Go Pro

Clean Energy Special Situations (SWSS) Competitors

$10.70 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/28/2026

SWSS vs. NSLR, TROO, MAAS, MFH, and BETR

Should you buy Clean Energy Special Situations stock or one of its competitors? Clean Energy Special Situations's main competitors and comparable companies include Neostellar Capital (NSLR), TROOPS (TROO), Maase (MAAS), Mercurity Fintech (MFH), and Better Home & Finance (BETR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Clean Energy Special Situations compare to Neostellar Capital?

Clean Energy Special Situations (NASDAQ:SWSS) and Neostellar Capital (NASDAQ:NSLR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Neostellar Capital has a consensus target price of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.16%. Given Neostellar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Neostellar Capital is more favorable than Clean Energy Special Situations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clean Energy Special Situations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Neostellar Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Neostellar Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Clean Energy Special Situations.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/AN/A$840KN/AN/A
Neostellar Capital$157.82M1.71$48.81M$4.032.53

23.5% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.9% of Neostellar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 86.0% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of Neostellar Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neostellar Capital has a net margin of 6,053.56% compared to Clean Energy Special Situations' net margin of 0.00%. Clean Energy Special Situations' return on equity of 0.00% beat Neostellar Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/A N/A N/A
Neostellar Capital 6,053.56%-12.63%-10.14%

In the previous week, Neostellar Capital had 5 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Special Situations. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Neostellar Capital and 0 mentions for Clean Energy Special Situations. Neostellar Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Clean Energy Special Situations' score of 0.00 indicating that Neostellar Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clean Energy Special Situations Neutral
Neostellar Capital Positive

Clean Energy Special Situations has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Neostellar Capital has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Neostellar Capital beats Clean Energy Special Situations on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Special Situations compare to TROOPS?

TROOPS (NASDAQ:TROO) and Clean Energy Special Situations (NASDAQ:SWSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, TROOPS had 10 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Special Situations. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for TROOPS and 0 mentions for Clean Energy Special Situations. Clean Energy Special Situations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat TROOPS's score of -0.59 indicating that Clean Energy Special Situations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TROOPS Negative
Clean Energy Special Situations Neutral

Clean Energy Special Situations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TROOPS.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TROOPS$17.10M15.36-$27.91MN/AN/A
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/AN/A$840KN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TROOPSN/A N/A N/A
Clean Energy Special Situations N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TROOPS
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Clean Energy Special Situations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

TROOPS has a beta of 3.49, meaning that its stock price is 249% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Energy Special Situations has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

23.5% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of TROOPS shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 86.0% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TROOPS and Clean Energy Special Situations tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Special Situations compare to Maase?

Clean Energy Special Situations (NASDAQ:SWSS) and Maase (NASDAQ:MAAS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Clean Energy Special Situations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Maase.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/AN/A$840KN/AN/A
Maase$109.05M2.42-$27.36MN/AN/A

Clean Energy Special Situations has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Maase has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clean Energy Special Situations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Maase
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Maase had 2 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Special Situations. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Maase and 0 mentions for Clean Energy Special Situations. Maase's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Clean Energy Special Situations' score of 0.00 indicating that Maase is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clean Energy Special Situations Neutral
Maase Positive

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/A N/A N/A
Maase N/A N/A N/A

23.5% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by institutional investors. 86.0% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 87.6% of Maase shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Maase beats Clean Energy Special Situations on 5 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Special Situations compare to Mercurity Fintech?

Clean Energy Special Situations (NASDAQ:SWSS) and Mercurity Fintech (NASDAQ:MFH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

23.5% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Mercurity Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. 86.0% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 62.8% of Mercurity Fintech shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Clean Energy Special Situations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Mercurity Fintech
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Clean Energy Special Situations has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mercurity Fintech has a beta of 4.3, suggesting that its stock price is 330% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Clean Energy Special Situations' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Mercurity Fintech'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Clean Energy Special Situations Neutral
Mercurity Fintech Neutral

Clean Energy Special Situations has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mercurity Fintech.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/AN/A$840KN/AN/A
Mercurity Fintech$2.35M95.84-$4.53MN/AN/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/A N/A N/A
Mercurity Fintech N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Mercurity Fintech beats Clean Energy Special Situations on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Clean Energy Special Situations compare to Better Home & Finance?

Better Home & Finance (NASDAQ:BETR) and Clean Energy Special Situations (NASDAQ:SWSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Better Home & Finance currently has a consensus price target of $28.17, indicating a potential upside of 103.37%. Given Better Home & Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Better Home & Finance is more favorable than Clean Energy Special Situations.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Better Home & Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Clean Energy Special Situations
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Clean Energy Special Situations has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Better Home & Finance.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Better Home & Finance$241.80M1.09-$165.87M-$11.02N/A
Clean Energy Special SituationsN/AN/A$840KN/AN/A

In the previous week, Better Home & Finance had 9 more articles in the media than Clean Energy Special Situations. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Better Home & Finance and 0 mentions for Clean Energy Special Situations. Better Home & Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Clean Energy Special Situations' score of 0.00 indicating that Better Home & Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Better Home & Finance Positive
Clean Energy Special Situations Neutral

20.9% of Better Home & Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.5% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.7% of Better Home & Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 86.0% of Clean Energy Special Situations shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Clean Energy Special Situations has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Better Home & Finance's net margin of -94.52%. Clean Energy Special Situations' return on equity of 0.00% beat Better Home & Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Better Home & Finance-94.52% -409.62% -9.94%
Clean Energy Special Situations N/A N/A N/A

Better Home & Finance has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clean Energy Special Situations has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Better Home & Finance beats Clean Energy Special Situations on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Clean Energy Special Situations News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SWSS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SWSS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SWSS vs. The Competition

MetricClean Energy Special SituationsFinancial Services IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$67.31M$27.05B$14.01B$12.89B
Dividend YieldN/A6.05%5.88%11.27%
P/E RatioN/A19.4326.7425.45
Price / SalesN/A445.68521.42103.75
Price / Cash66.4549.1530.4036.03
Price / BookN/A3.272.856.36
Net Income$840K$1.10B$1.31B$349.79M
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.46%0.29%-0.40%
1 Month PerformanceN/A13.12%2.55%4.24%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-1.37%10.76%15.13%

Clean Energy Special Situations Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SWSS
Clean Energy Special Situations
N/A$10.70
flat
N/AN/A$67.31MN/AN/A3
NSLR
Neostellar Capital
4.5259 of 5 stars
$10.01
+0.1%
$14.50
+44.9%
N/A$264.73M$157.82M2.489
TROO
TROOPS
0.2022 of 5 stars
$1.91
-7.3%
N/A+110.8%$251.65M$17.10MN/A20
MAAS
Maase
0.8143 of 5 stars
$15.63
flat
N/A+376.9%$248.79M$109.05MN/A550
MFH
Mercurity Fintech
N/A$3.39
-2.0%
N/A-53.4%$234.17M$2.35MN/A10

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SWSS) was last updated on 8/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners