Free Trial

UWM (UWMC) Competitors

UWM logo
$2.58 +0.21 (+8.61%)
As of 10:47 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UWMC vs. PFSI, RKT, WF, BSAC, and ALLY

Should you buy UWM stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares UWM with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with UWM include PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI), Rocket Companies (RKT), Woori Bank (WF), Banco Santander Chile (BSAC), and Ally Financial (ALLY). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does UWM compare to PennyMac Financial Services?

PennyMac Financial Services (NYSE:PFSI) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

PennyMac Financial Services has a beta of 1.44, meaning that its stock price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

PennyMac Financial Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than UWM. PennyMac Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennyMac Financial Services$2.05B2.14$501.08M$9.418.98
UWM$3.16B1.31$27.38M$0.279.61

PennyMac Financial Services has a net margin of 23.47% compared to UWM's net margin of 1.92%. UWM's return on equity of 19.01% beat PennyMac Financial Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennyMac Financial Services23.47% 10.93% 1.66%
UWM 1.92%19.01%1.85%

PennyMac Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. PennyMac Financial Services pays out 12.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UWM pays out 148.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennyMac Financial Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

PennyMac Financial Services presently has a consensus price target of $122.75, suggesting a potential upside of 45.31%. UWM has a consensus price target of $5.79, suggesting a potential upside of 123.12%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than PennyMac Financial Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennyMac Financial Services
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
UWM
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23

In the previous week, PennyMac Financial Services had 9 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for PennyMac Financial Services and 3 mentions for UWM. UWM's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat PennyMac Financial Services' score of 0.11 indicating that UWM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PennyMac Financial Services
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

57.9% of PennyMac Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.8% of PennyMac Financial Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

PennyMac Financial Services beats UWM on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Rocket Companies?

Rocket Companies (NYSE:RKT) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Rocket Companies has a beta of 2.19, meaning that its share price is 119% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Rocket Companies has a net margin of 2.78% compared to UWM's net margin of 1.92%. UWM's return on equity of 19.01% beat Rocket Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rocket Companies2.78% 4.30% 1.46%
UWM 1.92%19.01%1.85%

In the previous week, Rocket Companies had 19 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Rocket Companies and 3 mentions for UWM. UWM's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Rocket Companies' score of 0.41 indicating that UWM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rocket Companies
6 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

UWM has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rocket Companies. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rocket Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rocket Companies$7.86B5.21-$68M$0.05289.42
UWM$3.16B1.31$27.38M$0.279.61

Rocket Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.2820 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Rocket Companies pays out 2,564.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. UWM pays out 148.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

4.6% of Rocket Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. 57.7% of Rocket Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 80.3% of UWM shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Rocket Companies presently has a consensus price target of $20.93, suggesting a potential upside of 44.62%. UWM has a consensus price target of $5.79, suggesting a potential upside of 123.12%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Rocket Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rocket Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
UWM
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23

Summary

UWM beats Rocket Companies on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Woori Bank?

Woori Bank (NYSE:WF) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

3.4% of Woori Bank shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Woori Bank has higher revenue and earnings than UWM. Woori Bank is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UWM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Woori Bank$13.49T0.00$2.16B$8.657.50
UWM$3.16B1.31$27.38M$0.279.61

Woori Bank has a net margin of 13.34% compared to UWM's net margin of 1.92%. UWM's return on equity of 19.01% beat Woori Bank's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Woori Bank13.34% 8.46% 0.55%
UWM 1.92%19.01%1.85%

In the previous week, UWM had 3 more articles in the media than Woori Bank. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for UWM and 0 mentions for Woori Bank. UWM's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Woori Bank's score of 0.00 indicating that UWM is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Woori Bank Neutral
UWM Neutral

Woori Bank pays an annual dividend of $1.67 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Woori Bank pays out 19.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UWM pays out 148.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

UWM has a consensus price target of $5.79, suggesting a potential upside of 123.12%. Given UWM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Woori Bank.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Woori Bank
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
UWM
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23

Woori Bank has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

UWM beats Woori Bank on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Banco Santander Chile?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Banco Santander Chile (NYSE:BSAC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Banco Santander Chile pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. UWM pays out 148.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Banco Santander Chile pays out 47.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

UWM has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Banco Santander Chile has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Banco Santander Chile has higher revenue and earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Banco Santander Chile, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B1.31$27.38M$0.279.61
Banco Santander Chile$4.50B3.51$1.12B$2.3214.45

UWM presently has a consensus target price of $5.79, indicating a potential upside of 123.12%. Banco Santander Chile has a consensus target price of $36.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.37%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Banco Santander Chile.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Banco Santander Chile
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

In the previous week, UWM had 3 more articles in the media than Banco Santander Chile. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for UWM and 0 mentions for Banco Santander Chile. Banco Santander Chile's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat UWM's score of 0.44 indicating that Banco Santander Chile is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
UWM Neutral
Banco Santander Chile Positive

Banco Santander Chile has a net margin of 24.95% compared to UWM's net margin of 1.92%. Banco Santander Chile's return on equity of 21.00% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM1.92% 19.01% 1.85%
Banco Santander Chile 24.95%21.00%1.54%

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Banco Santander Chile shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Banco Santander Chile beats UWM on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Ally Financial?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Ally Financial (NYSE:ALLY) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation and dividends.

Ally Financial has higher revenue and earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ally Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B1.31$27.38M$0.279.61
Ally Financial$7.91B1.78$852M$4.1011.23

Ally Financial has a net margin of 16.47% compared to UWM's net margin of 1.92%. UWM's return on equity of 19.01% beat Ally Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM1.92% 19.01% 1.85%
Ally Financial 16.47%11.41%0.76%

53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Ally Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ally Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.4%. Ally Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. UWM pays out 148.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ally Financial pays out 29.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

UWM presently has a consensus target price of $5.79, suggesting a potential upside of 123.12%. Ally Financial has a consensus target price of $54.14, suggesting a potential upside of 17.59%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Ally Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
0 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Ally Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

UWM has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ally Financial has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ally Financial had 7 more articles in the media than UWM. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ally Financial and 3 mentions for UWM. Ally Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat UWM's score of 0.44 indicating that Ally Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ally Financial
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Ally Financial beats UWM on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get UWM News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UWMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UWMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UWMC vs. The Competition

MetricUWMFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$4.07B$4.68B$13.99B$23.31B
Dividend Yield16.81%6.75%5.75%4.05%
P/E Ratio9.4386.3720.2931.31
Price / Sales1.311.63144.68100.04
Price / Cash15.2411.6019.5018.65
Price / Book2.602.132.274.69
Net Income$27.38M$1.63B$1.14B$1.08B
7 Day Performance1.96%5.76%1.98%2.07%
1 Month Performance-13.36%-1.04%2.84%3.44%
1 Year Performance-37.86%-6.49%13.36%24.11%

UWM Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UWMC
UWM
4.7659 of 5 stars
$2.59
+8.6%
$5.79
+124.0%
-43.1%$4.14B$3.16B9.579,100
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services
4.9967 of 5 stars
$79.46
-2.2%
$122.75
+54.5%
-14.9%$4.22B$2.05B8.444,900
RKT
Rocket Companies
3.8889 of 5 stars
$12.36
-2.3%
$20.93
+69.3%
-5.4%$35.79B$6.70B247.2023,500
WF
Woori Bank
3.8598 of 5 stars
$58.27
-3.8%
N/A+39.3%$14.82B$16.27B6.7412,947
BSAC
Banco Santander Chile
4.449 of 5 stars
$30.01
0.0%
$36.00
+20.0%
+31.4%$14.14B$4.50B12.938,526

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UWMC) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners