Free Trial

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

Aramark logo
$53.08 +0.38 (+0.72%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$53.68 +0.61 (+1.15%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and CAVA

Should you buy Aramark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aramark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aramark include Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Yum China (YUMC), H World Group (HTHT), and CAVA Group (CAVA). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 32.80% 6.67%
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.33, indicating a potential upside of 10.08%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $53.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.80%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, Aramark had 18 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Aramark and 9 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of 0.66 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aramark
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$9.43B2.79$776M$2.8426.66
Aramark$18.51B0.75$326.39M$1.1944.60

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Aramark has a net margin of 1.84% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intercontinental Hotels GroupN/A N/A N/A
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

In the previous week, Aramark had 20 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Aramark and 7 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aramark
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Aramark pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.29$758MN/AN/A
Aramark$18.51B0.75$326.39M$1.1944.60

Intercontinental Hotels Group currently has a consensus price target of $154.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.67%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $53.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.80%. Given Intercontinental Hotels Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Intercontinental Hotels Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intercontinental Hotels Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Summary

Aramark beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Yum China has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yum China7.83% 15.11% 8.67%
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

In the previous week, Aramark had 9 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Aramark and 18 mentions for Yum China. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Yum China's score of 0.10 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Yum China
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aramark
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$11.80B1.35$929M$2.6117.46
Aramark$18.51B0.75$326.39M$1.1944.60

Yum China presently has a consensus price target of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 29.60%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $53.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.80%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yum China
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Summary

Aramark beats Yum China on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. H World Group pays out 113.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Aramark had 18 more articles in the media than H World Group. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Aramark and 9 mentions for H World Group. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Aramark's score of 0.80 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
H World Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aramark
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

H World Group has a net margin of 20.05% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. H World Group's return on equity of 37.79% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
H World Group20.05% 37.79% 7.11%
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

H World Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
H World Group$3.62B3.91$726M$2.2520.47
Aramark$18.51B0.75$326.39M$1.1944.60

H World Group has a beta of 0.15, suggesting that its share price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

H World Group presently has a consensus price target of $54.80, suggesting a potential upside of 19.00%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $53.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.80%. Given H World Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe H World Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
H World Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.17
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

46.4% of H World Group shares are held by institutional investors. 49.4% of H World Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

H World Group beats Aramark on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to CAVA Group?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and CAVA Group (NYSE:CAVA) are both restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Aramark had 14 more articles in the media than CAVA Group. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Aramark and 13 mentions for CAVA Group. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat CAVA Group's score of 0.40 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aramark
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CAVA Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CAVA Group has a net margin of 5.40% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat CAVA Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aramark1.84% 17.05% 4.02%
CAVA Group 5.40%8.43%4.90%

Aramark has higher revenue and earnings than CAVA Group. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CAVA Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aramark$18.51B0.75$326.39M$1.1944.60
CAVA Group$1.18B7.60$63.74M$0.54142.63

Aramark has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CAVA Group has a beta of 1.9, meaning that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Aramark presently has a consensus price target of $53.50, suggesting a potential upside of 0.80%. CAVA Group has a consensus price target of $89.96, suggesting a potential upside of 16.80%. Given CAVA Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CAVA Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
CAVA Group
1 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

73.2% of CAVA Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.7% of CAVA Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CAVA Group beats Aramark on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aramark News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ARMK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ARMK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ARMK vs. The Competition

MetricAramarkBUSINESS SVCS IndustryBusiness SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$13.96B$5.43B$6.38B$22.72B
Dividend Yield0.95%3.12%3.15%4.09%
P/E Ratio39.6111.9930.7630.25
Price / Sales0.751.44436.9492.35
Price / Cash13.5811.6123.1025.31
Price / Book4.254.316.744.59
Net Income$326.39M$155.84M$200.18M$1.06B
7 Day Performance17.59%0.87%1.91%-2.25%
1 Month Performance21.10%-0.86%-2.08%0.01%
1 Year Performance38.51%-5.49%35.84%22.53%

Aramark Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ARMK
Aramark
3.869 of 5 stars
$53.08
+0.7%
$53.50
+0.8%
+35.4%$13.96B$18.51B39.61278,390
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
3.707 of 5 stars
$80.05
+0.0%
$82.04
+2.5%
+12.6%$27.80B$9.43B33.9253,500
IHG
Intercontinental Hotels Group
2.6487 of 5 stars
$139.27
-2.6%
N/A+20.6%$21.46B$5.19BN/A13,049
YUMC
Yum China
4.4256 of 5 stars
$47.80
-2.0%
$59.05
+23.5%
-1.8%$17.14B$11.80B18.31290,000
HTHT
H World Group
4.4354 of 5 stars
$47.93
-5.9%
$54.80
+14.3%
+20.2%$15.66B$3.62B21.3028,502

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ARMK) was last updated on 5/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners