Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Public Policy (PPHC) Competitors

Public Policy logo
$11.55 -0.26 (-2.20%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.58 +0.02 (+0.22%)
As of 06:47 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PPHC vs. RDWR, PRSU, AHG, NEO, and UPBD

Should you buy Public Policy stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Public Policy with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Public Policy include Radware (RDWR), Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality (PRSU), Akso Health Group (AHG), NeoGenomics (NEO), and Upbound Group (UPBD). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Public Policy compare to Radware?

Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) and Radware (NASDAQ:RDWR) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

Radware has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy$197.35M1.72N/AN/AN/A
Radware$301.85M4.12$20.26M$0.4368.67

Public Policy currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 47.19%. Radware has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.59%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Radware.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Radware
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

In the previous week, Radware had 1 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Radware and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Radware's average media sentiment score of 0.31 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that Radware is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
Radware Neutral

73.1% of Radware shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Radware shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Radware has a net margin of 6.28% compared to Public Policy's net margin of 0.00%. Radware's return on equity of 7.69% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public PolicyN/A N/A N/A
Radware 6.28%7.69%4.44%

Summary

Radware beats Public Policy on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality?

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality (NYSE:PRSU) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality had 3 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality Positive
Public Policy Neutral

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality presently has a consensus price target of $47.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.87%. Public Policy has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 47.19%. Given Public Policy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality has a net margin of 6.19% compared to Public Policy's net margin of 0.00%. Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality's return on equity of 5.30% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality6.19% 5.30% 3.54%
Public Policy N/A N/A N/A

89.9% of Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality$466.48M2.60$22.67M$0.9944.84
Public Policy$197.35M1.72N/AN/AN/A

Summary

Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality beats Public Policy on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Akso Health Group?

Akso Health Group (NASDAQ:AHG) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Akso Health Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Public Policy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Akso Health Group Neutral
Public Policy Neutral

Public Policy has higher revenue and earnings than Akso Health Group.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Akso Health Group$14.84M56.89-$134.98MN/AN/A
Public Policy$197.35M1.72N/AN/AN/A

1.2% of Akso Health Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Akso Health GroupN/A N/A N/A
Public Policy N/A N/A N/A

Public Policy has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 47.19%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Akso Health Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Akso Health Group
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Summary

Public Policy beats Akso Health Group on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to NeoGenomics?

NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Public Policy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than NeoGenomics.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NeoGenomics$745.97M1.61-$108.03M-$0.77N/A
Public Policy$197.35M1.72N/AN/AN/A

NeoGenomics presently has a consensus price target of $13.86, indicating a potential upside of 50.13%. Public Policy has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.19%. Given NeoGenomics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NeoGenomics is more favorable than Public Policy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NeoGenomics
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 3 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for NeoGenomics and 0 mentions for Public Policy. NeoGenomics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Public Policy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
NeoGenomics Neutral
Public Policy Neutral

Public Policy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Public Policy's return on equity of 0.00% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NeoGenomics-13.30% -2.80% -1.72%
Public Policy N/A N/A N/A

98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Public Policy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NeoGenomics beats Public Policy on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Upbound Group?

Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) and Upbound Group (NASDAQ:UPBD) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Public Policy currently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.19%. Upbound Group has a consensus price target of $31.33, indicating a potential upside of 75.64%. Given Upbound Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Upbound Group is more favorable than Public Policy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Upbound Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Upbound Group has a net margin of 1.78% compared to Public Policy's net margin of 0.00%. Upbound Group's return on equity of 35.56% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public PolicyN/A N/A N/A
Upbound Group 1.78%35.56%7.79%

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Upbound Group pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Upbound Group pays out 109.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Upbound Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Upbound Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Upbound Group has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy$197.35M1.72N/AN/AN/A
Upbound Group$4.74B0.22$73.24M$1.4312.48

90.3% of Upbound Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Upbound Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Upbound Group had 2 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Upbound Group and 0 mentions for Public Policy. Upbound Group's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Public Policy's score of 0.00 indicating that Upbound Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Public Policy Neutral
Upbound Group Positive

Summary

Upbound Group beats Public Policy on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Public Policy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PPHC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PPHC vs. The Competition

MetricPublic PolicyServices – Management, Public Relations, Consulting IndustryServices SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$338.99M$120.31M$978.19M$12.30B
Dividend Yield4.30%4.30%5.19%5.33%
P/E RatioN/AN/A9.2525.67
Price / Sales1.721.1337.4998.72
Price / CashN/AN/A397.4656.16
Price / BookN/AN/A4.397.01
Net IncomeN/A$820K-$6.56M$335.38M
7 Day Performance1.32%-18.89%-2.03%2.66%
1 Month Performance-15.45%-24.06%-6.74%1.39%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A44.89%35.43%

Public Policy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PPHC
Public Policy
4.0801 of 5 stars
$11.55
-2.2%
$17.00
+47.2%
N/A$338.99M$197.35MN/A450
RDWR
Radware
1.5108 of 5 stars
$27.96
+2.2%
$30.00
+7.3%
+22.7%$1.15B$301.85M65.021,296
PRSU
Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality
2.5241 of 5 stars
$41.73
-1.5%
$34.67
-16.9%
+62.8%$1.14B$466.48M42.152,100
AHG
Akso Health Group
0.1399 of 5 stars
$1.73
-15.2%
N/A-6.2%$1.13B$14.84MN/A40
NEO
NeoGenomics
2.6083 of 5 stars
$8.24
-1.4%
$13.86
+68.2%
+23.1%$1.07B$745.97MN/A2,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PPHC) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners