FAT Brands (FATBP) Competitors

$0.13 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 05/1/2026

FATBP vs. BTBDW, HLT, QSR, IHG, and YUMC

Should you be buying FAT Brands stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of FAT Brands include BT Brands (BTBDW), Hilton Worldwide (HLT), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), and Yum China (YUMC). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

BT Brands (NASDAQ:BTBDW) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and valuation.

: Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BT Brands N/A N/A N/A
FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A
: In the previous week, BT Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FAT Brands'average media sentiment score.
Company Overall Sentiment
BT Brands Neutral
FAT Brands Neutral
: Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
BT Brands $13.49M N/A N/A N/A N/A
FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
BT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Overall Sentiment
BT Brands	Neutral
FAT Brands	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
BT Brands	$13.49M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

FAT Brands beats BT Brands on 1 of the 1 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Hilton Worldwide (NYSE:HLT) and FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

: Hilton Worldwide has a net margin of 12.56% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. FAT Brands' return on equity of 0.00% beat Hilton Worldwide's return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hilton Worldwide 12.56% -38.21% 12.04%
FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A
: In the previous week, Hilton Worldwide had 41 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Hilton Worldwide and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Hilton Worldwide's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Hilton Worldwide is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Company Overall Sentiment
Hilton Worldwide Positive
FAT Brands Neutral
: Hilton Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
Hilton Worldwide $12.28B 5.80 $1.46B $6.55 47.75
FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A
: 95.9% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hilton Worldwide shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
: Hilton Worldwide pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Hilton Worldwide pays out 9.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.
: Hilton Worldwide currently has a consensus target price of $348.59, suggesting a potential upside of 11.47%. Given Hilton Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hilton Worldwide is more favorable than FAT Brands.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hilton Worldwide
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)

14 Buy rating(s)

1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
FAT Brands
0 Sell rating(s)

0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hilton Worldwide	12.56%	-38.21%	12.04%
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hilton Worldwide	Positive
FAT Brands	Neutral

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hilton Worldwide	$12.28B	5.80	$1.46B	$6.55	47.75
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hilton Worldwide	0 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	14 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Hilton Worldwide beats FAT Brands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Restaurant Brands International?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

: FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 110.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years.
: Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $82.04, indicating a potential upside of 0.45%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than FAT Brands.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)

8 Hold rating(s)

16 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
: 82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 15 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Restaurant Brands International Positive
: Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 8.23% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.51% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A
Restaurant Brands International 8.23% 32.51% 6.46%
: Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A
Restaurant Brands International $9.43B 3.01 $776M $2.36 34.61

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	16 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Restaurant Brands International	Positive

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Restaurant Brands International	8.23%	32.51%	6.46%

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	3.01	$776M	$2.36	34.61

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) and Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

: FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%.
: Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Intercontinental Hotels Group
0 Sell rating(s)

1 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
: 15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: In the previous week, Intercontinental Hotels Group had 2 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Intercontinental Hotels Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Intercontinental Hotels Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Intercontinental Hotels Group Neutral
: Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A
Intercontinental Hotels Group N/A N/A N/A
: Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A
Intercontinental Hotels Group $5.19B 4.11 $758M N/A N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Intercontinental Hotels Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Intercontinental Hotels Group	Neutral

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Intercontinental Hotels Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Intercontinental Hotels Group	$5.19B	4.11	$758M	N/A	N/A

Summary

Intercontinental Hotels Group beats FAT Brands on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FAT Brands compare to Yum China?

FAT Brands (NASDAQ:FATBP) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

: In the previous week, Yum China had 27 more articles in the media than FAT Brands. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Yum China and 0 mentions for FAT Brands. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat FAT Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Company Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands Neutral
Yum China Positive
: Yum China has higher revenue and earnings than FAT Brands.
Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands $574.14M N/A N/A N/A N/A
Yum China $11.80B 1.44 $929M $2.61 18.54
: Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to FAT Brands' net margin of 0.00%. Yum China's return on equity of 14.98% beat FAT Brands' return on equity.
Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FAT Brands N/A N/A N/A
Yum China 7.83% 14.98% 8.65%
: 85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
: FAT Brands pays an annual dividend of $2.06 per share and has a dividend yield of 1,545.4%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.
: Yum China has a consensus price target of $59.05, indicating a potential upside of 22.00%. Given Yum China's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than FAT Brands.
Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FAT Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)

0 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Yum China
0 Sell rating(s)

1 Hold rating(s)

3 Buy rating(s)

0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Company	Overall Sentiment
FAT Brands	Neutral
Yum China	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
FAT Brands	$574.14M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Yum China	$11.80B	1.44	$929M	$2.61	18.54

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
FAT Brands	N/A	N/A	N/A
Yum China	7.83%	14.98%	8.65%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
FAT Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Yum China beats FAT Brands on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FAT Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FATBP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FATBP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	FAT Brands	Restaurants Industry	Cyclical Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	N/A	$1.84B	$3.91B	$11.87B
Dividend Yield	16.43%	5.07%	3.58%	5.21%
P/E Ratio	N/A	19.45	70.09	28.48
Price / Sales	N/A	43.19	328.62	60.89
Price / Cash	N/A	41.64	30.87	36.52
Price / Book	N/A	2.22	3.19	6.67
Net Income	N/A	$89.93M	$249.43M	$332.64M
7 Day Performance	N/A	-0.59%	-0.25%	2.01%
1 Month Performance	N/A	1.05%	1.65%	9.19%
1 Year Performance	-98.08%	0.21%	4.05%	39.59%

FAT Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FATBP FAT Brands	N/A	$0.13 flat	N/A	N/A	$0.00	$574.14M	N/A	5,200	Upcoming Earnings
BTBDW BT Brands	N/A	$0.16 -23.7%	N/A	N/A	$0.00	$13.49M	N/A	110	Positive News Gap Down High Trading Volume
HLT Hilton Worldwide	4.2212 of 5 stars	$314.57 -2.7%	$348.09 +10.7%	N/A	$71.97B	$12.28B	51.40	182,000	Earnings Report
QSR Restaurant Brands International	3.2769 of 5 stars	$78.63 +0.5%	$81.83 +4.1%	N/A	$27.29B	$9.43B	33.32	53,500	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	1.2852 of 5 stars	$142.42 -1.4%	N/A	N/A	$21.39B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FATBP) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

FAT Brands (FATBP) Competitors

FATBP vs. BTBDW, HLT, QSR, IHG, and YUMC

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Yum China?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBP vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

FAT Brands (FATBP) Competitors

FATBP vs. BTBDW, HLT, QSR, IHG, and YUMC

How does FAT Brands compare to BT Brands?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Hilton Worldwide?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does FAT Brands compare to Yum China?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FATBP vs. The Competition

FAT Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools