Do analysts rate LCUT or YHGJ?

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus target price of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Lifetime Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lifetime Brands is more favorable than Yunhong Green CTI. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lifetime Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Yunhong Green CTI 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Does the media favor LCUT or NWL?

In the previous week, Newell Brands had 11 more articles in the media than Lifetime Brands. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Newell Brands and 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands. Newell Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.91 indicating that Newell Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lifetime Brands 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Newell Brands 12 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate LCUT or BZH?

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Lifetime Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lifetime Brands is more favorable than Beazer Homes USA. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Lifetime Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Beazer Homes USA 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media prefer LCUT or BZH?

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Beazer Homes USA. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 1 mentions for Beazer Homes USA. Lifetime Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Beazer Homes USA's score of 0.00 indicating that Lifetime Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lifetime Brands 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Beazer Homes USA 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to HOV or LCUT?

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Hovnanian Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 3 mentions for Hovnanian Enterprises. Lifetime Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Hovnanian Enterprises' score of 0.75 indicating that Lifetime Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hovnanian Enterprises 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Lifetime Brands 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer LCUT or SDHC?

In the previous week, Smith Douglas Homes had 2 more articles in the media than Lifetime Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Smith Douglas Homes and 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands. Smith Douglas Homes' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.91 indicating that Smith Douglas Homes is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lifetime Brands 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Smith Douglas Homes 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) Competitors

$9.33 -0.12 (-1.27%)

As of 09:34 AM Eastern

Compare

LCUT vs. YHGJ, NWL, BZH, HOV, and SDHC

Should you buy Lifetime Brands stock or one of its competitors? Lifetime Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Yunhong Green CTI (YHGJ), Newell Brands (NWL), Beazer Homes USA (BZH), Hovnanian Enterprises (HOV), and Smith Douglas Homes (SDHC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household durables" industry.

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Yunhong Green CTI?

Lifetime Brands (NASDAQ:LCUT) and Yunhong Green CTI (NASDAQ:YHGJ) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and risk.

Yunhong Green CTI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lifetime Brands. Yunhong Green CTI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifetime Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lifetime Brands	$647.93M	0.34	-$26.94M	$1.43	6.61
Yunhong Green CTI	$19.70M	0.37	-$2.53M	-$1.11	N/A

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus target price of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Lifetime Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lifetime Brands is more favorable than Yunhong Green CTI.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lifetime Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Yunhong Green CTI	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of -14.43%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lifetime Brands	4.81%	26.39%	9.21%
Yunhong Green CTI	-14.43%	-38.81%	-13.25%

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are held by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.8% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Yunhong Green CTI. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 1 mentions for Yunhong Green CTI. Yunhong Green CTI's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.91 indicating that Yunhong Green CTI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Lifetime Brands	Positive
Yunhong Green CTI	Very Positive

Summary

Lifetime Brands beats Yunhong Green CTI on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Newell Brands?

Lifetime Brands (NASDAQ:LCUT) and Newell Brands (NASDAQ:NWL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Newell Brands' net margin of -3.05%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Newell Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lifetime Brands	4.81%	26.39%	9.21%
Newell Brands	-3.05%	12.31%	2.77%

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of Newell Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Newell Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Newell Brands has a consensus price target of $6.66, suggesting a potential upside of 6.50%. Given Newell Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Newell Brands is more favorable than Lifetime Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lifetime Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Newell Brands	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.30

Lifetime Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Newell Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Lifetime Brands pays out 11.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Newell Brands pays out -52.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Newell Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Newell Brands had 11 more articles in the media than Lifetime Brands. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Newell Brands and 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands. Newell Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.91 indicating that Newell Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lifetime Brands	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Newell Brands	12 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lifetime Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Newell Brands. Newell Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifetime Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lifetime Brands	$647.93M	0.34	-$26.94M	$1.43	6.61
Newell Brands	$7.20B	0.37	-$285M	-$0.53	N/A

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Newell Brands has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lifetime Brands and Newell Brands tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Beazer Homes USA?

Lifetime Brands (NASDAQ:LCUT) and Beazer Homes USA (NYSE:BZH) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Beazer Homes USA. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 1 mentions for Beazer Homes USA. Lifetime Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Beazer Homes USA's score of 0.00 indicating that Lifetime Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lifetime Brands	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Beazer Homes USA	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Beazer Homes USA has a beta of 2.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

Beazer Homes USA has higher revenue and earnings than Lifetime Brands. Beazer Homes USA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifetime Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lifetime Brands	$647.93M	0.34	-$26.94M	$1.43	6.61
Beazer Homes USA	$2.37B	0.37	$45.59M	-$0.30	N/A

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.7% of Beazer Homes USA shares are held by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Beazer Homes USA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Beazer Homes USA's net margin of -0.37%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Beazer Homes USA's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lifetime Brands	4.81%	26.39%	9.21%
Beazer Homes USA	-0.37%	0.18%	0.08%

Lifetime Brands currently has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Lifetime Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lifetime Brands is more favorable than Beazer Homes USA.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lifetime Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Beazer Homes USA	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Lifetime Brands beats Beazer Homes USA on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Hovnanian Enterprises?

Hovnanian Enterprises (NYSE:HOV) and Lifetime Brands (NASDAQ:LCUT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Hovnanian Enterprises currently has a consensus price target of $74.00, suggesting a potential downside of 40.28%. Lifetime Brands has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Lifetime Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lifetime Brands is more favorable than Hovnanian Enterprises.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hovnanian Enterprises	2 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Lifetime Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Hovnanian Enterprises has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

65.4% of Hovnanian Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 22.7% of Hovnanian Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Hovnanian Enterprises' net margin of 0.64%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Hovnanian Enterprises' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hovnanian Enterprises	0.64%	8.60%	2.19%
Lifetime Brands	4.81%	26.39%	9.21%

In the previous week, Lifetime Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Hovnanian Enterprises. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands and 3 mentions for Hovnanian Enterprises. Lifetime Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Hovnanian Enterprises' score of 0.75 indicating that Lifetime Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hovnanian Enterprises	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lifetime Brands	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Hovnanian Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Lifetime Brands. Lifetime Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hovnanian Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hovnanian Enterprises	$2.98B	0.24	$63.87M	$0.95	130.43
Lifetime Brands	$647.93M	0.34	-$26.94M	$1.43	6.61

Summary

Lifetime Brands beats Hovnanian Enterprises on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Lifetime Brands (NASDAQ:LCUT) and Smith Douglas Homes (NYSE:SDHC) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and dividends.

40.6% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 44.4% of Lifetime Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 84.2% of Smith Douglas Homes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lifetime Brands has a beta of 1, meaning that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Smith Douglas Homes has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Lifetime Brands has a net margin of 4.81% compared to Smith Douglas Homes' net margin of 0.64%. Lifetime Brands' return on equity of 26.39% beat Smith Douglas Homes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lifetime Brands	4.81%	26.39%	9.21%
Smith Douglas Homes	0.64%	-0.19%	-0.14%

Smith Douglas Homes has higher revenue and earnings than Lifetime Brands. Lifetime Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Smith Douglas Homes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lifetime Brands	$647.93M	0.34	-$26.94M	$1.43	6.61
Smith Douglas Homes	$971.12M	0.63	$10.69M	$0.72	16.82

In the previous week, Smith Douglas Homes had 2 more articles in the media than Lifetime Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Smith Douglas Homes and 4 mentions for Lifetime Brands. Smith Douglas Homes' average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Lifetime Brands' score of 0.91 indicating that Smith Douglas Homes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lifetime Brands	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Smith Douglas Homes	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lifetime Brands presently has a consensus price target of $9.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Smith Douglas Homes has a consensus price target of $13.90, suggesting a potential upside of 14.78%. Given Smith Douglas Homes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Smith Douglas Homes is more favorable than Lifetime Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lifetime Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Smith Douglas Homes	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.90

Summary

Lifetime Brands and Smith Douglas Homes tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lifetime Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LCUT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LCUT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lifetime Brands	Household Durables Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$211.96M	$5.47B	$13.19B	$12.89B
Dividend Yield	1.84%	3.50%	56.18%	10.96%
P/E Ratio	6.61	17.05	46.86	25.50
Price / Sales	0.34	63.51	88.55	97.53
Price / Cash	2.77	9.48	19.00	36.03
Price / Book	1.06	2.79	4.24	6.34
Net Income	-$26.94M	$267.93M	$445.07M	$349.45M
7 Day Performance	0.32%	-0.49%	-1.15%	-0.67%
1 Month Performance	12.90%	2.52%	-0.48%	4.48%
1 Year Performance	139.24%	-4.44%	-2.69%	14.94%

Lifetime Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LCUT Lifetime Brands	3.1919 of 5 stars	$9.33 -1.3%	$9.50 +1.8%	+139.2%	$214.96M	$647.93M	6.54	1,080	Gap Down
YHGJ Yunhong Green CTI	0.4784 of 5 stars	$3.32 -0.2%	N/A	-54.3%	$8.81M	$19.70M	N/A	70	Gap Down
NWL Newell Brands	2.9043 of 5 stars	$5.93 -1.8%	$6.66 +12.2%	+5.6%	$2.66B	$7.20B	N/A	21,900	Positive News Gap Down
BZH Beazer Homes USA	1.5198 of 5 stars	$33.11 -0.2%	N/A	+31.7%	$883.10M	$2.37B	N/A	1,018
HOV Hovnanian Enterprises	0.8318 of 5 stars	$124.17 -5.0%	$97.00 -21.9%	-11.6%	$785.48M	$2.98B	34.11	1,891

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LCUT) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) Competitors

LCUT vs. YHGJ, NWL, BZH, HOV, and SDHC

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Yunhong Green CTI?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Newell Brands?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Beazer Homes USA?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Hovnanian Enterprises?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LCUT vs. The Competition

Lifetime Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lifetime Brands (LCUT) Competitors

LCUT vs. YHGJ, NWL, BZH, HOV, and SDHC

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Yunhong Green CTI?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, LCUT or YHGJ?

Do analysts rate LCUT or YHGJ?

Is LCUT or YHGJ more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, LCUT or YHGJ?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in LCUT or YHGJ?

Does the media refer more to LCUT or YHGJ?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Newell Brands?

Is LCUT or NWL more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in LCUT or NWL?

Do analysts rate LCUT or NWL?

Is LCUT or NWL a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor LCUT or NWL?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LCUT or NWL?

Which has more volatility & risk, LCUT or NWL?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Beazer Homes USA?

Does the media prefer LCUT or BZH?

Which has more volatility & risk, LCUT or BZH?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, LCUT or BZH?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LCUT or BZH?

Is LCUT or BZH more profitable?

Do analysts rate LCUT or BZH?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Hovnanian Enterprises?

Do analysts prefer HOV or LCUT?

Which has more risk & volatility, HOV or LCUT?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of HOV or LCUT?

Is HOV or LCUT more profitable?

Does the media refer more to HOV or LCUT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HOV or LCUT?

Summary

How does Lifetime Brands compare to Smith Douglas Homes?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of LCUT or SDHC?

Which has more risk and volatility, LCUT or SDHC?

Is LCUT or SDHC more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LCUT or SDHC?

Does the media prefer LCUT or SDHC?

Do analysts prefer LCUT or SDHC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LCUT vs. The Competition

Lifetime Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools