Which has better earnings & valuation, BTBDW or FATBP?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio BT Brands $13.10M N/A N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is BTBDW or FATBP more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets BT Brands N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate HLT or FATBP?

Hilton Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $348.55, indicating a potential upside of 0.69%. Given Hilton Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hilton Worldwide is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Hilton Worldwide 0 Sell rating(s) 9 Hold rating(s) 14 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.61 FAT Brands 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HLT or FATBP?

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hilton Worldwide $12.04B 6.55 $1.46B $6.55 52.85 FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QSR or FATBP?

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 2.76 $776M $2.84 26.40 FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, IHG or FATBP?

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Intercontinental Hotels Group $5.19B 4.81 $758M N/A N/A FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is IHG or FATBP more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate YUMC or FATBP?

Yum China currently has a consensus target price of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 32.30%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than FAT Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Yum China 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 FAT Brands 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, YUMC or FATBP?

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Yum China $11.80B 1.32 $929M $2.61 17.10 FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is YUMC or FATBP more profitable?

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.11% beat FAT Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67% FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A

FAT Brands (FATBP) Competitors

$0.13 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 06/12/2026

Compare

FATBP vs. BTBDW, HLT, QSR, IHG, and YUMC

Should you buy FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FAT Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FAT Brands include BT Brands (BTBDW), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), and Yum China (YUMC). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBDW) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, BT Brands had 3 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BT Brands and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that BT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
BT Brands	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BT Brands	$13.10M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

BT Brands beats FAT Brands on 2 of the 3 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

Hilton Worldwide presently has a consensus target price of $348.55, indicating a potential upside of 0.69%. Given Hilton Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Hilton Worldwide is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hilton Worldwide	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Hilton Worldwide has a net margin of 12.56% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Hilton Worldwide's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hilton Worldwide	12.56%	-38.21%	12.04%
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Hilton Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Hilton Worldwide pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Hilton Worldwide had 7 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Hilton Worldwide and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Hilton Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hilton Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hilton Worldwide	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

95.9% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hilton Worldwide	$12.04B	6.55	$1.46B	$6.55	52.85
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Hilton Worldwide beats FAT Brands on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 12 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.54, indicating a potential upside of 11.41%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	17 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.76	$776M	$2.84	26.40
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%.

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intercontinental Hotels Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Intercontinental Hotels Group had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Intercontinental Hotels Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FAT Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Intercontinental Hotels Group	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intercontinental Hotels Group	$5.19B	4.81	$758M	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Intercontinental Hotels Group presently has a consensus target price of $154.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.76%. Given Intercontinental Hotels Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intercontinental Hotels Group is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intercontinental Hotels Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Intercontinental Hotels Group beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Yum China?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Yum China currently has a consensus target price of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 32.30%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than FAT Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. Yum China's return on equity of 15.11% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Yum China had 1 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Yum China and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. FAT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Yum China's score of -0.35 indicating that FAT Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Yum China	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Yum China	$11.80B	1.32	$929M	$2.61	17.10
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Summary

Yum China beats FAT Brands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FATBP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Restaurants Industry	Cyclical Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	N/A	$1.80B	$3.99B	$12.05B
Dividend Yield	16.43%	5.06%	3.51%	5.66%
P/E Ratio	N/A	9.59	76.02	24.42
Price / Sales	N/A	44.19	323.71	118.72
Price / Cash	N/A	41.64	30.81	37.92
Price / Book	N/A	2.24	3.36	6.82
Net Income	N/A	$89.93M	$249.12M	$337.56M
7 Day Performance	N/A	1.42%	0.54%	1.16%
1 Month Performance	N/A	1.29%	1.22%	3.16%
1 Year Performance	-95.42%	-1.89%	0.57%	30.60%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FATBP FAT Brands	N/A	$0.13 flat	N/A	N/A	$0.00	$574.14M	N/A	5,200
BTBDW BT Brands	N/A	$0.07 -2.9%	N/A	-22.5%	$0.00	$13.10M	N/A	110	Positive News Short Interest Increase Gap Down
HLT Hilton Worldwide	3.0262 of 5 stars	$332.19 -0.2%	$348.55 +4.9%	+42.0%	$75.77B	$12.04B	50.72	182,000
QSR Restaurant Brands International	4.2738 of 5 stars	$72.80 +1.7%	$83.54 +14.8%	+11.4%	$24.86B	$9.43B	25.63	53,500	Positive News
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	1.9813 of 5 stars	$160.33 +1.3%	$154.00 -4.0%	+49.4%	$23.67B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FATBP) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FATBP) Competitors

FATBP vs. BTBDW, HLT, QSR, IHG, and YUMC

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Yum China?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBP vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FATBP) Competitors

FATBP vs. BTBDW, HLT, QSR, IHG, and YUMC

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

Does the media favor BTBDW or FATBP?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BTBDW or FATBP?

Is BTBDW or FATBP more profitable?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Do analysts rate HLT or FATBP?

Is HLT or FATBP more profitable?

Is HLT or FATBP a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer HLT or FATBP?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of HLT or FATBP?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, HLT or FATBP?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Does the media refer more to QSR or FATBP?

Is QSR or FATBP a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend QSR or FATBP?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of QSR or FATBP?

Is QSR or FATBP more profitable?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, QSR or FATBP?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Is IHG or FATBP a better dividend stock?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in IHG or FATBP?

Is IHG or FATBP more profitable?

Does the media prefer IHG or FATBP?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, IHG or FATBP?

Do analysts recommend IHG or FATBP?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Yum China?

Do analysts rate YUMC or FATBP?

Is YUMC or FATBP more profitable?

Does the media favor YUMC or FATBP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in YUMC or FATBP?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, YUMC or FATBP?

Is YUMC or FATBP a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBP vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools