Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) Competitors

Broadstone Net Lease has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Broadstone Net Lease and Broadstone Net Lease both had 5 articles in the media. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Broadstone Net Lease's score of 0.83 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Broadstone Net Lease's net margin of 27.01%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Broadstone Net Lease's return on equity.

89.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadstone Net Lease presently has a consensus price target of $20.33, indicating a potential upside of 2.31%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $52.30, indicating a potential upside of 8.46%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Broadstone Net Lease.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Broadstone Net Lease. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadstone Net Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Broadstone Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Broadstone Net Lease pays out 180.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Broadstone Net Lease has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 7 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 5 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Brixmor Property Group's score of 1.35 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Brixmor Property Group's net margin of 31.99%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties currently has a consensus price target of $52.30, suggesting a potential upside of 8.46%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.22%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Brixmor Property Group.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Brixmor Property Group. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brixmor Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Essential Properties Realty Trust currently has a consensus target price of $36.95, suggesting a potential upside of 17.62%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $52.30, suggesting a potential upside of 8.46%. Given Essential Properties Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Essential Properties Realty Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust and 5 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Essential Properties Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 1.42 indicating that Essential Properties Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust's net margin of 43.46%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity.

Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 97.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Gaming and Leisure Properties presently has a consensus target price of $52.30, suggesting a potential upside of 8.46%. Four Corners Property Trust has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.18%. Given Four Corners Property Trust's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Four Corners Property Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Four Corners Property Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Four Corners Property Trust and 5 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat Four Corners Property Trust's score of 1.42 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Four Corners Property Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Four Corners Property Trust's net margin of 38.74%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity.

Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 131.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Four Corners Property Trust has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.