Belden (BDC) Competitors

Avnet has higher revenue and earnings than Belden. Belden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avnet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Belden had 3 more articles in the media than Avnet. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Belden and 6 mentions for Avnet. Avnet's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Belden's score of 0.48 indicating that Avnet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

98.8% of Belden shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.8% of Avnet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Belden shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Avnet shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Belden has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avnet has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Belden pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Avnet pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Belden pays out 3.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avnet pays out 54.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avnet has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Avnet is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Belden has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Avnet's net margin of 0.86%. Belden's return on equity of 24.47% beat Avnet's return on equity.

Belden currently has a consensus price target of $158.75, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Avnet has a consensus price target of $89.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.34%. Given Belden's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Belden is more favorable than Avnet.

Belden has higher revenue and earnings than Littelfuse. Littelfuse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Belden, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Belden has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Littelfuse has a beta of 1.49, meaning that its stock price is 49% more volatile than the broader market.

98.8% of Belden shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.1% of Littelfuse shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Belden shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Littelfuse shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Belden and Belden both had 9 articles in the media. Littelfuse's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Belden's score of 0.48 indicating that Littelfuse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Belden pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Littelfuse pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Belden pays out 3.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Littelfuse pays out -177.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Littelfuse has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Littelfuse is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Belden has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Littelfuse's net margin of -1.61%. Belden's return on equity of 24.47% beat Littelfuse's return on equity.

Belden currently has a consensus target price of $158.75, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Littelfuse has a consensus target price of $465.83, indicating a potential upside of 17.62%. Given Belden's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Belden is more favorable than Littelfuse.

98.8% of Belden shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Arrow Electronics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Belden shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Arrow Electronics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Arrow Electronics has higher revenue and earnings than Belden. Arrow Electronics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Belden, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Belden had 6 more articles in the media than Arrow Electronics. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Belden and 3 mentions for Arrow Electronics. Arrow Electronics' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Belden's score of 0.48 indicating that Arrow Electronics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Belden has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its share price is 12% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arrow Electronics has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Belden presently has a consensus price target of $158.75, suggesting a potential upside of 57.49%. Arrow Electronics has a consensus price target of $219.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.26%. Given Belden's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Belden is more favorable than Arrow Electronics.

Belden has a net margin of 8.49% compared to Arrow Electronics' net margin of 2.17%. Belden's return on equity of 24.47% beat Arrow Electronics' return on equity.

Crane has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Belden has a beta of 1.12, indicating that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Crane has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Belden. Belden is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Crane had 6 more articles in the media than Belden. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Crane and 9 mentions for Belden. Crane's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Belden's score of 0.48 indicating that Crane is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crane pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Belden pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Crane pays out 18.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Belden pays out 3.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crane has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Crane is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

75.1% of Crane shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Belden shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Crane shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Belden shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crane has a net margin of 13.10% compared to Belden's net margin of 8.49%. Belden's return on equity of 24.47% beat Crane's return on equity.

Crane presently has a consensus target price of $226.33, suggesting a potential upside of 3.11%. Belden has a consensus target price of $158.75, suggesting a potential upside of 57.49%. Given Belden's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Belden is more favorable than Crane.