Baozun (BZUN) Competitors

Dingdong (Cayman) has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baozun has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dingdong (Cayman) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baozun. Baozun is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dingdong (Cayman), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Dingdong (Cayman) and Dingdong (Cayman) both had 1 articles in the media. Baozun's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Dingdong (Cayman)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Baozun is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

24.7% of Dingdong (Cayman) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Baozun shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Dingdong (Cayman) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.2% of Baozun shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dingdong (Cayman) has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Baozun's net margin of -2.43%. Dingdong (Cayman)'s return on equity of 23.14% beat Baozun's return on equity.

ThredUp has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baozun. ThredUp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baozun, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, ThredUp had 17 more articles in the media than Baozun. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for ThredUp and 1 mentions for Baozun. Baozun's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat ThredUp's score of 0.32 indicating that Baozun is being referred to more favorably in the media.

47.3% of Baozun shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of ThredUp shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.2% of Baozun shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.1% of ThredUp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of $9.14, indicating a potential upside of 82.44%. Given ThredUp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ThredUp is more favorable than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ThredUp has a beta of 2.07, meaning that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Baozun has a net margin of -2.43% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -6.50%. Baozun's return on equity of 0.50% beat ThredUp's return on equity.

Stitch Fix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baozun. Stitch Fix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baozun, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Stitch Fix had 1 more articles in the media than Baozun. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Stitch Fix and 1 mentions for Baozun. Stitch Fix's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Baozun's score of 0.75 indicating that Stitch Fix is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

47.3% of Baozun shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Stitch Fix shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.2% of Baozun shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.1% of Stitch Fix shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Stitch Fix has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 34.77%. Given Stitch Fix's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stitch Fix is more favorable than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.33, meaning that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Baozun's net margin of -2.43%. Baozun's return on equity of 0.50% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a net margin of 9.85% compared to Baozun's net margin of -2.43%. Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 34.25% beat Baozun's return on equity.

Build-A-Bear Workshop currently has a consensus price target of $64.75, indicating a potential upside of 76.53%. Given Build-A-Bear Workshop's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Build-A-Bear Workshop is more favorable than Baozun.

79.3% of Build-A-Bear Workshop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Baozun shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Build-A-Bear Workshop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.2% of Baozun shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baozun has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baozun. Baozun is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Build-A-Bear Workshop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Baozun had 1 more articles in the media than Build-A-Bear Workshop. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Baozun and 0 mentions for Build-A-Bear Workshop. Build-A-Bear Workshop's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Baozun's score of 0.75 indicating that Build-A-Bear Workshop is being referred to more favorably in the media.