Do analysts rate CMRE or PANL?

Costamare currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.11%. Given Costamare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Costamare is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Costamare 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media refer more to CMRE or PANL?

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 8 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 4 mentions for Costamare. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Costamare's score of 0.85 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Costamare 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pangaea Logistics Solutions 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend TEN or PANL?

Tsakos Energy Navigation presently has a consensus target price of $29.50, indicating a potential downside of 28.76%. Given Tsakos Energy Navigation's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tsakos Energy Navigation 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Do analysts rate PANL or SB?

Safe Bulkers has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.73%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Safe Bulkers 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media favor PANL or SB?

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 11 more articles in the media than Safe Bulkers. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 1 mentions for Safe Bulkers. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' score of 1.14 indicating that Safe Bulkers is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pangaea Logistics Solutions 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Safe Bulkers 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts prefer PANL or HSHP?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pangaea Logistics Solutions 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Himalaya Shipping 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor PANL or HSHP?

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than Himalaya Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 8 mentions for Himalaya Shipping. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Himalaya Shipping's score of 0.92 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pangaea Logistics Solutions 4 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Himalaya Shipping 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL) Competitors

$7.44 -0.13 (-1.72%)

Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$7.44 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

PANL vs. CMRE, TEN, GNK, SB, and HSHP

Should you buy Pangaea Logistics Solutions stock or one of its competitors? Pangaea Logistics Solutions's main competitors and comparable companies include Costamare (CMRE), Tsakos Energy Navigation (TEN), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK), Safe Bulkers (SB), and Himalaya Shipping (HSHP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Costamare?

Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of Costamare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 8 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 4 mentions for Costamare. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Costamare's score of 0.85 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Costamare	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Costamare pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Costamare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Costamare	$877.90M	2.02	$364.58M	$2.63	5.57
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.77	$19.37M	$0.75	9.92

Costamare has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Costamare currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.11%. Given Costamare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Costamare is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Costamare	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Costamare has a net margin of 39.66% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Costamare's return on equity of 15.11% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Costamare	39.66%	15.11%	8.47%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	6.70%	9.42%	4.81%

Summary

Costamare beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Tsakos Energy Navigation?

Tsakos Energy Navigation (NYSE:TEN) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a beta of -0.28, meaning that its share price is 128% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Tsakos Energy Navigation presently has a consensus target price of $29.50, indicating a potential downside of 28.76%. Given Tsakos Energy Navigation's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Tsakos Energy Navigation is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tsakos Energy Navigation	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

19.2% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tsakos Energy Navigation shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tsakos Energy Navigation pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Tsakos Energy Navigation pays out 32.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 11 more articles in the media than Tsakos Energy Navigation. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 1 mentions for Tsakos Energy Navigation. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Tsakos Energy Navigation's score of 0.99 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tsakos Energy Navigation	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Tsakos Energy Navigation has higher revenue and earnings than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Tsakos Energy Navigation is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pangaea Logistics Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tsakos Energy Navigation	$798.69M	1.56	$160.90M	$6.14	6.74
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.77	$19.37M	$0.75	9.92

Tsakos Energy Navigation has a net margin of 24.81% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Tsakos Energy Navigation's return on equity of 23.26% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tsakos Energy Navigation	24.81%	23.26%	10.93%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	6.70%	9.42%	4.81%

Summary

Tsakos Energy Navigation beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Genco Shipping & Trading (NYSE:GNK) and Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Genco Shipping & Trading presently has a consensus price target of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.22%. Given Genco Shipping & Trading's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Genco Shipping & Trading	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Genco Shipping & Trading has a net margin of 9.15% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity of 9.42% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Genco Shipping & Trading	9.15%	6.46%	4.83%
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	6.70%	9.42%	4.81%

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 9 more articles in the media than Genco Shipping & Trading. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 3 mentions for Genco Shipping & Trading. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Genco Shipping & Trading's score of 0.25 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Genco Shipping & Trading	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Genco Shipping & Trading. Pangaea Logistics Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Genco Shipping & Trading	$342.05M	3.35	-$4.37M	$0.91	28.92
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.77	$19.37M	$0.75	9.92

58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 153.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Genco Shipping & Trading beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Safe Bulkers?

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) and Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Safe Bulkers has a net margin of 28.29% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Safe Bulkers' return on equity of 9.63% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	6.70%	9.42%	4.81%
Safe Bulkers	28.29%	9.63%	5.77%

60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Safe Bulkers has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.73%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Pangaea Logistics Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Safe Bulkers	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 11 more articles in the media than Safe Bulkers. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 1 mentions for Safe Bulkers. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' score of 1.14 indicating that Safe Bulkers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Safe Bulkers	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Safe Bulkers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Pangaea Logistics Solutions. Pangaea Logistics Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.77	$19.37M	$0.75	9.92
Safe Bulkers	$275.74M	2.87	$38.56M	$0.78	9.96

Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Pangaea Logistics Solutions pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Safe Bulkers pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Safe Bulkers beats Pangaea Logistics Solutions on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Himalaya Shipping?

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (NASDAQ:PANL) and Himalaya Shipping (NYSE:HSHP) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, Pangaea Logistics Solutions had 4 more articles in the media than Himalaya Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Pangaea Logistics Solutions and 8 mentions for Himalaya Shipping. Pangaea Logistics Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Himalaya Shipping's score of 0.92 indicating that Pangaea Logistics Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	4 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Himalaya Shipping	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

60.2% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Himalaya Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. 16.7% of Pangaea Logistics Solutions shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Himalaya Shipping has a net margin of 31.44% compared to Pangaea Logistics Solutions' net margin of 6.70%. Himalaya Shipping's return on equity of 32.83% beat Pangaea Logistics Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	6.70%	9.42%	4.81%
Himalaya Shipping	31.44%	32.83%	6.13%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Himalaya Shipping	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Himalaya Shipping. Pangaea Logistics Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Himalaya Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pangaea Logistics Solutions	$632.04M	0.77	$19.37M	$0.75	9.92
Himalaya Shipping	$131.90M	5.70	$17.70M	$0.63	25.58

Pangaea Logistics Solutions has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Himalaya Shipping has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pangaea Logistics Solutions beats Himalaya Shipping on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pangaea Logistics Solutions News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PANL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PANL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Pangaea Logistics Solutions	Marine Transportation Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$495.64M	$4.51B	$10.94B	$13.10B
Dividend Yield	2.64%	3.18%	97.21%	10.45%
P/E Ratio	9.92	13.67	27.85	25.28
Price / Sales	0.77	51.50	338.12	91.83
Price / Cash	8.00	5.98	24.95	50.90
Price / Book	0.98	1.12	4.78	6.24
Net Income	$19.37M	$356.70M	$609.43M	$347.60M
7 Day Performance	0.27%	4.08%	0.78%	1.06%
1 Month Performance	2.06%	8.19%	3.00%	0.81%
1 Year Performance	46.75%	35.98%	14.45%	20.90%

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PANL Pangaea Logistics Solutions	2.1551 of 5 stars	$7.44 -1.7%	N/A	+46.7%	$495.64M	$632.04M	9.92	570	Positive News Earnings Report Dividend Increase
CMRE Costamare	3.0359 of 5 stars	$13.97 -3.2%	$12.00 -14.1%	+30.9%	$1.68B	$877.90M	5.32	2,870	Positive News
TEN Tsakos Energy Navigation	2.1471 of 5 stars	$38.05 -0.7%	$29.50 -22.5%	+107.1%	$1.15B	$798.69M	6.20	71,000
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading	2.2318 of 5 stars	$24.48 -2.3%	$26.00 +6.2%	+59.4%	$1.07B	$440.69M	26.91	1,010
SB Safe Bulkers	3.1905 of 5 stars	$7.34 -2.1%	$6.00 -18.2%	+81.6%	$746.92M	$275.74M	9.40	920	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PANL) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL) Competitors

PANL vs. CMRE, TEN, GNK, SB, and HSHP

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Costamare?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Tsakos Energy Navigation?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Safe Bulkers?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Himalaya Shipping?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PANL vs. The Competition

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Pangaea Logistics Solutions (PANL) Competitors

PANL vs. CMRE, TEN, GNK, SB, and HSHP

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Costamare?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CMRE or PANL?

Does the media refer more to CMRE or PANL?

Is CMRE or PANL a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CMRE or PANL?

Which has more volatility and risk, CMRE or PANL?

Do analysts rate CMRE or PANL?

Is CMRE or PANL more profitable?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Tsakos Energy Navigation?

Which has more risk and volatility, TEN or PANL?

Do analysts recommend TEN or PANL?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of TEN or PANL?

Is TEN or PANL a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to TEN or PANL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TEN or PANL?

Is TEN or PANL more profitable?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Do analysts recommend GNK or PANL?

Is GNK or PANL more profitable?

Does the media favor GNK or PANL?

Which has more risk and volatility, GNK or PANL?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, GNK or PANL?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GNK or PANL?

Is GNK or PANL a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Safe Bulkers?

Which has more volatility and risk, PANL or SB?

Is PANL or SB more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PANL or SB?

Do analysts rate PANL or SB?

Does the media favor PANL or SB?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PANL or SB?

Is PANL or SB a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Pangaea Logistics Solutions compare to Himalaya Shipping?

Does the media favor PANL or HSHP?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in PANL or HSHP?

Is PANL or HSHP more profitable?

Do analysts prefer PANL or HSHP?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, PANL or HSHP?

Which has more risk and volatility, PANL or HSHP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PANL vs. The Competition

Pangaea Logistics Solutions Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools