Go Pro

Garrett Motion (GTX) Competitors

Garrett Motion logo
$31.75 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$31.69 -0.06 (-0.19%)
As of 07/2/2026 07:32 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GTX vs. STLA, RIVN, MGA, LI, and NIO

Should you buy Garrett Motion stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Garrett Motion with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Garrett Motion include Stellantis (STLA), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), Magna International (MGA), Li Auto (LI), and NIO (NIO). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Stellantis?

Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) and Stellantis (NYSE:STLA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.5% of Stellantis shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Stellantis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stellantis has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Stellantis' net margin of 0.00%. Stellantis' return on equity of 0.00% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Garrett Motion9.29% -42.77% 14.32%
Stellantis N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Stellantis had 5 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Stellantis and 8 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Stellantis' score of 0.11 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Garrett Motion
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Stellantis
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Garrett Motion presently has a consensus price target of $31.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.26%. Stellantis has a consensus price target of $10.65, suggesting a potential upside of 82.83%. Given Stellantis' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stellantis is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Stellantis
4 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

Garrett Motion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Stellantis. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stellantis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Garrett Motion$3.69B1.61$310M$1.7118.57
Stellantis$173.64B0.13-$25.31B$0.2523.30

Summary

Garrett Motion beats Stellantis on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Rivian Automotive?

Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -63.62%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -42.77% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rivian Automotive-63.62% -75.65% -25.49%
Garrett Motion 9.29%-42.77%14.32%

66.3% of Rivian Automotive shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Rivian Automotive shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rivian Automotive presently has a consensus target price of $18.57, suggesting a potential downside of 0.31%. Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $31.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.26%. Given Garrett Motion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Garrett Motion is more favorable than Rivian Automotive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rivian Automotive
6 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

In the previous week, Rivian Automotive had 34 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 42 mentions for Rivian Automotive and 8 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Rivian Automotive's score of 0.57 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rivian Automotive
22 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Garrett Motion
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Garrett Motion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rivian Automotive. Rivian Automotive is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rivian Automotive$5.39B4.29-$3.65B-$2.92N/A
Garrett Motion$3.69B1.61$310M$1.7118.57

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 1.6, indicating that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Garrett Motion beats Rivian Automotive on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Magna International?

Magna International (NYSE:MGA) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 7 more articles in the media than Magna International. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Garrett Motion and 1 mentions for Magna International. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Magna International's score of 0.67 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Magna International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Garrett Motion
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Magna International$42.32B0.40$829M$2.3926.24
Garrett Motion$3.69B1.61$310M$1.7118.57

Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Magna International pays out 82.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Garrett Motion pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magna International has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Magna International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Magna International currently has a consensus target price of $65.47, suggesting a potential upside of 4.40%. Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $31.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.26%. Given Magna International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Magna International is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Magna International
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Magna International's net margin of 1.60%. Magna International's return on equity of 14.01% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Magna International1.60% 14.01% 5.53%
Garrett Motion 9.29%-42.77%14.32%

67.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Magna International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Magna International has a beta of 1.44, suggesting that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Magna International beats Garrett Motion on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Li Auto?

Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Li Auto's net margin of -1.72%. Li Auto's return on equity of -2.58% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Li Auto-1.72% -2.58% -1.22%
Garrett Motion 9.29%-42.77%14.32%

9.9% of Li Auto shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. 48.5% of Li Auto shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Li Auto presently has a consensus target price of $17.30, suggesting a potential upside of 43.93%. Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $31.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.26%. Given Li Auto's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Li Auto is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Li Auto
4 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.94
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

In the previous week, Li Auto had 1 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Li Auto and 8 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Li Auto's score of 0.61 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Li Auto
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Garrett Motion
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Garrett Motion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Li Auto. Li Auto is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Li Auto$16.06B0.80$160.79M-$0.28N/A
Garrett Motion$3.69B1.61$310M$1.7118.57

Li Auto has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Garrett Motion beats Li Auto on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to NIO?

NIO (NYSE:NIO) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability and dividends.

NIO has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

NIO currently has a consensus price target of $6.70, suggesting a potential upside of 39.79%. Garrett Motion has a consensus price target of $31.83, suggesting a potential upside of 0.26%. Given NIO's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe NIO is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NIO
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to NIO's net margin of -8.78%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -42.77% beat NIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NIO-8.78% -318.96% -7.67%
Garrett Motion 9.29%-42.77%14.32%

Garrett Motion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NIO$12.51B0.95-$2.14B-$0.55N/A
Garrett Motion$3.69B1.61$310M$1.7118.57

48.6% of NIO shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of NIO shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, NIO had 5 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for NIO and 8 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat NIO's score of 0.46 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NIO
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Garrett Motion
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Garrett Motion beats NIO on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Garrett Motion News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GTX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GTX vs. The Competition

MetricGarrett Motion IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$5.94B$3.14B$21.07B$12.48B
Dividend Yield1.01%15.26%2.60%6.52%
P/E Ratio18.5713.5118.7224.70
Price / Sales1.612,827.6716.3999.42
Price / Cash14.8425.3111.4557.09
Price / Book-7.715.153.286.46
Net Income$310M-$34.63M$332.96M$337.01M
7 Day Performance-9.57%1.00%0.25%1.69%
1 Month Performance-0.66%0.85%-2.01%3.81%
1 Year Performance188.77%12.21%-8.66%23.90%

Garrett Motion Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GTX
Garrett Motion
4.7205 of 5 stars
$31.75
flat
$31.83
+0.3%
+188.8%$5.94B$3.69B18.576,700
STLA
Stellantis
4.9133 of 5 stars
$5.57
-2.0%
$10.65
+91.4%
-43.5%$21.38B$155.83B22.26258,668
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
1.5393 of 5 stars
$16.81
+7.5%
$18.57
+10.5%
+42.4%$19.40B$5.39BN/A15,232
MGA
Magna International
4.4117 of 5 stars
$64.79
+0.4%
$65.47
+1.0%
+51.8%$17.57B$42.01B27.11156,000
LI
Li Auto
3.4072 of 5 stars
$11.89
-1.2%
$17.30
+45.5%
-54.0%$12.90B$16.06BN/A30,728

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GTX) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners