Go Pro

Profusa (PFSA) Competitors

Profusa logo
$2.93 -1.31 (-30.90%)
As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

PFSA vs. HSCS, MBAI, ICCM, NVNO, and NXL

Should you buy Profusa stock or one of its competitors? Profusa's main competitors and comparable companies include HeartSciences (HSCS), Check-Cap (MBAI), IceCure Medical (ICCM), enVVeno Medical (NVNO), and Nexalin Technology (NXL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "healthcare equipment" industry.

How does Profusa compare to HeartSciences?

Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) and HeartSciences (NASDAQ:HSCS) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Profusa has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HeartSciences has a beta of 1.79, meaning that its share price is 79% more volatile than the broader market.

HeartSciences has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 164.03%. Given HeartSciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe HeartSciences is more favorable than Profusa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
HeartSciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

HeartSciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Profusa. HeartSciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Profusa$100K17.87-$35.82M-$5.62 thousandN/A
HeartSciencesN/AN/A-$9.14M-$3.94N/A

In the previous week, Profusa had 2 more articles in the media than HeartSciences. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Profusa and 2 mentions for HeartSciences. HeartSciences' average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Profusa's score of 0.38 indicating that HeartSciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Profusa Neutral
HeartSciences Positive

Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat HeartSciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProfusaN/A N/A -1,731.09%
HeartSciences N/A -358.60%-144.82%

9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.2% of HeartSciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Profusa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of HeartSciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

HeartSciences beats Profusa on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to Check-Cap?

Check-Cap (NASDAQ:MBAI) and Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Check-Cap
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Check-Cap had 1 more articles in the media than Profusa. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Check-Cap and 4 mentions for Profusa. Check-Cap's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Profusa's score of 0.38 indicating that Check-Cap is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Check-Cap
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Profusa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Check-Cap has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Profusa. Check-Cap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Check-CapN/AN/A$4.14M-$14.07N/A
Profusa$100K17.87-$35.82M-$5.62 thousandN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Check-CapN/A N/A N/A
Profusa N/A N/A -1,731.09%

1.1% of Check-Cap shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Check-Cap shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Profusa shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Check-Cap has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profusa has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Check-Cap beats Profusa on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to IceCure Medical?

IceCure Medical (NASDAQ:ICCM) and Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

IceCure Medical has higher revenue and earnings than Profusa. IceCure Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IceCure Medical$3.38M2.33-$15.06M-$8.52N/A
Profusa$100K17.87-$35.82M-$5.62 thousandN/A

IceCure Medical has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profusa has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

IceCure Medical presently has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2,182.61%. Given IceCure Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe IceCure Medical is more favorable than Profusa.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IceCure Medical
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Profusa had 2 more articles in the media than IceCure Medical. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Profusa and 2 mentions for IceCure Medical. Profusa's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat IceCure Medical's score of 0.28 indicating that Profusa is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IceCure Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profusa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.6% of IceCure Medical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Profusa shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of IceCure Medical shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Profusa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profusa has a net margin of 0.00% compared to IceCure Medical's net margin of -427.67%. Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat IceCure Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IceCure Medical-427.67% -174.26% -112.58%
Profusa N/A N/A -1,731.09%

Summary

IceCure Medical and Profusa tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to enVVeno Medical?

enVVeno Medical (NASDAQ:NVNO) and Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Profusa had 2 more articles in the media than enVVeno Medical. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Profusa and 2 mentions for enVVeno Medical. enVVeno Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Profusa's score of 0.38 indicating that enVVeno Medical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
enVVeno Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Profusa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
enVVeno Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

enVVeno Medical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Profusa. enVVeno Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
enVVeno MedicalN/AN/A-$19.47M-$19.33N/A
Profusa$100K17.87-$35.82M-$5.62 thousandN/A

34.7% of enVVeno Medical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.8% of Profusa shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of enVVeno Medical shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Profusa shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat enVVeno Medical's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
enVVeno MedicalN/A -62.28% -56.83%
Profusa N/A N/A -1,731.09%

enVVeno Medical has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profusa has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

enVVeno Medical beats Profusa on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Profusa compare to Nexalin Technology?

Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) and Nexalin Technology (NASDAQ:NXL) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Nexalin Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Profusa. Nexalin Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Profusa$100K17.87-$35.82M-$5.62 thousandN/A
Nexalin Technology$300K18.72-$8.22M-$0.48N/A

9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Nexalin Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Profusa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of Nexalin Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profusa has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Nexalin Technology's net margin of -4,141.94%. Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat Nexalin Technology's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProfusaN/A N/A -1,731.09%
Nexalin Technology -4,141.94%-278.24%-218.42%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Nexalin Technology
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Profusa has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nexalin Technology has a beta of 4, meaning that its stock price is 300% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Nexalin Technology had 2 more articles in the media than Profusa. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Nexalin Technology and 4 mentions for Profusa. Profusa's average media sentiment score of 0.38 beat Nexalin Technology's score of 0.31 indicating that Profusa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Profusa
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nexalin Technology
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Nexalin Technology beats Profusa on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Profusa News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFSA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PFSA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PFSA vs. The Competition

MetricProfusaHealthcare Equipment & Supplies IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.77M$5.84B$7.20B$12.90B
Dividend YieldN/A1.75%2.54%11.28%
P/E Ratio0.0025.92273.1625.45
Price / Sales17.8767.90592.6473.57
Price / CashN/A33.0376.7453.00
Price / Book-0.076.1812.986.14
Net Income-$35.82M$149.01M$3.48B$348.86M
7 Day Performance-46.34%-0.24%0.13%-0.80%
1 Month Performance-30.90%6.18%7.08%4.13%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.30%24.67%15.17%

Profusa Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PFSA
Profusa
0.7956 of 5 stars
$2.93
-30.9%
N/AN/A$1.77M$100KN/A2
HSCS
HeartSciences
2.7879 of 5 stars
$2.99
-0.3%
$8.00
+167.6%
-11.1%$11.70MN/AN/A10
MBAI
Check-Cap
0.7276 of 5 stars
$6.78
-16.1%
N/AN/A$11.11MN/AN/A80
ICCM
IceCure Medical
2.3672 of 5 stars
$2.29
+0.4%
$52.50
+2,192.6%
-93.2%$7.81M$3.38MN/A60
NVNO
enVVeno Medical
1.5225 of 5 stars
$11.47
+6.2%
N/A-61.6%$7.50MN/AN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PFSA) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners