Free Trial

CRISPR Therapeutics (CRSP) Competitors

CRISPR Therapeutics logo
$54.01 -0.82 (-1.50%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$54.75 +0.74 (+1.37%)
As of 06:05 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRSP vs. ALLO, AXSM, BEAM, EDIT, and KALA

Should you be buying CRISPR Therapeutics stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of CRISPR Therapeutics include Allogene Therapeutics (ALLO), Axsome Therapeutics (AXSM), Beam Therapeutics (BEAM), Editas Medicine (EDIT), and KALA BIO (KALA). These companies are all part of the "pharmaceutical products" industry.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Allogene Therapeutics?

Allogene Therapeutics (NASDAQ:ALLO) and CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) are both medical companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Allogene Therapeutics has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Allogene Therapeutics currently has a consensus target price of $8.44, suggesting a potential upside of 270.11%. CRISPR Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $66.06, suggesting a potential upside of 22.32%. Given Allogene Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allogene Therapeutics is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Allogene Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
CRISPR Therapeutics
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 36 more articles in the media than Allogene Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 3 mentions for Allogene Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Allogene Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Allogene Therapeutics
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
CRISPR Therapeutics
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Allogene Therapeutics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Allogene Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Allogene TherapeuticsN/AN/A-$190.89M-$0.87N/A
CRISPR Therapeutics$1M5,209.21-$581.60M-$6.22N/A

83.6% of Allogene Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 13.2% of Allogene Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allogene Therapeutics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Allogene Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Allogene TherapeuticsN/A -57.07% -41.63%
CRISPR Therapeutics -13,856.54%-25.66%-20.39%

Summary

Allogene Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Axsome Therapeutics?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Axsome Therapeutics (NASDAQ:AXSM) are both medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Axsome Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. Axsome Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRISPR Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$1M5,209.21-$581.60M-$6.22N/A
Axsome Therapeutics$708.24M15.73-$183.17M-$3.73N/A

CRISPR Therapeutics presently has a consensus target price of $66.06, suggesting a potential upside of 22.32%. Axsome Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $251.26, suggesting a potential upside of 16.07%. Given CRISPR Therapeutics' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe CRISPR Therapeutics is more favorable than Axsome Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Axsome Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Axsome Therapeutics has a net margin of -26.59% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Axsome Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-13,856.54% -25.66% -20.39%
Axsome Therapeutics -26.59%-267.16%-28.53%

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of Axsome Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.6% of Axsome Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Axsome Therapeutics had 1 more articles in the media than CRISPR Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Axsome Therapeutics and 39 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Axsome Therapeutics' score of 0.23 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Axsome Therapeutics
13 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Axsome Therapeutics has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Axsome Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Beam Therapeutics?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Beam Therapeutics (NASDAQ:BEAM) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Beam Therapeutics has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. Beam Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRISPR Therapeutics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$1M5,209.21-$581.60M-$6.22N/A
Beam Therapeutics$164.01M19.89-$79.99M-$0.68N/A

CRISPR Therapeutics currently has a consensus target price of $66.06, suggesting a potential upside of 22.32%. Beam Therapeutics has a consensus target price of $47.17, suggesting a potential upside of 48.56%. Given Beam Therapeutics' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Beam Therapeutics is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Beam Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Beam Therapeutics has a net margin of -39.66% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Beam Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-13,856.54% -25.66% -20.39%
Beam Therapeutics -39.66%-29.00%-22.61%

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.7% of Beam Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Beam Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 28 more articles in the media than Beam Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 11 mentions for Beam Therapeutics. Beam Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat CRISPR Therapeutics' score of 0.38 indicating that Beam Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Beam Therapeutics
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Beam Therapeutics has a beta of 2.26, meaning that its share price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Beam Therapeutics beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to Editas Medicine?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Editas Medicine (NASDAQ:EDIT) are both medical companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Editas Medicine has higher revenue and earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Editas Medicine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$1M5,209.21-$581.60M-$6.22N/A
Editas Medicine$38.69M7.74-$160.06M-$1.23N/A

Editas Medicine has a net margin of -281.59% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat Editas Medicine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-13,856.54% -25.66% -20.39%
Editas Medicine -281.59%-677.39%-58.25%

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 23 more articles in the media than Editas Medicine. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 16 mentions for Editas Medicine. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Editas Medicine's score of 0.12 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Editas Medicine
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CRISPR Therapeutics presently has a consensus target price of $66.06, suggesting a potential upside of 22.32%. Editas Medicine has a consensus target price of $5.40, suggesting a potential upside of 76.47%. Given Editas Medicine's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Editas Medicine is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Editas Medicine
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Editas Medicine has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its share price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.9% of Editas Medicine shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Editas Medicine shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Editas Medicine beats CRISPR Therapeutics on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CRISPR Therapeutics compare to KALA BIO?

CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and KALA BIO (NASDAQ:KALA) are both mid-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk and profitability.

KALA BIO has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CRISPR Therapeutics' net margin of -13,856.54%. CRISPR Therapeutics' return on equity of -25.66% beat KALA BIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISPR Therapeutics-13,856.54% -25.66% -20.39%
KALA BIO N/A -12,971.16%-90.83%

In the previous week, CRISPR Therapeutics had 33 more articles in the media than KALA BIO. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for CRISPR Therapeutics and 6 mentions for KALA BIO. CRISPR Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat KALA BIO's score of -0.37 indicating that CRISPR Therapeutics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CRISPR Therapeutics
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
KALA BIO
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CRISPR Therapeutics currently has a consensus target price of $66.06, suggesting a potential upside of 22.32%. KALA BIO has a consensus target price of $1,018.75, suggesting a potential upside of 25,954.99%. Given KALA BIO's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe KALA BIO is more favorable than CRISPR Therapeutics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CRISPR Therapeutics
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
KALA BIO
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

CRISPR Therapeutics has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, KALA BIO has a beta of -2.23, indicating that its stock price is 323% less volatile than the S&P 500.

KALA BIO has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CRISPR Therapeutics. CRISPR Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KALA BIO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISPR Therapeutics$1M5,209.21-$581.60M-$6.22N/A
KALA BION/AN/A-$26.98M-$3.33N/A

69.2% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of KALA BIO shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of CRISPR Therapeutics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of KALA BIO shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CRISPR Therapeutics beats KALA BIO on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CRISPR Therapeutics News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSP vs. The Competition

MetricCRISPR TherapeuticsMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.21B$3.37B$6.18B$12.27B
Dividend YieldN/A2.24%2.78%5.22%
P/E Ratio-8.6815.1920.6625.70
Price / Sales5,209.21189.41528.1664.14
Price / CashN/A56.9327.8136.27
Price / Book2.686.949.776.74
Net Income-$581.60M$24.11M$3.54B$333.09M
7 Day PerformanceN/AN/AN/A0.52%
1 Month Performance5.45%4.62%6.25%8.97%
1 Year Performance51.63%78.20%41.74%42.42%

CRISPR Therapeutics Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSP
CRISPR Therapeutics
2.614 of 5 stars
$54.01
-1.5%
$66.06
+22.3%
+53.9%$5.21B$1MN/A460
ALLO
Allogene Therapeutics
2.9691 of 5 stars
$2.26
+5.1%
$8.44
+273.4%
+96.6%$553.29M$20KN/A310
AXSM
Axsome Therapeutics
3.3974 of 5 stars
$224.03
+8.5%
$234.21
+4.5%
+101.7%$11.52B$638.50MN/A380
BEAM
Beam Therapeutics
3.3874 of 5 stars
$30.08
-2.0%
$49.36
+64.1%
+85.5%$3.09B$139.74MN/A510
EDIT
Editas Medicine
3.4624 of 5 stars
$3.00
+3.4%
$5.30
+76.7%
+114.5%$293.73M$40.52MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSP) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners