Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors

Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Truist Financial and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Truist Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Truist Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Truist Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Truist Financial pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Truist Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Peapack-Gladstone Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Truist Financial and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Truist Financial and Peapack-Gladstone Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.

Truist Financial currently has a consensus price target of $53.0833, suggesting a potential downside of 4.78%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 21.75%. Given Truist Financial's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Truist Financial is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

72.1% of Truist Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Truist Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Truist Financial has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Truist Financial beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and The PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Dividends

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. The PNC Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The PNC Financial Services Group pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The PNC Financial Services Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The PNC Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The PNC Financial Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and The PNC Financial Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.75%. The PNC Financial Services Group has a consensus price target of $174.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.32%. Given The PNC Financial Services Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The PNC Financial Services Group is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.6% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.5% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

The PNC Financial Services Group beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.5% of First Republic Bank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

First Republic Bank has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for First Republic Bank and Peapack-Gladstone Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

First Republic Bank presently has a consensus price target of $144.1765, suggesting a potential downside of 16.48%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 21.75%. Given First Republic Bank's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe First Republic Bank is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Profitability

This table compares First Republic Bank and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

First Republic Bank pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. First Republic Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Republic Bank has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Peapack-Gladstone Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares First Republic Bank and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

First Republic Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Republic Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

First Republic Bank beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SIVB) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares SVB Financial Group and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for SVB Financial Group and Peapack-Gladstone Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.

SVB Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $434.5333, suggesting a potential downside of 14.41%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 21.75%. Given SVB Financial Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe SVB Financial Group is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SVB Financial Group and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SVB Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SVB Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

SVB Financial Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.4% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SVB Financial Group beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Volatility & Risk

Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Fifth Third Bancorp and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Fifth Third Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fifth Third Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Fifth Third Bancorp and Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Fifth Third Bancorp and Peapack-Gladstone Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Fifth Third Bancorp presently has a consensus target price of $34.4605, indicating a potential downside of 5.43%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.75%. Given Fifth Third Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fifth Third Bancorp is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Dividends

Fifth Third Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fifth Third Bancorp has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Peapack-Gladstone Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Fifth Third Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

79.2% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fifth Third Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 16 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and M&T Bank (NYSE:MTB) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and M&T Bank, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial presently has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.75%. M&T Bank has a consensus price target of $139.40, indicating a potential downside of 6.86%. Given M&T Bank's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M&T Bank is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

66.6% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.7% of M&T Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 4.5% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of M&T Bank shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial and M&T Bank's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

M&T Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. M&T Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, M&T Bank has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. M&T Bank pays an annual dividend of $4.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M&T Bank pays out 32.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and M&T Bank has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial and M&T Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

M&T Bank beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.