PFGC vs. TEL, FERG, WSO.B, USFD, CNM, SITE, INGM, AVT, REZI, and GMS
Should you be buying Performance Food Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Performance Food Group include TE Connectivity (TEL), Ferguson (FERG), Watsco (WSO.B), US Foods (USFD), Core & Main (CNM), SiteOne Landscape Supply (SITE), Ingram Micro (INGM), Avnet (AVT), Resideo Technologies (REZI), and GMS (GMS). These companies are all part of the "wholesale" industry.
Performance Food Group vs.
Performance Food Group (NYSE:PFGC) and TE Connectivity (NYSE:TEL) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, community ranking, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.
TE Connectivity received 229 more outperform votes than Performance Food Group when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 69.31% of users gave TE Connectivity an outperform vote while only 64.25% of users gave Performance Food Group an outperform vote.
96.9% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.4% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Performance Food Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of TE Connectivity shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
TE Connectivity has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.64%. TE Connectivity's return on equity of 18.82% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity.
Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TE Connectivity has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.
In the previous week, TE Connectivity had 26 more articles in the media than Performance Food Group. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for TE Connectivity and 10 mentions for Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat TE Connectivity's score of 1.13 indicating that Performance Food Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.
TE Connectivity has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Performance Food Group. Performance Food Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TE Connectivity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Performance Food Group presently has a consensus price target of $95.55, suggesting a potential upside of 14.43%. TE Connectivity has a consensus price target of $160.30, suggesting a potential upside of 0.84%. Given Performance Food Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Performance Food Group is more favorable than TE Connectivity.
Summary
TE Connectivity beats Performance Food Group on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Performance Food Group News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PFGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Media Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Performance Food Group Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NYSE:PFGC) was last updated on 5/22/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
