Free Trial

Garrett Motion (GTX) Competitors

Garrett Motion logo
$33.29 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/22/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$33.30 +0.01 (+0.02%)
As of 05/22/2026 07:53 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GTX vs. LI, RIVN, MGA, XPEV, and NIO

Should you buy Garrett Motion stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Garrett Motion with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Garrett Motion include Li Auto (LI), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), Magna International (MGA), XPENG (XPEV), and NIO (NIO). These companies are all part of the "automobiles and trucks" industry.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Li Auto?

Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) and Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Li Auto's net margin of 0.99%. Li Auto's return on equity of 1.52% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Garrett Motion9.29% -42.77% 14.32%
Li Auto 0.99%1.52%0.70%

Garrett Motion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Li Auto. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Li Auto, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Garrett Motion$3.58B1.74$310M$1.7119.47
Li Auto$16.06B1.06$160.79M$0.13122.23

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.9% of Li Auto shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 48.5% of Li Auto shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Garrett Motion currently has a consensus target price of $31.83, suggesting a potential downside of 4.38%. Li Auto has a consensus target price of $18.55, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Li Auto's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Li Auto is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Li Auto
3 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Li Auto has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 5 more articles in the media than Li Auto. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Garrett Motion and 9 mentions for Li Auto. Li Auto's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Garrett Motion's score of 0.86 indicating that Li Auto is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Garrett Motion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Li Auto
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Garrett Motion beats Li Auto on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Rivian Automotive?

Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) and Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rivian Automotive had 9 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Rivian Automotive and 14 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Rivian Automotive's score of 0.69 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Garrett Motion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Rivian Automotive
10 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Garrett Motion presently has a consensus price target of $31.83, suggesting a potential downside of 4.38%. Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $18.57, suggesting a potential upside of 30.60%. Given Rivian Automotive's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rivian Automotive is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Rivian Automotive
6 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -63.62%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -42.77% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Garrett Motion9.29% -42.77% 14.32%
Rivian Automotive -63.62%-75.65%-25.49%

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rivian Automotive has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Garrett Motion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rivian Automotive. Rivian Automotive is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Garrett Motion$3.58B1.74$310M$1.7119.47
Rivian Automotive$5.39B3.28-$3.65B-$2.92N/A

Summary

Garrett Motion beats Rivian Automotive on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to Magna International?

Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) and Magna International (NYSE:MGA) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Magna International has higher revenue and earnings than Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Magna International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Garrett Motion$3.58B1.74$310M$1.7119.47
Magna International$42.01B0.42$829M$2.3927.02

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magna International has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.5% of Magna International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Magna International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 13 more articles in the media than Magna International. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Garrett Motion and 1 mentions for Magna International. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Magna International's score of 0.70 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Garrett Motion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Magna International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Garrett Motion pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Magna International pays an annual dividend of $1.98 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Garrett Motion pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magna International pays out 82.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Magna International has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Magna International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Magna International's net margin of 1.60%. Magna International's return on equity of 14.01% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Garrett Motion9.29% -42.77% 14.32%
Magna International 1.60%14.01%5.53%

Garrett Motion currently has a consensus target price of $31.83, suggesting a potential downside of 4.38%. Magna International has a consensus target price of $63.13, suggesting a potential downside of 2.25%. Given Magna International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Magna International is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Magna International
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Magna International beats Garrett Motion on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to XPENG?

XPENG (NYSE:XPEV) and Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to XPENG's net margin of -1.46%. XPENG's return on equity of -3.71% beat Garrett Motion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
XPENG-1.46% -3.71% -1.18%
Garrett Motion 9.29%-42.77%14.32%

21.1% of XPENG shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are held by institutional investors. 27.6% of XPENG shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

XPENG currently has a consensus target price of $25.38, indicating a potential upside of 62.56%. Garrett Motion has a consensus target price of $31.83, indicating a potential downside of 4.38%. Given XPENG's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe XPENG is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
XPENG
4 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

In the previous week, Garrett Motion had 5 more articles in the media than XPENG. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Garrett Motion and 9 mentions for XPENG. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat XPENG's score of 0.19 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
XPENG
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Garrett Motion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Garrett Motion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than XPENG. XPENG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
XPENG$10.97B1.35-$158.50M-$0.17N/A
Garrett Motion$3.58B1.74$310M$1.7119.47

XPENG has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Garrett Motion beats XPENG on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Garrett Motion compare to NIO?

Garrett Motion (NASDAQ:GTX) and NIO (NYSE:NIO) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Garrett Motion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NIO. NIO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Garrett Motion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Garrett Motion$3.58B1.74$310M$1.7119.47
NIO$12.51B0.96-$2.14B-$0.55N/A

In the previous week, NIO had 20 more articles in the media than Garrett Motion. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for NIO and 14 mentions for Garrett Motion. Garrett Motion's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat NIO's score of 0.64 indicating that Garrett Motion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Garrett Motion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NIO
11 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Garrett Motion has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NIO has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

86.3% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.6% of NIO shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Garrett Motion shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of NIO shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Garrett Motion has a net margin of 9.29% compared to NIO's net margin of -8.78%. Garrett Motion's return on equity of -42.77% beat NIO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Garrett Motion9.29% -42.77% 14.32%
NIO -8.78%-396.04%-7.97%

Garrett Motion presently has a consensus target price of $31.83, indicating a potential downside of 4.38%. NIO has a consensus target price of $6.70, indicating a potential upside of 28.48%. Given NIO's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NIO is more favorable than Garrett Motion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Garrett Motion
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
NIO
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36

Summary

Garrett Motion beats NIO on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Garrett Motion News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GTX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GTX vs. The Competition

MetricGarrett Motion IndustryAuto SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$6.23B$2.95B$22.38B$12.34B
Dividend Yield0.96%15.26%2.61%5.28%
P/E Ratio19.4713.0621.6625.65
Price / Sales1.741,857.0619.1386.31
Price / Cash15.5627.6411.7556.67
Price / Book-7.986.132.587.14
Net Income$310M-$42.06M$333.18M$335.98M
7 Day Performance11.49%1.48%4.33%4.15%
1 Month Performance58.45%1.57%0.20%2.54%
1 Year Performance203.74%18.70%5.08%35.06%

Garrett Motion Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GTX
Garrett Motion
4.5117 of 5 stars
$33.29
flat
$31.83
-4.4%
+203.7%$6.23B$3.58B19.476,700
LI
Li Auto
3.3126 of 5 stars
$16.69
-9.8%
$18.55
+11.1%
-45.0%$19.77B$16.06B128.3930,728
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
3.4238 of 5 stars
$13.35
-3.2%
$18.57
+39.1%
-9.0%$17.11B$5.53BN/A15,232
MGA
Magna International
3.7927 of 5 stars
$59.64
-1.3%
$63.13
+5.8%
+82.3%$16.57B$42.01B24.95156,000
XPEV
XPENG
2.9096 of 5 stars
$15.10
-3.4%
$24.74
+63.9%
-21.9%$14.82B$10.97BN/A19,884

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GTX) was last updated on 5/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners