Free Trial

UWM (UWMC) Competitors

UWM logo
$1.36 -0.03 (-1.81%)
Closing price 11/11/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.34 -0.01 (-0.74%)
As of 04:54 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UWMC vs. RKT, ESNT, MTG, RDN, and FIGR

Should you buy UWM stock or one of its competitors? UWM's main competitors and comparable companies include Rocket Companies (RKT), Essent Group (ESNT), MGIC Investment (MTG), Radian Group (RDN), and Figure Technology Solutions (FIGR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "commercial & residential mortgage finance" industry.

How does UWM compare to Rocket Companies?

Rocket Companies (NYSE:RKT) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

4.6% of Rocket Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. 57.7% of Rocket Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 80.9% of UWM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Rocket Companies presently has a consensus target price of $18.75, suggesting a potential upside of 30.09%. UWM has a consensus target price of $2.45, suggesting a potential upside of 80.48%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than Rocket Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rocket Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
UWM
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Rocket Companies has a net margin of 11.14% compared to UWM's net margin of 0.55%. Rocket Companies' return on equity of 5.33% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rocket Companies11.14% 5.33% 2.08%
UWM 0.55%4.29%0.32%

In the previous week, Rocket Companies had 8 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Rocket Companies and 7 mentions for UWM. Rocket Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat UWM's score of 0.68 indicating that Rocket Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rocket Companies
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
UWM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Rocket Companies has a beta of 2.27, meaning that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

UWM has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rocket Companies. Rocket Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rocket Companies$6.70B6.11-$68M$0.4532.03
UWM$3.16B0.69$27.38M$0.0267.75

Summary

Rocket Companies beats UWM on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Essent Group?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Essent Group (NYSE:ESNT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

UWM has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essent Group has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Essent Group has a net margin of 49.08% compared to UWM's net margin of 0.55%. Essent Group's return on equity of 11.99% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM0.55% 4.29% 0.32%
Essent Group 49.08%11.99%9.02%

In the previous week, Essent Group had 30 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Essent Group and 7 mentions for UWM. UWM's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Essent Group's score of 0.10 indicating that UWM is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Essent Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
14 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.0% of Essent Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.9% of UWM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Essent Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 29.5%. Essent Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. UWM pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essent Group pays out 19.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Essent Group has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Essent Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. Essent Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.69$27.38M$0.0267.75
Essent Group$1.26B4.52$689.97M$7.328.85

UWM presently has a consensus price target of $2.45, indicating a potential upside of 80.48%. Essent Group has a consensus price target of $70.63, indicating a potential upside of 8.99%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than Essent Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Essent Group
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Essent Group beats UWM on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to MGIC Investment?

MGIC Investment (NYSE:MTG) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, MGIC Investment had 11 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for MGIC Investment and 7 mentions for UWM. MGIC Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat UWM's score of 0.68 indicating that MGIC Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MGIC Investment
5 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
UWM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

MGIC Investment has a net margin of 58.12% compared to UWM's net margin of 0.55%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 13.81% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MGIC Investment58.12% 13.81% 10.66%
UWM 0.55%4.29%0.32%

MGIC Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than UWM. MGIC Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MGIC Investment$1.21B4.57$738.35M$3.228.65
UWM$3.16B0.69$27.38M$0.0267.75

MGIC Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 29.5%. MGIC Investment pays out 21.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UWM pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. MGIC Investment has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

95.6% of MGIC Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of MGIC Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 80.9% of UWM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

MGIC Investment currently has a consensus price target of $31.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.31%. UWM has a consensus price target of $2.45, indicating a potential upside of 80.48%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than MGIC Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MGIC Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
UWM
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

MGIC Investment beats UWM on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Radian Group?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Radian Group (NYSE:RDN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, Radian Group had 16 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Radian Group and 7 mentions for UWM. UWM's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Radian Group's score of 0.64 indicating that UWM is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Radian Group
8 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

UWM has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Radian Group has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Radian Group has a net margin of 28.41% compared to UWM's net margin of 0.55%. Radian Group's return on equity of 14.39% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM0.55% 4.29% 0.32%
Radian Group 28.41%14.39%6.88%

UWM currently has a consensus target price of $2.45, indicating a potential upside of 80.48%. Radian Group has a consensus target price of $42.57, indicating a potential upside of 14.29%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than Radian Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Radian Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Radian Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. Radian Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.69$27.38M$0.0267.75
Radian Group$1.97B2.40$582.64M$4.089.13

53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.3% of Radian Group shares are held by institutional investors. 80.9% of UWM shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Radian Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 29.5%. Radian Group pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. UWM pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Radian Group pays out 25.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Radian Group has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Summary

Radian Group beats UWM on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Figure Technology Solutions?

Figure Technology Solutions (NASDAQ:FIGR) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.6% of Figure Technology Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 80.9% of UWM shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Figure Technology Solutions currently has a consensus price target of $52.43, suggesting a potential upside of 116.74%. UWM has a consensus price target of $2.45, suggesting a potential upside of 80.48%. Given Figure Technology Solutions' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Figure Technology Solutions is more favorable than UWM.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Figure Technology Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
UWM
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

In the previous week, Figure Technology Solutions had 3 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Figure Technology Solutions and 7 mentions for UWM. UWM's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Figure Technology Solutions' score of 0.07 indicating that UWM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Figure Technology Solutions
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
UWM
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Figure Technology Solutions has a net margin of 33.45% compared to UWM's net margin of 0.55%. Figure Technology Solutions' return on equity of 18.90% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Figure Technology Solutions33.45% 18.90% 9.46%
UWM 0.55%4.29%0.32%

Figure Technology Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than UWM. Figure Technology Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Figure Technology Solutions$700.91M6.41$133.86M$0.9326.01
UWM$3.16B0.69$27.38M$0.0267.75

Figure Technology Solutions has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Figure Technology Solutions beats UWM on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get UWM News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UWMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UWMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UWMC vs. The Competition

MetricUWMFinancial Services IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.21B$30.98B$14.17B$23.43B
Dividend Yield27.03%7.07%4.88%3.74%
P/E Ratio67.7525.2720.0127.47
Price / Sales1.467.035.023.20
Price / Cash8.8420.6820.3315.86
Price / Book1.653.021.833.73
Net Income$27.38M$1.12B$1.32B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-16.62%-0.09%0.65%2.53%
1 Month Performance32.20%-3.26%-0.06%1.23%
1 Year Performance-75.48%-10.61%4.87%6.57%

UWM Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UWMC
UWM
4 of 5 stars
$1.36
-1.8%
$2.45
+80.5%
-75.3%$2.21B$1.48B67.759,100
RKT
Rocket Companies
3.7639 of 5 stars
$15.22
+1.0%
$18.75
+23.2%
-19.3%$42.50B$6.70B33.8123,500
ESNT
Essent Group
4.2168 of 5 stars
$65.59
+3.4%
$70.63
+7.7%
+4.4%$6.23B$1.26B8.96514
MTG
MGIC Investment
3.5407 of 5 stars
$28.54
-0.2%
$31.00
+8.6%
-2.2%$5.98B$1.21B9.02542
RDN
Radian Group
4.6818 of 5 stars
$36.47
+1.4%
$43.29
+18.7%
+5.0%$4.84B$1.20B7.30900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UWMC) was last updated on 11/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners