Trustmark (TRMK) Competitors

67.6% of Trustmark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of First Busey shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Trustmark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of First Busey shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trustmark has a net margin of 20.12% compared to First Busey's net margin of 19.16%. Trustmark's return on equity of 10.74% beat First Busey's return on equity.

Trustmark has higher revenue and earnings than First Busey. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trustmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Busey has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Trustmark had 11 more articles in the media than First Busey. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Trustmark and 6 mentions for First Busey. First Busey's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Trustmark's score of 0.50 indicating that First Busey is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Trustmark pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Trustmark pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Busey pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trustmark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and First Busey has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Trustmark currently has a consensus target price of $44.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.02%. First Busey has a consensus target price of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 3.54%. Given First Busey's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe First Busey is more favorable than Trustmark.

Trustmark pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Trustmark pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trustmark has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

67.6% of Trustmark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Trustmark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trustmark had 3 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Trustmark and 14 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. Trustmark's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat First Financial Bancorp.'s score of 0.48 indicating that Trustmark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Trustmark currently has a consensus target price of $44.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.02%. First Financial Bancorp. has a consensus target price of $33.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.41%. Given First Financial Bancorp.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe First Financial Bancorp. is more favorable than Trustmark.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the S&P 500.

First Financial Bancorp. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trustmark. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trustmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.92% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 20.12%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.09% beat Trustmark's return on equity.

Hope Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Trustmark pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Hope Bancorp pays out 107.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trustmark pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trustmark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Trustmark has higher revenue and earnings than Hope Bancorp. Trustmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hope Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hope Bancorp presently has a consensus target price of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.09%. Trustmark has a consensus target price of $44.75, indicating a potential downside of 0.02%. Given Hope Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hope Bancorp is more favorable than Trustmark.

Trustmark has a net margin of 20.12% compared to Hope Bancorp's net margin of 6.56%. Trustmark's return on equity of 10.74% beat Hope Bancorp's return on equity.

In the previous week, Trustmark had 7 more articles in the media than Hope Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Trustmark and 10 mentions for Hope Bancorp. Hope Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Trustmark's score of 0.50 indicating that Hope Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hope Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trustmark has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

84.0% of Hope Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.6% of Trustmark shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Hope Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Trustmark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Trustmark pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Hancock Whitney pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Trustmark pays out 26.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hancock Whitney pays out 41.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trustmark has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hancock Whitney has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Hancock Whitney is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hancock Whitney has a net margin of 21.34% compared to Trustmark's net margin of 20.12%. Hancock Whitney's return on equity of 11.20% beat Trustmark's return on equity.

Trustmark presently has a consensus price target of $44.75, suggesting a potential downside of 0.02%. Hancock Whitney has a consensus price target of $76.86, suggesting a potential upside of 13.96%. Given Hancock Whitney's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hancock Whitney is more favorable than Trustmark.

67.6% of Trustmark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.2% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Trustmark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Hancock Whitney shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trustmark had 12 more articles in the media than Hancock Whitney. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Trustmark and 5 mentions for Hancock Whitney. Hancock Whitney's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Trustmark's score of 0.50 indicating that Hancock Whitney is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Hancock Whitney has higher revenue and earnings than Trustmark. Trustmark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hancock Whitney, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trustmark has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hancock Whitney has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.