NYSE:BKR

Baker Hughes Competitors

$20.09
-0.02 (-0.10 %)
(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$19.93
Now: $20.09
$20.48
50-Day Range
$20.11
MA: $23.00
$25.15
52-Week Range
$12.01
Now: $20.09
$25.64
Volume8.20 million shs
Average Volume7.68 million shs
Market Capitalization$20.90 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield3.58%
Beta1.78

Competitors

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) Vs. BHGE, NOV, FTI, WHD, DRQ, and DNOW

Should you be buying BKR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "oil & gas field machinery" are considered alternatives and competitors to Baker Hughes, including Baker Hughes A GE (BHGE), NOV (NOV), TechnipFMC (FTI), Cactus (WHD), Dril-Quip (DRQ), and NOW (DNOW).

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) and Baker Hughes A GE (NYSE:BHGE) are both large-cap oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baker Hughes A GE has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Baker Hughes A GE shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Baker Hughes A GE shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Baker Hughes A GE pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Baker Hughes pays out 84.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Baker Hughes A GE pays out 109.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Baker Hughes and Baker Hughes A GE, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baker Hughes081302.62
Baker Hughes A GE0000N/A

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $20.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.28%. Given Baker Hughes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Baker Hughes A GE.

Profitability

This table compares Baker Hughes and Baker Hughes A GE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baker Hughes-48.86%1.12%0.59%
Baker Hughes A GE0.71%1.07%0.71%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Baker Hughes and Baker Hughes A GE's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$23.84 billion0.88$128 million$0.8523.64
Baker Hughes A GE$22.88 billion0.91$195 million$0.6630.44

Baker Hughes A GE has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baker Hughes. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes A GE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Baker Hughes A GE on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) and NOV (NYSE:NOV) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOV has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of NOV shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of NOV shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Baker Hughes and NOV, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baker Hughes081302.62
NOV27802.35

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $20.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.28%. NOV has a consensus target price of $13.8071, indicating a potential upside of 5.00%. Given NOV's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NOV is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Profitability

This table compares Baker Hughes and NOV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baker Hughes-48.86%1.12%0.59%
NOV-36.63%1.13%0.62%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Baker Hughes and NOV's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$23.84 billion0.88$128 million$0.8523.64
NOV$8.48 billion0.60$-6,095,000,000.00($0.72)-18.26

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOV. NOV is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats NOV on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) and TechnipFMC (NYSE:FTI) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TechnipFMC has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of TechnipFMC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Baker Hughes and TechnipFMC, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baker Hughes081302.62
TechnipFMC112902.36

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $20.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.28%. TechnipFMC has a consensus target price of $10.3393, indicating a potential upside of 42.02%. Given TechnipFMC's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe TechnipFMC is more favorable than Baker Hughes.

Profitability

This table compares Baker Hughes and TechnipFMC's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baker Hughes-48.86%1.12%0.59%
TechnipFMC-42.41%1.56%0.38%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Baker Hughes and TechnipFMC's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$23.84 billion0.88$128 million$0.8523.64
TechnipFMC$13.41 billion0.24$-2,415,200,000.00$0.749.84

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than TechnipFMC. TechnipFMC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats TechnipFMC on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) and Cactus (NYSE:WHD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cactus has a beta of 2.35, indicating that its stock price is 135% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

98.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Cactus shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.3% of Cactus shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Baker Hughes pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Cactus pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Baker Hughes pays out 84.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cactus pays out 19.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cactus has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Baker Hughes and Cactus, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baker Hughes081302.62
Cactus05512.64

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $20.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.28%. Cactus has a consensus target price of $26.6154, indicating a potential downside of 11.66%. Given Baker Hughes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Cactus.

Profitability

This table compares Baker Hughes and Cactus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baker Hughes-48.86%1.12%0.59%
Cactus11.96%14.25%9.00%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Baker Hughes and Cactus' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$23.84 billion0.88$128 million$0.8523.64
Cactus$628.41 million3.62$85.61 million$1.8616.20

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Cactus. Cactus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baker Hughes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cactus beats Baker Hughes on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) and Dril-Quip (NYSE:DRQ) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Volatility & Risk

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dril-Quip has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Dril-Quip shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Baker Hughes and Dril-Quip, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baker Hughes081302.62
Dril-Quip16001.86

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $20.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.28%. Dril-Quip has a consensus target price of $28.60, indicating a potential downside of 6.17%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than Dril-Quip.

Profitability

This table compares Baker Hughes and Dril-Quip's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baker Hughes-48.86%1.12%0.59%
Dril-Quip-3.14%0.99%0.89%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Baker Hughes and Dril-Quip's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$23.84 billion0.88$128 million$0.8523.64
Dril-Quip$414.81 million2.60$1.72 million$0.08381.00

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than Dril-Quip. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dril-Quip, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats Dril-Quip on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Baker Hughes (NYSE:BKR) and NOW (NYSE:DNOW) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Baker Hughes and NOW's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baker Hughes$23.84 billion0.88$128 million$0.8523.64
NOW$2.95 billion0.36$-97,000,000.00$0.2342.13

Baker Hughes has higher revenue and earnings than NOW. Baker Hughes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NOW, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NOW has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Baker Hughes and NOW's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Baker Hughes-48.86%1.12%0.59%
NOW-26.92%-5.78%-4.00%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Baker Hughes and NOW, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Baker Hughes081302.62
NOW11202.25

Baker Hughes presently has a consensus target price of $20.95, indicating a potential upside of 4.28%. NOW has a consensus target price of $9.3333, indicating a potential downside of 3.68%. Given Baker Hughes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Baker Hughes is more favorable than NOW.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

98.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of NOW shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baker Hughes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of NOW shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Baker Hughes beats NOW on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Baker Hughes Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Baker Hughes A GE logo
BHGE
Baker Hughes A GE
1.5$20.09-0.1%$20.85 billion$22.88 billion30.44
NOV logo
NOV
NOV
1.2$13.15-0.5%$5.10 billion$8.48 billion-1.95
TechnipFMC logo
FTI
TechnipFMC
2.3$7.28-3.7%$3.26 billion$13.41 billion-0.58Increase in Short Interest
Cactus logo
WHD
Cactus
1.3$30.13-1.5%$2.28 billion$628.41 million23.18
Dril-Quip logo
DRQ
Dril-Quip
0.6$30.48-0.3%$1.08 billion$414.81 million-92.36
NOW logo
DNOW
NOW
1.1$9.69-0.6%$1.07 billion$2.95 billion-2.03
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure logo
SOI
Solaris Oilfield Infrastructure
1.3$11.50-2.1%$521.27 million$241.69 million-23.47
Oil States International logo
OIS
Oil States International
1.2$5.78-1.4%$354.23 million$1.02 billion-0.55
Newpark Resources logo
NR
Newpark Resources
1.1$3.24-2.8%$294.69 million$820.12 million-3.68
Forum Energy Technologies logo
FET
Forum Energy Technologies
0.8$19.92-1.8%$111.55 million$956.50 million-1.46Decrease in Short Interest
Profire Energy logo
PFIE
Profire Energy
0.8$1.15-4.3%$55.21 million$38.98 million-14.38Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
This page was last updated on 4/13/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.