Philip Morris International Competitors

The Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) and Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

The Procter & Gamble pays an annual dividend of $3.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. The Procter & Gamble pays out 61.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Procter & Gamble has increased its dividend for 59 consecutive years and Philip Morris International has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The Procter & Gamble and Philip Morris International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Procter & Gamble has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Philip Morris International. Philip Morris International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Procter & Gamble, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for The Procter & Gamble and Philip Morris International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

The Procter & Gamble presently has a consensus target price of $146.4667, suggesting a potential upside of 12.67%. Philip Morris International has a consensus target price of $96.6923, suggesting a potential upside of 19.85%. Given Philip Morris International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than The Procter & Gamble.

Profitability

This table compares The Procter & Gamble and Philip Morris International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

The Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.1% of The Procter & Gamble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of The Procter & Gamble shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Procter & Gamble beats Philip Morris International on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) and The Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. The Coca-Cola pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Coca-Cola pays out 77.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Philip Morris International has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and The Coca-Cola has raised its dividend for 57 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Philip Morris International and The Coca-Cola's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Coca-Cola has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Philip Morris International. Philip Morris International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Coca-Cola, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Philip Morris International and The Coca-Cola, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Philip Morris International currently has a consensus target price of $96.6923, indicating a potential upside of 19.85%. The Coca-Cola has a consensus target price of $54.5294, indicating a potential upside of 12.45%. Given Philip Morris International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than The Coca-Cola.

Profitability

This table compares Philip Morris International and The Coca-Cola's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.0% of The Coca-Cola shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of The Coca-Cola shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

The Coca-Cola beats Philip Morris International on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) and PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. PepsiCo pays an annual dividend of $4.09 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PepsiCo pays out 74.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Philip Morris International has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and PepsiCo has raised its dividend for 49 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Philip Morris International and PepsiCo's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

PepsiCo has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Philip Morris International. Philip Morris International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PepsiCo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Philip Morris International and PepsiCo, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Philip Morris International currently has a consensus target price of $96.6923, indicating a potential upside of 19.85%. PepsiCo has a consensus target price of $144.6471, indicating a potential upside of 4.37%. Given Philip Morris International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than PepsiCo.

Profitability

This table compares Philip Morris International and PepsiCo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PepsiCo has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.9% of PepsiCo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (NYSE:BUD) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Dividends

Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV pays out 20.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Philip Morris International has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Philip Morris International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Philip Morris International and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Philip Morris International. Philip Morris International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Philip Morris International and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Philip Morris International currently has a consensus target price of $96.6923, indicating a potential upside of 19.85%. Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has a consensus target price of $60.25, indicating a potential downside of 9.55%. Given Philip Morris International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV.

Profitability

This table compares Philip Morris International and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Philip Morris International beats Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) and Diageo (NYSE:DEO) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of Diageo shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Philip Morris International and Diageo's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Philip Morris International has higher revenue and earnings than Diageo. Philip Morris International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diageo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Philip Morris International and Diageo's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Philip Morris International and Diageo, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Philip Morris International currently has a consensus target price of $96.6923, indicating a potential upside of 19.85%. Diageo has a consensus target price of $143.50, indicating a potential downside of 9.53%. Given Philip Morris International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than Diageo.

Dividends

Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Diageo pays an annual dividend of $4.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diageo pays out 79.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Philip Morris International has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years. Philip Morris International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk and Volatility

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diageo has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Philip Morris International beats Diageo on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Philip Morris International (NYSE:PM) and The Estée Lauder Companies (NYSE:EL) are both large-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

74.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Philip Morris International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.0% of The Estée Lauder Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Philip Morris International and The Estée Lauder Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Philip Morris International has higher revenue and earnings than The Estée Lauder Companies. Philip Morris International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Estée Lauder Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Philip Morris International and The Estée Lauder Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Philip Morris International and The Estée Lauder Companies, as reported by MarketBeat.

Philip Morris International currently has a consensus target price of $96.6923, indicating a potential upside of 19.85%. The Estée Lauder Companies has a consensus target price of $242.3478, indicating a potential downside of 2.99%. Given Philip Morris International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Philip Morris International is more favorable than The Estée Lauder Companies.

Dividends

Philip Morris International pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. The Estée Lauder Companies pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Philip Morris International pays out 92.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. The Estée Lauder Companies pays out 51.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Philip Morris International has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and The Estée Lauder Companies has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Philip Morris International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Estée Lauder Companies has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Philip Morris International beats The Estée Lauder Companies on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.