Go Pro

CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) Competitors

CRISPR Therapeutics logo
$52.26 -1.19 (-2.23%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$52.08 -0.18 (-0.34%)
As of 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRSP vs. ALLO, AXSM, BEAM, EDIT, and KALA

Should you buy CRISPR Therapeutics stock or one of its competitors? CRISPR Therapeutics's main competitors and comparable companies include Allogene Therapeutics (ALLO), Axsome Therapeutics (AXSM), Beam Therapeutics (BEAM), Editas Medicine (EDIT), and KALA BIO (KALA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "healthcare" sector.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Allogene Therapeutics?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Allogene Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ALLO) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

CRISPR Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $68.06, suggesting a potential upside of 30.22%. Allogene Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $8.30, suggesting a potential upside of 371.59%. Given Allogene Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allogene Therapeutics is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61
Allogene Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics and CRISPR Therapeutics both had 8 articles in the media. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Allogene Therapeutics' score of 0.80 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Allogene Therapeutics
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allogene Therapeutics has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Allogene Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -3,368.72%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -24.39% beat Allogene Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-3,368.72% -24.39% -18.25%
Allogene Therapeutics N/A -50.04%-36.74%

Allogene Therapeutics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allogene Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,439.61-$581.60M-$4.76N/A
Allogene Therapeutics$20K30,403.12-$190.89M-$0.67N/A

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Allogene Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.2% of Allogene Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Allogene Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Axsome Therapeutics?

Axsome Therapeutics (NASDAQ:AXSM) and CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Axsome Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $267.60, indicating a potential upside of 26.75%. CRISPR Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $68.06, indicating a potential upside of 30.22%. Given CRISPR Therapeutics' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CRISPR Therapeutics is more favorable than Axsome Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Axsome Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61

Axsome Therapeutics has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

81.5% of Axsome Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 20.6% of Axsome Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Axsome Therapeutics had 5 more articles in the media than CRISPR Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Axsome Therapeutics and 8 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics. Axsome Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat CRISPR Therapeutics' score of 0.95 indicating that Axsome Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Axsome Therapeutics
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Axsome Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. Axsome Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRISPR Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Axsome Therapeutics$638.50M17.32-$183.17M-$3.75N/A
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,439.61-$581.60M-$4.76N/A

Axsome Therapeutics has a net margin of -24.68% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -3,368.72%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -24.39% beat Axsome Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Axsome Therapeutics-24.68% -265.55% -28.10%
CRISPR Therapeutics -3,368.72%-24.39%-18.25%

Summary

Axsome Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Beam Therapeutics?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Beam Therapeutics (NASDAQ:BEAM) are both mid-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Beam Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. Beam Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRISPR Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,439.61-$581.60M-$4.76N/A
Beam Therapeutics$139.74M18.01-$79.99M-$0.86N/A

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of Beam Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Beam Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CRISPR Therapeutics currently has a consensus price target of $68.06, indicating a potential upside of 30.22%. Beam Therapeutics has a consensus price target of $49.00, indicating a potential upside of 101.07%. Given Beam Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Beam Therapeutics is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61
Beam Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

In the previous week, Beam Therapeutics had 13 more articles in the media than CRISPR Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Beam Therapeutics and 8 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Beam Therapeutics' score of 0.69 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Beam Therapeutics
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Beam Therapeutics has a net margin of -54.75% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -3,368.72%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -24.39% beat Beam Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-3,368.72% -24.39% -18.25%
Beam Therapeutics -54.75%-30.71%-24.07%

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beam Therapeutics has a beta of 2.22, meaning that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Beam Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Editas Medicine?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Editas Medicine has a net margin of -157.32% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -3,368.72%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -24.39% beat Editas Medicine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-3,368.72% -24.39% -18.25%
Editas Medicine -157.32%-196.63%-38.17%

CRISPR Therapeutics presently has a consensus price target of $68.06, indicating a potential upside of 30.22%. Editas Medicine has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 126.42%. Given Editas Medicine's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Editas Medicine is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61
Editas Medicine
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.9% of Editas Medicine shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Editas Medicine shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Editas Medicine has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Editas Medicine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,439.61-$581.60M-$4.76N/A
Editas Medicine$40.52M10.04-$160.06M-$0.75N/A

In the previous week, Editas Medicine had 8 more articles in the media than CRISPR Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Editas Medicine and 8 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Editas Medicine's score of 0.56 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Editas Medicine
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Editas Medicine has a beta of 2.09, suggesting that its share price is 109% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Editas Medicine beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to KALA BIO?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and KALA BIO (NASDAQ:KALA) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, KALA BIO has a beta of -2.28, indicating that its stock price is 328% less volatile than the broader market.

KALA BIO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KALA BIO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$3.51M1,439.61-$581.60M-$4.76N/A
KALA BION/AN/A-$26.98M-$31.96N/A

KALA BIO has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -3,368.72%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -24.39% beat KALA BIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-3,368.72% -24.39% -18.25%
KALA BIO N/A -222.35%-70.23%

CRISPR Therapeutics presently has a consensus target price of $68.06, indicating a potential upside of 30.22%. KALA BIO has a consensus target price of $1,158.33, indicating a potential upside of 205,679.59%. Given KALA BIO's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe KALA BIO is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61
KALA BIO
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of KALA BIO shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of KALA BIO shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 6 more articles in the media than KALA BIO. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 2 mentions for KALA BIO. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat KALA BIO's score of 0.41 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics Positive
KALA BIO Neutral

Summary

CRISPR Therapeutics beats KALA BIO on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CRISPR Therapeutics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSP vs. The Competition

MetricCRISPR TherapeuticsBiotechnology IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.17B$3.89B$7.21B$12.81B
Dividend YieldN/A3.63%2.56%10.55%
P/E Ratio-10.9813.60272.8125.11
Price / Sales1,439.611,325.67618.4190.53
Price / CashN/A106.6177.3351.83
Price / Book2.5915.4210.436.18
Net Income-$581.60M-$22.82M$3.49B$358.18M
7 Day Performance-7.49%-3.59%-2.99%-2.34%
1 Month Performance-2.34%0.88%0.02%-2.50%
1 Year Performance0.87%43.89%20.19%9.87%

CRISPR Therapeutics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics
2.3681 of 5 stars
$52.26
-2.2%
$68.06
+30.2%
-0.4%$5.17B$3.51MN/A460
ALLO
Allogene Therapeutics
2.0029 of 5 stars
$1.97
flat
$8.30
+321.3%
+51.8%$680.62M$20KN/A310
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics
3.9781 of 5 stars
$206.68
flat
$267.60
+29.5%
+67.6%$10.83B$638.50MN/A380
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics
2.381 of 5 stars
$29.66
flat
$49.00
+65.2%
+23.6%$3.06B$139.74MN/A510
EDIT
Editas Medicine
2.24 of 5 stars
$3.23
flat
$6.00
+85.8%
+0.4%$496.06M$40.52MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSP) was last updated on 9/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners