VersaBank (VBNK) Competitors

Merchants Bancorp has a beta of 1.16, indicating that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, VersaBank has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Merchants Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than VersaBank. Merchants Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Merchants Bancorp has a net margin of 16.64% compared to VersaBank's net margin of 10.03%. Merchants Bancorp's return on equity of 13.60% beat VersaBank's return on equity.

Merchants Bancorp currently has a consensus target price of $50.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.93%. VersaBank has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential downside of 28.57%. Given Merchants Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Merchants Bancorp is more favorable than VersaBank.

24.6% of Merchants Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.9% of VersaBank shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.9% of Merchants Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Merchants Bancorp had 2 more articles in the media than VersaBank. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Merchants Bancorp and 3 mentions for VersaBank. VersaBank's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Merchants Bancorp's score of 0.14 indicating that VersaBank is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Merchants Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. VersaBank pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Merchants Bancorp pays out 10.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. VersaBank pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Merchants Bancorp has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Merchants Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CompoSecure has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, VersaBank has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

37.6% of CompoSecure shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.9% of VersaBank shares are owned by institutional investors. 52.1% of CompoSecure shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

VersaBank has higher revenue and earnings than CompoSecure. CompoSecure is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

VersaBank has a net margin of 10.03% compared to CompoSecure's net margin of -24.53%. VersaBank's return on equity of 7.70% beat CompoSecure's return on equity.

CompoSecure currently has a consensus target price of $25.50, suggesting a potential upside of 60.08%. VersaBank has a consensus target price of $13.00, suggesting a potential downside of 28.57%. Given CompoSecure's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CompoSecure is more favorable than VersaBank.

In the previous week, VersaBank had 3 more articles in the media than CompoSecure. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for VersaBank and 0 mentions for CompoSecure. CompoSecure's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat VersaBank's score of 0.34 indicating that CompoSecure is being referred to more favorably in the media.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perella Weinberg Partners has a beta of 1.74, indicating that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

VersaBank has a net margin of 10.03% compared to Perella Weinberg Partners' net margin of 2.82%. VersaBank's return on equity of 7.70% beat Perella Weinberg Partners' return on equity.

VersaBank pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Perella Weinberg Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. VersaBank pays out 10.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Perella Weinberg Partners pays out 116.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

56.9% of VersaBank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.1% of Perella Weinberg Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 26.1% of Perella Weinberg Partners shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Perella Weinberg Partners had 21 more articles in the media than VersaBank. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Perella Weinberg Partners and 3 mentions for VersaBank. VersaBank's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Perella Weinberg Partners' score of 0.05 indicating that VersaBank is being referred to more favorably in the media.

VersaBank currently has a consensus price target of $13.00, suggesting a potential downside of 28.57%. Perella Weinberg Partners has a consensus price target of $23.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.14%. Given Perella Weinberg Partners' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Perella Weinberg Partners is more favorable than VersaBank.

Perella Weinberg Partners has higher revenue and earnings than VersaBank. VersaBank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Perella Weinberg Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, LendingClub had 8 more articles in the media than VersaBank. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for LendingClub and 3 mentions for VersaBank. LendingClub's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat VersaBank's score of 0.34 indicating that LendingClub is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

VersaBank has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LendingClub has a beta of 2, meaning that its share price is 100% more volatile than the S&P 500.

LendingClub has higher revenue and earnings than VersaBank. LendingClub is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than VersaBank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

56.9% of VersaBank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.1% of LendingClub shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of LendingClub shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

VersaBank presently has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential downside of 28.57%. LendingClub has a consensus price target of $23.07, indicating a potential upside of 35.15%. Given LendingClub's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe LendingClub is more favorable than VersaBank.

LendingClub has a net margin of 16.99% compared to VersaBank's net margin of 10.03%. LendingClub's return on equity of 11.92% beat VersaBank's return on equity.