Go Pro

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

Peapack-Gladstone Financial logo
$46.32 +0.34 (+0.74%)
Closing price 08/3/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$46.46 +0.13 (+0.29%)
As of 08/3/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PGC vs. BUSE, DCOM, FFBC, GSBC, and STBA

Should you buy Peapack-Gladstone Financial stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peapack-Gladstone Financial include First Busey (BUSE), Dime Community Bancshares (DCOM), First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC), Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), and S&T Bancorp (STBA). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

First Busey has a net margin of 21.00% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.42% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Busey21.00% 10.42% 1.41%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.91%0.69%

First Busey has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

56.5% of First Busey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of First Busey shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Busey currently has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.33%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.62%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Busey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Busey
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Busey pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Busey has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Busey$1.04B2.53$135.26M$2.4212.92
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.85$37.33M$2.8816.08

In the previous week, First Busey had 9 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for First Busey and 18 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.24 indicating that First Busey is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Busey
15 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

First Busey beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Dime Community Bancshares?

Dime Community Bancshares (NASDAQ:DCOM) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 10 more articles in the media than Dime Community Bancshares. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 8 mentions for Dime Community Bancshares. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Dime Community Bancshares' score of 0.12 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dime Community Bancshares
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Dime Community Bancshares has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Dime Community Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dime Community Bancshares$489.44M3.72$110.68M$2.7714.88
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.85$37.33M$2.8816.08

Dime Community Bancshares has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Dime Community Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Dime Community Bancshares pays out 36.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dime Community Bancshares has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Dime Community Bancshares is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

75.3% of Dime Community Bancshares shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Dime Community Bancshares shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dime Community Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $39.75, indicating a potential downside of 3.57%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 21.62%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Dime Community Bancshares.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dime Community Bancshares
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Dime Community Bancshares has a net margin of 15.15% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Dime Community Bancshares' return on equity of 9.12% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dime Community Bancshares15.15% 9.12% 0.83%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.91%0.69%

Summary

Dime Community Bancshares beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 9 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 9 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. First Financial Bancorp.'s average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.24 indicating that First Financial Bancorp. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Financial Bancorp.
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

First Financial Bancorp. presently has a consensus price target of $33.67, indicating a potential downside of 1.39%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 21.62%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Financial Bancorp.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Financial Bancorp.$1.26B2.84$255.60M$2.8312.06
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.85$37.33M$2.8816.08

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.77% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.13% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Financial Bancorp.20.77% 11.13% 1.49%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.91%0.69%

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. First Financial Bancorp. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

First Financial Bancorp. beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Great Southern Bancorp (NASDAQ:GSBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Great Southern Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.05%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.62%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Great Southern Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 15 more articles in the media than Great Southern Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 3 mentions for Great Southern Bancorp. Great Southern Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.24 indicating that Great Southern Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Bancorp
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great Southern Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Great Southern Bancorp pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Great Southern Bancorp has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

41.7% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Bancorp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern Bancorp$226.41M3.91$70.97M$6.0213.51
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.85$37.33M$2.8816.08

Great Southern Bancorp has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Great Southern Bancorp's return on equity of 10.86% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern Bancorp20.72% 10.86% 1.21%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.91%0.69%

Summary

Peapack-Gladstone Financial beats Great Southern Bancorp on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&T Bancorp pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&T Bancorp has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

S&T Bancorp has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.85$37.33M$2.8816.08
S&T Bancorp$415.61M4.53$134.23M$3.7613.93

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 24.51% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 9.74% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial11.09% 7.91% 0.69%
S&T Bancorp 24.51%9.74%1.42%

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial presently has a consensus target price of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.62%. S&T Bancorp has a consensus target price of $51.60, suggesting a potential downside of 1.49%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
S&T Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 8 more articles in the media than S&T Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 10 mentions for S&T Bancorp. S&T Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.24 indicating that S&T Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
S&T Bancorp
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

S&T Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peapack-Gladstone Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PGC vs. The Competition

MetricPeapack-Gladstone FinancialBanks IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$814.69M$23.53B$13.92B$12.44B
Dividend Yield0.43%3.22%5.95%10.03%
P/E Ratio16.0828.1428.7724.99
Price / Sales1.859.76462.0990.43
Price / Cash16.7416.1729.9534.82
Price / Book1.241.403.726.21
Net Income$37.33M$2.58B$1.31B$347.49M
7 Day Performance-2.93%0.59%0.44%1.29%
1 Month Performance-2.24%3.00%0.79%-3.59%
1 Year Performance85.65%30.67%13.22%18.38%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
4.8972 of 5 stars
$46.32
+0.7%
$56.33
+21.6%
+87.2%$814.69M$444.61M16.08500
BUSE
First Busey
4.4918 of 5 stars
$30.27
+1.8%
$29.75
-1.7%
+41.3%$2.56B$790.86M13.461,948
DCOM
Dime Community Bancshares
2.9296 of 5 stars
$40.83
+1.6%
$39.75
-2.6%
+51.9%$1.80B$489.44M17.30820
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.
2.7469 of 5 stars
$33.83
+0.7%
$33.67
-0.5%
+44.4%$3.55B$1.26B11.952,199
GSBC
Great Southern Bancorp
2.1195 of 5 stars
$80.63
+1.7%
$74.00
-8.2%
+45.3%$875.28M$342.78M13.351,075

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PGC) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners