Go Pro

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

Peapack-Gladstone Financial logo
$43.99 +0.37 (+0.85%)
As of 03:59 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PGC vs. BUSE, FFBC, GSBC, OCFC, and STBA

Should you buy Peapack-Gladstone Financial stock or one of its competitors? Peapack-Gladstone Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include First Busey (BUSE), First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC), Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), OceanFirst Financial (OCFC), and S&T Bancorp (STBA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "regional banks" industry.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. First Busey pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Busey has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

First Busey currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.55%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 28.06%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Busey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Busey
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

56.5% of First Busey shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of First Busey shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 1 more articles in the media than First Busey. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 1 mentions for First Busey. First Busey's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 1.03 indicating that First Busey is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Busey Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Positive

First Busey has a net margin of 21.00% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.48% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Busey21.00% 10.48% 1.40%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

First Busey has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Busey$1.04B2.33$135.26M$2.4212.18
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.75$37.33M$2.8815.27

Summary

First Busey beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Financial Bancorp. presently has a consensus price target of $34.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.82%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 28.06%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Financial Bancorp.
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 36.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. First Financial Bancorp. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Financial Bancorp. had 3 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for First Financial Bancorp. and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat First Financial Bancorp.'s score of 0.76 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Financial Bancorp.
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Financial Bancorp.$996.38M3.32$255.60M$2.8311.14
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.75$37.33M$2.8815.27

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.77% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.13% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Financial Bancorp.20.77% 11.13% 1.49%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

Summary

First Financial Bancorp. beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Great Southern Bancorp (NASDAQ:GSBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

Great Southern Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.37%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 28.06%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Great Southern Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Great Southern Bancorp has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Great Southern Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Great Southern Bancorp pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Great Southern Bancorp had 2 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Great Southern Bancorp and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 1.03 indicating that Great Southern Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Bancorp
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

41.7% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Bancorp has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Great Southern Bancorp's return on equity of 10.83% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern Bancorp20.72% 10.83% 1.22%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

Great Southern Bancorp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern Bancorp$342.78M2.49$70.97M$6.0212.99
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.75$37.33M$2.8815.27

Summary

Great Southern Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to OceanFirst Financial?

OceanFirst Financial (NASDAQ:OCFC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

OceanFirst Financial has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a net margin of 11.09% compared to OceanFirst Financial's net margin of 6.38%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 7.82% beat OceanFirst Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OceanFirst Financial6.38% 5.34% 0.59%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

OceanFirst Financial currently has a consensus price target of $21.50, indicating a potential upside of 28.94%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 28.06%. Given OceanFirst Financial's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe OceanFirst Financial is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OceanFirst Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, OceanFirst Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for OceanFirst Financial and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat OceanFirst Financial's score of 0.86 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OceanFirst Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

OceanFirst Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. OceanFirst Financial pays out 94.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

OceanFirst Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OceanFirst Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OceanFirst Financial$687.16M2.35$70.98M$0.8519.62
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.75$37.33M$2.8815.27

71.0% of OceanFirst Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 5.4% of OceanFirst Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Peapack-Gladstone Financial beats OceanFirst Financial on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

S&T Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&T Bancorp$568.51M3.04$134.23M$3.7613.04
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.75$37.33M$2.8815.27

S&T Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $51.60, indicating a potential upside of 5.27%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 28.06%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
S&T Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 24.51% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 9.74% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
S&T Bancorp24.51% 9.74% 1.42%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. S&T Bancorp pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&T Bancorp has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, S&T Bancorp had 4 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for S&T Bancorp and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat S&T Bancorp's score of 0.56 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
S&T Bancorp
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

S&T Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peapack-Gladstone Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PGC vs. The Competition

MetricPeapack-Gladstone FinancialBanks IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$778.97M$22.53B$13.26B$13.10B
Dividend Yield0.46%3.12%6.01%14.40%
P/E Ratio15.2625.3424.6525.84
Price / Sales1.759.00495.18105.71
Price / Cash15.9114.7549.0652.18
Price / Book1.171.332.696.28
Net Income$37.33M$2.58B$1.32B$360.95M
7 Day Performance-1.85%-1.20%-1.01%-1.68%
1 Month Performance-1.35%-1.72%1.17%-3.19%
1 Year Performance61.85%20.70%7.84%2.88%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
4.6486 of 5 stars
$43.99
+0.8%
$56.33
+28.1%
+58.0%$778.97M$444.61M15.26682
BUSE
First Busey
3.979 of 5 stars
$29.79
-0.6%
$32.00
+7.4%
+25.8%$2.47B$1.04B12.361,948
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.
3.196 of 5 stars
$31.38
-1.1%
$33.67
+7.3%
+24.0%$3.31B$996.38M11.142,199
GSBC
Great Southern Bancorp
1.9637 of 5 stars
$78.37
-0.2%
$74.00
-5.6%
+26.1%$856.41M$342.78M13.051,075
OCFC
OceanFirst Financial
4.5698 of 5 stars
$17.43
-0.8%
$21.50
+23.3%
-5.9%$1.70B$687.16M20.64954

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PGC) was last updated on 10/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners