Tanger (SKT) Competitors

Tanger presently has a consensus target price of $39.70, indicating a potential downside of 2.38%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus target price of $34.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.81%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Tanger.

Tanger has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 17 more articles in the media than Tanger. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 6 mentions for Tanger. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Tanger's score of 0.65 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 30.82% compared to Tanger's net margin of 20.76%. Tanger's return on equity of 17.53% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Tanger. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tanger pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Tanger pays out 116.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tanger has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Brixmor Property Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

85.2% of Tanger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Tanger shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Tanger. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus target price of $127.63, indicating a potential upside of 2.78%. Tanger has a consensus target price of $39.70, indicating a potential downside of 2.38%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Tanger.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Tanger pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tanger pays out 116.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Tanger has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of Tanger shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Tanger shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 25 more articles in the media than Tanger. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 6 mentions for Tanger. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Tanger's score of 0.65 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Tanger's net margin of 20.76%. Tanger's return on equity of 17.53% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tanger has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Tanger currently has a consensus target price of $39.70, suggesting a potential downside of 2.38%. Kimco Realty has a consensus target price of $26.12, suggesting a potential upside of 2.52%. Given Kimco Realty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kimco Realty is more favorable than Tanger.

Tanger pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Kimco Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Tanger pays out 116.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimco Realty pays out 120.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tanger has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Kimco Realty has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

85.2% of Tanger shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Tanger shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimco Realty has higher revenue and earnings than Tanger. Kimco Realty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Tanger has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimco Realty has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kimco Realty had 6 more articles in the media than Tanger. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Kimco Realty and 6 mentions for Tanger. Kimco Realty's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Tanger's score of 0.65 indicating that Kimco Realty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 28.54% compared to Tanger's net margin of 20.76%. Tanger's return on equity of 17.53% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity.

Kite Realty Group Trust has a net margin of 41.80% compared to Tanger's net margin of 20.76%. Tanger's return on equity of 17.53% beat Kite Realty Group Trust's return on equity.

85.2% of Tanger shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Tanger shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Kite Realty Group Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tanger pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Kite Realty Group Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Tanger pays out 116.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kite Realty Group Trust pays out 87.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Tanger has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Kite Realty Group Trust has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Kite Realty Group Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Tanger has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kite Realty Group Trust has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Tanger presently has a consensus target price of $39.70, indicating a potential downside of 2.38%. Kite Realty Group Trust has a consensus target price of $29.57, indicating a potential upside of 3.46%. Given Kite Realty Group Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kite Realty Group Trust is more favorable than Tanger.

Kite Realty Group Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Tanger. Kite Realty Group Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tanger, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Kite Realty Group Trust had 19 more articles in the media than Tanger. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Kite Realty Group Trust and 6 mentions for Tanger. Kite Realty Group Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Tanger's score of 0.65 indicating that Kite Realty Group Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.