Pitney Bowes Competitors

Avery Dennison (NYSE:AVY) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Avery Dennison pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Avery Dennison pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avery Dennison has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Avery Dennison is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Avery Dennison and Pitney Bowes' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Avery Dennison has higher revenue and earnings than Pitney Bowes. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avery Dennison, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Avery Dennison and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.0% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Avery Dennison has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, indicating that its share price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Avery Dennison and Pitney Bowes, as provided by MarketBeat.

Avery Dennison presently has a consensus price target of $159.3636, indicating a potential upside of 2.57%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 55.98%. Given Avery Dennison's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Avery Dennison is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Summary

Avery Dennison beats Pitney Bowes on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both mid-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

MSA Safety has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

MSA Safety pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. MSA Safety pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MSA Safety has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Pitney Bowes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for MSA Safety and Pitney Bowes, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

MSA Safety presently has a consensus target price of $138.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 13.52%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Given MSA Safety's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe MSA Safety is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MSA Safety and Pitney Bowes' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than MSA Safety. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSA Safety, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.2% of MSA Safety shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of MSA Safety shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MSA Safety and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MSA Safety beats Pitney Bowes on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Herman Miller (NASDAQ:MLHR) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Herman Miller and Pitney Bowes' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Herman Miller.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.0% of Herman Miller shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Herman Miller shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Herman Miller and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Herman Miller and Pitney Bowes, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Herman Miller presently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.21%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Given Herman Miller's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Herman Miller is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Dividends

Herman Miller pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Volatility and Risk

Herman Miller has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Herman Miller beats Pitney Bowes on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Steelcase (NYSE:SCS) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Steelcase has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its share price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Steelcase pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Steelcase pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Steelcase has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Steelcase is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Steelcase and Pitney Bowes, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Steelcase presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 11.37%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 55.98%. Given Steelcase's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Steelcase is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.0% of Steelcase shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. 13.0% of Steelcase shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Steelcase and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Steelcase and Pitney Bowes' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Steelcase has higher revenue and earnings than Pitney Bowes. Steelcase is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pitney Bowes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Steelcase beats Pitney Bowes on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

HNI (NYSE:HNI) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares HNI and Pitney Bowes' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than HNI.

Volatility and Risk

HNI has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, indicating that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for HNI and Pitney Bowes, as reported by MarketBeat.

HNI currently has a consensus target price of $34.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.29%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Given HNI's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe HNI is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Profitability

This table compares HNI and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.2% of HNI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of HNI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats HNI on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) and Knoll (NYSE:KNL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Knoll has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Knoll shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Knoll shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Pitney Bowes and Knoll, as reported by MarketBeat.

Pitney Bowes currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Knoll has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.34%. Given Knoll's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Knoll is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Profitability

This table compares Pitney Bowes and Knoll's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pitney Bowes and Knoll's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Knoll.

Dividends

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Knoll pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats Knoll on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.