Interface (TILE) Competitors

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Interface. Interface is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pitney Bowes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Interface has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Pitney Bowes pays out 43.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interface pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Pitney Bowes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Interface shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Interface shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 4 more articles in the media than Interface. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 4 mentions for Interface. Interface's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Pitney Bowes' score of 1.13 indicating that Interface is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Pitney Bowes presently has a consensus target price of $11.93, suggesting a potential downside of 23.24%. Interface has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.87%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interface is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Interface has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Pitney Bowes' net margin of 7.65%. Interface's return on equity of 19.54% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

In the previous week, Acco Brands had 23 more articles in the media than Interface. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Acco Brands and 4 mentions for Interface. Interface's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.25 indicating that Interface is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Interface has a beta of 1.92, indicating that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Acco Brands has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

98.3% of Interface shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Acco Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of Interface shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Interface presently has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 31.87%. Acco Brands has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.53%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Interface is more favorable than Acco Brands.

Interface has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interface, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.5%. Interface pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acco Brands pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Interface has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Acco Brands' net margin of 4.76%. Interface's return on equity of 19.54% beat Acco Brands' return on equity.

98.3% of Interface shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of NL Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of Interface shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of NL Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Interface had 2 more articles in the media than NL Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Interface and 2 mentions for NL Industries. Interface's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat NL Industries' score of 0.40 indicating that Interface is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Interface has higher revenue and earnings than NL Industries. NL Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interface, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Interface presently has a consensus price target of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.87%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Interface is more favorable than NL Industries.

Interface has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NL Industries has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. NL Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. Interface pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NL Industries pays out -51.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. NL Industries has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. NL Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Interface has a net margin of 8.37% compared to NL Industries' net margin of -23.88%. Interface's return on equity of 19.54% beat NL Industries' return on equity.

Interface has a net margin of 8.37% compared to Avery Dennison's net margin of 7.66%. Avery Dennison's return on equity of 33.69% beat Interface's return on equity.

Avery Dennison pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Avery Dennison pays out 45.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interface pays out 6.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avery Dennison has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Avery Dennison is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Avery Dennison had 19 more articles in the media than Interface. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Avery Dennison and 4 mentions for Interface. Interface's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Avery Dennison's score of 0.48 indicating that Interface is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Avery Dennison has higher revenue and earnings than Interface. Interface is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avery Dennison, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avery Dennison has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Interface has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

94.2% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Interface shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Interface shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Avery Dennison currently has a consensus price target of $204.11, indicating a potential upside of 25.96%. Interface has a consensus price target of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.87%. Given Interface's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Interface is more favorable than Avery Dennison.