Free Trial

Public Policy (PPHC) Competitors

Public Policy logo
$10.44 -0.14 (-1.32%)
As of 10/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PPHC vs. RDVT, WLDN, CRAI, FBYD, and LZ

Should you buy Public Policy stock or one of its competitors? Public Policy's main competitors and comparable companies include Red Violet (RDVT), Willdan Group (WLDN), Charles River Associates (CRAI), Falcon's Beyond Global (FBYD), and LegalZoom.com (LZ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "research & consulting services" industry.

How does Public Policy compare to Red Violet?

Red Violet (NASDAQ:RDVT) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Red Violet presently has a consensus target price of $83.50, suggesting a potential upside of 9.93%. Public Policy has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.52%. Given Public Policy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Red Violet.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Red Violet
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Red Violet has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -18.85%. Red Violet's return on equity of 16.12% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Red Violet16.54% 16.12% 14.77%
Public Policy -18.85%-0.26%-0.11%

63.6% of Red Violet shares are held by institutional investors. 8.9% of Red Violet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Public Policy had 1 more articles in the media than Red Violet. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Public Policy and 3 mentions for Red Violet. Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Red Violet's score of 0.56 indicating that Public Policy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Red Violet
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Public Policy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Red Violet has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Public Policy. Red Violet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Public Policy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Red Violet$99.02M12.31$13.15M$1.1267.82
Public Policy$186.54M1.70-$39M$0.1195.09

Summary

Red Violet beats Public Policy on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Willdan Group?

Willdan Group (NASDAQ:WLDN) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

72.3% of Willdan Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Willdan Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Willdan Group has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Willdan Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Public Policy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Willdan Group$681.55M1.61$52.56M$4.2616.90
Public Policy$186.54M1.70-$39M$0.1195.09

Willdan Group presently has a consensus target price of $127.50, suggesting a potential upside of 77.06%. Public Policy has a consensus target price of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 62.52%. Given Willdan Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Willdan Group is more favorable than Public Policy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Willdan Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Willdan Group has a net margin of 8.80% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -18.85%. Willdan Group's return on equity of 24.51% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Willdan Group8.80% 24.51% 13.92%
Public Policy -18.85%-0.26%-0.11%

In the previous week, Willdan Group and Willdan Group both had 4 articles in the media. Willdan Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Public Policy's score of 0.94 indicating that Willdan Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Willdan Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Public Policy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Willdan Group beats Public Policy on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Charles River Associates?

Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) and Charles River Associates (NASDAQ:CRAI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Charles River Associates has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. Charles River Associates is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Public Policy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Public Policy$186.54M1.70-$39M$0.1195.09
Charles River Associates$751.58M1.47$54.78M$7.5123.38

84.1% of Charles River Associates shares are held by institutional investors. 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Charles River Associates shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Public Policy pays an annual dividend of $0.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Charles River Associates pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Public Policy pays out 209.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Charles River Associates pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles River Associates has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Public Policy had 2 more articles in the media than Charles River Associates. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Public Policy and 2 mentions for Charles River Associates. Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Charles River Associates' score of 0.70 indicating that Public Policy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Public Policy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Charles River Associates
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Public Policy presently has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 62.52%. Charles River Associates has a consensus price target of $245.00, indicating a potential upside of 39.55%. Given Public Policy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Charles River Associates.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Charles River Associates
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Charles River Associates has a net margin of 6.20% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -18.85%. Charles River Associates' return on equity of 27.31% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Public Policy-18.85% -0.26% -0.11%
Charles River Associates 6.20%27.31%8.36%

Summary

Charles River Associates beats Public Policy on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to Falcon's Beyond Global?

Falcon's Beyond Global (NASDAQ:FBYD) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Falcon's Beyond Global has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Public Policy. Falcon's Beyond Global is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Public Policy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Falcon's Beyond Global$21.63M46.13$2.84M-$0.10N/A
Public Policy$186.54M1.70-$39M$0.1195.09

In the previous week, Public Policy had 2 more articles in the media than Falcon's Beyond Global. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Public Policy and 2 mentions for Falcon's Beyond Global. Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Falcon's Beyond Global's score of 0.91 indicating that Public Policy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Falcon's Beyond Global
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Public Policy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Public Policy has a consensus target price of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 62.52%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Public Policy is more favorable than Falcon's Beyond Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Falcon's Beyond Global
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

Falcon's Beyond Global has a net margin of -8.60% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -18.85%. Public Policy's return on equity of -0.26% beat Falcon's Beyond Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Falcon's Beyond Global-8.60% -50.04% -19.91%
Public Policy -18.85%-0.26%-0.11%

38.9% of Falcon's Beyond Global shares are held by institutional investors. 25.2% of Falcon's Beyond Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Public Policy beats Falcon's Beyond Global on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Public Policy compare to LegalZoom.com?

LegalZoom.com (NASDAQ:LZ) and Public Policy (NASDAQ:PPHC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

LegalZoom.com has higher revenue and earnings than Public Policy. LegalZoom.com is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Public Policy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LegalZoom.com$756.04M1.36$15.43M$0.0966.56
Public Policy$186.54M1.70-$39M$0.1195.09

LegalZoom.com presently has a consensus price target of $7.30, indicating a potential upside of 21.87%. Public Policy has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 62.52%. Given Public Policy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Public Policy is more favorable than LegalZoom.com.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LegalZoom.com
3 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.63
Public Policy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, LegalZoom.com had 1 more articles in the media than Public Policy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for LegalZoom.com and 4 mentions for Public Policy. Public Policy's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat LegalZoom.com's score of 0.72 indicating that Public Policy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
LegalZoom.com
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Public Policy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

LegalZoom.com has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Public Policy's net margin of -18.85%. LegalZoom.com's return on equity of 15.83% beat Public Policy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LegalZoom.com2.13% 15.83% 5.08%
Public Policy -18.85%-0.26%-0.11%

82.0% of LegalZoom.com shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of LegalZoom.com shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.6% of Public Policy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

LegalZoom.com and Public Policy tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Public Policy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PPHC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PPHC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PPHC vs. The Competition

MetricPublic PolicyProfessional Services IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$321.59M$7.51B$10.15B$13.18B
Dividend Yield2.21%3.73%96.63%19.60%
P/E RatioN/A33.0723.7719.26
Price / Sales1.7021.35278.7577.58
Price / Cash8.3022.0523.8452.75
Price / Book3.996.864.655.92
Net Income-$39M$236.73M$614.62M$380.90M
7 Day Performance-4.04%-1.23%-2.11%-3.85%
1 Month Performance-11.13%-3.41%-3.63%-6.37%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-10.20%-0.18%-6.01%

Public Policy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PPHC
Public Policy
3.826 of 5 stars
$10.46
-1.1%
$17.00
+62.5%
N/A$321.59M$186.54MN/A450
RDVT
Red Violet
3.5528 of 5 stars
$79.27
-1.2%
$83.50
+5.3%
+43.9%$1.27B$90.25M70.78250
WLDN
Willdan Group
4.4708 of 5 stars
$73.54
-0.2%
$127.50
+73.4%
-24.6%$1.12B$681.55M17.261,814
CRAI
Charles River Associates
4.6904 of 5 stars
$170.38
-3.1%
$245.00
+43.8%
-1.1%$1.07B$751.58M22.69959
FBYD
Falcon's Beyond Global
0.2791 of 5 stars
$8.56
+0.5%
N/A-34.5%$1.04B$14.90MN/A243

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PPHC) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners