Pathward Financial (CASH) Competitors

Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hancock Whitney had 4 more articles in the media than Pathward Financial. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Hancock Whitney and 4 mentions for Pathward Financial. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Pathward Financial's score of 0.79 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pathward Financial currently has a consensus price target of $101.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.29%. Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $83.78, suggesting a potential upside of 7.96%. Given Pathward Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pathward Financial is more favorable than Hancock Whitney.

Pathward Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Pathward Financial pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 39.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hancock Whitney has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hancock Whitney is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than Pathward Financial. Pathward Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hancock Whitney, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.7% of Pathward Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Pathward Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.81% compared to Pathward Financial's net margin of 21.03%. Pathward Financial's return on equity of 20.61% beat Hancock Whitney's return on equity.

92.7% of Pathward Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Old Second Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Pathward Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Old Second Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pathward Financial has a net margin of 21.03% compared to Old Second Bancorp's net margin of 20.22%. Pathward Financial's return on equity of 20.61% beat Old Second Bancorp's return on equity.

Pathward Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Old Second Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pathward Financial pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Old Second Bancorp pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Second Bancorp has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Old Second Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Old Second Bancorp has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pathward Financial and Pathward Financial both had 4 articles in the media. Old Second Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Pathward Financial's score of 0.79 indicating that Old Second Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pathward Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Old Second Bancorp. Pathward Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Second Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pathward Financial presently has a consensus price target of $101.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.29%. Old Second Bancorp has a consensus price target of $25.40, suggesting a potential downside of 0.16%. Given Pathward Financial's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pathward Financial is more favorable than Old Second Bancorp.

Pathward Financial presently has a consensus price target of $101.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.29%. Towne Bank has a consensus price target of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.45%. Given Pathward Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pathward Financial is more favorable than Towne Bank.

In the previous week, Pathward Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Towne Bank. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pathward Financial and 3 mentions for Towne Bank. Towne Bank's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Pathward Financial's score of 0.79 indicating that Towne Bank is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Towne Bank has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Pathward Financial has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Towne Bank. Towne Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pathward Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pathward Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Towne Bank pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pathward Financial pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Towne Bank pays out 31.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Towne Bank has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Towne Bank is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Towne Bank has a net margin of 25.64% compared to Pathward Financial's net margin of 21.03%. Pathward Financial's return on equity of 20.61% beat Towne Bank's return on equity.

92.7% of Pathward Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.0% of Towne Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Pathward Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Towne Bank shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pathward Financial had 4 more articles in the media than Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Pathward Financial and 0 mentions for Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania. Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Pathward Financial's score of 0.79 indicating that Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pathward Financial currently has a consensus target price of $101.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.29%. Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 5.46%. Given Pathward Financial's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pathward Financial is more favorable than Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania.

92.7% of Pathward Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Pathward Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pathward Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Pathward Financial pays out 2.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania pays out 26.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Pathward Financial has a net margin of 21.03% compared to Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania's net margin of 18.86%. Pathward Financial's return on equity of 20.61% beat Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania's return on equity.

Pathward Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania. Pathward Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.