Go Pro

UWM (UWMC) Competitors

UWM logo
$1.46 +0.01 (+0.34%)
As of 09/4/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

UWMC vs. RKT, FIGR, MTG, ESNT, and RDN

Should you buy UWM stock or one of its competitors? UWM's main competitors and comparable companies include Rocket Companies (RKT), Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR), MGIC Investment (MTG), Essent Group (ESNT), and Radian Group (RDN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "commercial & residential mortgage finance" industry.

How does UWM compare to Rocket Companies?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Rocket Companies (NYSE:RKT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

Rocket Companies has a net margin of 4.70% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Rocket Companies' return on equity of 5.13% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
Rocket Companies 4.70%5.13%1.88%

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.6% of Rocket Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 57.7% of Rocket Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

UWM has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rocket Companies has a beta of 2.2, indicating that its stock price is 120% more volatile than the broader market.

UWM presently has a consensus price target of $4.01, suggesting a potential upside of 173.97%. Rocket Companies has a consensus price target of $19.87, suggesting a potential upside of 40.90%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than Rocket Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Rocket Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

UWM has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rocket Companies. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rocket Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.74$27.38M-$0.08N/A
Rocket Companies$6.70B5.96-$68M$0.14100.71

In the previous week, UWM had 18 more articles in the media than Rocket Companies. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for UWM and 23 mentions for Rocket Companies. Rocket Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat UWM's score of 0.09 indicating that Rocket Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
35 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Rocket Companies
9 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
12 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Rocket Companies beats UWM on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Figure Technology Solutions?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Figure Technology Solutions (NASDAQ:FIGR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

UWM presently has a consensus target price of $4.01, indicating a potential upside of 173.97%. Figure Technology Solutions has a consensus target price of $50.63, indicating a potential upside of 40.78%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Figure Technology Solutions.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Figure Technology Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Figure Technology Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Figure Technology Solutions, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.74$27.38M-$0.08N/A
Figure Technology Solutions$506.86M13.17$133.86M$0.9338.67

In the previous week, UWM had 31 more articles in the media than Figure Technology Solutions. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for UWM and 10 mentions for Figure Technology Solutions. Figure Technology Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat UWM's score of 0.09 indicating that Figure Technology Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
35 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Figure Technology Solutions
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Figure Technology Solutions has a net margin of 33.45% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Figure Technology Solutions' return on equity of 18.90% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
Figure Technology Solutions 33.45%18.90%9.46%

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.6% of Figure Technology Solutions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Figure Technology Solutions beats UWM on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to MGIC Investment?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and MGIC Investment (NYSE:MTG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 27.3%. MGIC Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MGIC Investment pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MGIC Investment has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, UWM had 32 more articles in the media than MGIC Investment. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for UWM and 9 mentions for MGIC Investment. MGIC Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat UWM's score of 0.09 indicating that MGIC Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
35 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MGIC Investment
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MGIC Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGIC Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.74$27.38M-$0.08N/A
MGIC Investment$1.21B5.24$738.35M$3.209.69

MGIC Investment has a net margin of 59.20% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 13.90% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
MGIC Investment 59.20%13.90%10.81%

UWM has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of MGIC Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of MGIC Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UWM presently has a consensus target price of $4.01, indicating a potential upside of 173.97%. MGIC Investment has a consensus target price of $30.60, indicating a potential downside of 1.32%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than MGIC Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
MGIC Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Summary

MGIC Investment beats UWM on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Essent Group?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Essent Group (NYSE:ESNT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

UWM has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essent Group has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Essent Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essent Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.74$27.38M-$0.08N/A
Essent Group$1.26B4.94$689.97M$7.179.66

In the previous week, UWM had 36 more articles in the media than Essent Group. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for UWM and 5 mentions for Essent Group. Essent Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat UWM's score of 0.09 indicating that Essent Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
35 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Essent Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.0% of Essent Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Essent Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Essent Group has a net margin of 51.45% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Essent Group's return on equity of 11.91% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
Essent Group 51.45%11.91%9.09%

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 27.3%. Essent Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Essent Group pays out 19.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Essent Group has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

UWM presently has a consensus price target of $4.01, suggesting a potential upside of 173.97%. Essent Group has a consensus price target of $71.86, suggesting a potential upside of 3.76%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Essent Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Essent Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Summary

Essent Group beats UWM on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Radian Group?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Radian Group (NYSE:RDN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 27.3%. Radian Group pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Radian Group pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Radian Group has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, UWM had 34 more articles in the media than Radian Group. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for UWM and 7 mentions for Radian Group. Radian Group's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat UWM's score of 0.09 indicating that Radian Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
35 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Radian Group
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Radian Group shares are held by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Radian Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

UWM currently has a consensus target price of $4.01, suggesting a potential upside of 173.97%. Radian Group has a consensus target price of $42.17, suggesting a potential upside of 15.24%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than Radian Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Radian Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Radian Group has a net margin of 32.60% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.65% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
Radian Group 32.60%13.65%6.91%

Radian Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Radian Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.74$27.38M-$0.08N/A
Radian Group$1.20B4.04$582.64M$3.899.41

UWM has a beta of 1.76, meaning that its share price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Radian Group has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Radian Group beats UWM on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get UWM News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UWMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UWMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UWMC vs. The Competition

MetricUWMFinancial Services IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.35B$27.81B$14.01B$23.66B
Dividend Yield27.21%6.03%5.89%3.73%
P/E Ratio-18.3112.2924.3825.21
Price / Sales0.74426.99518.7420.85
Price / Cash9.4154.0230.8419.95
Price / Book1.473.312.804.83
Net Income$27.38M$1.10B$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.68%1.00%3.84%-0.05%
1 Month Performance22.59%12.72%1.69%0.08%
1 Year Performance-76.84%-0.20%11.19%12.82%

UWM Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UWMC
UWM
3.908 of 5 stars
$1.47
+0.3%
$4.01
+174.0%
-76.8%$2.35B$3.16BN/A9,100
RKT
Rocket Companies
3.7059 of 5 stars
$14.10
+1.2%
$19.87
+40.9%
-30.4%$39.44B$8.97B100.6823,500
FIGR
Figure Technology Solutions
4.8995 of 5 stars
$38.64
-1.2%
$50.63
+31.0%
N/A$7.26B$506.86M41.55530
MTG
MGIC Investment
4.4898 of 5 stars
$31.09
+0.6%
$30.60
-1.6%
+9.3%$6.34B$1.21B9.72680
ESNT
Essent Group
3.9709 of 5 stars
$68.48
+0.6%
$71.86
+4.9%
+8.5%$6.12B$1.26B9.55350

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UWMC) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners