Profusa (PFSA) Competitors

Profusa logo
$0.11 0.00 (-3.05%)
Closing price 06/26/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.11 0.00 (-1.22%)
As of 06/26/2026 07:50 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PFSA vs. AMIX, BBLG, IVF, GCTK, and PTHL

Should you buy Profusa stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Profusa with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Profusa include Autonomix Medical (AMIX), Bone Biologics (BBLG), INVO Fertility (IVF), GlucoTrack (GCTK), and Pheton (PTHL). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Profusa compare to Autonomix Medical?

Autonomix Medical (NASDAQ:AMIX) and Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat Autonomix Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Autonomix MedicalN/A -239.36% -192.46%
Profusa N/A N/A -1,348.07%

Autonomix Medical has a beta of -1.43, indicating that its stock price is 243% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profusa has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Autonomix Medical presently has a consensus target price of $42.00, indicating a potential upside of 634.27%. Given Autonomix Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Autonomix Medical is more favorable than Profusa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Autonomix Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

10.8% of Autonomix Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.2% of Autonomix Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Profusa shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Autonomix Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Autonomix MedicalN/AN/A-$16.72M-$74.58N/A
ProfusaN/AN/A-$35.82M-$169.72N/A

In the previous week, Autonomix Medical had 2 more articles in the media than Profusa. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Autonomix Medical and 3 mentions for Profusa. Profusa's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Autonomix Medical's score of 0.63 indicating that Profusa is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Autonomix Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Profusa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Autonomix Medical beats Profusa on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to Bone Biologics?

Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) and Bone Biologics (NASDAQ:BBLG) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Profusa had 2 more articles in the media than Bone Biologics. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Profusa and 1 mentions for Bone Biologics. Bone Biologics' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Profusa's score of 0.96 indicating that Bone Biologics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Profusa Positive
Bone Biologics Very Positive

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bone Biologics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Profusa has a beta of 0.35, indicating that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bone Biologics has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat Bone Biologics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProfusaN/A N/A -1,348.07%
Bone Biologics N/A -50.47%-47.40%

9.8% of Profusa shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.3% of Bone Biologics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Profusa shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Bone Biologics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bone Biologics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProfusaN/AN/A-$35.82M-$169.72N/A
Bone BiologicsN/AN/A-$3.11M-$2.27N/A

Summary

Bone Biologics beats Profusa on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to INVO Fertility?

INVO Fertility (NASDAQ:IVF) and Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

INVO Fertility has a beta of 2.33, suggesting that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profusa has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

INVO Fertility has higher revenue and earnings than Profusa. INVO Fertility is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
INVO Fertility$6.84M0.64-$25.13M-$1.85 thousandN/A
ProfusaN/AN/A-$35.82M-$169.72N/A

In the previous week, INVO Fertility had 2 more articles in the media than Profusa. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for INVO Fertility and 3 mentions for Profusa. INVO Fertility's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Profusa's score of 0.96 indicating that INVO Fertility is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
INVO Fertility
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Profusa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

12.0% of INVO Fertility shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of INVO Fertility shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Profusa shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profusa has a net margin of 0.00% compared to INVO Fertility's net margin of -183.75%. Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat INVO Fertility's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
INVO Fertility-183.75% -420.62% -45.21%
Profusa N/A N/A -1,348.07%

INVO Fertility currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 716.33%. Given INVO Fertility's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe INVO Fertility is more favorable than Profusa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
INVO Fertility
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

INVO Fertility beats Profusa on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to GlucoTrack?

Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) and GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Profusa has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat GlucoTrack's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProfusaN/A N/A -1,348.07%
GlucoTrack N/A -581.98%-220.10%

9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Profusa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

GlucoTrack is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProfusaN/AN/A-$35.82M-$169.72N/A
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A

In the previous week, Profusa had 2 more articles in the media than GlucoTrack. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Profusa and 1 mentions for GlucoTrack. GlucoTrack's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Profusa's score of 0.96 indicating that GlucoTrack is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Profusa Positive
GlucoTrack Very Positive

Summary

GlucoTrack beats Profusa on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to Pheton?

Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) and Pheton (NASDAQ:PTHL) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Pheton
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Profusa has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pheton has a beta of 5.4, suggesting that its share price is 440% more volatile than the broader market.

9.8% of Profusa shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Profusa shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Profusa had 3 more articles in the media than Pheton. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Profusa and 0 mentions for Pheton. Profusa's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Pheton's score of 0.00 indicating that Profusa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Profusa Positive
Pheton Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProfusaN/A N/A -1,348.07%
Pheton N/A N/A N/A

Pheton has higher revenue and earnings than Profusa.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ProfusaN/AN/A-$35.82M-$169.72N/A
Pheton$305.22K6.69-$660KN/AN/A

Summary

Profusa and Pheton tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Profusa News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFSA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFSA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFSA vs. The Competition

MetricProfusaSurgical, Medical, And Dental Instruments And Supplies IndustryManufacturing SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$550K$2.85B$4.34B$12.22B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A12.97%6.12%
P/E Ratio0.0014.5322.0124.17
Price / SalesN/A306.62148.39100.03
Price / CashN/A8.3138.2754.37
Price / Book-0.015.9713.626.35
Net Income-$35.82M$7.39M$115.37M$337.63M
7 Day Performance-36.44%-3.11%0.82%0.06%
1 Month Performance-69.12%-7.48%-2.50%-0.15%
1 Year PerformanceN/A2.73%10.86%27.55%

Profusa Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFSA
Profusa
0.825 of 5 stars
$0.11
-3.1%
N/AN/A$550KN/AN/A2
AMIX
Autonomix Medical
3.1459 of 5 stars
$7.21
-4.4%
$42.00
+482.5%
-78.2%$2.48MN/AN/A1
BBLG
Bone Biologics
1.1779 of 5 stars
$1.35
-2.2%
N/A-66.3%$2.48MN/AN/A2
IVF
INVO Fertility
2.3528 of 5 stars
$1.32
-3.6%
$20.00
+1,415.2%
-98.0%$2.45M$6.84MN/A10
GCTK
GlucoTrack
0.5821 of 5 stars
$0.35
-4.0%
N/A-93.7%$2.28MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PFSA) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners