Go Pro
→ Elon Warns 'America Will Go Bankrupt'. Trump's Plan Inside. (From American Hartford Gold) (Ad)tc pixel Free SHOT Stock Alerts

RMG ML Sports (SHOT) Competitors

$9.86 +0.01 (+0.10%)
As of 10:14 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

SHOT vs. VCTR, AVAL, BXSL, STEP, and OBDC

Should you buy RMG ML Sports stock or one of its competitors? RMG ML Sports's main competitors and comparable companies include Victory Capital (VCTR), Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (AVAL), Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (BXSL), StepStone Group (STEP), and Blue Owl Capital (OBDC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does RMG ML Sports compare to Victory Capital?

Victory Capital (NASDAQ:VCTR) and RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Victory Capital and Victory Capital both had 1 articles in the media. Victory Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat RMG ML Sports' score of -1.00 indicating that Victory Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Victory Capital Very Positive
RMG ML Sports Negative

Victory Capital has a net margin of 29.57% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Victory Capital's return on equity of 24.17% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Victory Capital29.57% 24.17% 13.77%
RMG ML Sports N/A N/A N/A

Victory Capital has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Victory Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Victory Capital$1.31B5.38$330.06M$5.4421.01
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,382.90-$54.86M-$0.32N/A

87.7% of Victory Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Victory Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Victory Capital presently has a consensus target price of $113.33, suggesting a potential downside of 0.83%. Given Victory Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Victory Capital is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Victory Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Victory Capital has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Victory Capital beats RMG ML Sports on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RMG ML Sports compare to Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores?

Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores (NYSE:AVAL) and RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.69%. Given Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

0.2% of Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores had 1 more articles in the media than RMG ML Sports. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores and 1 mentions for RMG ML Sports. Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat RMG ML Sports' score of -1.00 indicating that Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores Positive
RMG ML Sports Negative

Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores has a beta of 0.59, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores$6.76B0.84$344.37M$0.4011.94
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,382.90-$54.86M-$0.32N/A

Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores has a net margin of 5.08% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores' return on equity of 6.06% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores5.08% 6.06% 0.60%
RMG ML Sports N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores beats RMG ML Sports on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RMG ML Sports compare to Blackstone Secured Lending Fund?

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund (NYSE:BXSL) and RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackstone Secured Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund$1.42B3.88$563.46M$1.2718.61
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,382.90-$54.86M-$0.32N/A

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund presently has a consensus target price of $24.89, indicating a potential upside of 5.29%. Given Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

36.5% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blackstone Secured Lending Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Blackstone Secured Lending Fund and Blackstone Secured Lending Fund both had 1 articles in the media. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat RMG ML Sports' score of -1.00 indicating that Blackstone Secured Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund Very Positive
RMG ML Sports Negative

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund has a net margin of 21.51% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Blackstone Secured Lending Fund's return on equity of 11.86% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund21.51% 11.86% 5.10%
RMG ML Sports N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Blackstone Secured Lending Fund beats RMG ML Sports on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RMG ML Sports compare to StepStone Group?

RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) and StepStone Group (NASDAQ:STEP) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of StepStone Group shares are held by institutional investors. 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of StepStone Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RMG ML Sports has a net margin of 0.00% compared to StepStone Group's net margin of -30.53%. StepStone Group's return on equity of 43.38% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RMG ML SportsN/A N/A N/A
StepStone Group -30.53%43.38%4.40%

StepStone Group has a consensus target price of $67.44, indicating a potential upside of 47.18%. Given StepStone Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe StepStone Group is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
StepStone Group
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, StepStone Group has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

RMG ML Sports has higher earnings, but lower revenue than StepStone Group. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than StepStone Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,382.90-$54.86M-$0.32N/A
StepStone Group$1.99B2.74-$535.81M-$7.72N/A

In the previous week, StepStone Group had 8 more articles in the media than RMG ML Sports. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for StepStone Group and 1 mentions for RMG ML Sports. StepStone Group's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat RMG ML Sports' score of -1.00 indicating that StepStone Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RMG ML Sports Negative
StepStone Group Neutral

Summary

StepStone Group beats RMG ML Sports on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does RMG ML Sports compare to Blue Owl Capital?

Blue Owl Capital (NYSE:OBDC) and RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

Blue Owl Capital has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blue Owl Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Owl Capital$1.85B2.74$800.36M$0.5618.38
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,382.90-$54.86M-$0.32N/A

In the previous week, Blue Owl Capital had 6 more articles in the media than RMG ML Sports. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Blue Owl Capital and 1 mentions for RMG ML Sports. Blue Owl Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat RMG ML Sports' score of -1.00 indicating that Blue Owl Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Owl Capital Positive
RMG ML Sports Negative

42.8% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Blue Owl Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Blue Owl Capital currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.27%. Given Blue Owl Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Blue Owl Capital is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blue Owl Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Blue Owl Capital has a net margin of 16.99% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Blue Owl Capital's return on equity of 9.49% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Owl Capital16.99% 9.49% 4.19%
RMG ML Sports N/A N/A N/A

Blue Owl Capital has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Blue Owl Capital beats RMG ML Sports on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get RMG ML Sports News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SHOT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SHOT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SHOT vs. The Competition

Export
MetricRMG ML SportsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.69B$5.16B$13.32B$13.24B
Dividend YieldN/A7.55%6.03%15.88%
P/E Ratio-30.8129.3424.4726.06
Price / Sales-18,382.901,265.11507.1489.74
Price / CashN/A47.7747.4551.25
Price / BookN/A3.492.706.32
Net IncomeN/A$417.69M$1.32B$361.55M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.69%-1.00%-1.67%
1 Month Performance0.20%5.26%1.03%-3.94%
1 Year Performance3,408.90%3.36%8.18%2.75%

RMG ML Sports Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SHOT
RMG ML Sports
0.3785 of 5 stars		$9.86
+0.1%		N/A+3,421.4%$1.69B-$91.96KN/A8
VCTR
Victory Capital
4.3766 of 5 stars		$107.76
+1.1%		$105.71
-1.9%		+78.6%$6.55B$1.31B19.81699
AVAL
Grupo Aval Acciones y Valores
3.8 of 5 stars		$5.09
+0.4%		$5.00
-1.8%		+43.3%$6.02B$6.76B12.7367,585
BXSL
Blackstone Secured Lending Fund
2.8756 of 5 stars		$24.96
+0.5%		$24.89
-0.3%		-8.1%$5.79B$1.42B19.652,020
STEP
StepStone Group
4.3835 of 5 stars		$47.45
+2.5%		$69.00
+45.4%		-30.2%$5.53B$1.99BN/A1,310

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:SHOT) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
A new kind of civil war is coming after election day?
Across America, AI-driven backlash is fueling protests, lawsuits, and moratoria that could reshape the politic...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Elon’s Empire Ends (and how to profit)
Marc Chaikin, the 60 year Wall Street veteran whose Chaikin Money Flow indicator sits on every Bloomberg termi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
How options let you do more with less capital
Would you rather spend $5,000 buying 100 shares of a $50 stock, or control those same 100 shares for a fractio...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
The SEC Just Opened The Floodgates…
The SEC removed the 25 year old Pattern Day Trader rule in June 2026, cutting the minimum to open a trading ac...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
They're not buying gold. They're buying this.
Bank of America raised its stake in a small gold company by 139%. Jane Street increased its position by 159%, ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Safe Trade Options Formula' book for free - but only for a limited time throug...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel