report Gap Up
ADI Analog Devices	4.6634 of 5 stars	$416.76 -0.8%	$432.71 +3.8%	+89.1%	$203.00B	$12.74B	61.93	24,500	Positive News
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$20.51 +0.4%	N/A	+20.5%	$0.00	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Dividend Announcement
ENTG Entegris	4.2958 of 5 stars	$140.07 -1.4%	$153.78 +9.8%	+99.6%	$21.36B	$3.20B	80.96	7,700	Analyst Downgrade
KLAC KLA	4.0049 of 5 stars	$1,956.65 -2.7%	$1,842.19 -5.8%	+158.9%	$255.60B	$12.16B	55.38	15,200

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:AMBA) was last updated on 6/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Ambarella (AMBA) Competitors

AMBA vs. ADI, CSQ, ENTG, KLAC, and LRCX

How does Ambarella compare to Analog Devices?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to Entegris?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to KLA?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to Lam Research?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMBA vs. The Competition

Ambarella Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Ambarella (AMBA) Competitors

AMBA vs. ADI, CSQ, ENTG, KLAC, and LRCX

How does Ambarella compare to Analog Devices?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMBA or ADI?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in AMBA or ADI?

Is AMBA or ADI more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, AMBA or ADI?

Does the media refer more to AMBA or ADI?

Do analysts recommend AMBA or ADI?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Does the media refer more to AMBA or CSQ?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AMBA or CSQ?

Is AMBA or CSQ more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, AMBA or CSQ?

Do analysts rate AMBA or CSQ?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to Entegris?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AMBA or ENTG?

Does the media favor AMBA or ENTG?

Do analysts rate AMBA or ENTG?

Is AMBA or ENTG more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AMBA or ENTG?

Which has more risk & volatility, AMBA or ENTG?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to KLA?

Do analysts prefer KLAC or AMBA?

Which has more volatility and risk, KLAC or AMBA?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, KLAC or AMBA?

Is KLAC or AMBA more profitable?

Does the media prefer KLAC or AMBA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of KLAC or AMBA?

Summary

How does Ambarella compare to Lam Research?

Do analysts prefer LRCX or AMBA?

Which has more volatility and risk, LRCX or AMBA?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, LRCX or AMBA?

Does the media refer more to LRCX or AMBA?

Is LRCX or AMBA more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in LRCX or AMBA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AMBA vs. The Competition

Ambarella Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools