Ambarella Competitors

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Risk and Volatility

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and NVIDIA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ambarella and NVIDIA, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $87.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 27.63%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $584.1944, suggesting a potential upside of 5.51%. Given NVIDIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NVIDIA is more favorable than Ambarella.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of NVIDIA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ambarella and NVIDIA's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Ambarella on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Intel shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Intel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its share price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intel has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ambarella and Intel's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Intel has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and Intel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Ambarella and Intel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $87.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 27.63%. Intel has a consensus target price of $61.7714, suggesting a potential downside of 1.76%. Given Intel's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intel is more favorable than Ambarella.

Summary

Intel beats Ambarella on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Broadcom shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Broadcom shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Broadcom has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ambarella and Broadcom's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Broadcom has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadcom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and Broadcom's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ambarella and Broadcom, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $87.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 27.63%. Broadcom has a consensus target price of $434.8846, suggesting a potential downside of 11.17%. Given Broadcom's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Broadcom is more favorable than Ambarella.

Summary

Broadcom beats Ambarella on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.1% of Texas Instruments shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Texas Instruments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Texas Instruments has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ambarella and Texas Instruments' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Texas Instruments has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Instruments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and Texas Instruments' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ambarella and Texas Instruments, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $87.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 27.63%. Texas Instruments has a consensus target price of $166.5185, suggesting a potential downside of 6.28%. Given Texas Instruments' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Texas Instruments is more favorable than Ambarella.

Summary

Texas Instruments beats Ambarella on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Micron Technology (NASDAQ:MU) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.4% of Micron Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Micron Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Micron Technology has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ambarella and Micron Technology's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Micron Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Micron Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and Micron Technology's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ambarella and Micron Technology, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $87.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 27.63%. Micron Technology has a consensus target price of $91.1818, suggesting a potential downside of 3.49%. Given Micron Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Micron Technology is more favorable than Ambarella.

Summary

Micron Technology beats Ambarella on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ambarella (NASDAQ:AMBA) and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

72.3% of Ambarella shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.9% of Analog Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Ambarella shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Analog Devices shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Ambarella has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Analog Devices has a beta of 1.31, meaning that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ambarella and Analog Devices' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Analog Devices has higher revenue and earnings than Ambarella. Ambarella is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Analog Devices, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ambarella and Analog Devices' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ambarella and Analog Devices, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ambarella presently has a consensus target price of $87.6923, suggesting a potential downside of 27.63%. Analog Devices has a consensus target price of $154.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.29%. Given Analog Devices' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Analog Devices is more favorable than Ambarella.

Summary

Analog Devices beats Ambarella on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.