Go Pro

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

Nomadar logo
$2.35 +0.10 (+4.44%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

NOMA vs. PUSA, GDHG, LTH, MTN, and PLNT

Should you buy Nomadar stock or one of its competitors? Nomadar's main competitors and comparable companies include Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Golden Heaven Group (GDHG), Life Time Group (LTH), Vail Resorts (MTN), and Planet Fitness (PLNT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "leisure facilities" industry.

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 3 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 2 mentions for Nomadar. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Aureus Greenway has a net margin of -154.20% compared to Nomadar's net margin of -259.36%. Aureus Greenway's return on equity of -12.81% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway-154.20% -12.81% -12.30%
Nomadar -259.36%-34.28%-20.84%

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aureus Greenway. Aureus Greenway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway$2.96M31.22-$3.68M-$0.29N/A
Nomadar$920K38.01-$2.77M-$0.25N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Aureus Greenway beats Nomadar on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Golden Heaven Group?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Golden Heaven Group (NASDAQ:GDHG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

0.6% of Golden Heaven Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Golden Heaven Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Nomadar's net margin of -259.36%. Golden Heaven Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomadar-259.36% -34.28% -20.84%
Golden Heaven Group N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Nomadar had 1 more articles in the media than Golden Heaven Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Nomadar and 1 mentions for Golden Heaven Group. Golden Heaven Group's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Golden Heaven Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Golden Heaven Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Golden Heaven Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$920K38.01-$2.77M-$0.25N/A
Golden Heaven Group$15.29M0.22-$8.59MN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Golden Heaven Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Golden Heaven Group beats Nomadar on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Life Time Group?

Life Time Group (NYSE:LTH) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Life Time Group has higher revenue and earnings than Nomadar. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Life Time Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Life Time Group$3.00B3.37$373.67M$1.8424.54
Nomadar$920K38.01-$2.77M-$0.25N/A

Life Time Group currently has a consensus price target of $54.85, suggesting a potential upside of 21.48%. Given Life Time Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Life Time Group is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Life Time Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.13
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Life Time Group and Life Time Group both had 2 articles in the media. Life Time Group's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Life Time Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Life Time Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

79.4% of Life Time Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of Life Time Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Life Time Group has a net margin of 13.07% compared to Nomadar's net margin of -259.36%. Life Time Group's return on equity of 10.56% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Life Time Group13.07% 10.56% 4.13%
Nomadar -259.36%-34.28%-20.84%

Summary

Life Time Group beats Nomadar on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Vail Resorts?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Vail Resorts (NYSE:MTN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Vail Resorts had 14 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Vail Resorts and 2 mentions for Nomadar. Vail Resorts' average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Vail Resorts is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Vail Resorts
10 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Vail Resorts has higher revenue and earnings than Nomadar. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vail Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$920K38.01-$2.77M-$0.25N/A
Vail Resorts$2.96B1.84$280M$4.4034.76

Vail Resorts has a consensus price target of $149.83, suggesting a potential downside of 2.02%. Given Vail Resorts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vail Resorts is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Vail Resorts
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Vail Resorts has a net margin of 5.38% compared to Nomadar's net margin of -259.36%. Vail Resorts' return on equity of 21.88% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Nomadar-259.36% -34.28% -20.84%
Vail Resorts 5.38%21.88%2.67%

94.9% of Vail Resorts shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Vail Resorts shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vail Resorts beats Nomadar on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Planet Fitness?

Planet Fitness (NYSE:PLNT) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Planet Fitness currently has a consensus price target of $70.24, indicating a potential upside of 29.59%. Given Planet Fitness' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Planet Fitness is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Planet Fitness
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Planet Fitness has a net margin of 16.88% compared to Nomadar's net margin of -259.36%. Nomadar's return on equity of -34.28% beat Planet Fitness' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Planet Fitness16.88% -59.46% 8.60%
Nomadar -259.36%-34.28%-20.84%

In the previous week, Planet Fitness had 30 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Planet Fitness and 2 mentions for Nomadar. Planet Fitness' average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Planet Fitness is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Planet Fitness
2 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
26 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Planet Fitness has higher revenue and earnings than Nomadar. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Planet Fitness, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Planet Fitness$1.32B3.09$219.10M$2.9518.37
Nomadar$920K38.01-$2.77M-$0.25N/A

95.5% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Planet Fitness shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Planet Fitness beats Nomadar on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomadar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOMA vs. The Competition

MetricNomadarHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$34.97M$8.29B$13.21B$12.84B
Dividend YieldN/A3.72%56.57%11.08%
P/E RatioN/A23.2246.9624.24
Price / Sales38.01317.5888.5899.48
Price / CashN/A22.3129.1353.99
Price / Book5.004.893.936.20
Net Income-$2.77M$260.60M$445.72M$348.59M
7 Day Performance-12.64%0.57%-0.26%0.08%
1 Month Performance-20.58%4.15%2.74%3.88%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-3.43%-1.57%16.98%

Nomadar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOMA
Nomadar
0.3541 of 5 stars
$2.35
+4.4%
N/AN/A$34.97M$920KN/A6
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.9241 of 5 stars
$3.51
-4.1%
N/A-4.7%$94.56M$2.96MN/A40
GDHG
Golden Heaven Group
0.6706 of 5 stars
$1.31
+3.1%
N/A-77.4%$3.31M$15.29MN/A610
LTH
Life Time Group
4.8653 of 5 stars
$45.42
+0.2%
$54.85
+20.8%
+55.3%$10.15B$3.18B24.6844,000
MTN
Vail Resorts
3.7741 of 5 stars
$149.87
+2.2%
$149.83
0.0%
-6.0%$5.34B$2.83B34.066,800

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NOMA) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners