Go Pro

Gogoro (GGR) Competitors

Gogoro logo
$4.00 +0.02 (+0.50%)
As of 01:41 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GGR vs. CHPT, NIU, CAAS, INVZ, and EMPD

Should you buy Gogoro stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gogoro with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gogoro include ChargePoint (CHPT), Niu Technologies (NIU), China Automotive Systems (CAAS), Innoviz Technologies (INVZ), and Volcon (EMPD). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does Gogoro compare to ChargePoint?

Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR) and ChargePoint (NYSE:CHPT) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Gogoro has a net margin of -24.98% compared to ChargePoint's net margin of -49.66%. Gogoro's return on equity of -55.12% beat ChargePoint's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gogoro-24.98% -55.12% -10.59%
ChargePoint -49.66%-504.42%-18.93%

Gogoro has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ChargePoint has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, ChargePoint had 5 more articles in the media than Gogoro. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ChargePoint and 1 mentions for Gogoro. Gogoro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat ChargePoint's score of 0.96 indicating that Gogoro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gogoro Very Positive
ChargePoint Positive

Gogoro has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ChargePoint. Gogoro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ChargePoint, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gogoro$281.48M0.21-$79.97M-$4.72N/A
ChargePoint$411.22M0.35-$220.20M-$8.68N/A

15.9% of Gogoro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.8% of ChargePoint shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Gogoro shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of ChargePoint shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ChargePoint has a consensus price target of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 42.31%. Given ChargePoint's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ChargePoint is more favorable than Gogoro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gogoro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
ChargePoint
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Summary

ChargePoint beats Gogoro on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gogoro compare to Niu Technologies?

Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR) and Niu Technologies (NASDAQ:NIU) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Gogoro and Gogoro both had 1 articles in the media. Gogoro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Niu Technologies'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gogoro Very Positive
Niu Technologies Very Positive

Gogoro has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Niu Technologies has a beta of -0.13, indicating that its stock price is 113% less volatile than the broader market.

Niu Technologies has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 72.75%. Given Niu Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Niu Technologies is more favorable than Gogoro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gogoro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Niu Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

Niu Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Gogoro. Niu Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gogoro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gogoro$281.48M0.21-$79.97M-$4.72N/A
Niu Technologies$4.54B0.03-$5.63M-$0.18N/A

Niu Technologies has a net margin of -2.17% compared to Gogoro's net margin of -24.98%. Niu Technologies' return on equity of -10.85% beat Gogoro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gogoro-24.98% -55.12% -10.59%
Niu Technologies -2.17%-10.85%-3.12%

15.9% of Gogoro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.1% of Niu Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Gogoro shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.2% of Niu Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Niu Technologies beats Gogoro on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gogoro compare to China Automotive Systems?

China Automotive Systems (NASDAQ:CAAS) and Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

5.2% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.9% of Gogoro shares are owned by institutional investors. 64.8% of China Automotive Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Gogoro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

China Automotive Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Gogoro. Gogoro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than China Automotive Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China Automotive Systems$765.74M0.18$42.84M$1.423.14
Gogoro$281.48M0.21-$79.97M-$4.72N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China Automotive Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Gogoro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China Automotive Systems has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gogoro has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, China Automotive Systems had 1 more articles in the media than Gogoro. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for China Automotive Systems and 1 mentions for Gogoro. Gogoro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat China Automotive Systems' score of 0.94 indicating that Gogoro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
China Automotive Systems Positive
Gogoro Very Positive

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Gogoro's net margin of -24.98%. China Automotive Systems' return on equity of 10.58% beat Gogoro's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China Automotive Systems5.59% 10.58% 5.07%
Gogoro -24.98%-55.12%-10.59%

Summary

China Automotive Systems beats Gogoro on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gogoro compare to Innoviz Technologies?

Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR) and Innoviz Technologies (NASDAQ:INVZ) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

15.9% of Gogoro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Innoviz Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Gogoro shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.2% of Innoviz Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Innoviz Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Gogoro. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Innoviz Technologies and 1 mentions for Gogoro. Gogoro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Innoviz Technologies' score of 0.47 indicating that Gogoro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gogoro Very Positive
Innoviz Technologies Neutral

Gogoro has a net margin of -24.98% compared to Innoviz Technologies' net margin of -181.46%. Gogoro's return on equity of -55.12% beat Innoviz Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gogoro-24.98% -55.12% -10.59%
Innoviz Technologies -181.46%-101.64%-57.82%

Innoviz Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gogoro. Innoviz Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gogoro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gogoro$281.48M0.21-$79.97M-$4.72N/A
Innoviz Technologies$55.09M2.71-$67.79M-$0.39N/A

Gogoro has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Innoviz Technologies has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Innoviz Technologies has a consensus target price of $2.65, indicating a potential upside of 280.75%. Given Innoviz Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Innoviz Technologies is more favorable than Gogoro.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gogoro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Innoviz Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Innoviz Technologies beats Gogoro on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gogoro compare to Volcon?

Volcon (NASDAQ:EMPD) and Gogoro (NASDAQ:GGR) are both small-cap automobiles and trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Volcon
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Gogoro
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Gogoro has higher revenue and earnings than Volcon. Gogoro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volcon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Volcon$980K113.87-$150.05M-$8.36N/A
Gogoro$281.48M0.21-$79.97M-$4.72N/A

In the previous week, Volcon had 2 more articles in the media than Gogoro. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Volcon and 1 mentions for Gogoro. Gogoro's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Volcon's score of 0.47 indicating that Gogoro is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Volcon Neutral
Gogoro Very Positive

15.9% of Gogoro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Volcon shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Gogoro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volcon has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gogoro has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Volcon has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gogoro's net margin of -24.98%. Gogoro's return on equity of -55.12% beat Volcon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
VolconN/A -62.90% -50.68%
Gogoro -24.98%-55.12%-10.59%

Summary

Gogoro beats Volcon on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gogoro News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GGR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GGR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GGR vs. The Competition

MetricGogoroTechnology Services IndustryBusiness SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$59.08M$4.17B$6.94B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A2.09%3.17%6.14%
P/E Ratio-0.8538.1032.7724.95
Price / Sales0.2148.86373.8498.92
Price / Cash5.8239.2724.3159.26
Price / Book0.554.625.926.48
Net Income-$79.97M$31.97M$205.07M$336.59M
7 Day Performance0.76%2.70%3.01%2.45%
1 Month Performance-0.25%-10.34%-0.79%0.15%
1 Year Performance-36.97%10.18%21.59%25.41%

Gogoro Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GGR
Gogoro
0.9019 of 5 stars
$4.00
+0.5%
N/A-27.1%$59.08M$281.48MN/A1,416
CHPT
ChargePoint
3.696 of 5 stars
$6.80
-14.2%
$8.31
+22.2%
-57.7%$166.06M$411.22MN/A1,440
NIU
Niu Technologies
2.3634 of 5 stars
$1.97
-3.9%
$3.50
+77.7%
-39.5%$154.11M$4.54BN/A700
CAAS
China Automotive Systems
1.8911 of 5 stars
$4.38
-0.5%
N/A+9.0%$132.15M$765.74M3.084,370
INVZ
Innoviz Technologies
2.1597 of 5 stars
$0.61
+1.5%
$2.65
+334.4%
-48.6%$130.86M$55.09MN/A400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GGR) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners