Do analysts rate NOMA or CURI?

CuriosityStream has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 83.49%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 CuriosityStream 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.83

Do analysts prefer SEAT or NOMA?

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 1.52%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vivid Seats 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.11 Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, SEAT or NOMA?

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Vivid Seats $532.54M 0.19 -$429.30M -$69.61 N/A Nomadar $920K 58.87 -$2.77M -$0.18 N/A

Is SEAT or NOMA more profitable?

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Vivid Seats -82.25% 68.65% 5.92% Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend PUSA or NOMA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Aureus Greenway 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts prefer GAMB or NOMA?

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.38, indicating a potential upside of 208.58%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Gambling.com Group 1 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.56 Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend NOMA or GAIA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Nomadar 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Gaia 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NOMA or GAIA?

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gaia. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Nomadar $920K 58.87 -$2.77M -$0.18 N/A Gaia $98.95M 0.59 -$4.49M -$0.19 N/A

Is NOMA or GAIA more profitable?

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gaia's net margin of -4.76%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gaia's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Nomadar N/A N/A N/A Gaia -4.76% -4.62% -3.06%

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

$3.64 +0.20 (+5.81%)

Closing price 06/2/2026 03:57 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$3.54 -0.10 (-2.75%)

As of 06/2/2026 04:30 PM Eastern

Compare

NOMA vs. CURI, SEAT, PUSA, GAMB, and GAIA

Should you buy Nomadar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomadar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomadar include CuriosityStream (CURI), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), and Gaia (GAIA). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar	$920K	58.87	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A
CuriosityStream	$71.66M	2.69	-$6.43M	-$0.13	N/A

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CuriosityStream's net margin of -11.26%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A
CuriosityStream	-11.26%	-18.46%	-10.83%

CuriosityStream has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 83.49%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
CuriosityStream	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 4 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for CuriosityStream and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat CuriosityStream's score of 0.96 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nomadar	Very Positive
CuriosityStream	Positive

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Nomadar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats	$532.54M	0.19	-$429.30M	-$69.61	N/A
Nomadar	$920K	58.87	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A

Vivid Seats currently has a consensus price target of $9.27, suggesting a potential downside of 1.52%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vivid Seats	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.11
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are held by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vivid Seats	-82.25%	68.65%	5.92%
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.79 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats	Positive
Nomadar	Very Positive

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Nomadar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway	-167.57%	-17.49%	-16.56%
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 1 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat Aureus Greenway's score of -0.66 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway	Negative
Nomadar	Very Positive

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aureus Greenway. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway	$2.96M	46.70	-$3.68M	-$0.31	N/A
Nomadar	$920K	58.87	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aureus Greenway	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Nomadar beats Aureus Greenway on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Gambling.com Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.38, indicating a potential upside of 208.58%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gambling.com Group	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.56
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group and Gambling.com Group both had 1 articles in the media. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 1.89 equaled Nomadar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group	Very Positive
Nomadar	Very Positive

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group	-27.44%	27.61%	11.20%
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group	$165.25M	0.51	-$32.93M	-$1.29	N/A
Nomadar	$920K	58.87	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Nomadar on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gaia?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Gaia (NASDAQ:GAIA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Nomadar and Nomadar both had 1 articles in the media. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.89 equaled Gaia'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Nomadar	Very Positive
Gaia	Very Positive

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gaia's net margin of -4.76%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Gaia's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Nomadar	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gaia	-4.76%	-4.62%	-3.06%

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Gaia. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gaia, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar	$920K	58.87	-$2.77M	-$0.18	N/A
Gaia	$98.95M	0.59	-$4.49M	-$0.19	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Nomadar	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Gaia	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

40.5% of Gaia shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.0% of Gaia shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Nomadar beats Gaia on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomadar News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

NOMA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Nomadar	Services – Amusement And Recreation Industry	Services Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$51.19M	$103.68M	$1.06B	$12.58B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	4.81%	5.45%
P/E Ratio	-20.22	N/A	8.97	24.51
Price / Sales	58.87	29.87	67.01	128.07
Price / Cash	N/A	345.04	327.75	57.88
Price / Book	7.74	15.68	6.72	6.75
Net Income	-$2.77M	-$106.12M	-$13.24M	$337.19M
7 Day Performance	14.11%	-12.22%	3.59%	1.88%
1 Month Performance	-3.70%	-21.44%	41.06%	6.59%
1 Year Performance	N/A	N/A	51.87%	35.52%

Nomadar Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
NOMA Nomadar	0.8102 of 5 stars	$3.64 +5.8%	N/A	N/A	$51.19M	$920K	N/A	6	Positive News Gap Up High Trading Volume
CURI CuriosityStream	4.685 of 5 stars	$3.27 -1.1%	$6.00 +83.3%	-52.4%	$195.20M	$71.73M	N/A	90
SEAT Vivid Seats	1.5983 of 5 stars	$9.49 +1.4%	$9.27 -2.3%	-68.2%	$93.34M	$570.78M	N/A	430
PUSA Aureus Greenway	0.1992 of 5 stars	$4.78 flat	N/A	+1,059.4%	$90.74M	$2.96M	N/A	40	Gap Down
GAMB Gambling.com Group	4.7168 of 5 stars	$2.39 +0.1%	$7.38 +208.2%	-79.5%	$83.53M	$165.45M	N/A	230

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOMA) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

NOMA vs. CURI, SEAT, PUSA, GAMB, and GAIA

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Gaia?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOMA vs. The Competition

Nomadar Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

NOMA vs. CURI, SEAT, PUSA, GAMB, and GAIA

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Which has better valuation & earnings, NOMA or CURI?

Is NOMA or CURI more profitable?

Do analysts rate NOMA or CURI?

Does the media favor NOMA or CURI?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of NOMA or CURI?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SEAT or NOMA?

Do analysts prefer SEAT or NOMA?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in SEAT or NOMA?

Is SEAT or NOMA more profitable?

Does the media prefer SEAT or NOMA?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Is PUSA or NOMA more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PUSA or NOMA?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PUSA or NOMA?

Do analysts recommend PUSA or NOMA?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Do analysts prefer GAMB or NOMA?

Does the media refer more to GAMB or NOMA?

Is GAMB or NOMA more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of GAMB or NOMA?

Which has better earnings & valuation, GAMB or NOMA?

Summary

How does Nomadar compare to Gaia?

Does the media refer more to NOMA or GAIA?

Is NOMA or GAIA more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, NOMA or GAIA?

Do analysts recommend NOMA or GAIA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NOMA or GAIA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

NOMA vs. The Competition

Nomadar Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools