Go Pro

Cardinal Infrastructure Group (CDNL) Competitors

Cardinal Infrastructure Group logo
$28.04 +0.51 (+1.83%)
As of 12:04 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CDNL vs. AGX, ROAD, MWH, BBUC, and GVA

Should you buy Cardinal Infrastructure Group stock or one of its competitors? Cardinal Infrastructure Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Argan (AGX), Construction Partners (ROAD), SOLV Energy (MWH), Brookfield Business (BBUC), and Granite Construction (GVA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction & engineering" industry.

How does Cardinal Infrastructure Group compare to Argan?

Argan (NYSE:AGX) and Cardinal Infrastructure Group (NASDAQ:CDNL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

79.4% of Argan shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Argan shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 61.7% of Cardinal Infrastructure Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Argan currently has a consensus target price of $437.50, indicating a potential upside of 19.97%. Cardinal Infrastructure Group has a consensus target price of $49.25, indicating a potential upside of 75.61%. Given Cardinal Infrastructure Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Argan.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Argan
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 12 more articles in the media than Argan. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 2 mentions for Argan. Cardinal Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Argan's score of 0.47 indicating that Cardinal Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Argan
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Argan has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Infrastructure Group. Argan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Infrastructure Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Argan$944.61M5.42$137.77M$12.6428.85
Cardinal Infrastructure Group$456.05M2.92$22.69M$0.5550.99

Argan has a net margin of 15.09% compared to Cardinal Infrastructure Group's net margin of 0.00%. Argan's return on equity of 38.51% beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Argan15.09% 38.51% 14.56%
Cardinal Infrastructure Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Argan beats Cardinal Infrastructure Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Infrastructure Group compare to Construction Partners?

Construction Partners (NASDAQ:ROAD) and Cardinal Infrastructure Group (NASDAQ:CDNL) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Construction Partners currently has a consensus price target of $133.50, indicating a potential upside of 45.70%. Cardinal Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of $49.25, indicating a potential upside of 75.61%. Given Cardinal Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Construction Partners.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Construction Partners
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Construction Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Infrastructure Group. Construction Partners is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Infrastructure Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Construction Partners$2.81B1.85$101.78M$2.5535.93
Cardinal Infrastructure Group$456.05M2.92$22.69M$0.5550.99

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 5 more articles in the media than Construction Partners. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 9 mentions for Construction Partners. Cardinal Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Construction Partners' score of 0.54 indicating that Cardinal Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Construction Partners
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

94.8% of Construction Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of Construction Partners shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 61.7% of Cardinal Infrastructure Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 4.10% compared to Cardinal Infrastructure Group's net margin of 0.00%. Construction Partners' return on equity of 16.06% beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Construction Partners4.10% 16.06% 4.59%
Cardinal Infrastructure Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Construction Partners and Cardinal Infrastructure Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Infrastructure Group compare to SOLV Energy?

Cardinal Infrastructure Group (NASDAQ:CDNL) and SOLV Energy (NASDAQ:MWH) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Infrastructure GroupN/A N/A N/A
SOLV Energy N/A N/A N/A

Cardinal Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus price target of $49.25, indicating a potential upside of 75.61%. SOLV Energy has a consensus price target of $39.91, indicating a potential upside of 57.44%. Given Cardinal Infrastructure Group's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more favorable than SOLV Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
SOLV Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Cardinal Infrastructure Group has higher revenue and earnings than SOLV Energy. Cardinal Infrastructure Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SOLV Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal Infrastructure Group$456.05M2.92$22.69M$0.5550.99
SOLV EnergyN/AN/AN/A$0.3084.50

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 11 more articles in the media than SOLV Energy. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 3 mentions for SOLV Energy. SOLV Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's score of 0.56 indicating that SOLV Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
SOLV Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Cardinal Infrastructure Group and SOLV Energy tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Infrastructure Group compare to Brookfield Business?

Cardinal Infrastructure Group (NASDAQ:CDNL) and Brookfield Business (NYSE:BBUC) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Brookfield Business has a net margin of 1.13% compared to Cardinal Infrastructure Group's net margin of 0.00%. Brookfield Business' return on equity of 2.05% beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cardinal Infrastructure GroupN/A N/A N/A
Brookfield Business 1.13%2.05%0.40%

Cardinal Infrastructure Group currently has a consensus price target of $49.25, indicating a potential upside of 75.61%. Brookfield Business has a consensus price target of $39.20, indicating a potential upside of 54.00%. Given Cardinal Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Brookfield Business.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Brookfield Business
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

85.0% of Brookfield Business shares are held by institutional investors. 61.7% of Cardinal Infrastructure Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 9 more articles in the media than Brookfield Business. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 5 mentions for Brookfield Business. Cardinal Infrastructure Group's average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Brookfield Business' score of -0.15 indicating that Cardinal Infrastructure Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brookfield Business
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cardinal Infrastructure Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Business. Brookfield Business is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Infrastructure Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cardinal Infrastructure Group$456.05M2.92$22.69M$0.5550.99
Brookfield Business$27.46B0.19-$26M-$0.39N/A

Summary

Cardinal Infrastructure Group beats Brookfield Business on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Cardinal Infrastructure Group compare to Granite Construction?

Granite Construction (NYSE:GVA) and Cardinal Infrastructure Group (NASDAQ:CDNL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

Granite Construction has higher revenue and earnings than Cardinal Infrastructure Group. Granite Construction is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cardinal Infrastructure Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Granite Construction$4.42B1.12$193M-$4.31N/A
Cardinal Infrastructure Group$456.05M2.92$22.69M$0.5550.99

In the previous week, Cardinal Infrastructure Group had 11 more articles in the media than Granite Construction. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Cardinal Infrastructure Group and 3 mentions for Granite Construction. Granite Construction's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's score of 0.56 indicating that Granite Construction is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Granite Construction
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Granite Construction presently has a consensus price target of $158.50, suggesting a potential upside of 39.98%. Cardinal Infrastructure Group has a consensus price target of $49.25, suggesting a potential upside of 75.61%. Given Cardinal Infrastructure Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cardinal Infrastructure Group is more favorable than Granite Construction.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Granite Construction
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Cardinal Infrastructure Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Granite Construction's net margin of -3.32%. Granite Construction's return on equity of 27.83% beat Cardinal Infrastructure Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Granite Construction-3.32% 27.83% 7.17%
Cardinal Infrastructure Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Cardinal Infrastructure Group beats Granite Construction on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Cardinal Infrastructure Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CDNL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CDNL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CDNL vs. The Competition

MetricCardinal Infrastructure GroupConstruction & Engineering IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.32B$7.97B$10.25B$13.14B
Dividend YieldN/A2.66%96.83%12.57%
P/E Ratio50.6421.2625.2425.79
Price / Sales2.9258.96280.35110.78
Price / Cash18.1616.8624.1252.76
Price / Book7.705.074.856.34
Net Income$22.69M$487.38M$614.17M$359.88M
7 Day Performance-9.15%0.75%0.78%-0.11%
1 Month Performance-35.22%-3.13%-2.64%-4.05%
1 Year PerformanceN/A15.73%4.72%6.19%

Cardinal Infrastructure Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CDNL
Cardinal Infrastructure Group
4.5197 of 5 stars
$28.05
+1.8%
$49.25
+75.6%
N/A$1.32B$456.05M50.641,480
AGX
Argan
4.4593 of 5 stars
$388.95
+1.6%
$437.50
+12.5%
+39.2%$5.44B$944.61M30.671,409
ROAD
Construction Partners
4.5284 of 5 stars
$94.71
+0.1%
$133.50
+41.0%
-30.3%$5.38B$3.48B37.166,412
MWH
SOLV Energy
4.6476 of 5 stars
$26.28
+2.2%
$39.91
+51.9%
N/A$5.33B$3.17B87.762,300
BBUC
Brookfield Business
3.5439 of 5 stars
$25.57
+0.0%
$39.20
+53.3%
N/A$5.30B$7.17BN/A57,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CDNL) was last updated on 9/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners