Lifetime Brands (LCUT) Competitors

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Advantage Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 14 mentions for Advantage Solutions. Lifetime Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Advantage Solutions' score of 0.38 indicating that Lifetime Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

49.8% of Advantage Solutions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of Advantage Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Advantage Solutions' net margin of -7.65%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Advantage Solutions' return on equity.

Advantage Solutions currently has a consensus target price of $42.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.56%. Lifetime Brands has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 8.31%. Given Advantage Solutions' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Advantage Solutions is more favorable than Lifetime Brands.

Advantage Solutions has a beta of 2.18, indicating that its stock price is 118% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Lifetime Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Advantage Solutions. Advantage Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifetime Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.5% of Barnes & Noble Education shares are held by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Barnes & Noble Education shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 13 more articles in the media than Barnes & Noble Education. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 3 mentions for Barnes & Noble Education. Barnes & Noble Education's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.45 indicating that Barnes & Noble Education is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lifetime Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Barnes & Noble Education pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Lifetime Brands pays out 11.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Barnes & Noble Education pays out 68.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Barnes & Noble Education has higher revenue and earnings than Lifetime Brands. Lifetime Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Barnes & Noble Education, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Barnes & Noble Education has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Lifetime Brands presently has a consensus target price of $8.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.31%. Barnes & Noble Education has a consensus target price of $17.25, indicating a potential upside of 35.72%. Given Barnes & Noble Education's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Barnes & Noble Education is more favorable than Lifetime Brands.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Barnes & Noble Education's net margin of 0.98%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Barnes & Noble Education's return on equity.

Honest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lifetime Brands. Honest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifetime Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.50, indicating a potential downside of 8.31%. Honest has a consensus price target of $4.38, indicating a potential downside of 16.25%. Given Lifetime Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lifetime Brands is more favorable than Honest.

In the previous week, Honest had 14 more articles in the media than Lifetime Brands. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Honest and 16 mentions for Lifetime Brands. Honest's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.45 indicating that Honest is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.5% of Honest shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.4% of Honest shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Honest's net margin of -3.56%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Honest's return on equity.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Honest has a beta of 2.12, meaning that its share price is 112% more volatile than the broader market.

Alto Ingredients has higher revenue and earnings than Lifetime Brands. Alto Ingredients is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifetime Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Alto Ingredients had 1 more articles in the media than Lifetime Brands. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Alto Ingredients and 16 mentions for Lifetime Brands. Alto Ingredients' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.45 indicating that Alto Ingredients is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Alto Ingredients has a beta of 0.17, indicating that its stock price is 83% less volatile than the broader market.

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus price target of $8.50, suggesting a potential downside of 8.31%. Alto Ingredients has a consensus price target of $10.00, suggesting a potential upside of 136.41%. Given Alto Ingredients' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Alto Ingredients is more favorable than Lifetime Brands.

Alto Ingredients has a net margin of 5.51% compared to Lifetime Brands' net margin of 4.81%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Alto Ingredients' return on equity.

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.4% of Alto Ingredients shares are held by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Alto Ingredients shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.