Garrett Motion (GTX) Competitors

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.2% of VinFast Auto shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 21 more articles in the media than VinFast Auto. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Garrett Motion and 2 mentions for VinFast Auto. VinFast Auto's average media sentiment score of 1.95 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.84 indicating that VinFast Auto is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Garrett Motion presently has a consensus target price of $22.80, indicating a potential downside of 12.78%. VinFast Auto has a consensus target price of $5.83, indicating a potential upside of 40.22%. Given VinFast Auto's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe VinFast Auto is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to VinFast Auto's net margin of -107.40%. VinFast Auto's return on equity of 0.00% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, VinFast Auto has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Garrett Motion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than VinFast Auto. VinFast Auto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Autoliv pays an annual dividend of $3.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Garrett Motion pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Autoliv pays out 37.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Autoliv has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Autoliv is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Autoliv shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Autoliv shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 11 more articles in the media than Autoliv. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Garrett Motion and 12 mentions for Autoliv. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Autoliv's score of 0.10 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Garrett Motion presently has a consensus target price of $22.80, indicating a potential downside of 12.78%. Autoliv has a consensus target price of $134.25, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Given Autoliv's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Autoliv is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 6.45%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.03% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Autoliv has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Autoliv has higher revenue and earnings than Garrett Motion. Autoliv is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Icahn Enterprises has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 21 more articles in the media than Icahn Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Garrett Motion and 2 mentions for Icahn Enterprises. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Icahn Enterprises' score of 0.00 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

87.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 90.1% of Icahn Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Garrett Motion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icahn Enterprises. Icahn Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Icahn Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 24.0%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Icahn Enterprises pays out -333.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Icahn Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Icahn Enterprises' net margin of -2.98%. Icahn Enterprises' return on equity of -8.22% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $22.80, suggesting a potential downside of 12.78%. Given Garrett Motion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Garrett Motion is more favorable than Icahn Enterprises.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a beta of 1.47, meaning that its share price is 47% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Atmus Filtration Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Atmus Filtration Technologies and 23 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Atmus Filtration Technologies' score of 0.35 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

32.7% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Atmus Filtration Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Garrett Motion has higher revenue and earnings than Atmus Filtration Technologies. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Atmus Filtration Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Atmus Filtration Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Atmus Filtration Technologies pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Garrett Motion pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Atmus Filtration Technologies has a net margin of 11.56% compared to Garrett Motion's net margin of 9.29%. Atmus Filtration Technologies' return on equity of 64.29% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Atmus Filtration Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $56.75, suggesting a potential upside of 6.32%. Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $22.80, suggesting a potential downside of 12.78%. Given Atmus Filtration Technologies' higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Atmus Filtration Technologies is more favorable than Garrett Motion.