Free Trial
→ Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach (From Weiss Ratings) (Ad)tc pixel Free NOMA Stock Alerts

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

Nomadar logo
$3.38 +0.02 (+0.45%)
As of 05/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

NOMA vs. CURI, GAMB, SEAT, AGH, and GAIA

Should you buy Nomadar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomadar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomadar include CuriosityStream (CURI), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Aureus Greenway (AGH), and Gaia (GAIA). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CuriosityStream$71.66M2.43-$6.43M-$0.10N/A
Nomadar$920K51.22-$2.77M-$0.12N/A

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 1 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CuriosityStream and 1 mentions for Nomadar. CuriosityStream's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Nomadar's score of 0.94 indicating that CuriosityStream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CuriosityStream Very Positive
Nomadar Positive

CuriosityStream currently has a consensus price target of $6.17, suggesting a potential upside of 109.04%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CuriosityStream's net margin of -8.97%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CuriosityStream-8.97% -13.07% -8.18%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are held by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Nomadar on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 4 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.85 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Positive
Nomadar Positive

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.63, suggesting a potential upside of 85.07%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -19.90%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 38.87% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-19.90% 38.87% 16.85%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.87-$32.93M-$0.95N/A
Nomadar$920K51.22-$2.77M-$0.12N/A

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Nomadar on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 89.2% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.65 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomadar Positive
Vivid Seats Positive

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 0.25%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NomadarN/A N/A N/A
Vivid Seats -82.25%68.65%5.92%

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$920K51.22-$2.77M-$0.12N/A
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.18-$429.30M-$69.61N/A

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Nomadar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:AGH) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 3 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Aureus Greenway's score of 0.31 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomadar Positive
Aureus Greenway Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NomadarN/A N/A N/A
Aureus Greenway -167.57%-20.16%-18.90%

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aureus Greenway. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aureus Greenway, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$920K51.22-$2.77M-$0.12N/A
Aureus Greenway$2.96M27.78-$3.68M-$0.26N/A

Summary

Nomadar beats Aureus Greenway on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gaia?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Gaia (NASDAQ:GAIA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Gaia had 15 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Gaia and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Gaia's score of -0.14 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomadar Positive
Gaia Neutral

40.5% of Gaia shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of Gaia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Gaia
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gaia's net margin of -4.76%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gaia's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NomadarN/A N/A N/A
Gaia -4.76%-4.62%-3.06%

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gaia. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$920K51.22-$2.77M-$0.12N/A
Gaia$98.95M0.65-$4.49M-$0.19N/A

Summary

Nomadar beats Gaia on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomadar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOMA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricNomadarServices – Amusement And Recreation IndustryServices SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$48.11M$109.03M$1.02B$12.20B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A4.82%5.30%
P/E Ratio-27.50N/A14.4525.65
Price / Sales51.2230.6425.0879.76
Price / CashN/A1,106.92426.6555.34
Price / Book7.024.276.406.66
Net Income-$2.77M-$902.50K$64.39K$333.63M
7 Day Performance-12.00%-10.50%16.36%-0.11%
1 Month Performance-17.29%-4.91%40.23%3.94%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A25.43%36.07%

Nomadar Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOMA
Nomadar
0.8195 of 5 stars		$3.30
-2.1%		N/AN/A$48.11M$920KN/A6
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.0288 of 5 stars		$3.04
+1.1%		$6.17
+102.6%		-48.3%$179.52M$71.66MN/A90
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
4.8762 of 5 stars		$4.26
-2.4%		$7.63
+79.2%		-71.7%$149.35M$165.45MN/A230
SEAT
Vivid Seats
0.7816 of 5 stars		$8.67
+1.9%		$9.27
+6.9%		-77.7%$93.38M$570.78MN/A430
AGH
Aureus Greenway
0.2112 of 5 stars		$4.18
-2.6%		N/A+534.3%$84.65M$2.96MN/A40

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOMA) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The one number Musk can't hide in the S-1
When SpaceX files its S-1 in June, one number will stand out - power consumption. Running 1 million GPUs requi...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Before you buy SpaceX shares, consider this alternative approach
SpaceX has confidentially filed for an IPO with the SEC, targeting a June 2026 listing at a valuation exceedin...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Collect $1,170 a month from silver
I've Rarely Seen This With Silver This combination - 20% dividends + 68% share appreciation - never happens...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
The system holding the dollar together is gone…
Saudi Arabia has terminated its 1974 petrodollar agreement with the United States - the deal that forced every...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s ‘iPhone’ Could 10x Apple’s iPhone
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Millionaire warns: Move your money now
Larry Benedict, the hedge fund trader who generated $274 million in profits for clients and beat the S&P 500 b...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel