Ennis (EBF) Competitors

Ennis has a beta of 0.28, indicating that its share price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quad Graphics has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

74.3% of Ennis shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.5% of Quad Graphics shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Ennis shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Quad Graphics shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ennis has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quad Graphics. Ennis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quad Graphics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Quad Graphics had 5 more articles in the media than Ennis. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Quad Graphics and 0 mentions for Ennis. Quad Graphics' average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Ennis' score of 0.00 indicating that Quad Graphics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Quad Graphics has a consensus target price of $9.93, indicating a potential upside of 38.83%. Given Quad Graphics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quad Graphics is more favorable than Ennis.

Ennis has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Quad Graphics' net margin of 1.16%. Quad Graphics' return on equity of 47.27% beat Ennis' return on equity.

Ennis pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Quad Graphics pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Ennis pays out 60.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Quad Graphics pays out 71.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Quad Graphics has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Quad Graphics is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ennis has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Acco Brands' net margin of 4.76%. Ennis' return on equity of 13.98% beat Acco Brands' return on equity.

Ennis pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Ennis pays out 60.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acco Brands pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acco Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Ennis has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ennis, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ennis has a beta of 0.28, meaning that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acco Brands has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

74.3% of Ennis shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Acco Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Ennis shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Acco Brands has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 29.70%. Given Acco Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than Ennis.

In the previous week, Acco Brands had 5 more articles in the media than Ennis. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acco Brands and 0 mentions for Ennis. Acco Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.13 beat Ennis' score of 0.00 indicating that Acco Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Gorman-Rupp has higher revenue and earnings than Ennis. Ennis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gorman-Rupp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

59.3% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.3% of Ennis shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Gorman-Rupp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Ennis shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gorman-Rupp had 2 more articles in the media than Ennis. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Gorman-Rupp and 0 mentions for Ennis. Gorman-Rupp's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Ennis' score of 0.00 indicating that Gorman-Rupp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ennis has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Gorman-Rupp pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Ennis pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Gorman-Rupp pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ennis pays out 60.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gorman-Rupp has increased its dividend for 52 consecutive years.

Ennis has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Gorman-Rupp's net margin of 8.45%. Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 15.08% beat Ennis' return on equity.

92.4% of Alamo Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.3% of Ennis shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Alamo Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Ennis shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Alamo Group pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Ennis pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Alamo Group pays out 16.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ennis pays out 60.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Alamo Group has increased its dividend for 14 consecutive years.

Alamo Group has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ennis has a beta of 0.28, suggesting that its stock price is 72% less volatile than the broader market.

Alamo Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ennis. Ennis is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Alamo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Alamo Group had 3 more articles in the media than Ennis. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Alamo Group and 0 mentions for Ennis. Alamo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Ennis' score of 0.00 indicating that Alamo Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Ennis has a net margin of 10.86% compared to Alamo Group's net margin of 6.21%. Ennis' return on equity of 13.98% beat Alamo Group's return on equity.

Alamo Group currently has a consensus price target of $224.00, indicating a potential upside of 50.14%. Given Alamo Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Alamo Group is more favorable than Ennis.