Go Pro

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

Capstone Copper logo
C$16.08 +0.68 (+4.42%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CS vs. FM, LUN, HBM, KAT, and ERO

Should you buy Capstone Copper stock or one of its competitors? Capstone Copper's main competitors and comparable companies include First Quantum Minerals (FM), Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Ero Copper (ERO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.172553, meaning that its share price is 117% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.377459, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.2% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper and Capstone Copper both had 3 articles in the media. First Quantum Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Capstone Copper's score of 0.53 indicating that First Quantum Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Quantum Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
First Quantum Minerals -1.44%-0.73%2.31%

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 1.68%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus price target of C$44.68, indicating a potential downside of 5.96%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
First Quantum Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Capstone Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.59-C$14.64MC$0.6225.94
First Quantum MineralsC$5.75B6.90-C$1.05B-C$0.09N/A

Summary

Capstone Copper beats First Quantum Minerals on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Copper. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lundin MiningC$4.63B7.00C$216.85MC$1.7521.75
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.59-C$14.64MC$0.6225.94

Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Lundin Mining pays out 4.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Lundin Mining had 11 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Lundin Mining and 3 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Lundin Mining's score of -0.40 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lundin Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.11% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 22.97% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lundin Mining35.11% 22.97% 4.56%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

61.2% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lundin Mining currently has a consensus target price of C$39.64, suggesting a potential upside of 4.12%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.35, suggesting a potential upside of 1.68%. Given Lundin Mining's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lundin Mining is more favorable than Capstone Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lundin Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.300308, suggesting that its stock price is 130% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.172553, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Capstone Copper on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both large-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Hudbay Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B7.44C$69.59MC$1.6325.40
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.59-C$14.64MC$0.6225.94

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$40.91, indicating a potential downside of 1.07%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 1.68%. Given Capstone Copper's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 2 more articles in the media than Hudbay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Capstone Copper and 1 mentions for Hudbay Minerals. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.31136, suggesting that its stock price is 131% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.172553, suggesting that its stock price is 117% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

46.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus target price of C$16.35, suggesting a potential upside of 1.68%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 3 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper Positive
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Neutral

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) N/A N/A N/A

Capstone Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.59-C$14.64MC$0.6225.94
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)C$1.39B0.00-C$11.75B-C$0.19N/A

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Ero Copper?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

36.5% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.72% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.09% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Ero Copper 29.72%30.09%3.46%

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$16.35, indicating a potential upside of 1.68%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$47.63, indicating a potential downside of 12.08%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.172553, suggesting that its share price is 117% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.746136, suggesting that its share price is 75% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ero Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Ero Copper and 3 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.39 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ero Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capstone Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B4.59-C$14.64MC$0.6225.94
Ero CopperC$1.04B5.41C$10.88MC$2.9518.37

Summary

Ero Copper beats Capstone Copper on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capstone Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CS vs. The Competition

MetricCapstone CopperMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$12.28BC$4.11BC$5.13BC$12.56B
Dividend Yield0.07%5.18%4.68%6.21%
P/E Ratio25.9425.6526.6139.07
Price / Sales4.598,034.254,779.8510.02
Price / Cash16.5126.6824.7182.29
Price / Book3.0310.709.024.79
Net Income-C$14.64MC$122.81MC$154.52MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance6.49%3.27%2.58%0.82%
1 Month Performance23.98%12.55%10.17%5.39%
1 Year Performance66.46%57.65%45.55%35.05%

Capstone Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CS
Capstone Copper
1.8548 of 5 stars
C$16.08
+4.4%
C$16.35
+1.7%
+66.5%C$12.28BC$2.68B25.941,049
FM
First Quantum Minerals
1.7483 of 5 stars
C$43.40
-2.9%
C$44.68
+2.9%
+102.4%C$36.20BC$5.75BN/A20,000
LUN
Lundin Mining
1.8838 of 5 stars
C$35.33
-2.3%
C$39.64
+12.2%
+142.6%C$30.08BC$4.63B20.196,019
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
1.3588 of 5 stars
C$36.58
-3.7%
C$40.91
+11.8%
+154.0%C$16.25BC$2.47B22.472,500
KAT
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$9.79BC$1.39BN/A4,457

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CS) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners