Garmin (GRMN) Competitors

Garmin has a net margin of 23.26% compared to Agilent Technologies' net margin of 18.26%. Agilent Technologies' return on equity of 24.49% beat Garmin's return on equity.

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $268.40, indicating a potential upside of 10.63%. Agilent Technologies has a consensus price target of $163.71, indicating a potential upside of 46.53%. Given Agilent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Agilent Technologies is more favorable than Garmin.

81.6% of Garmin shares are held by institutional investors. 19.5% of Garmin shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Agilent Technologies. Agilent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garmin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Garmin and Garmin both had 9 articles in the media. Agilent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Garmin's score of 0.81 indicating that Agilent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Garmin pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Agilent Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Garmin pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agilent Technologies pays out 22.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Garmin has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Agilent Technologies has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Garmin has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agilent Technologies has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Arista Networks has a net margin of 38.32% compared to Garmin's net margin of 23.26%. Arista Networks' return on equity of 30.10% beat Garmin's return on equity.

Arista Networks presently has a consensus price target of $182.83, suggesting a potential upside of 33.93%. Garmin has a consensus price target of $268.40, suggesting a potential upside of 10.63%. Given Arista Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Arista Networks is more favorable than Garmin.

82.5% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of Arista Networks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.5% of Garmin shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Garmin. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Arista Networks had 69 more articles in the media than Garmin. MarketBeat recorded 78 mentions for Arista Networks and 9 mentions for Garmin. Garmin's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Arista Networks' score of 0.67 indicating that Garmin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garmin has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Garmin currently has a consensus price target of $268.40, suggesting a potential upside of 10.63%. Universal Electronics has a consensus price target of $5.75, suggesting a potential upside of 35.93%. Given Universal Electronics' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Universal Electronics is more favorable than Garmin.

Garmin has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Garmin had 1 more articles in the media than Universal Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Garmin and 8 mentions for Universal Electronics. Garmin's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Universal Electronics' score of -0.35 indicating that Garmin is being referred to more favorably in the media.

81.6% of Garmin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.4% of Universal Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 19.5% of Garmin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.1% of Universal Electronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Garmin has a net margin of 23.26% compared to Universal Electronics' net margin of -5.05%. Garmin's return on equity of 20.07% beat Universal Electronics' return on equity.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Universal Electronics. Universal Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garmin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 30 more articles in the media than Garmin. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Teradyne and 9 mentions for Garmin. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Garmin's score of 0.81 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Garmin has a net margin of 23.26% compared to Teradyne's net margin of 22.55%. Teradyne's return on equity of 31.79% beat Garmin's return on equity.

Garmin has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teradyne has a beta of 1.79, suggesting that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

81.6% of Garmin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. 19.5% of Garmin shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Garmin pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Garmin pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teradyne pays out 9.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Garmin has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Teradyne has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Garmin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Garmin currently has a consensus price target of $268.40, suggesting a potential upside of 10.63%. Teradyne has a consensus price target of $339.80, suggesting a potential downside of 7.32%. Given Garmin's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Garmin is more favorable than Teradyne.