Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Imperial Petroleum (IMPP) Competitors

Imperial Petroleum logo
$5.14 +0.09 (+1.68%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.18 +0.04 (+0.72%)
As of 04:11 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

IMPP vs. IMPPP, SB, HSHP, PANL, and FIP

Should you buy Imperial Petroleum stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Imperial Petroleum with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Imperial Petroleum include Imperial Petroleum (IMPPP), Safe Bulkers (SB), Himalaya Shipping (HSHP), Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL), and FTAI Infrastructure (FIP). These companies are all part of the "transportation" industry.

How does Imperial Petroleum compare to Imperial Petroleum?

Imperial Petroleum (NASDAQ:IMPPP) and Imperial Petroleum (NASDAQ:IMPP) are both transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Imperial Petroleum and Imperial Petroleum both had 1 articles in the media. Imperial Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Imperial Petroleum'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Imperial Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Imperial Petroleum has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.62%. Given Imperial Petroleum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Imperial Petroleum is more favorable than Imperial Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Imperial Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Imperial Petroleum has a net margin of 31.04% compared to Imperial Petroleum's net margin of 0.00%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.20% beat Imperial Petroleum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial PetroleumN/A N/A N/A
Imperial Petroleum 31.04%13.20%9.95%

Imperial Petroleum has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Imperial Petroleum.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Petroleum$161.00MN/AN/AN/AN/A
Imperial Petroleum$161M1.16$49.98M$1.293.99

94.4% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Imperial Petroleum beats Imperial Petroleum on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Petroleum compare to Safe Bulkers?

Imperial Petroleum (NASDAQ:IMPP) and Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Imperial Petroleum has a net margin of 31.04% compared to Safe Bulkers' net margin of 13.99%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.20% beat Safe Bulkers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Petroleum31.04% 13.20% 9.95%
Safe Bulkers 13.99%4.91%2.91%

Imperial Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Safe Bulkers. Imperial Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Petroleum$161M1.16$49.98M$1.293.99
Safe Bulkers$275.74M2.54$38.56M$0.3022.80

94.4% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Imperial Petroleum currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.62%. Safe Bulkers has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 12.29%. Given Imperial Petroleum's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Imperial Petroleum is more favorable than Safe Bulkers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Safe Bulkers
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, Safe Bulkers had 2 more articles in the media than Imperial Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe Bulkers and 1 mentions for Imperial Petroleum. Imperial Petroleum's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Safe Bulkers' score of -0.03 indicating that Imperial Petroleum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Safe Bulkers
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Imperial Petroleum beats Safe Bulkers on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Petroleum compare to Himalaya Shipping?

Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) and Imperial Petroleum (NASDAQ:IMPP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

Imperial Petroleum has a net margin of 31.04% compared to Himalaya Shipping's net margin of 13.44%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.20% beat Himalaya Shipping's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Himalaya Shipping13.44% 11.02% 2.04%
Imperial Petroleum 31.04%13.20%9.95%

Imperial Petroleum has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.62%. Given Imperial Petroleum's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Imperial Petroleum is more favorable than Himalaya Shipping.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Himalaya Shipping
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Imperial Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Himalaya Shipping had 3 more articles in the media than Imperial Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Himalaya Shipping and 1 mentions for Imperial Petroleum. Himalaya Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Imperial Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Himalaya Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Himalaya Shipping
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Imperial Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Imperial Petroleum has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Imperial Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Himalaya Shipping$131.90M5.36$17.70M$0.3839.86
Imperial Petroleum$161M1.16$49.98M$1.293.99

Summary

Imperial Petroleum beats Himalaya Shipping on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Petroleum compare to Pangaea Logistics Solutions?

Imperial Petroleum (NASDAQ:IMPP) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 1 more articles in the media than Imperial Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 1 mentions for Imperial Petroleum. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Imperial Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Imperial Petroleum has a net margin of 31.04% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 5.10%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.20% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Petroleum31.04% 13.20% 9.95%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions 5.10%5.71%2.89%

Imperial Petroleum presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.62%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.63%. Given Imperial Petroleum's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Imperial Petroleum is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

94.4% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Imperial Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Imperial Petroleum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Petroleum$161M1.16$49.98M$1.293.99
Pangaea Logistics Solutions$632.04M0.86$19.37M$0.5515.06

Summary

Imperial Petroleum beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Imperial Petroleum compare to FTAI Infrastructure?

Imperial Petroleum (NASDAQ:IMPP) and FTAI Infrastructure (NASDAQ:FIP) are both small-cap transportation companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Imperial Petroleum has a net margin of 31.04% compared to FTAI Infrastructure's net margin of -68.58%. Imperial Petroleum's return on equity of 13.20% beat FTAI Infrastructure's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Imperial Petroleum31.04% 13.20% 9.95%
FTAI Infrastructure -68.58%-147.01%-7.66%

Imperial Petroleum has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTAI Infrastructure. FTAI Infrastructure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Imperial Petroleum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Imperial Petroleum$161M1.16$49.98M$1.293.99
FTAI Infrastructure$502.52M1.06-$107.17M-$4.51N/A

94.4% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Imperial Petroleum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of FTAI Infrastructure shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Imperial Petroleum has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTAI Infrastructure has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FTAI Infrastructure had 2 more articles in the media than Imperial Petroleum. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for FTAI Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Imperial Petroleum. FTAI Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.57 beat Imperial Petroleum's score of 0.00 indicating that FTAI Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Imperial Petroleum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FTAI Infrastructure
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Imperial Petroleum currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.62%. FTAI Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 99.29%. Given FTAI Infrastructure's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTAI Infrastructure is more favorable than Imperial Petroleum.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Imperial Petroleum
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
FTAI Infrastructure
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Imperial Petroleum beats FTAI Infrastructure on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Imperial Petroleum News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for IMPP and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding IMPP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

IMPP vs. The Competition

MetricImperial PetroleumTRANS IndustryTransportation SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$186.35M$3.27B$8.34B$12.28B
Dividend YieldN/A4.86%955.97%5.36%
P/E Ratio3.9916.2123.2325.48
Price / Sales1.165.405.2673.33
Price / Cash2.276.638.1755.00
Price / Book0.351.262.177.01
Net Income$49.98M$289.76M$534.40M$335.16M
7 Day Performance6.08%0.86%1.30%-0.30%
1 Month Performance20.77%6.80%0.42%1.14%
1 Year Performance102.56%61.71%38.08%34.69%

Imperial Petroleum Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
IMPP
Imperial Petroleum
2.0028 of 5 stars
$5.15
+1.7%
$6.00
+16.6%
+99.2%$186.35M$161M3.9974
IMPPP
Imperial Petroleum
N/A$25.89
+0.1%
N/A+5.1%$0.00$161.00MN/AN/A
SB
Safe Bulkers
1.7521 of 5 stars
$6.81
-2.9%
$6.00
-11.9%
+80.0%$696.08M$275.74M22.69920
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping
1.2507 of 5 stars
$14.61
-5.4%
N/A+166.3%$681.42M$131.90M38.442
PANL
Pangaea Logistics Solutions
3.1752 of 5 stars
$8.16
+3.0%
$9.00
+10.3%
+66.7%$533.83M$632.04M14.84570

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:IMPP) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners