Do analysts recommend NOMA or CURI?

CuriosityStream has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 141.94%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 CuriosityStream 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83

Do analysts recommend NOMA or PUSA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Aureus Greenway 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts prefer GAMB or NOMA?

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 222.05%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gambling.com Group 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.56 Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts rate AHMA or NOMA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AHMA or NOMA?

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has higher revenue and earnings than Nomadar. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C $20.23M 2.80 N/A N/A N/A Nomadar $920K 53.37 -$2.77M -$0.18 N/A

Is AHMA or NOMA more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C N/A N/A N/A Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate NOMA or SEAT?

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.43, suggesting a potential upside of 20.94%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Is NOMA or SEAT more profitable?

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nomadar N/A N/A N/A Vivid Seats -82.25% 68.65% 5.92%

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

$3.30 -0.22 (-6.25%)

As of 02:12 PM Eastern

Compare

NOMA vs. CURI, PUSA, GAMB, AHMA, and SEAT

Should you buy Nomadar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomadar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomadar include CuriosityStream (CURI), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (AHMA), and Vivid Seats (SEAT). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar	$920K	53.37	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A
CuriosityStream	$71.66M	2.04	-$6.43M	-$0.13	N/A

CuriosityStream has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 141.94%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
CuriosityStream	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 4 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CuriosityStream and 0 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat CuriosityStream's score of -0.55 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nomadar	Neutral
CuriosityStream	Negative

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CuriosityStream's net margin of -11.26%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A
CuriosityStream	-11.26%	-18.46%	-10.83%

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Nomadar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aureus Greenway	-167.57%	-17.49%	-16.56%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Aureus Greenway	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aureus Greenway. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aureus Greenway, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar	$920K	53.37	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A
Aureus Greenway	$2.96M	29.92	-$3.68M	-$0.31	N/A

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nomadar	Neutral
Aureus Greenway	Very Positive

Summary

Nomadar beats Aureus Greenway on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 1 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 0 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Gambling.com Group's score of -0.18 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group	Neutral
Nomadar	Neutral

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.38, suggesting a potential upside of 222.05%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gambling.com Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group	-27.44%	27.61%	11.20%
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group	$165.45M	0.49	-$32.93M	-$1.29	N/A
Nomadar	$920K	53.37	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Nomadar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C (NASDAQ:AHMA) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C has higher revenue and earnings than Nomadar.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	$20.23M	2.80	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nomadar	$920K	53.37	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A

In the previous week, Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C had 1 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C and 0 mentions for Nomadar. Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	Positive
Nomadar	Neutral

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	N/A	N/A	N/A
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C beats Nomadar on 3 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Vivid Seats'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nomadar	Neutral
Vivid Seats	Neutral

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vivid Seats. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar	$920K	53.37	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A
Vivid Seats	$570.78M	0.15	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A

Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $9.43, suggesting a potential upside of 20.94%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Nomadar on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomadar News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOMA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Nomadar	Services – Amusement And Recreation Industry	Services Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$49.10M	$107.64M	$14.30B	$12.13B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	5.01%	5.81%
P/E Ratio	-18.33	N/A	11.64	24.01
Price / Sales	53.37	23.90	43.68	110.00
Price / Cash	N/A	333.70	57.38	37.84
Price / Book	7.02	73.86	12.25	6.53
Net Income	-$2.77M	-$106.12M	-$12.25M	$336.99M
7 Day Performance	-1.20%	-5.87%	0.93%	-0.18%
1 Month Performance	-8.33%	0.13%	5.95%	0.83%
1 Year Performance	N/A	N/A	40.75%	31.55%

Nomadar Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOMA Nomadar	N/A	$3.30 -6.3%	N/A	N/A	$49.10M	$920K	N/A	6
CURI CuriosityStream	4.5465 of 5 stars	$2.56 +0.4%	$6.00 +134.4%	-50.4%	$150.96M	$71.66M	N/A	90
PUSA Aureus Greenway	0.7003 of 5 stars	$4.43 -1.6%	N/A	+613.1%	$95.69M	$2.96M	N/A	40	Positive News Gap Down
GAMB Gambling.com Group	4.5108 of 5 stars	$2.36 -2.9%	$7.38 +212.5%	-80.6%	$82.84M	$165.45M	N/A	230	News Coverage
AHMA Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C	N/A	$2.69 +39.4%	N/A	N/A	$79.36M	N/A	N/A	43	Positive News Gap Down High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOMA) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

NOMA vs. CURI, PUSA, GAMB, AHMA, and SEAT

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOMA vs. The Competition

Nomadar Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

NOMA vs. CURI, PUSA, GAMB, AHMA, and SEAT

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, NOMA or CURI?

Do analysts recommend NOMA or CURI?

Does the media refer more to NOMA or CURI?

Is NOMA or CURI more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in NOMA or CURI?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Is NOMA or PUSA more profitable?

Do analysts recommend NOMA or PUSA?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NOMA or PUSA?

Does the media favor NOMA or PUSA?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Does the media refer more to GAMB or NOMA?

Do analysts prefer GAMB or NOMA?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in GAMB or NOMA?

Is GAMB or NOMA more profitable?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, GAMB or NOMA?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Ambitions Enterprise Management Co. L.L.C?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AHMA or NOMA?

Does the media refer more to AHMA or NOMA?

Is AHMA or NOMA more profitable?

Do analysts rate AHMA or NOMA?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of NOMA or SEAT?

Does the media favor NOMA or SEAT?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, NOMA or SEAT?

Do analysts rate NOMA or SEAT?

Is NOMA or SEAT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOMA vs. The Competition

Nomadar Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools