Go Pro

Factorial Energy (FAC) Competitors

Factorial Energy logo
$6.00 -3.32 (-35.62%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.61 -0.39 (-6.55%)
As of 08:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FAC vs. ORC, LADR, DEA, SAFE, and PBT

Should you buy Factorial Energy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Factorial Energy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Factorial Energy include Orchid Island Capital (ORC), Ladder Capital (LADR), Easterly Government Properties (DEA), Safehold (SAFE), and Permian Basin Royalty Trust (PBT). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Factorial Energy compare to Orchid Island Capital?

Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) and Orchid Island Capital (NYSE:ORC) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Orchid Island Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Factorial Energy. Orchid Island Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Factorial Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Factorial EnergyN/AN/A$6.22M$0.2425.00
Orchid Island Capital$414M3.26$159.03M$0.758.96

Orchid Island Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Factorial EnergyN/A -60.51% 2.80%
Orchid Island Capital N/A 10.24%1.19%

32.7% of Orchid Island Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Orchid Island Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Factorial Energy currently has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 200.00%. Orchid Island Capital has a consensus target price of $7.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.57%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Orchid Island Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Factorial Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Orchid Island Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 4 more articles in the media than Orchid Island Capital. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Factorial Energy and 9 mentions for Orchid Island Capital. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Orchid Island Capital's score of 0.56 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Factorial Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Orchid Island Capital
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Factorial Energy beats Orchid Island Capital on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Factorial Energy compare to Ladder Capital?

Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) and Ladder Capital (NYSE:LADR) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

62.3% of Ladder Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 12.0% of Ladder Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 12 more articles in the media than Ladder Capital. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Factorial Energy and 1 mentions for Ladder Capital. Ladder Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Factorial Energy's score of 0.65 indicating that Ladder Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Factorial Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ladder Capital
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Ladder Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Factorial Energy. Ladder Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Factorial Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Factorial EnergyN/AN/A$6.22M$0.2425.00
Ladder Capital$390.29M3.17$64.18M$0.4422.13

Ladder Capital has a net margin of 13.82% compared to Factorial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Ladder Capital's return on equity of 5.73% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Factorial EnergyN/A -60.51% 2.80%
Ladder Capital 13.82%5.73%1.70%

Factorial Energy presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 200.00%. Ladder Capital has a consensus price target of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 30.97%. Given Factorial Energy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Ladder Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Factorial Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Ladder Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Ladder Capital beats Factorial Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Factorial Energy compare to Easterly Government Properties?

Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) and Easterly Government Properties (NYSE:DEA) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Factorial Energy currently has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 200.00%. Easterly Government Properties has a consensus target price of $23.49, indicating a potential downside of 5.47%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Easterly Government Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Factorial Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Easterly Government Properties
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Easterly Government Properties has a net margin of 3.22% compared to Factorial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Easterly Government Properties' return on equity of 0.82% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Factorial EnergyN/A -60.51% 2.80%
Easterly Government Properties 3.22%0.82%0.33%

86.5% of Easterly Government Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Easterly Government Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Easterly Government Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Factorial Energy. Factorial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Easterly Government Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Factorial EnergyN/AN/A$6.22M$0.2425.00
Easterly Government Properties$336.10M3.43$13M$0.24103.54

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Easterly Government Properties. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Factorial Energy and 2 mentions for Easterly Government Properties. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Easterly Government Properties' score of 0.00 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Factorial Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Easterly Government Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Factorial Energy and Easterly Government Properties tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Factorial Energy compare to Safehold?

Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) and Safehold (NYSE:SAFE) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 13 more articles in the media than Safehold. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Factorial Energy and 0 mentions for Safehold. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Safehold's score of 0.00 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Factorial Energy Positive
Safehold Neutral

Safehold has higher revenue and earnings than Factorial Energy. Safehold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Factorial Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Factorial EnergyN/AN/A$6.22M$0.2425.00
Safehold$385.55M3.04$114.47M$1.5910.28

70.4% of Safehold shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Safehold shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Safehold has a net margin of 28.58% compared to Factorial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Safehold's return on equity of 4.78% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Factorial EnergyN/A -60.51% 2.80%
Safehold 28.58%4.78%1.61%

Factorial Energy presently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 200.00%. Safehold has a consensus price target of $18.71, indicating a potential upside of 14.47%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Safehold.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Factorial Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Safehold
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.10

Summary

Safehold beats Factorial Energy on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Factorial Energy compare to Permian Basin Royalty Trust?

Permian Basin Royalty Trust (NYSE:PBT) and Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) are both small-cap trading companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

28.9% of Permian Basin Royalty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 88.99% compared to Factorial Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 9,061.81% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Permian Basin Royalty Trust88.99% 9,061.81% 484.53%
Factorial Energy N/A -60.51%2.80%

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 11 more articles in the media than Permian Basin Royalty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Factorial Energy and 2 mentions for Permian Basin Royalty Trust. Permian Basin Royalty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Factorial Energy's score of 0.65 indicating that Permian Basin Royalty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Factorial Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Permian Basin Royalty Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Factorial Energy. Factorial Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Permian Basin Royalty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Permian Basin Royalty Trust$16.13M80.68$14.30M$0.3287.25
Factorial EnergyN/AN/A$6.22M$0.2425.00

Factorial Energy has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 200.00%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Permian Basin Royalty Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Permian Basin Royalty Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Factorial Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

Permian Basin Royalty Trust beats Factorial Energy on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Factorial Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FAC vs. The Competition

MetricFactorial EnergyInvestment Offices IndustryFinancial SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$997.46M$301.53M$6.16B$12.42B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A5.23%8.01%
P/E Ratio38.832.1629.7424.29
Price / SalesN/A19,517.511,779.2695.49
Price / Cash51.70138.3088.6449.39
Price / Book-15.79353.606.436.29
Net Income$6.22M-$66.54M$1.13B$330.86M
7 Day Performance-40.18%-0.36%-0.56%-2.41%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.35%0.30%-0.64%
1 Year PerformanceN/A2.14%15.53%20.09%

Factorial Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FAC
Factorial Energy
3.6643 of 5 stars
$6.00
-35.6%
$18.00
+200.0%
N/A$997.46MN/A38.832
ORC
Orchid Island Capital
2.3218 of 5 stars
$6.90
-0.3%
$7.50
+8.7%
-4.7%$1.39B$414M9.202,018
LADR
Ladder Capital
4.9723 of 5 stars
$9.75
-2.6%
$12.75
+30.8%
-11.3%$1.27B$390.29M22.1660
DEA
Easterly Government Properties
1.7996 of 5 stars
$25.08
-1.8%
$23.49
-6.3%
+7.1%$1.19B$336.10M104.5050
SAFE
Safehold
3.2821 of 5 stars
$15.96
-2.6%
$18.75
+17.5%
+5.1%$1.17B$385.55M10.04120

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FAC) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners