Renasant (RNST) Competitors

First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Renasant pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. First Busey pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Renasant pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Busey has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renasant has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

First Busey currently has a consensus price target of $27.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.44%. Renasant has a consensus price target of $45.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Given Renasant's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Renasant is more favorable than First Busey.

In the previous week, First Busey had 4 more articles in the media than Renasant. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for First Busey and 0 mentions for Renasant. First Busey's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Renasant's score of 0.00 indicating that First Busey is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Renasant has higher revenue and earnings than First Busey. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renasant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

56.5% of First Busey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Renasant shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of First Busey shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Renasant shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

First Busey has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Renasant's net margin of 14.47%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.19% beat Renasant's return on equity.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.92% compared to Renasant's net margin of 14.47%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.09% beat Renasant's return on equity.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Renasant. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renasant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Renasant pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Renasant pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. First Financial Bancorp. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, First Financial Bancorp. had 7 more articles in the media than Renasant. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for First Financial Bancorp. and 0 mentions for Renasant. First Financial Bancorp.'s average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Renasant's score of 0.00 indicating that First Financial Bancorp. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

First Financial Bancorp. presently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.85%. Renasant has a consensus price target of $45.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Given Renasant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Renasant is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Renasant shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Renasant shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renasant has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Hope Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renasant has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hope Bancorp had 3 more articles in the media than Renasant. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Hope Bancorp and 0 mentions for Renasant. Hope Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Renasant's score of 0.00 indicating that Hope Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hope Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Renasant pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hope Bancorp pays out 107.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Renasant pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Renasant has higher revenue and earnings than Hope Bancorp. Renasant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hope Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hope Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $14.50, suggesting a potential upside of 19.34%. Renasant has a consensus price target of $45.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Given Hope Bancorp's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hope Bancorp is more favorable than Renasant.

Renasant has a net margin of 14.47% compared to Hope Bancorp's net margin of 6.56%. Renasant's return on equity of 8.17% beat Hope Bancorp's return on equity.

84.0% of Hope Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Renasant shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Hope Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Renasant shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.3% of Renasant shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Renasant shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Renasant pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hancock Whitney pays out 41.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Renasant pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hancock Whitney has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hancock Whitney is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.34% compared to Renasant's net margin of 14.47%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.20% beat Renasant's return on equity.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than Renasant. Hancock Whitney is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Renasant, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Hancock Whitney had 4 more articles in the media than Renasant. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hancock Whitney and 0 mentions for Renasant. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Renasant's score of 0.00 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Renasant has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Hancock Whitney currently has a consensus target price of $78.14, suggesting a potential upside of 16.23%. Renasant has a consensus target price of $45.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.46%. Given Hancock Whitney's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Hancock Whitney is more favorable than Renasant.