Garmin Competitors

Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) and Garmin (NASDAQ:GRMN) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.6, suggesting that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Garmin has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Uber Technologies and Garmin, as provided by MarketBeat.

Uber Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $60.2105, suggesting a potential upside of 15.61%. Garmin has a consensus price target of $126.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 1.39%. Given Uber Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Uber Technologies is more favorable than Garmin.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Uber Technologies and Garmin's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Garmin has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Uber Technologies. Uber Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garmin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

70.6% of Uber Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 49.6% of Garmin shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of Uber Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.0% of Garmin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Uber Technologies and Garmin's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Garmin (NASDAQ:GRMN) and Lam Research (NASDAQ:LRCX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Garmin has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Garmin and Lam Research, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $126.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 1.39%. Lam Research has a consensus price target of $478.88, suggesting a potential downside of 15.91%. Given Garmin's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Garmin is more favorable than Lam Research.

Dividends

Garmin pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Lam Research pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Garmin pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lam Research pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Garmin has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Lam Research has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Garmin and Lam Research's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Garmin. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lam Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.0% of Lam Research shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Garmin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Garmin and Lam Research's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lam Research beats Garmin on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Garmin (NASDAQ:GRMN) and Infosys (NYSE:INFY) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Garmin has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Infosys has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Garmin and Infosys, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $126.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 1.39%. Infosys has a consensus price target of $12.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 26.64%. Given Garmin's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Garmin is more favorable than Infosys.

Dividends

Garmin pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Infosys pays an annual dividend of $0.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Garmin pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Infosys pays out 49.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Garmin has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Garmin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Garmin and Infosys' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Infosys has higher revenue and earnings than Garmin. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infosys, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 16.3% of Infosys shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Garmin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 22.4% of Infosys shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Garmin and Infosys' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Garmin beats Infosys on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Garmin (NASDAQ:GRMN) and Snowflake (NYSE:SNOW) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Garmin and Snowflake, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $126.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 1.39%. Snowflake has a consensus price target of $290.1304, suggesting a potential upside of 9.81%. Given Snowflake's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Snowflake is more favorable than Garmin.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Garmin and Snowflake's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Snowflake.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of Snowflake shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Garmin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Snowflake shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Garmin and Snowflake's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Garmin beats Snowflake on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Garmin (NASDAQ:GRMN) and NetEase (NASDAQ:NTES) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Garmin has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NetEase has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Garmin and NetEase, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $126.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 1.39%. NetEase has a consensus price target of $103.7111, suggesting a potential downside of 4.46%. Given Garmin's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Garmin is more favorable than NetEase.

Dividends

Garmin pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. NetEase pays an annual dividend of $0.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Garmin pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NetEase pays out 26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Garmin has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Garmin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Garmin and NetEase's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NetEase has higher revenue and earnings than Garmin. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NetEase, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

49.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Garmin shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.7% of NetEase shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Garmin and NetEase's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

NetEase beats Garmin on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Garmin (NASDAQ:GRMN) and Autodesk (NASDAQ:ADSK) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Garmin has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autodesk has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Garmin and Autodesk, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $126.4286, suggesting a potential upside of 1.39%. Autodesk has a consensus price target of $289.6957, suggesting a potential upside of 2.57%. Given Autodesk's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Autodesk is more favorable than Garmin.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Garmin and Autodesk's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Autodesk. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Autodesk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

49.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Autodesk shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.0% of Garmin shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Autodesk shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Garmin and Autodesk's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Garmin beats Autodesk on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.