Go Pro
→ Buy this stock today (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free PGC Stock Alerts

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

Peapack-Gladstone Financial logo
$44.59 -0.05 (-0.11%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

PGC vs. BUSE, DCOM, FFBC, GSBC, and STBA

Should you buy Peapack-Gladstone Financial stock or one of its competitors? Peapack-Gladstone Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include First Busey (BUSE), Dime Community Bancshares (DCOM), First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC), Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), and S&T Bancorp (STBA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "regional banks" industry.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, First Busey had 3 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for First Busey and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat First Busey's score of 1.00 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Busey
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Peapack-Gladstone Financial presently has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 26.34%. First Busey has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.02%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Busey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
First Busey
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

First Busey has a net margin of 21.00% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.48% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial11.09% 7.82% 0.68%
First Busey 21.00%10.48%1.40%

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of First Busey shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of First Busey shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Busey pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Busey has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

First Busey has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.78$37.33M$2.8815.48
First Busey$1.04B2.37$135.26M$2.4212.36

Summary

First Busey beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Dime Community Bancshares?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and Dime Community Bancshares (NASDAQ:DCOM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Dime Community Bancshares has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Dime Community Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.78$37.33M$2.8815.48
Dime Community Bancshares$489.44M3.56$110.68M$2.7714.26

In the previous week, Dime Community Bancshares had 4 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Dime Community Bancshares and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Dime Community Bancshares' average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 1.17 indicating that Dime Community Bancshares is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dime Community Bancshares
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Dime Community Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dime Community Bancshares pays out 36.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dime Community Bancshares has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Dime Community Bancshares is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Dime Community Bancshares has a net margin of 15.15% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Dime Community Bancshares' return on equity of 9.12% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial11.09% 7.82% 0.68%
Dime Community Bancshares 15.15%9.12%0.83%

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of Dime Community Bancshares shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Dime Community Bancshares shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dime Community Bancshares has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial presently has a consensus target price of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 26.34%. Dime Community Bancshares has a consensus target price of $39.75, suggesting a potential upside of 0.66%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Dime Community Bancshares.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Dime Community Bancshares
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Summary

Dime Community Bancshares beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment, earnings and analyst recommendations.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Financial Bancorp.$1.26B2.67$255.60M$2.8311.31
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.78$37.33M$2.8815.48

First Financial Bancorp. presently has a consensus target price of $33.67, indicating a potential upside of 5.14%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 26.34%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Financial Bancorp.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. First Financial Bancorp. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, First Financial Bancorp. had 4 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Financial Bancorp. and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat First Financial Bancorp.'s score of 1.00 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Financial Bancorp.
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.77% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.13% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Financial Bancorp.20.77% 11.13% 1.49%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

Summary

First Financial Bancorp. beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Great Southern Bancorp (NASDAQ:GSBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Great Southern Bancorp has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Great Southern Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Great Southern Bancorp pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

41.7% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Great Southern Bancorp has a net margin of 20.72% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. Great Southern Bancorp's return on equity of 10.83% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern Bancorp20.72% 10.83% 1.22%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

Great Southern Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $74.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.10%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 26.34%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Great Southern Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Great Southern Bancorp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern Bancorp$342.78M2.48$70.97M$6.0212.95
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.78$37.33M$2.8815.48

In the previous week, Great Southern Bancorp had 1 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Great Southern Bancorp and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.84 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 1.17 indicating that Great Southern Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Bancorp
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Great Southern Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 24.51% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 11.09%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 9.74% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
S&T Bancorp24.51% 9.74% 1.42%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 11.09%7.82%0.68%

S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

S&T Bancorp currently has a consensus price target of $51.60, suggesting a potential upside of 4.88%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 26.34%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
S&T Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, S&T Bancorp had 4 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for S&T Bancorp and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 1.17 indicating that S&T Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
S&T Bancorp
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. S&T Bancorp pays out 39.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&T Bancorp has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

S&T Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&T Bancorp$568.51M3.05$134.23M$3.7613.09
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.78$37.33M$2.8815.48

Summary

S&T Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peapack-Gladstone Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PGC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPeapack-Gladstone FinancialBanks IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$791.38M$23.61B$14.01B$12.83B
Dividend Yield0.45%3.18%5.88%11.79%
P/E Ratio15.4827.2726.0725.01
Price / Sales1.789.29519.9791.06
Price / Cash16.2515.9338.4652.85
Price / Book1.151.352.096.03
Net Income$37.33M$2.58B$1.32B$348.89M
7 Day Performance-1.24%-0.38%-0.90%-2.42%
1 Month Performance-3.02%0.14%1.84%2.94%
1 Year Performance53.71%22.46%9.97%13.69%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
4.7498 of 5 stars		$44.59
-0.1%		$56.33
+26.3%		+53.9%$791.38M$444.61M15.48500
BUSE
First Busey
3.9014 of 5 stars		$30.05
-0.8%		$32.00
+6.5%		+21.9%$2.48B$1.04B12.431,948
DCOM
Dime Community Bancshares
3.1667 of 5 stars		$40.41
0.0%		$39.75
-1.6%		+31.4%$1.78B$489.44M17.10820
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.
3.1322 of 5 stars		$32.67
-0.8%		$33.67
+3.0%		+23.2%$3.43B$1.26B11.562,199
GSBC
Great Southern Bancorp
2.144 of 5 stars		$78.84
+0.2%		$74.00
-6.1%		+23.7%$859.14M$226.41M13.101,075

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PGC) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel