Do analysts recommend PANL or CMRE?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33 Costamare 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67

Does the media refer more to PANL or CMRE?

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 11 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 1 mentions for Costamare. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Costamare's score of 0.01 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pangaea Logistics Solutions 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Costamare 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend GSL or PANL?

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.45%. Given Global Ship Lease's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Global Ship Lease 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Does the media refer more to GSL or PANL?

In the previous week, Global Ship Lease had 3 more articles in the media than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Global Ship Lease and 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.85 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Global Ship Lease 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pangaea Logistics Solutions 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend TEN or PANL?

Tsakos Energy Navigation presently has a consensus price target of $29.50, indicating a potential downside of 37.11%. Given Tsakos Energy Navigation's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tsakos Energy Navigation 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Do analysts rate PANL or GNK?

Genco Shipping & Trading has a consensus target price of $29.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.84%. Given Genco Shipping & Trading's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33 Genco Shipping & Trading 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Do analysts rate SB or PANL?

Safe Bulkers presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Safe Bulkers 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.33

Does the media refer more to SB or PANL?

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than Safe Bulkers. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 8 mentions for Safe Bulkers. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Safe Bulkers' score of 0.92 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Safe Bulkers 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pangaea Logistics Solutions 5 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL) Competitors

$9.31 -0.15 (-1.59%)

As of 12:28 PM Eastern

Compare

PANL vs. CMRE, GSL, TEN, GNK, and SB

Should you buy Pangaea Logistics Solutions stock or one of its competitors? Pangaea Logistics Solutions's main competitors and comparable companies include Costamare (CMRE), Global Ship Lease (GSL), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK), and Safe Bulkers (SB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Costamare?

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) and Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Costamare pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.98	$19.37M	$1.15	8.23
Costamare	$877.90M	1.83	$364.58M	$2.59	5.12

60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.1% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Costamare shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 11 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 1 mentions for Costamare. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Costamare's score of 0.01 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Costamare	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Costamare has a net margin of 39.40% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 9.68%. Costamare's return on equity of 14.29% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	9.68%	13.64%	7.07%
Costamare	39.40%	14.29%	7.99%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Costamare	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Costamare beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Global Ship Lease?

Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Ship Lease has higher revenue and earnings than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Global Ship Lease	$766.45M	2.03	$416.45M	$10.56	4.11
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.98	$19.37M	$1.15	8.23

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Global Ship Lease had 3 more articles in the media than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Global Ship Lease and 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.85 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Global Ship Lease	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 49.38% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 9.68%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 19.40% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Global Ship Lease	49.38%	19.40%	12.65%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	9.68%	13.64%	7.07%

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.45%. Given Global Ship Lease's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Global Ship Lease	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Tsakos Energy Navigation?

Tsakos Energy Navigation (NYSE:TEN) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 10 more articles in the media than Tsakos Energy Navigation. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 2 mentions for Tsakos Energy Navigation. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Tsakos Energy Navigation's score of 0.00 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tsakos Energy Navigation	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 33.81% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 9.68%. Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 29.44% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tsakos Energy Navigation	33.81%	29.44%	13.76%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	9.68%	13.64%	7.07%

Tsakos Energy Navigation pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tsakos Energy Navigation is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tsakos Energy Navigation presently has a consensus price target of $29.50, indicating a potential downside of 37.11%. Given Tsakos Energy Navigation's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tsakos Energy Navigation	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

Tsakos Energy Navigation has higher revenue and earnings than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Tsakos Energy Navigation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tsakos Energy Navigation	$798.69M	1.77	$160.90M	$9.87	4.75
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.98	$19.37M	$1.15	8.23

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

19.2% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tsakos Energy Navigation beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) and Genco Shipping & Trading (NYSE:GNK) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 5 more articles in the media than Genco Shipping & Trading. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 7 mentions for Genco Shipping & Trading. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Genco Shipping & Trading's score of 0.40 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Genco Shipping & Trading	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 15.48% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 9.68%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity of 13.64% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	9.68%	13.64%	7.07%
Genco Shipping & Trading	15.48%	10.88%	7.79%

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Genco Shipping & Trading. Pangaea Logistics Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.98	$19.37M	$1.15	8.23
Genco Shipping & Trading	$342.05M	3.36	-$4.37M	$1.78	14.83

Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.1%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 179.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Genco Shipping & Trading has a consensus target price of $29.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.84%. Given Genco Shipping & Trading's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33
Genco Shipping & Trading	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Summary

Pangaea Logistics Solutions beats Genco Shipping & Trading on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Safe Bulkers?

Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Safe Bulkers presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Safe Bulkers	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.33

Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Safe Bulkers pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Safe Bulkers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Pangaea Logistics Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Safe Bulkers	$275.74M	2.99	$38.56M	$0.98	8.26
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.98	$19.37M	$1.15	8.23

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than Safe Bulkers. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 8 mentions for Safe Bulkers. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Safe Bulkers' score of 0.92 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Safe Bulkers	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	5 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Safe Bulkers has a net margin of 33.24% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 9.68%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity of 13.64% beat Safe Bulkers' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Safe Bulkers	33.24%	11.94%	7.14%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	9.68%	13.64%	7.07%

Summary

Pangaea Logistics Solutions beats Safe Bulkers on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pangaea Logistics Solutions News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PANL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PANL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pangaea Logistics Solutions	Marine Transportation Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$609.26M	$5.22B	$10.08B	$12.01B
Dividend Yield	4.52%	3.98%	2.91%	4.50%
P/E Ratio	8.09	17.64	32.28	30.36
Price / Sales	0.96	2.42	3.15	5.82
Price / Cash	9.34	6.18	19.83	22.80
Price / Book	1.15	1.15	3.79	3.77
Net Income	$19.37M	$375.14M	$611.94M	$390.55M
7 Day Performance	22.99%	2.32%	0.91%	-0.58%
1 Month Performance	9.79%	-8.61%	-2.55%	-6.84%
1 Year Performance	44.79%	31.40%	1.99%	-6.12%

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PANL Pangaea Logistics Solutions	3.73 of 5 stars	$9.31 -1.6%	N/A	+46.7%	$609.26M	$632.04M	8.09	1,070	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Upgrade
CMRE Costamare	3.5025 of 5 stars	$12.82 +0.3%	N/A	-8.3%	$1.55B	$877.90M	4.95	1,880
GSL Global Ship Lease	4.735 of 5 stars	$41.83 +1.5%	$51.00 +21.9%	+26.4%	$1.50B	$766.45M	4.02	7	Earnings Report Dividend Increase
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation	3.0185 of 5 stars	$44.57 -0.5%	$29.50 -33.8%	+85.2%	$1.34B	$798.69M	4.51	71,000	Upcoming Earnings Gap Down
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading	2.5639 of 5 stars	$25.89 -0.2%	$29.00 +12.0%	+49.2%	$1.13B	$342.05M	14.54	1,056	Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PANL) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL) Competitors

PANL vs. CMRE, GSL, TEN, GNK, and SB

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Costamare?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Global Ship Lease?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Tsakos Energy Navigation?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Safe Bulkers?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PANL vs. The Competition

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL) Competitors

PANL vs. CMRE, GSL, TEN, GNK, and SB

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Costamare?

Is PANL or CMRE a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, PANL or CMRE?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PANL or CMRE?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of PANL or CMRE?

Does the media refer more to PANL or CMRE?

Is PANL or CMRE more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PANL or CMRE?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Global Ship Lease?

Is GSL or PANL a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, GSL or PANL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, GSL or PANL?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in GSL or PANL?

Does the media refer more to GSL or PANL?

Is GSL or PANL more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GSL or PANL?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Tsakos Energy Navigation?

Does the media refer more to TEN or PANL?

Is TEN or PANL more profitable?

Is TEN or PANL a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend TEN or PANL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TEN or PANL?

Which has more risk and volatility, TEN or PANL?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TEN or PANL?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Does the media refer more to PANL or GNK?

Is PANL or GNK more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, PANL or GNK?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PANL or GNK?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, PANL or GNK?

Is PANL or GNK a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate PANL or GNK?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Safe Bulkers?

Do analysts rate SB or PANL?

Is SB or PANL a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SB or PANL?

Which has better valuation & earnings, SB or PANL?

Which has more risk & volatility, SB or PANL?

Does the media refer more to SB or PANL?

Is SB or PANL more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PANL vs. The Competition

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools