Acco Brands (ACCO) Competitors

Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Avery Dennison pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Acco Brands pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avery Dennison pays out 42.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avery Dennison has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Acco Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Avery Dennison has a net margin of 7.66% compared to Acco Brands' net margin of 4.76%. Avery Dennison's return on equity of 33.69% beat Acco Brands' return on equity.

Avery Dennison has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avery Dennison, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Acco Brands presently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.37%. Avery Dennison has a consensus price target of $201.33, indicating a potential upside of 31.80%. Given Avery Dennison's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Avery Dennison is more favorable than Acco Brands.

In the previous week, Avery Dennison had 7 more articles in the media than Acco Brands. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Avery Dennison and 4 mentions for Acco Brands. Avery Dennison's average media sentiment score of 1.48 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.33 indicating that Avery Dennison is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Acco Brands has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Avery Dennison has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

84.6% of Acco Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.2% of Avery Dennison shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Avery Dennison shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MSA Safety Incorporporated has a net margin of 15.16% compared to Acco Brands' net margin of 4.76%. MSA Safety Incorporporated's return on equity of 24.54% beat Acco Brands' return on equity.

In the previous week, MSA Safety Incorporporated had 5 more articles in the media than Acco Brands. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for MSA Safety Incorporporated and 4 mentions for Acco Brands. MSA Safety Incorporporated's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.33 indicating that MSA Safety Incorporporated is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Acco Brands has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MSA Safety Incorporporated has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Acco Brands currently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.37%. MSA Safety Incorporporated has a consensus target price of $200.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.58%. Given Acco Brands' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than MSA Safety Incorporporated.

84.6% of Acco Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of MSA Safety Incorporporated shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of MSA Safety Incorporporated shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. MSA Safety Incorporporated pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Acco Brands pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MSA Safety Incorporporated pays out 29.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MSA Safety Incorporporated has increased its dividend for 56 consecutive years.

MSA Safety Incorporporated has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSA Safety Incorporporated, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Acco Brands had 4 more articles in the media than HNI. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Acco Brands and 0 mentions for HNI. HNI's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.33 indicating that HNI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Acco Brands pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HNI pays out 341.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HNI has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Acco Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Acco Brands has a net margin of 4.76% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.04%. HNI's return on equity of 13.17% beat Acco Brands' return on equity.

84.6% of Acco Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of HNI shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of HNI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

HNI has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HNI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Acco Brands has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HNI has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Acco Brands presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 28.37%. HNI has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 115.25%. Given HNI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe HNI is more favorable than Acco Brands.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 8.92% compared to Acco Brands' net margin of 4.76%. Acco Brands' return on equity of 12.58% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Acco Brands has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

84.6% of Acco Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pitney Bowes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 2 more articles in the media than Acco Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 4 mentions for Acco Brands. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.33 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Acco Brands presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.37%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $15.18, suggesting a potential downside of 10.44%. Given Acco Brands' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Acco Brands pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 38.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Acco Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.