Go Pro
→ Gates. Google. The Pentagon. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free NOMA Stock Alerts

Nomadar (NOMA) Competitors

Nomadar logo
$3.25 +0.14 (+4.53%)
Closing price 07/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$3.10 -0.16 (-4.80%)
As of 07/13/2026 04:21 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

NOMA vs. CURI, PUSA, SEAT, GAMB, and CNVS

Should you buy Nomadar stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Nomadar with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Nomadar include CuriosityStream (CURI), Aureus Greenway (PUSA), Vivid Seats (SEAT), Gambling.com Group (GAMB), and Cineverse (CNVS). These companies are all part of the "entertainment" industry.

How does Nomadar compare to CuriosityStream?

Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) and CuriosityStream (NASDAQ:CURI) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Nomadar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CuriosityStream. CuriosityStream is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomadar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomadar$1.14M42.48-$2.77M-$0.18N/A
CuriosityStream$71.66M2.11-$6.43M-$0.13N/A

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to CuriosityStream's net margin of -11.26%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat CuriosityStream's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NomadarN/A N/A N/A
CuriosityStream -11.26%-18.46%-10.83%

6.8% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by institutional investors. 31.1% of CuriosityStream shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CuriosityStream had 3 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for CuriosityStream and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat CuriosityStream's score of 0.53 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Nomadar Very Positive
CuriosityStream Positive

CuriosityStream has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 133.46%. Given CuriosityStream's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CuriosityStream is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
CuriosityStream
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Summary

CuriosityStream beats Nomadar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Aureus Greenway?

Aureus Greenway (NASDAQ:PUSA) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aureus Greenway. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aureus Greenway, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aureus Greenway$3.11M25.32-$3.68M-$0.31N/A
Nomadar$1.14M42.48-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aureus Greenway's net margin of -167.57%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Aureus Greenway's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aureus Greenway-167.57% -17.49% -16.56%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Aureus Greenway had 1 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Aureus Greenway and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Aureus Greenway's score of 0.93 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aureus Greenway Positive
Nomadar Very Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aureus Greenway
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Nomadar beats Aureus Greenway on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Vivid Seats?

Vivid Seats (NASDAQ:SEAT) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Vivid Seats had 2 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Vivid Seats and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Vivid Seats' score of 0.72 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vivid Seats Positive
Nomadar Very Positive

Vivid Seats presently has a consensus target price of $9.43, suggesting a potential upside of 17.62%. Given Vivid Seats' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Vivid Seats is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vivid Seats
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vivid Seats' net margin of -82.25%. Vivid Seats' return on equity of 68.65% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vivid Seats-82.25% 68.65% 5.92%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vivid Seats. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vivid Seats, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vivid Seats$570.78M0.15-$429.30M-$69.61N/A
Nomadar$1.14M42.48-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

39.9% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.5% of Vivid Seats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Vivid Seats beats Nomadar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Gambling.com Group?

Gambling.com Group (NASDAQ:GAMB) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Gambling.com Group's net margin of -27.44%. Gambling.com Group's return on equity of 27.61% beat Nomadar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gambling.com Group-27.44% 27.61% 11.20%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

72.3% of Gambling.com Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Gambling.com Group. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gambling.com Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gambling.com Group$165.45M0.40-$32.93M-$1.29N/A
Nomadar$1.14M42.48-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

In the previous week, Gambling.com Group had 3 more articles in the media than Nomadar. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gambling.com Group and 1 mentions for Nomadar. Nomadar's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Gambling.com Group's score of 0.29 indicating that Nomadar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gambling.com Group Neutral
Nomadar Very Positive

Gambling.com Group presently has a consensus target price of $7.38, indicating a potential upside of 290.21%. Given Gambling.com Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gambling.com Group is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gambling.com Group
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Gambling.com Group beats Nomadar on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Nomadar compare to Cineverse?

Cineverse (NASDAQ:CNVS) and Nomadar (NASDAQ:NOMA) are both small-cap entertainment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

8.2% of Cineverse shares are held by institutional investors. 13.3% of Cineverse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nomadar has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Cineverse's net margin of -13.44%. Nomadar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Cineverse's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cineverse-13.44% -45.60% -19.83%
Nomadar N/A N/A N/A

Cineverse presently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 244.83%. Given Cineverse's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cineverse is more favorable than Nomadar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cineverse
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Nomadar
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Nomadar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Cineverse. Nomadar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cineverse, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cineverse$65.73M0.93-$8.84M-$0.52N/A
Nomadar$1.14M42.48-$2.77M-$0.18N/A

In the previous week, Cineverse and Cineverse both had 1 articles in the media. Cineverse's average media sentiment score of 1.87 equaled Nomadar'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cineverse Very Positive
Nomadar Very Positive

Summary

Cineverse beats Nomadar on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Nomadar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NOMA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NOMA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NOMA vs. The Competition

Export
MetricNomadarServices – Amusement And Recreation IndustryServices SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$46.21M$103.23M$20.79B$12.61B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A5.11%8.00%
P/E Ratio-18.06N/A18.7124.26
Price / Sales42.4821.0438.48117.88
Price / CashN/A187.6379.2049.36
Price / Book6.9253.7611.286.29
Net Income-$2.77M-$84.65M-$15.57M$330.66M
7 Day Performance-2.96%-1.99%-0.97%-1.32%
1 Month Performance-7.41%12.80%1.06%-0.64%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A-15.86%19.08%

Nomadar Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NOMA
Nomadar
0.4586 of 5 stars		$3.25
+4.5%		N/AN/A$46.21M$1.14MN/A6
CURI
CuriosityStream
4.6663 of 5 stars		$2.74
-2.8%		$6.00
+119.0%		-42.8%$161.58M$71.66MN/A90
PUSA
Aureus Greenway
0.2188 of 5 stars		$3.66
-7.1%		N/A+475.9%$79.06M$2.96MN/A40
SEAT
Vivid Seats
1.6184 of 5 stars		$6.75
-0.3%		$9.43
+39.8%		-77.8%$72.70M$570.78MN/A430
GAMB
Gambling.com Group
4.7673 of 5 stars		$1.94
-3.0%		$7.38
+280.2%		-83.6%$68.09M$165.45MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:NOMA) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
They told you not to miss this one
The largest companies in the SP 500 are now more overvalued relative to fundamentals than they were at the abs...
Thor Metals | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
When I found Rolls-Royce under $2, most people thought I was crazy
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce when it traded under $2. The stock climbed more than 1,100% ...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
BofA: Digital Dollar Coming 2025-2030
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel