Does the media favor QSR or ARMK?

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 7 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Restaurant Brands International 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, IHG or ARMK?

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Intercontinental Hotels Group $5.19B 4.56 $758M N/A N/A Aramark $19.41B 0.79 $326.39M $1.34 43.28

Does the media refer more to IHG or ARMK?

In the previous week, Aramark had 4 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aramark and 3 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Intercontinental Hotels Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that Intercontinental Hotels Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Intercontinental Hotels Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aramark $19.41B 0.79 $326.39M $1.34 43.28 Yum China $11.80B 1.28 $929M $2.61 16.61

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02% Yum China 7.83% 15.11% 8.67%

Does the media favor ARMK or YUMC?

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 7 articles in the media. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Yum China 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, ARMK or HTHT?

H World Group has higher revenue and earnings than Aramark. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aramark $19.41B 0.79 $326.39M $1.34 43.28 H World Group $25.91B 0.49 $726M $2.23 18.48

Is ARMK or HTHT more profitable?

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Aramark's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02% H World Group 19.22% 39.73% 7.47%

Does the media prefer ARMK or HTHT?

In the previous week, Aramark had 5 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aramark and 2 mentions for H World Group. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aramark 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive H World Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings & valuation, BROS or ARMK?

Aramark has higher revenue and earnings than Dutch Bros. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dutch Bros, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Dutch Bros $1.64B 6.83 $79.84M $0.64 100.16 Aramark $19.41B 0.79 $326.39M $1.34 43.28

Is BROS or ARMK more profitable?

Dutch Bros has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Dutch Bros' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Dutch Bros 4.61% 9.42% 2.80% Aramark 1.84% 17.05% 4.02%

Does the media refer more to BROS or ARMK?

In the previous week, Dutch Bros had 6 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Dutch Bros and 7 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Dutch Bros' score of 0.60 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Dutch Bros 3 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aramark 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

$58.00 -0.15 (-0.26%)

Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$58.00 0.00 (-0.01%)

As of 04:44 PM Eastern

Compare

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and BROS

Should you buy Aramark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aramark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aramark include Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Yum China (YUMC), H World Group (HTHT), and Dutch Bros (BROS). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 1 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 7 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aramark	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International	9.96%	32.80%	6.67%
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International	$9.43B	2.77	$776M	$2.84	26.29
Aramark	$19.41B	0.79	$326.39M	$1.34	43.28

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.04, indicating a potential upside of 11.23%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.58
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intercontinental Hotels Group	$5.19B	4.56	$758M	N/A	N/A
Aramark	$19.41B	0.79	$326.39M	$1.34	43.28

In the previous week, Aramark had 4 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aramark and 3 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Intercontinental Hotels Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that Intercontinental Hotels Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Intercontinental Hotels Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aramark	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aramark has a net margin of 1.84% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intercontinental Hotels Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%

Intercontinental Hotels Group currently has a consensus price target of $174.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.76%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Intercontinental Hotels Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Intercontinental Hotels Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intercontinental Hotels Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Summary

Intercontinental Hotels Group and Aramark tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$19.41B	0.79	$326.39M	$1.34	43.28
Yum China	$11.80B	1.28	$929M	$2.61	16.61

In the previous week, Aramark and Aramark both had 7 articles in the media. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Yum China	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Aramark has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.1, indicating that its share price is 90% less volatile than the broader market.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $59.21, suggesting a potential upside of 2.09%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 36.20%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
Yum China	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%
Yum China	7.83%	15.11%	8.67%

Summary

Yum China beats Aramark on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

H World Group has higher revenue and earnings than Aramark. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aramark	$19.41B	0.79	$326.39M	$1.34	43.28
H World Group	$25.91B	0.49	$726M	$2.23	18.48

Aramark has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H World Group has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its stock price is 87% less volatile than the broader market.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. H World Group has a consensus target price of $61.20, indicating a potential upside of 48.51%. Given H World Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe H World Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
H World Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

46.4% of H World Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 49.4% of H World Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%
H World Group	19.22%	39.73%	7.47%

In the previous week, Aramark had 5 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Aramark and 2 mentions for H World Group. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Aramark's score of 0.70 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aramark	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
H World Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

H World Group beats Aramark on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Dutch Bros?

Dutch Bros (NYSE:BROS) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and dividends.

Dutch Bros presently has a consensus target price of $77.33, indicating a potential upside of 20.64%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 2.09%. Given Dutch Bros' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Dutch Bros is more favorable than Aramark.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Dutch Bros	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	19 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Aramark	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85

Dutch Bros has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Dutch Bros' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Dutch Bros	4.61%	9.42%	2.80%
Aramark	1.84%	17.05%	4.02%

In the previous week, Dutch Bros had 6 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Dutch Bros and 7 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat Dutch Bros' score of 0.60 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Dutch Bros	3 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aramark	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

85.5% of Dutch Bros shares are owned by institutional investors. 38.9% of Dutch Bros shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Aramark has higher revenue and earnings than Dutch Bros. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dutch Bros, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Dutch Bros	$1.64B	6.83	$79.84M	$0.64	100.16
Aramark	$19.41B	0.79	$326.39M	$1.34	43.28

Dutch Bros has a beta of 2.31, indicating that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dutch Bros beats Aramark on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aramark News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ARMK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ARMK vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Aramark	BUSINESS SVCS Industry	Business Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$15.25B	$5.46B	$6.82B	$23.35B
Dividend Yield	0.83%	2.97%	3.10%	4.02%
P/E Ratio	43.28	11.90	28.82	31.16
Price / Sales	0.79	1.36	346.81	20.27
Price / Cash	15.49	11.48	23.21	18.64
Price / Book	4.84	5.28	5.70	4.78
Net Income	$326.39M	$150.86M	$203.46M	$1.06B
7 Day Performance	3.24%	-1.88%	-2.06%	-0.04%
1 Month Performance	6.85%	-3.02%	-2.60%	0.07%
1 Year Performance	32.95%	-6.93%	13.83%	16.91%

Aramark Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ARMK Aramark	2.7409 of 5 stars	$58.00 -0.3%	$59.21 +2.1%	+33.8%	$15.25B	$19.41B	43.28	278,390	News Coverage Analyst Forecast
QSR Restaurant Brands International	3.9106 of 5 stars	$73.21 -2.1%	$83.54 +14.1%	+12.2%	$26.18B	$9.43B	25.78	53,500
IHG Intercontinental Hotels Group	3.2435 of 5 stars	$166.54 -2.0%	$174.50 +4.8%	+34.6%	$25.36B	$5.19B	N/A	13,049	News Coverage Gap Down
YUMC Yum China	4.6194 of 5 stars	$42.51 +1.9%	$59.05 +38.9%	-7.7%	$14.56B	$11.80B	16.29	290,000	Positive News
HTHT H World Group	4.5556 of 5 stars	$42.07 -0.2%	$61.20 +45.5%	+23.3%	$12.96B	$3.62B	18.87	26,458	Positive News Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:ARMK) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and BROS

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Dutch Bros?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ARMK vs. The Competition

Aramark Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and BROS

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Which has more volatility & risk, QSR or ARMK?

Does the media favor QSR or ARMK?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in QSR or ARMK?

Is QSR or ARMK more profitable?

Is QSR or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, QSR or ARMK?

Do analysts rate QSR or ARMK?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Which has more volatility and risk, IHG or ARMK?

Is IHG or ARMK a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, IHG or ARMK?

Does the media refer more to IHG or ARMK?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of IHG or ARMK?

Is IHG or ARMK more profitable?

Do analysts prefer IHG or ARMK?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, ARMK or YUMC?

Does the media favor ARMK or YUMC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in ARMK or YUMC?

Which has more volatility and risk, ARMK or YUMC?

Is ARMK or YUMC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend ARMK or YUMC?

Is ARMK or YUMC more profitable?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

Which has better earnings & valuation, ARMK or HTHT?

Which has more volatility & risk, ARMK or HTHT?

Is ARMK or HTHT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts prefer ARMK or HTHT?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of ARMK or HTHT?

Is ARMK or HTHT more profitable?

Does the media prefer ARMK or HTHT?

Summary

How does Aramark compare to Dutch Bros?

Do analysts prefer BROS or ARMK?

Is BROS or ARMK more profitable?

Does the media refer more to BROS or ARMK?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in BROS or ARMK?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BROS or ARMK?

Which has more risk & volatility, BROS or ARMK?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ARMK vs. The Competition

Aramark Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools