Go Pro

UWM (UWMC) Competitors

UWM logo
$1.60 -0.04 (-2.15%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.61 +0.01 (+0.69%)
As of 08/14/2026 08:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UWMC vs. PFSI, RKT, MTG, ESNT, and RDN

Should you buy UWM stock or one of its competitors? UWM's main competitors and comparable companies include PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI), Rocket Companies (RKT), MGIC Investment (MTG), Essent Group (ESNT), and Radian Group (RDN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "commercial & residential mortgage finance" industry.

How does UWM compare to PennyMac Financial Services?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and PennyMac Financial Services (NYSE:PFSI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

UWM presently has a consensus price target of $4.01, suggesting a potential upside of 151.64%. PennyMac Financial Services has a consensus price target of $104.88, suggesting a potential upside of 34.28%. Given UWM's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe UWM is more favorable than PennyMac Financial Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
PennyMac Financial Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

In the previous week, UWM had 31 more articles in the media than PennyMac Financial Services. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for UWM and 3 mentions for PennyMac Financial Services. PennyMac Financial Services' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat UWM's score of -0.11 indicating that PennyMac Financial Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
PennyMac Financial Services
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

PennyMac Financial Services has a net margin of 17.74% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. PennyMac Financial Services' return on equity of 11.18% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
PennyMac Financial Services 17.74%11.18%1.65%

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.1%. PennyMac Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PennyMac Financial Services pays out 16.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. PennyMac Financial Services has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

PennyMac Financial Services has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennyMac Financial Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.81$27.38M-$0.08N/A
PennyMac Financial Services$2.05B1.98$501.08M$7.2810.73

UWM has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennyMac Financial Services has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.9% of PennyMac Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of PennyMac Financial Services shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PennyMac Financial Services beats UWM on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Rocket Companies?

Rocket Companies (NYSE:RKT) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Rocket Companies has a net margin of 4.70% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Rocket Companies' return on equity of 5.13% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rocket Companies4.70% 5.13% 1.88%
UWM -1.04%-6.20%-0.50%

UWM has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rocket Companies. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rocket Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rocket Companies$6.70B6.25-$68M$0.14105.61
UWM$3.16B0.81$27.38M-$0.08N/A

Rocket Companies presently has a consensus target price of $19.87, indicating a potential upside of 34.37%. UWM has a consensus target price of $4.01, indicating a potential upside of 151.64%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Rocket Companies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rocket Companies
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

4.6% of Rocket Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. 57.7% of Rocket Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, UWM had 14 more articles in the media than Rocket Companies. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for UWM and 20 mentions for Rocket Companies. Rocket Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat UWM's score of -0.11 indicating that Rocket Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rocket Companies
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Rocket Companies has a beta of 2.19, indicating that its stock price is 119% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Rocket Companies beats UWM on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to MGIC Investment?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and MGIC Investment (NYSE:MTG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk and earnings.

53.6% of UWM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of MGIC Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of MGIC Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MGIC Investment has a net margin of 59.20% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 13.90% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
MGIC Investment 59.20%13.90%10.81%

MGIC Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MGIC Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.81$27.38M-$0.08N/A
MGIC Investment$1.21B5.26$738.35M$3.209.73

UWM currently has a consensus price target of $4.01, indicating a potential upside of 151.64%. MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of $30.60, indicating a potential downside of 1.70%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than MGIC Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
MGIC Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.1%. MGIC Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MGIC Investment pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MGIC Investment has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

UWM has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its share price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MGIC Investment has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, UWM had 27 more articles in the media than MGIC Investment. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for UWM and 7 mentions for MGIC Investment. MGIC Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat UWM's score of -0.11 indicating that MGIC Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MGIC Investment
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

MGIC Investment beats UWM on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Essent Group?

UWM (NYSE:UWMC) and Essent Group (NYSE:ESNT) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, profitability and institutional ownership.

UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.1%. Essent Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Essent Group pays out 19.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Essent Group has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

UWM currently has a consensus price target of $4.01, suggesting a potential upside of 151.64%. Essent Group has a consensus price target of $71.86, suggesting a potential upside of 3.35%. Given UWM's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Essent Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Essent Group
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Essent Group has a net margin of 51.45% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Essent Group's return on equity of 11.91% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
UWM-1.04% -6.20% -0.50%
Essent Group 51.45%11.91%9.09%

Essent Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essent Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
UWM$3.16B0.81$27.38M-$0.08N/A
Essent Group$1.26B4.96$689.97M$7.179.70

UWM has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essent Group has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, UWM had 14 more articles in the media than Essent Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for UWM and 20 mentions for Essent Group. Essent Group's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat UWM's score of -0.11 indicating that Essent Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Essent Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.0% of Essent Group shares are held by institutional investors. 80.3% of UWM shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.6% of Essent Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Essent Group beats UWM on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UWM compare to Radian Group?

Radian Group (NYSE:RDN) and UWM (NYSE:UWMC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, UWM had 15 more articles in the media than Radian Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for UWM and 19 mentions for Radian Group. Radian Group's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat UWM's score of -0.11 indicating that Radian Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Radian Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
UWM
1 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Radian Group pays an annual dividend of $1.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. UWM pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 25.1%. Radian Group pays out 26.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. UWM pays out -500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Radian Group has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. UWM is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

95.3% of Radian Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.6% of UWM shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Radian Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 80.3% of UWM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Radian Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than UWM. UWM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Radian Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Radian Group$1.20B4.11$582.64M$3.899.56
UWM$3.16B0.81$27.38M-$0.08N/A

Radian Group has a net margin of 32.60% compared to UWM's net margin of -1.04%. Radian Group's return on equity of 13.65% beat UWM's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Radian Group32.60% 13.65% 6.91%
UWM -1.04%-6.20%-0.50%

Radian Group has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UWM has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market.

Radian Group currently has a consensus target price of $42.17, indicating a potential upside of 13.34%. UWM has a consensus target price of $4.01, indicating a potential upside of 151.64%. Given UWM's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe UWM is more favorable than Radian Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Radian Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
UWM
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Summary

Radian Group beats UWM on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get UWM News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UWMC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UWMC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UWMC vs. The Competition

MetricUWMFinancial Services IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.55B$27.47B$14.17B$24.33B
Dividend Yield25.16%5.92%5.87%3.68%
P/E Ratio-19.9412.3527.8726.71
Price / Sales0.81412.51519.6521.30
Price / Cash10.18136.5137.2632.61
Price / Book2.573.082.816.82
Net Income$27.38M$1.09B$1.31B$1.06B
7 Day Performance24.12%0.86%0.77%0.55%
1 Month Performance-21.62%-0.99%1.56%2.90%
1 Year Performance-70.41%-10.72%12.52%19.10%

UWM Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UWMC
UWM
3.9249 of 5 stars
$1.60
-2.1%
$4.01
+151.6%
-70.9%$2.55B$3.16BN/A9,100
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services
4.944 of 5 stars
$76.35
+1.2%
$104.88
+37.4%
-28.1%$3.92B$2.05B10.494,900
RKT
Rocket Companies
4.3703 of 5 stars
$13.70
+6.2%
$20.73
+51.4%
-21.3%$36.50B$6.70B273.9023,500
MTG
MGIC Investment
4.4822 of 5 stars
$30.59
+1.8%
$30.60
+0.0%
+11.7%$6.16B$1.21B9.56680
ESNT
Essent Group
3.4371 of 5 stars
$66.73
+1.2%
$67.71
+1.5%
+10.6%$6.08B$1.26B9.51350

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:UWMC) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners