TriCo Bancshares Competitors

TriCo Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBK) and Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

TriCo Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Truist Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. TriCo Bancshares pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Truist Financial pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TriCo Bancshares has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Truist Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

TriCo Bancshares has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Truist Financial has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TriCo Bancshares and Truist Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

TriCo Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.36%. Truist Financial has a consensus target price of $53.0833, indicating a potential downside of 10.00%. Given Truist Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Truist Financial is more favorable than TriCo Bancshares.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and Truist Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Truist Financial has higher revenue and earnings than TriCo Bancshares. Truist Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TriCo Bancshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and Truist Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

61.2% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Truist Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Truist Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Truist Financial beats TriCo Bancshares on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriCo Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBK) and The PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

TriCo Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. The PNC Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. TriCo Bancshares pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The PNC Financial Services Group pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TriCo Bancshares has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The PNC Financial Services Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

TriCo Bancshares has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TriCo Bancshares and The PNC Financial Services Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

TriCo Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.36%. The PNC Financial Services Group has a consensus target price of $160.1176, indicating a potential downside of 9.85%. Given The PNC Financial Services Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The PNC Financial Services Group is more favorable than TriCo Bancshares.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and The PNC Financial Services Group's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The PNC Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than TriCo Bancshares. TriCo Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The PNC Financial Services Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and The PNC Financial Services Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

61.2% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The PNC Financial Services Group beats TriCo Bancshares on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriCo Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBK) and First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and profitability.

Dividends

TriCo Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. First Republic Bank pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. TriCo Bancshares pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Republic Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TriCo Bancshares has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and First Republic Bank has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Volatility & Risk

TriCo Bancshares has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Republic Bank has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for TriCo Bancshares and First Republic Bank, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

TriCo Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.36%. First Republic Bank has a consensus target price of $136.1333, indicating a potential downside of 19.89%. Given First Republic Bank's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe First Republic Bank is more favorable than TriCo Bancshares.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and First Republic Bank's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

First Republic Bank has higher revenue and earnings than TriCo Bancshares. TriCo Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Republic Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and First Republic Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

61.2% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.5% of First Republic Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

First Republic Bank beats TriCo Bancshares on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriCo Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBK) and Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

61.2% of TriCo Bancshares shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.2% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of TriCo Bancshares shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

TriCo Bancshares has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and Fifth Third Bancorp's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fifth Third Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than TriCo Bancshares. Fifth Third Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TriCo Bancshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for TriCo Bancshares and Fifth Third Bancorp, as reported by MarketBeat.

TriCo Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.36%. Fifth Third Bancorp has a consensus target price of $34.4605, indicating a potential downside of 9.84%. Given Fifth Third Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fifth Third Bancorp is more favorable than TriCo Bancshares.

Profitability

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and Fifth Third Bancorp's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

TriCo Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Fifth Third Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. TriCo Bancshares pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TriCo Bancshares has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Fifth Third Bancorp has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Fifth Third Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Fifth Third Bancorp beats TriCo Bancshares on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriCo Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBK) and SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SIVB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

61.2% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.7% of TriCo Bancshares shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SVB Financial Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

TriCo Bancshares has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SVB Financial Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and SVB Financial Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

SVB Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than TriCo Bancshares. TriCo Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SVB Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for TriCo Bancshares and SVB Financial Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

TriCo Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.36%. SVB Financial Group has a consensus target price of $434.5333, indicating a potential downside of 12.77%. Given SVB Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SVB Financial Group is more favorable than TriCo Bancshares.

Profitability

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and SVB Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

SVB Financial Group beats TriCo Bancshares on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

TriCo Bancshares (NASDAQ:TCBK) and Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

61.2% of TriCo Bancshares shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of Regions Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.7% of TriCo Bancshares shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

TriCo Bancshares has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and Regions Financial's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Regions Financial has higher revenue and earnings than TriCo Bancshares. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TriCo Bancshares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations for TriCo Bancshares and Regions Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.

TriCo Bancshares currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential downside of 31.36%. Regions Financial has a consensus target price of $18.5526, indicating a potential downside of 10.98%. Given Regions Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Regions Financial is more favorable than TriCo Bancshares.

Profitability

This table compares TriCo Bancshares and Regions Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

TriCo Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. TriCo Bancshares pays out 33.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TriCo Bancshares has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Regions Financial beats TriCo Bancshares on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.