Free Trial

GlucoTrack (GCTK) Competitors

GlucoTrack logo
$0.67 +0.00 (+0.67%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.67 +0.00 (+0.54%)
As of 07:45 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GCTK vs. ICU, SURG, MBAI, ALUR, and LFWD

Should you buy GlucoTrack stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares GlucoTrack with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with GlucoTrack include SeaStar Medical (ICU), SurgePays (SURG), Check-Cap (MBAI), Allurion Technologies (ALUR), and Lifeward (LFWD). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does GlucoTrack compare to SeaStar Medical?

GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) and SeaStar Medical (NASDAQ:ICU) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

SeaStar Medical has higher revenue and earnings than GlucoTrack. SeaStar Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlucoTrack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A
SeaStar Medical$1.23M10.67-$12.15M-$4.80N/A

SeaStar Medical has a consensus target price of $8.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.90%. Given SeaStar Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SeaStar Medical is more favorable than GlucoTrack.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
SeaStar Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, GlucoTrack had 1 more articles in the media than SeaStar Medical. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GlucoTrack and 1 mentions for SeaStar Medical. SeaStar Medical's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat GlucoTrack's score of 0.96 indicating that SeaStar Medical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GlucoTrack Positive
SeaStar Medical Very Positive

GlucoTrack has a net margin of 0.00% compared to SeaStar Medical's net margin of -828.62%. SeaStar Medical's return on equity of -146.29% beat GlucoTrack's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlucoTrackN/A -581.98% -220.10%
SeaStar Medical -828.62%-146.29%-96.48%

10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.7% of SeaStar Medical shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of SeaStar Medical shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SeaStar Medical has a beta of -1.05, indicating that its share price is 205% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SeaStar Medical beats GlucoTrack on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlucoTrack compare to SurgePays?

SurgePays (NASDAQ:SURG) and GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

6.9% of SurgePays shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are held by institutional investors. 29.1% of SurgePays shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SurgePays currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 851.29%. Given SurgePays' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe SurgePays is more favorable than GlucoTrack.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
SurgePays
2 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, SurgePays and SurgePays both had 2 articles in the media. GlucoTrack's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat SurgePays' score of 0.77 indicating that GlucoTrack is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
SurgePays
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlucoTrack
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

GlucoTrack has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SurgePays. SurgePays is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlucoTrack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SurgePays$56.96M0.23-$36.07M-$1.94N/A
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A

SurgePays has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

GlucoTrack has a net margin of 0.00% compared to SurgePays' net margin of -64.91%. GlucoTrack's return on equity of -581.98% beat SurgePays' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SurgePays-64.91% -967.32% -310.16%
GlucoTrack N/A -581.98%-220.10%

Summary

GlucoTrack beats SurgePays on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlucoTrack compare to Check-Cap?

Check-Cap (NASDAQ:MBAI) and GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk and earnings.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Check-Cap
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Check-Cap and Check-Cap both had 2 articles in the media. GlucoTrack's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Check-Cap's score of 0.94 indicating that GlucoTrack is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Check-Cap
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlucoTrack
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Check-Cap's return on equity of 0.00% beat GlucoTrack's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Check-CapN/A N/A N/A
GlucoTrack N/A -581.98%-220.10%

Check-Cap is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlucoTrack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Check-CapN/AN/A$4.14M-$2.77N/A
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A

Check-Cap has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of Check-Cap shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Check-Cap shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

GlucoTrack beats Check-Cap on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlucoTrack compare to Allurion Technologies?

Allurion Technologies (NYSE:ALUR) and GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, GlucoTrack had 1 more articles in the media than Allurion Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for GlucoTrack and 1 mentions for Allurion Technologies. Allurion Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.42 beat GlucoTrack's score of 0.96 indicating that Allurion Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Allurion Technologies
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
GlucoTrack
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

21.4% of Allurion Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Allurion Technologies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Allurion Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $3.00, suggesting a potential upside of 250.88%. Given Allurion Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Allurion Technologies is more favorable than GlucoTrack.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Allurion Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

GlucoTrack has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Allurion Technologies' net margin of -199.96%. Allurion Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat GlucoTrack's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Allurion Technologies-199.96% N/A -77.13%
GlucoTrack N/A -581.98%-220.10%

Allurion Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than GlucoTrack. Allurion Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlucoTrack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Allurion Technologies$17.21M0.74-$7.20M-$1.75N/A
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A

Allurion Technologies has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Allurion Technologies beats GlucoTrack on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does GlucoTrack compare to Lifeward?

GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) and Lifeward (NASDAQ:LFWD) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

Lifeward has a consensus price target of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 37.36%. Given Lifeward's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lifeward is more favorable than GlucoTrack.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Lifeward
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Lifeward had 4 more articles in the media than GlucoTrack. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lifeward and 2 mentions for GlucoTrack. Lifeward's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat GlucoTrack's score of 0.96 indicating that Lifeward is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
GlucoTrack Positive
Lifeward Positive

GlucoTrack has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lifeward. Lifeward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GlucoTrack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A
Lifeward$22.03M0.93-$19.91M-$19.66N/A

GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lifeward has a beta of 0.36, suggesting that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

GlucoTrack has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lifeward's net margin of -123.66%. Lifeward's return on equity of -243.14% beat GlucoTrack's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GlucoTrackN/A -581.98% -220.10%
Lifeward -123.66%-243.14%-97.39%

10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of Lifeward shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Lifeward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lifeward beats GlucoTrack on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get GlucoTrack News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GCTK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GCTK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GCTK vs. The Competition

MetricGlucoTrackMED PRODUCTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.14M$8.16B$6.47B$12.54B
Dividend YieldN/A2.61%2.69%5.22%
P/E Ratio-0.0412.4318.8922.53
Price / SalesN/A7.06520.79112.26
Price / CashN/A17.1041.3457.13
Price / Book0.243.539.846.72
Net Income-$19.39M$224.05M$3.57B$337.19M
7 Day Performance4.46%-1.09%-1.16%0.48%
1 Month Performance-16.83%0.34%3.85%5.07%
1 Year Performance-92.24%-0.29%27.40%34.25%

GlucoTrack Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GCTK
GlucoTrack
1.0728 of 5 stars
$0.67
+0.7%
N/A-91.3%$4.14MN/AN/A5
ICU
SeaStar Medical
3.0199 of 5 stars
$3.59
+0.3%
$8.00
+122.8%
-70.1%$14.31M$1.23MN/A2
SURG
SurgePays
3.0757 of 5 stars
$0.55
+9.0%
$5.00
+807.4%
-81.3%$12.70M$56.96MN/A40
MBAI
Check-Cap
0.2751 of 5 stars
$1.70
-1.2%
N/AN/A$12.54MN/AN/A80
ALUR
Allurion Technologies
1.9539 of 5 stars
$0.80
flat
$3.00
+275.0%
-73.5%$12.00M$17.21MN/A501

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GCTK) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners