Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.93% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $68.07, indicating a potential upside of 11.23%. Yum! Brands has a consensus target price of $174.31, indicating a potential upside of 15.35%. Given Yum! Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yum! Brands is more favorable than Aramark.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum! Brands pays out 37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum! Brands has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Yum! Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aramark had 17 more articles in the media than Yum! Brands. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Aramark and 18 mentions for Yum! Brands. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Yum! Brands' score of 0.26 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Yum! Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum! Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

82.4% of Yum! Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Yum! Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Aramark's return on equity.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Aramark had 10 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Aramark and 25 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.53 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus target price of $83.70, suggesting a potential upside of 9.45%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $68.07, suggesting a potential upside of 11.23%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Aramark currently has a consensus target price of $68.07, indicating a potential upside of 11.23%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus target price of $228.88, indicating a potential upside of 2.34%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aramark is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

In the previous week, Aramark had 26 more articles in the media than Darden Restaurants. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Aramark and 9 mentions for Darden Restaurants. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Darden Restaurants' score of 0.32 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Darden Restaurants has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Darden Restaurants is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

93.6% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 9.13% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Darden Restaurants' return on equity of 57.44% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Darden Restaurants has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Darden Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Yum China currently has a consensus target price of $59.21, suggesting a potential upside of 25.32%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $68.07, suggesting a potential upside of 11.23%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

In the previous week, Aramark had 24 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for Aramark and 11 mentions for Yum China. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Yum China's score of 0.55 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its stock price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.84% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.93% beat Yum China's return on equity.

85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.