Garmin (GRMN) Competitors

Garmin presently has a consensus price target of $289.20, indicating a potential downside of 2.02%. Agilent Technologies has a consensus price target of $159.35, indicating a potential upside of 15.21%. Given Agilent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Agilent Technologies is more favorable than Garmin.

In the previous week, Garmin had 27 more articles in the media than Agilent Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Garmin and 18 mentions for Agilent Technologies. Agilent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Garmin's score of 0.85 indicating that Agilent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Garmin pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Agilent Technologies pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Garmin pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Agilent Technologies pays out 20.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Garmin has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Agilent Technologies has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

81.6% of Garmin shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Agilent Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 14.8% of Garmin shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Agilent Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Garmin has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agilent Technologies has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

Garmin has a net margin of 24.47% compared to Agilent Technologies' net margin of 19.55%. Agilent Technologies' return on equity of 24.33% beat Garmin's return on equity.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Agilent Technologies. Agilent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garmin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Arista Networks currently has a consensus price target of $189.74, indicating a potential upside of 5.02%. Garmin has a consensus price target of $289.20, indicating a potential downside of 2.02%. Given Arista Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Arista Networks is more favorable than Garmin.

82.5% of Arista Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Arista Networks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Garmin shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Garmin. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Arista Networks has a net margin of 38.32% compared to Garmin's net margin of 24.47%. Arista Networks' return on equity of 30.10% beat Garmin's return on equity.

In the previous week, Arista Networks had 22 more articles in the media than Garmin. MarketBeat recorded 67 mentions for Arista Networks and 45 mentions for Garmin. Arista Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Garmin's score of 0.85 indicating that Arista Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Arista Networks has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garmin has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Garmin had 42 more articles in the media than Universal Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for Garmin and 3 mentions for Universal Electronics. Garmin's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Universal Electronics' score of 0.37 indicating that Garmin is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Universal Electronics has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garmin has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Universal Electronics. Universal Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garmin, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

79.4% of Universal Electronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Garmin shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.1% of Universal Electronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Garmin shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Universal Electronics currently has a consensus target price of $5.75, indicating a potential upside of 25.55%. Garmin has a consensus target price of $289.20, indicating a potential downside of 2.02%. Given Universal Electronics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Universal Electronics is more favorable than Garmin.

Garmin has a net margin of 24.47% compared to Universal Electronics' net margin of -5.54%. Garmin's return on equity of 20.95% beat Universal Electronics' return on equity.

Teradyne pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Garmin pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Teradyne pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garmin pays out 46.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teradyne has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Garmin has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Garmin is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

99.8% of Teradyne shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.6% of Garmin shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Teradyne shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Garmin shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Teradyne presently has a consensus target price of $396.80, suggesting a potential upside of 7.92%. Garmin has a consensus target price of $289.20, suggesting a potential downside of 2.02%. Given Teradyne's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Teradyne is more favorable than Garmin.

Garmin has higher revenue and earnings than Teradyne. Garmin is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradyne, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teradyne has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garmin has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

Teradyne has a net margin of 25.77% compared to Garmin's net margin of 24.47%. Teradyne's return on equity of 39.93% beat Garmin's return on equity.

In the previous week, Teradyne had 39 more articles in the media than Garmin. MarketBeat recorded 84 mentions for Teradyne and 45 mentions for Garmin. Teradyne's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Garmin's score of 0.85 indicating that Teradyne is being referred to more favorably in the media.