Free Trial

Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

Aramark logo
$54.28 -0.25 (-0.46%)
Closing price 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$54.52 +0.24 (+0.44%)
As of 06/12/2026 07:52 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ARMK vs. QSR, IHG, YUMC, HTHT, and BROS

Should you buy Aramark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Aramark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Aramark include Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Intercontinental Hotels Group (IHG), Yum China (YUMC), H World Group (HTHT), and Dutch Bros (BROS). These companies are all part of the "restaurants, hotels, motels" industry.

How does Aramark compare to Restaurant Brands International?

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 9.96% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 32.80% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Restaurant Brands International9.96% 32.80% 6.67%
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Restaurant Brands International currently has a consensus price target of $83.54, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $55.33, suggesting a potential upside of 1.94%. Given Restaurant Brands International's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Restaurant Brands International
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays out 91.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years and Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Restaurant Brands International has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$9.59B2.72$776M$2.8426.40
Aramark$18.51B0.77$326.39M$1.3440.51

In the previous week, Restaurant Brands International had 8 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Restaurant Brands International and 4 mentions for Aramark. Restaurant Brands International's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Aramark's score of 0.39 indicating that Restaurant Brands International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Restaurant Brands International
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Aramark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Aramark on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Intercontinental Hotels Group?

Intercontinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

In the previous week, Aramark had 4 more articles in the media than Intercontinental Hotels Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Aramark and 0 mentions for Intercontinental Hotels Group. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Intercontinental Hotels Group Neutral
Aramark Neutral

Intercontinental Hotels Group currently has a consensus target price of $154.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.76%. Aramark has a consensus target price of $55.33, indicating a potential upside of 1.94%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Intercontinental Hotels Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Intercontinental Hotels Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Intercontinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Aramark has a net margin of 1.84% compared to Intercontinental Hotels Group's net margin of 0.00%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Intercontinental Hotels Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Intercontinental Hotels GroupN/A N/A N/A
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

Intercontinental Hotels Group pays an annual dividend of $2.43 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Intercontinental Hotels Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Intercontinental Hotels Group$5.19B4.81$758MN/AN/A
Aramark$18.51B0.77$326.39M$1.3440.51

15.1% of Intercontinental Hotels Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Aramark beats Intercontinental Hotels Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Yum China?

Yum China (NYSE:YUMC) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Yum China currently has a consensus price target of $59.05, suggesting a potential upside of 32.30%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $55.33, suggesting a potential upside of 1.94%. Given Yum China's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yum China
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Yum China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yum China$12.09B1.29$929M$2.6117.10
Aramark$18.51B0.77$326.39M$1.3440.51

In the previous week, Aramark had 4 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Aramark and 0 mentions for Yum China. Yum China's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Aramark's score of 0.39 indicating that Yum China is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Yum China Neutral
Aramark Neutral

Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Yum China pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Yum China has a beta of 0.09, indicating that its share price is 91% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.83% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Yum China's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yum China7.83% 15.11% 8.67%
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

85.6% of Yum China shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Yum China shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Yum China beats Aramark on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to H World Group?

Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) and H World Group (NASDAQ:HTHT) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. H World Group pays an annual dividend of $2.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Aramark pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. H World Group pays out 114.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Aramark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, H World Group had 9 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for H World Group and 4 mentions for Aramark. H World Group's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Aramark's score of 0.39 indicating that H World Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Aramark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
H World Group
11 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, H World Group has a beta of 0.11, indicating that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market.

H World Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. H World Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aramark$18.51B0.77$326.39M$1.3440.51
H World Group$3.62B3.80$726M$2.2320.03

H World Group has a net margin of 19.22% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. H World Group's return on equity of 39.73% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aramark1.84% 17.05% 4.02%
H World Group 19.22%39.73%7.47%

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $55.33, suggesting a potential upside of 1.94%. H World Group has a consensus target price of $61.20, suggesting a potential upside of 37.04%. Given H World Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe H World Group is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
H World Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

46.4% of H World Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 49.4% of H World Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

H World Group beats Aramark on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Aramark compare to Dutch Bros?

Dutch Bros (NYSE:BROS) and Aramark (NYSE:ARMK) are both large-cap restaurants, hotels, motels companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

85.5% of Dutch Bros shares are held by institutional investors. 38.9% of Dutch Bros shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aramark has higher revenue and earnings than Dutch Bros. Aramark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dutch Bros, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dutch Bros$1.75B6.59$79.84M$0.64102.99
Aramark$18.51B0.77$326.39M$1.3440.51

In the previous week, Dutch Bros had 29 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Dutch Bros and 4 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat Dutch Bros' score of 0.37 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dutch Bros
11 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Aramark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Dutch Bros has a beta of 2.36, suggesting that its stock price is 136% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Dutch Bros currently has a consensus price target of $76.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.31%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $55.33, indicating a potential upside of 1.94%. Given Dutch Bros' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Dutch Bros is more favorable than Aramark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dutch Bros
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Aramark
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

Dutch Bros has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.84%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.05% beat Dutch Bros' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dutch Bros4.61% 9.42% 2.80%
Aramark 1.84%17.05%4.02%

Summary

Dutch Bros beats Aramark on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Aramark News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ARMK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ARMK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ARMK vs. The Competition

MetricAramarkBUSINESS SVCS IndustryBusiness SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$14.27B$5.55B$6.72B$23.31B
Dividend Yield0.88%2.89%3.09%4.07%
P/E Ratio40.5112.4328.4631.33
Price / Sales0.771.44402.55103.93
Price / Cash14.5311.9023.7624.31
Price / Book4.535.025.784.68
Net Income$326.39M$154.78M$205.40M$1.07B
7 Day Performance1.56%-1.80%-0.07%2.11%
1 Month Performance3.03%11.62%0.43%1.95%
1 Year Performance35.53%-0.90%36.78%24.11%

Aramark Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ARMK
Aramark
2.9706 of 5 stars
$54.28
-0.5%
$55.33
+1.9%
+35.5%$14.27B$18.51B40.51278,390
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
4.404 of 5 stars
$72.87
-2.4%
$83.54
+14.6%
+11.4%$25.95B$9.59B25.6653,500
IHG
Intercontinental Hotels Group
1.757 of 5 stars
$154.96
+0.1%
$154.00
-0.6%
+49.4%$23.17B$5.19BN/A13,049
YUMC
Yum China
4.6171 of 5 stars
$42.77
+0.8%
$59.05
+38.1%
+2.5%$14.81B$11.80B16.39290,000
HTHT
H World Group
4.7349 of 5 stars
$44.37
-1.2%
$61.20
+37.9%
+34.1%$13.80B$3.62B19.9026,458

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:ARMK) was last updated on 6/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners