Go Pro

CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) Competitors

CRISPR Therapeutics logo
$53.35 -2.99 (-5.31%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$53.86 +0.51 (+0.96%)
As of 07/10/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRSP vs. ALLO, AXSM, BEAM, EDIT, and KALA

Should you buy CRISPR Therapeutics stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CRISPR Therapeutics with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CRISPR Therapeutics include Allogene Therapeutics (ALLO), Axsome Therapeutics (AXSM), Beam Therapeutics (BEAM), Editas Medicine (EDIT), and KALA BIO (KALA). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Allogene Therapeutics?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Allogene Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ALLO) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allogene Therapeutics has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Allogene Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Allogene Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-13,856.54% -25.66% -20.39%
Allogene Therapeutics N/A -56.45%-40.36%

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 11 more articles in the media than Allogene Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 2 mentions for Allogene Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Allogene Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Allogene Therapeutics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Allogene Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Allogene Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allogene Therapeutics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allogene Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,465.99-$581.60M-$6.22N/A
Allogene Therapeutics$20K34,515.00-$190.89M-$0.77N/A

CRISPR Therapeutics presently has a consensus price target of $67.78, suggesting a potential upside of 27.04%. Allogene Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $8.52, suggesting a potential upside of 326.11%. Given Allogene Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allogene Therapeutics is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Allogene Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Summary

Allogene Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Axsome Therapeutics?

Axsome Therapeutics (NASDAQ:AXSM) and CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) are both medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Axsome Therapeutics has a net margin of -26.59% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Axsome Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Axsome Therapeutics-26.59% -267.16% -28.53%
CRISPR Therapeutics -13,856.54%-25.66%-20.39%

In the previous week, Axsome Therapeutics and Axsome Therapeutics both had 13 articles in the media. Axsome Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat CRISPR Therapeutics' score of 0.64 indicating that Axsome Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Axsome Therapeutics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Axsome Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. Axsome Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRISPR Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Axsome Therapeutics$638.50M18.84-$183.17M-$3.73N/A
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,465.99-$581.60M-$6.22N/A

81.5% of Axsome Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Axsome Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Axsome Therapeutics currently has a consensus target price of $259.05, indicating a potential upside of 10.80%. CRISPR Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $67.78, indicating a potential upside of 27.04%. Given CRISPR Therapeutics' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CRISPR Therapeutics is more favorable than Axsome Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Axsome Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.95
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Axsome Therapeutics has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Axsome Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Beam Therapeutics?

Beam Therapeutics (NASDAQ:BEAM) and CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Beam Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. Beam Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRISPR Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beam Therapeutics$139.74M24.06-$79.99M-$0.68N/A
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,465.99-$581.60M-$6.22N/A

99.7% of Beam Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Beam Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Beam Therapeutics has a beta of 2.18, meaning that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.71, meaning that its stock price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 1 more articles in the media than Beam Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 12 mentions for Beam Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Beam Therapeutics' score of 0.18 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beam Therapeutics
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Beam Therapeutics has a net margin of -39.66% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Beam Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beam Therapeutics-39.66% -29.00% -22.61%
CRISPR Therapeutics -13,856.54%-25.66%-20.39%

Beam Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $46.85, indicating a potential upside of 43.35%. CRISPR Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $67.78, indicating a potential upside of 27.04%. Given Beam Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Beam Therapeutics is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beam Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

Summary

Beam Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Editas Medicine?

Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT) and CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Editas Medicine has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Editas Medicine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Editas Medicine$40.52M7.88-$160.06M-$1.23N/A
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,465.99-$581.60M-$6.22N/A

Editas Medicine has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.71, indicating that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

Editas Medicine presently has a consensus price target of $5.40, indicating a potential upside of 65.64%. CRISPR Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $67.78, indicating a potential upside of 27.04%. Given Editas Medicine's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Editas Medicine is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Editas Medicine
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

71.9% of Editas Medicine shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Editas Medicine shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 11 more articles in the media than Editas Medicine. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 2 mentions for Editas Medicine. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Editas Medicine's score of 0.00 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Editas Medicine
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Editas Medicine has a net margin of -281.59% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Editas Medicine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Editas Medicine-281.59% -677.39% -58.25%
CRISPR Therapeutics -13,856.54%-25.66%-20.39%

Summary

CRISPR Therapeutics beats Editas Medicine on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to KALA BIO?

KALA BIO (NASDAQ:KALA) and CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) are both medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

KALA BIO has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat KALA BIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KALA BION/A -1,336.10% -94.85%
CRISPR Therapeutics -13,856.54%-25.66%-20.39%

KALA BIO has a beta of -2.35, suggesting that its share price is 335% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.71, suggesting that its share price is 71% more volatile than the broader market.

24.6% of KALA BIO shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of KALA BIO shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

KALA BIO presently has a consensus price target of $1,158.33, suggesting a potential upside of 98,481.56%. CRISPR Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $67.78, suggesting a potential upside of 27.04%. Given KALA BIO's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe KALA BIO is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
KALA BIO
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58

KALA BIO has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KALA BIO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KALA BION/AN/A-$26.98M-$96.14N/A
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,465.99-$581.60M-$6.22N/A

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 10 more articles in the media than KALA BIO. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 3 mentions for KALA BIO. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat KALA BIO's score of 0.00 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KALA BIO
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CRISPR Therapeutics beats KALA BIO on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CRISPR Therapeutics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSP vs. The Competition

MetricCRISPR TherapeuticsMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.43B$3.79B$7.12B$12.61B
Dividend YieldN/A2.17%2.68%7.83%
P/E Ratio-8.5821.2727.2224.56
Price / Sales1,465.99323.90590.16121.71
Price / CashN/A147.6449.3460.04
Price / Book2.658.4110.906.39
Net Income-$581.60M$23.85M$3.57B$331.44M
7 Day Performance-11.20%-0.76%-0.25%0.37%
1 Month Performance6.21%11.35%5.77%2.17%
1 Year Performance-6.07%51.68%28.14%20.90%

CRISPR Therapeutics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics
3.7183 of 5 stars
$53.35
-5.3%
$67.78
+27.0%
-9.6%$5.43B$3.51MN/A460
ALLO
Allogene Therapeutics
2.336 of 5 stars
$2.22
+4.2%
$8.52
+283.9%
+58.7%$766.23M$20KN/A310
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics
3.6712 of 5 stars
$241.12
-0.2%
$258.95
+7.4%
+111.1%$12.41B$708.24MN/A380
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics
3.2841 of 5 stars
$34.95
+0.4%
$46.83
+34.0%
+48.3%$3.60B$164.01MN/A510
EDIT
Editas Medicine
2.1961 of 5 stars
$3.20
+12.3%
$5.40
+68.8%
+6.5%$313.30M$38.69MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSP) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners