Go Pro

CBL & Associates Properties (CBL) Competitors

CBL & Associates Properties logo
$53.00 -0.26 (-0.49%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$53.02 +0.01 (+0.03%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CBL vs. MAC, KRG, PECO, SKT, and CURB

Should you buy CBL & Associates Properties stock or one of its competitors? CBL & Associates Properties's main competitors and comparable companies include Macerich (MAC), Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO), Tanger (SKT), and Curbline Properties (CURB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "retail reits" industry.

How does CBL & Associates Properties compare to Macerich?

CBL & Associates Properties (NYSE:CBL) and Macerich (NYSE:MAC) are both real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Macerich had 8 more articles in the media than CBL & Associates Properties. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Macerich and 1 mentions for CBL & Associates Properties. Macerich's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat CBL & Associates Properties' score of -0.33 indicating that Macerich is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Macerich
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CBL & Associates Properties has a net margin of 36.59% compared to Macerich's net margin of -16.85%. CBL & Associates Properties' return on equity of 56.82% beat Macerich's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CBL & Associates Properties36.59% 56.82% 8.01%
Macerich -16.85%-6.26%-1.97%

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Macerich has a beta of 2.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% more volatile than the broader market.

83.6% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Macerich shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Macerich shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CBL & Associates Properties has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Macerich. Macerich is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CBL & Associates Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CBL & Associates Properties$578.37M2.84$135.97M$6.897.69
Macerich$1.01B6.27-$197.15M-$0.65N/A

CBL & Associates Properties presently has a consensus target price of $55.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.77%. Macerich has a consensus target price of $26.00, suggesting a potential upside of 16.05%. Given Macerich's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Macerich is more favorable than CBL & Associates Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Macerich
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

CBL & Associates Properties pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Macerich pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. CBL & Associates Properties pays out 36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Macerich pays out -104.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CBL & Associates Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. CBL & Associates Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

CBL & Associates Properties and Macerich tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CBL & Associates Properties compare to Kite Realty Group Trust?

Kite Realty Group Trust (NYSE:KRG) and CBL & Associates Properties (NYSE:CBL) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and risk.

Kite Realty Group Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. CBL & Associates Properties pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Kite Realty Group Trust pays out 71.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CBL & Associates Properties pays out 36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kite Realty Group Trust has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and CBL & Associates Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. CBL & Associates Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Kite Realty Group Trust presently has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.03%. CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.77%. Given Kite Realty Group Trust's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Kite Realty Group Trust is more favorable than CBL & Associates Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kite Realty Group Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Kite Realty Group Trust had 6 more articles in the media than CBL & Associates Properties. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Kite Realty Group Trust and 1 mentions for CBL & Associates Properties. Kite Realty Group Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat CBL & Associates Properties' score of -0.33 indicating that Kite Realty Group Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kite Realty Group Trust
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Kite Realty Group Trust has a net margin of 41.80% compared to CBL & Associates Properties' net margin of 36.59%. CBL & Associates Properties' return on equity of 56.82% beat Kite Realty Group Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kite Realty Group Trust41.80% 11.26% 5.20%
CBL & Associates Properties 36.59%56.82%8.01%

Kite Realty Group Trust has higher revenue and earnings than CBL & Associates Properties. CBL & Associates Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kite Realty Group Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kite Realty Group Trust$844.36M6.08$298.66M$1.6215.82
CBL & Associates Properties$578.37M2.84$135.97M$6.897.69

90.8% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Kite Realty Group Trust beats CBL & Associates Properties on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CBL & Associates Properties compare to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.?

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (NASDAQ:PECO) and CBL & Associates Properties (NYSE:CBL) are both real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

CBL & Associates Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. CBL & Associates Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips Edison & Company, Inc., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.$726.59M6.70$111.30M$1.1532.87
CBL & Associates Properties$578.37M2.84$135.97M$6.897.69

80.7% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. presently has a consensus price target of $44.56, indicating a potential upside of 17.87%. CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.77%. Given Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is more favorable than CBL & Associates Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CBL & Associates Properties pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. pays out 113.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CBL & Associates Properties pays out 36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CBL & Associates Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. CBL & Associates Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. had 4 more articles in the media than CBL & Associates Properties. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. and 1 mentions for CBL & Associates Properties. Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat CBL & Associates Properties' score of -0.33 indicating that Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

CBL & Associates Properties has a net margin of 36.59% compared to Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s net margin of 19.14%. CBL & Associates Properties' return on equity of 56.82% beat Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.19.14% 5.52% 2.69%
CBL & Associates Properties 36.59%56.82%8.01%

Summary

CBL & Associates Properties beats Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CBL & Associates Properties compare to Tanger?

Tanger (NYSE:SKT) and CBL & Associates Properties (NYSE:CBL) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CBL & Associates Properties has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tanger. CBL & Associates Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tanger$612.31M6.72$114.78M$1.1032.56
CBL & Associates Properties$578.37M2.84$135.97M$6.897.69

In the previous week, Tanger and Tanger both had 1 articles in the media. Tanger's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat CBL & Associates Properties' score of -0.33 indicating that Tanger is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tanger
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tanger has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

CBL & Associates Properties has a net margin of 36.59% compared to Tanger's net margin of 20.74%. CBL & Associates Properties' return on equity of 56.82% beat Tanger's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tanger20.74% 17.72% 4.62%
CBL & Associates Properties 36.59%56.82%8.01%

Tanger pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. CBL & Associates Properties pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Tanger pays out 113.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CBL & Associates Properties pays out 36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tanger has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and CBL & Associates Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. CBL & Associates Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

85.2% of Tanger shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Tanger shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Tanger presently has a consensus target price of $40.40, indicating a potential upside of 12.79%. CBL & Associates Properties has a consensus target price of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.77%. Given Tanger's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Tanger is more favorable than CBL & Associates Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tanger
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.10
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

CBL & Associates Properties beats Tanger on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CBL & Associates Properties compare to Curbline Properties?

CBL & Associates Properties (NYSE:CBL) and Curbline Properties (NYSE:CURB) are both real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

CBL & Associates Properties pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Curbline Properties pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. CBL & Associates Properties pays out 36.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Curbline Properties pays out 251.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CBL & Associates Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. CBL & Associates Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

83.6% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of CBL & Associates Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of Curbline Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CBL & Associates Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Curbline Properties. CBL & Associates Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curbline Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CBL & Associates Properties$578.37M2.84$135.97M$6.897.69
Curbline Properties$182.89M18.06$39.83M$0.27106.35

In the previous week, Curbline Properties had 19 more articles in the media than CBL & Associates Properties. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Curbline Properties and 1 mentions for CBL & Associates Properties. Curbline Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat CBL & Associates Properties' score of -0.33 indicating that Curbline Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Curbline Properties
10 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CBL & Associates Properties has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curbline Properties has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

CBL & Associates Properties has a net margin of 36.59% compared to Curbline Properties' net margin of 13.10%. CBL & Associates Properties' return on equity of 56.82% beat Curbline Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CBL & Associates Properties36.59% 56.82% 8.01%
Curbline Properties 13.10%1.50%1.13%

CBL & Associates Properties presently has a consensus target price of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.77%. Curbline Properties has a consensus target price of $32.22, indicating a potential upside of 12.22%. Given Curbline Properties' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Curbline Properties is more favorable than CBL & Associates Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CBL & Associates Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Curbline Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Summary

CBL & Associates Properties beats Curbline Properties on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CBL & Associates Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CBL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CBL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CBL vs. The Competition

MetricCBL & Associates PropertiesRetail REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.64B$7.08B$5.38B$22.93B
Dividend Yield4.59%5.31%6.48%3.58%
P/E Ratio7.6927.8028.0228.24
Price / Sales2.8496.96125.0418.99
Price / Cash4.8457.0134.3234.34
Price / Book4.462.381.794.66
Net Income$135.97M$272.91M-$63.40M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.12%-1.80%-1.45%-2.12%
1 Month Performance-8.85%-6.39%-4.56%-4.92%
1 Year Performance69.74%8.24%-3.37%8.27%

CBL & Associates Properties Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CBL
CBL & Associates Properties
2.6035 of 5 stars
$53.00
-0.5%
$55.00
+3.8%
+68.3%$1.64B$578.37M7.69500
MAC
Macerich
2.7256 of 5 stars
$23.02
-2.4%
$26.00
+12.9%
+23.6%$6.53B$1.01BN/A650
KRG
Kite Realty Group Trust
4.0439 of 5 stars
$26.05
-0.1%
$30.00
+15.1%
+14.5%$5.22B$806.85M16.08240
PECO
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
4.1144 of 5 stars
$38.73
-0.9%
$44.33
+14.5%
+6.9%$4.98B$750.89M33.68290
SKT
Tanger
2.5358 of 5 stars
$36.74
-1.5%
$40.40
+10.0%
+7.0%$4.22B$581.56M33.40600

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CBL) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners