Go Pro

Trading of Nomadar was halted at 09:31 AM EST due to "LULD Pause".

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

Nomadar logo
$2.97 -0.04 (-1.36%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NOMA vs. CURI, SEAT, GAMB, PUSA, and CNVS

Should you buy Nomadar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomadar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomadar include CuriosityStream (CURI), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), and Cineverse (CNVS).

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CuriosityStream's net margin of -11.26%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CuriosityStream-11.26% -18.46% -10.83%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

CuriosityStream presently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 137.62%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 1 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CuriosityStream and 1 mentions for Nomadar. CuriosityStream's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that CuriosityStream is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CuriosityStream
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CuriosityStream$71.73M2.08-$6.43M-$0.13N/A
Nomadar$920K48.44-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are held by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Nomadar on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and dividends.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-82.25% 68.65% 5.92%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 5 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Vivid Seats' average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Vivid Seats is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.15-$429.30M-$69.61N/A
Nomadar$920K48.44-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $9.43, indicating a potential upside of 18.51%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Nomadar on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.9% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gambling.com Group presently has a consensus price target of $7.13, suggesting a potential upside of 278.99%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Nomadar had 1 more articles in the media than Gambling.com Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Nomadar and 0 mentions for Gambling.com Group. Gambling.com Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Nomadar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Neutral
Nomadar Neutral

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.25M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Nomadar$920K48.44-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Nomadar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 4 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Aureus Greenway's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Aureus Greenway is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway-167.57% -17.49% -16.56%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aureus Greenway. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aureus Greenway, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway$2.96M20.14-$3.68M-$0.31N/A
Nomadar$920K48.44-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

Summary

Nomadar beats Aureus Greenway on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Cineverse?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Nomadar and Nomadar both had 1 articles in the media. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Nomadar's score of 0.00 indicating that Cineverse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Nomadar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Cineverse
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Cineverse has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 262.17%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -13.44%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NomadarN/A N/A N/A
Cineverse -13.44%-45.60%-19.83%

8.2% of Cineverse shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.3% of Cineverse shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Cineverse. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$920K48.44-$2.77M-$0.18N/A
Cineverse$65.73M0.89-$8.84M-$0.52N/A

Summary

Cineverse beats Nomadar on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomadar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOMA vs. The Competition

MetricNomadarHotels, Restaurants & Leisure IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$44.57M$8.15B$13.30B$12.70B
Dividend YieldN/A3.85%53.32%10.03%
P/E Ratio-16.6422.4447.6725.14
Price / Sales48.44340.8290.7179.78
Price / CashN/A21.9418.9434.82
Price / Book6.374.974.556.20
Net Income-$2.77M$261.43M$444.07M$347.60M
7 Day Performance-4.01%0.70%1.26%0.81%
1 Month Performance-27.83%-1.38%0.79%-3.65%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-3.46%4.00%20.30%

Nomadar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOMA
Nomadar
0.4321 of 5 stars
$2.88
-4.5%
N/AN/A$43.82M$920KN/A6
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.3052 of 5 stars
$2.45
+0.4%
$6.00
+144.9%
-48.1%$144.49M$71.73MN/A90
SEAT
Vivid Seats
1.6046 of 5 stars
$8.07
+4.5%
$9.43
+16.9%
-73.4%$86.88M$532.54MN/A430
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
3.7825 of 5 stars
$1.88
+2.2%
$7.13
+279.0%
-81.5%$65.98M$165.25MN/A230
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.2451 of 5 stars
$2.86
-12.8%
N/A+2.4%$61.78M$2.96MN/A40

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:NOMA) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners