Go Pro

Pitney Bowes (PBI) Competitors

Pitney Bowes logo
$16.40 +0.23 (+1.42%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

PBI vs. HNI, TILE, MLKN, ACCO, and CIX

Should you buy Pitney Bowes stock or one of its competitors? Pitney Bowes's main competitors and comparable companies include HNI (HNI), Interface (TILE), MillerKnoll (MLKN), Acco Brands (ACCO), and CompX International (CIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "office services & supplies" industry.

How does Pitney Bowes compare to HNI?

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) and HNI (NYSE:HNI) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, HNI had 6 more articles in the media than Pitney Bowes. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for HNI and 5 mentions for Pitney Bowes. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat HNI's score of 0.91 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pitney Bowes
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
HNI
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of HNI shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of HNI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HNI pays out 1,555.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and HNI has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. HNI is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 10.04% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.10%. HNI's return on equity of 13.66% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pitney Bowes10.04% -31.37% 8.02%
HNI 0.10%13.66%5.23%

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HNI has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Pitney Bowes currently has a consensus target price of $18.45, indicating a potential upside of 12.50%. HNI has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.41%. Given HNI's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HNI is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pitney Bowes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
HNI
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Pitney Bowes has higher earnings, but lower revenue than HNI. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HNI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pitney Bowes$1.89B1.19$144.70M$1.2213.44
HNI$2.84B1.25$54.20M$0.09545.44

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats HNI on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pitney Bowes compare to Interface?

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) and Interface (NASDAQ:TILE) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Interface. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interface, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pitney Bowes$1.89B1.19$144.70M$1.2213.44
Interface$1.39B1.63$116.10M$2.4715.77

Pitney Bowes presently has a consensus price target of $18.45, indicating a potential upside of 12.50%. Interface has a consensus price target of $40.50, indicating a potential upside of 4.01%. Given Pitney Bowes' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than Interface.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pitney Bowes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Interface
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interface pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Pitney Bowes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Interface had 1 more articles in the media than Pitney Bowes. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Interface and 5 mentions for Pitney Bowes. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Interface's score of 0.63 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pitney Bowes
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Interface
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interface has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Interface has a net margin of 10.10% compared to Pitney Bowes' net margin of 10.04%. Interface's return on equity of 21.77% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pitney Bowes10.04% -31.37% 8.02%
Interface 10.10%21.77%11.18%

67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Interface shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Interface shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Interface beats Pitney Bowes on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pitney Bowes compare to MillerKnoll?

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 2 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 3 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Pitney Bowes' score of 1.05 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pitney Bowes
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
MillerKnoll
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Pitney Bowes currently has a consensus price target of $18.45, suggesting a potential upside of 12.50%. Given Pitney Bowes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pitney Bowes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
MillerKnoll
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pitney Bowes has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MillerKnoll. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pitney Bowes$1.89B1.19$144.70M$1.2213.44
MillerKnoll$3.84B0.41$91.50M$1.3217.45

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 10.04% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 9.77% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pitney Bowes10.04% -31.37% 8.02%
MillerKnoll 2.38%9.77%3.25%

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats MillerKnoll on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pitney Bowes compare to Acco Brands?

Acco Brands (NYSE:ACCO) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

84.6% of Acco Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pitney Bowes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acco Brands$1.52B0.26$41.30M$0.626.84
Pitney Bowes$1.89B1.19$144.70M$1.2213.44

Acco Brands has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 10.04% compared to Acco Brands' net margin of 3.74%. Acco Brands' return on equity of 12.57% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acco Brands3.74% 12.57% 3.69%
Pitney Bowes 10.04%-31.37%8.02%

Acco Brands currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential upside of 41.51%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus price target of $18.45, indicating a potential upside of 12.50%. Given Acco Brands' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acco Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Pitney Bowes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

In the previous week, Acco Brands and Acco Brands both had 5 articles in the media. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.73 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acco Brands
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Pitney Bowes
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Acco Brands pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats Acco Brands on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Pitney Bowes compare to CompX International?

CompX International (NYSE:CIX) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

CompX International pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. CompX International pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CompX International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

CompX International has a net margin of 12.48% compared to Pitney Bowes' net margin of 10.04%. CompX International's return on equity of 11.51% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CompX International12.48% 11.51% 10.52%
Pitney Bowes 10.04%-31.37%8.02%

Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $18.45, indicating a potential upside of 12.50%. Given Pitney Bowes' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than CompX International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CompX International
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pitney Bowes
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

7.5% of CompX International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of CompX International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 5 more articles in the media than CompX International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 0 mentions for CompX International. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat CompX International's score of 0.00 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CompX International Neutral
Pitney Bowes Positive

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than CompX International. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CompX International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CompX International$161.83M2.44$22.59M$1.7917.88
Pitney Bowes$1.89B1.19$144.70M$1.2213.44

CompX International has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats CompX International on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Pitney Bowes News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PBI vs. The Competition

MetricPitney BowesCommercial Services & Supplies IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.26B$4.26B$10.69B$24.30B
Dividend Yield2.43%5.07%97.12%3.70%
P/E Ratio13.4429.1626.6930.31
Price / Sales1.191,058.49328.8019.95
Price / Cash7.5022.4524.4732.49
Price / Book-2.604.194.496.77
Net Income$144.70M$146.38M$612.35M$1.07B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.66%-1.41%-0.65%
1 Month Performance-7.94%1.90%2.54%3.38%
1 Year Performance38.69%5.88%12.36%14.90%

Pitney Bowes Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PBI
Pitney Bowes
4.3332 of 5 stars
$16.40
+1.4%
$18.45
+12.5%
+38.7%$2.26B$1.89B13.446,600
HNI
HNI
4.3285 of 5 stars
$48.16
-1.4%
$65.00
+35.0%
+9.5%$3.53B$2.84B535.1719,500
TILE
Interface
3.0616 of 5 stars
$38.04
+0.2%
$40.50
+6.5%
+42.8%$2.20B$1.39B15.403,570
MLKN
MillerKnoll
3.0465 of 5 stars
$23.34
-2.1%
N/A+3.8%$1.62B$3.84B17.6810,544
ACCO
Acco Brands
4.8375 of 5 stars
$4.24
-2.3%
$6.00
+41.5%
+5.9%$400.61M$1.52B6.844,700

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PBI) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners