Aramark (ARMK) Competitors

In the previous week, Yum! Brands had 17 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Yum! Brands and 4 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Yum! Brands' score of 0.28 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Yum! Brands has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

82.4% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Yum! Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Yum! Brands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Aramark. Yum! Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Yum! Brands has a net margin of 25.42% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.68% beat Yum! Brands' return on equity.

Yum! Brands presently has a consensus price target of $172.56, indicating a potential upside of 19.30%. Aramark has a consensus price target of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 25.80%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Yum! Brands.

Yum! Brands pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Yum! Brands pays out 37.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yum! Brands has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years and Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Yum! Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Restaurant Brands International pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Restaurant Brands International pays out 69.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Restaurant Brands International has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. Restaurant Brands International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.3% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Aramark had 1 more articles in the media than Restaurant Brands International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Aramark and 3 mentions for Restaurant Brands International. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Restaurant Brands International's score of -0.45 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Aramark currently has a consensus price target of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 25.80%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus price target of $83.63, suggesting a potential upside of 17.88%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Aramark is more favorable than Restaurant Brands International.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Restaurant Brands International has a net margin of 13.12% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Restaurant Brands International's return on equity of 33.43% beat Aramark's return on equity.

In the previous week, Darden Restaurants had 15 more articles in the media than Aramark. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Darden Restaurants and 4 mentions for Aramark. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Darden Restaurants' score of 0.47 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $69.14, suggesting a potential upside of 25.80%. Darden Restaurants has a consensus target price of $232.48, suggesting a potential upside of 17.74%. Given Aramark's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Aramark is more favorable than Darden Restaurants.

Darden Restaurants has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Darden Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Darden Restaurants pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 63.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Darden Restaurants has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Darden Restaurants is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

93.6% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 8.85% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Darden Restaurants' return on equity of 58.64% beat Aramark's return on equity.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Yum China has a net margin of 7.84% compared to Aramark's net margin of 1.93%. Aramark's return on equity of 17.68% beat Yum China's return on equity.

85.6% of Yum China shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Aramark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Yum China shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Aramark had 1 more articles in the media than Yum China. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Aramark and 3 mentions for Yum China. Aramark's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Yum China's score of 0.34 indicating that Aramark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Aramark pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Yum China pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Aramark pays out 33.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yum China pays out 42.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Aramark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Yum China has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Yum China is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Aramark presently has a consensus target price of $69.14, indicating a potential upside of 25.80%. Yum China has a consensus target price of $59.21, indicating a potential upside of 38.02%. Given Yum China's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Yum China is more favorable than Aramark.

Yum China has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aramark. Yum China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aramark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Aramark has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yum China has a beta of 0.07, suggesting that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the broader market.