S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
pixel
S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
pixel
S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
pixel
S&P 500   3,849.62
DOW   30,937.04
QQQ   328.59
pixel
Log in
NYSE:PBI

Pitney Bowes Competitors

$13.63
+6.10 (+81.01 %)
(As of 01/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$7.26
Now: $13.63
$14.39
50-Day Range
$5.32
MA: $6.38
$7.73
52-Week Range
$1.67
Now: $13.63
$14.39
Volume45.10 million shs
Average Volume5.20 million shs
Market Capitalization$2.36 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield2.66%
Beta2.91

Competitors

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) Vs. AVY, MSA, MLHR, SCS, HNI, and KNL

Should you be buying PBI stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "office services & supplies" are considered alternatives and competitors to Pitney Bowes, including Avery Dennison (AVY), MSA Safety (MSA), Herman Miller (MLHR), Steelcase (SCS), HNI (HNI), and Knoll (KNL).

Avery Dennison (NYSE:AVY) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both industrial products companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Avery Dennison pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Avery Dennison pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Avery Dennison has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Avery Dennison is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Avery Dennison and Pitney Bowes' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Avery Dennison$7.07 billion1.83$303.60 million$6.6023.54
Pitney Bowes$3.21 billion0.74$194.61 million$0.6820.04

Avery Dennison has higher revenue and earnings than Pitney Bowes. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avery Dennison, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Avery Dennison and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Avery Dennison7.80%44.88%9.56%
Pitney Bowes-0.71%49.74%1.06%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.0% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Avery Dennison shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Avery Dennison has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, indicating that its share price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Avery Dennison and Pitney Bowes, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Avery Dennison13902.62
Pitney Bowes00103.00

Avery Dennison presently has a consensus price target of $159.3636, indicating a potential upside of 2.57%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 55.98%. Given Avery Dennison's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Avery Dennison is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Summary

Avery Dennison beats Pitney Bowes on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

MSA Safety (NYSE:MSA) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both mid-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

Risk & Volatility

MSA Safety has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

MSA Safety pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. MSA Safety pays out 35.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MSA Safety has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Pitney Bowes is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for MSA Safety and Pitney Bowes, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
MSA Safety02202.50
Pitney Bowes00103.00

MSA Safety presently has a consensus target price of $138.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 13.52%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Given MSA Safety's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe MSA Safety is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares MSA Safety and Pitney Bowes' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MSA Safety$1.40 billion4.45$136.44 million$4.8033.40
Pitney Bowes$3.21 billion0.74$194.61 million$0.6820.04

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than MSA Safety. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSA Safety, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.2% of MSA Safety shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. 7.0% of MSA Safety shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares MSA Safety and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
MSA Safety10.40%23.96%10.13%
Pitney Bowes-0.71%49.74%1.06%

Summary

MSA Safety beats Pitney Bowes on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Herman Miller (NASDAQ:MLHR) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both mid-cap business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Herman Miller and Pitney Bowes' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Herman Miller$2.49 billion0.84$-9,100,000.00N/AN/A
Pitney Bowes$3.21 billion0.74$194.61 million$0.6820.04

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Herman Miller.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.0% of Herman Miller shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Herman Miller shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Herman Miller and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Herman Miller-0.49%23.25%8.80%
Pitney Bowes-0.71%49.74%1.06%

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Herman Miller and Pitney Bowes, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Herman Miller00203.00
Pitney Bowes00103.00

Herman Miller presently has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.21%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Given Herman Miller's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Herman Miller is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Dividends

Herman Miller pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Volatility and Risk

Herman Miller has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Herman Miller beats Pitney Bowes on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Steelcase (NYSE:SCS) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Risk and Volatility

Steelcase has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its share price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Steelcase pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Steelcase pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Steelcase has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Steelcase is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Steelcase and Pitney Bowes, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Steelcase01102.50
Pitney Bowes00103.00

Steelcase presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 11.37%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 55.98%. Given Steelcase's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Steelcase is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

66.0% of Steelcase shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. 13.0% of Steelcase shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Steelcase and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Steelcase3.00%10.77%4.06%
Pitney Bowes-0.71%49.74%1.06%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Steelcase and Pitney Bowes' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Steelcase$3.72 billion0.42$199.70 million$1.509.03
Pitney Bowes$3.21 billion0.74$194.61 million$0.6820.04

Steelcase has higher revenue and earnings than Pitney Bowes. Steelcase is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pitney Bowes, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Steelcase beats Pitney Bowes on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

HNI (NYSE:HNI) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares HNI and Pitney Bowes' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
HNI$2.25 billion0.65$110.50 millionN/AN/A
Pitney Bowes$3.21 billion0.74$194.61 million$0.6820.04

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than HNI.

Volatility and Risk

HNI has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, indicating that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for HNI and Pitney Bowes, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
HNI01102.50
Pitney Bowes00103.00

HNI currently has a consensus target price of $34.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.29%. Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Given HNI's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe HNI is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Profitability

This table compares HNI and Pitney Bowes' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
HNI3.33%17.16%7.04%
Pitney Bowes-0.71%49.74%1.06%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

73.2% of HNI shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of HNI shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.22 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats HNI on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) and Knoll (NYSE:KNL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Risk and Volatility

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 2.91, suggesting that its stock price is 191% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Knoll has a beta of 1.89, suggesting that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

73.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Knoll shares are held by institutional investors. 3.6% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Knoll shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Pitney Bowes and Knoll, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pitney Bowes00103.00
Knoll02002.00

Pitney Bowes currently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 55.98%. Knoll has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 26.34%. Given Knoll's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Knoll is more favorable than Pitney Bowes.

Profitability

This table compares Pitney Bowes and Knoll's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pitney Bowes-0.71%49.74%1.06%
Knoll1.44%16.36%4.86%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Pitney Bowes and Knoll's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pitney Bowes$3.21 billion0.74$194.61 million$0.6820.04
Knoll$1.43 billion0.58$67.50 millionN/AN/A

Pitney Bowes has higher revenue and earnings than Knoll.

Dividends

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Knoll pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pitney Bowes pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats Knoll on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.


Pitney Bowes Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Avery Dennison logo
AVY
Avery Dennison
2.1$155.37+0.4%$12.96 billion$7.07 billion24.82Upcoming Earnings
MSA Safety logo
MSA
MSA Safety
2.0$160.34+1.9%$6.25 billion$1.40 billion45.42
Herman Miller logo
MLHR
Herman Miller
1.6$35.38+0.0%$2.09 billion$2.49 billion-176.88
Steelcase logo
SCS
Steelcase
1.6$13.54+0.6%$1.56 billion$3.72 billion19.07
HNI logo
HNI
HNI
1.4$34.06+1.0%$1.45 billion$2.25 billion22.12
Knoll logo
KNL
Knoll
1.0$16.29+1.1%$826.03 million$1.43 billion47.91
ACCO Brands logo
ACCO
ACCO Brands
2.6$8.73+1.1%$824.96 million$1.96 billion11.19
Interface logo
TILE
Interface
1.9$10.94+0.4%$641.84 million$1.34 billion-8.48
Kimball International logo
KBAL
Kimball International
1.0$12.48+0.6%$461.47 million$727.86 million13.28
NL Industries logo
NL
NL Industries
0.9$4.77+0.8%$232.72 million$124.20 million14.03
ARC Document Solutions logo
ARC
ARC Document Solutions
1.0$2.09+3.3%$91.67 million$382.42 million14.93
This page was last updated on 1/27/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.