Free Trial
Your Rate Never Goes Up! Save $100 a Year on MarketBeat All Access
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Capstone Copper (CS) Competitors

Capstone Copper logo
C$11.17 -0.67 (-5.66%)
As of 04:16 PM Eastern

CS vs. FM, LUN, HBM, KAT, and ERO

Should you buy Capstone Copper stock or one of its competitors? Capstone Copper's main competitors and comparable companies include First Quantum Minerals (FM), Lundin Mining (LUN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (KAT), and Ero Copper (ERO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "copper" industry.

How does Capstone Copper compare to First Quantum Minerals?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and First Quantum Minerals (TSE:FM) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to First Quantum Minerals' net margin of -1.44%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat First Quantum Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
First Quantum Minerals -1.44%-0.73%2.31%

36.7% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of First Quantum Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 3 more articles in the media than First Quantum Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 4 mentions for First Quantum Minerals. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat First Quantum Minerals' score of 0.86 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Quantum Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus target price of C$17.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.67%. First Quantum Minerals has a consensus target price of C$46.78, indicating a potential upside of 37.21%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than First Quantum Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
First Quantum Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

Capstone Copper has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Quantum Minerals. First Quantum Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B3.19-C$14.64MC$0.6218.02
First Quantum MineralsC$5.75B4.95-C$1.05B-C$0.09N/A

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.272755, suggesting that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Quantum Minerals has a beta of 1.465253, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Capstone Copper beats First Quantum Minerals on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Lundin Mining?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Lundin Mining (TSE:LUN) are both materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Lundin Mining has higher revenue and earnings than Capstone Copper. Lundin Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B3.19-C$14.64MC$0.6218.02
Lundin MiningC$4.63B5.43C$216.85MC$1.7516.86

Lundin Mining has a net margin of 35.11% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Lundin Mining's return on equity of 22.97% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Lundin Mining 35.11%22.97%4.56%

Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Lundin Mining pays an annual dividend of C$0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lundin Mining pays out 4.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper and Capstone Copper both had 7 articles in the media. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Lundin Mining's score of 0.53 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lundin Mining
1 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$17.50, indicating a potential upside of 56.67%. Lundin Mining has a consensus price target of C$39.82, indicating a potential upside of 34.92%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Lundin Mining.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Lundin Mining
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.272755, suggesting that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lundin Mining has a beta of 2.360932, suggesting that its stock price is 136% more volatile than the broader market.

36.7% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Lundin Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.7% of Lundin Mining shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Lundin Mining beats Capstone Copper on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Hudbay Minerals?

Hudbay Minerals (TSE:HBM) and Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, Hudbay Minerals had 7 more articles in the media than Capstone Copper. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Hudbay Minerals and 7 mentions for Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Hudbay Minerals' score of 0.16 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hudbay Minerals
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hudbay Minerals has a beta of 2.372374, indicating that its share price is 137% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.272755, indicating that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

Hudbay Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Capstone Copper. Capstone Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hudbay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay MineralsC$2.47B5.52C$69.59MC$1.6318.84
Capstone CopperC$2.68B3.19-C$14.64MC$0.6218.02

45.0% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.7% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Hudbay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hudbay Minerals currently has a consensus target price of C$42.58, suggesting a potential upside of 38.84%. Capstone Copper has a consensus target price of C$17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.67%. Given Capstone Copper's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hudbay Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.08
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91

Hudbay Minerals has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Hudbay Minerals' return on equity of 18.41% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hudbay Minerals27.22% 18.41% 4.78%
Capstone Copper 17.67%13.69%0.47%

Hudbay Minerals pays an annual dividend of C$0.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Capstone Copper pays an annual dividend of C$0.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Hudbay Minerals pays out 1.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstone Copper pays out 41.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Hudbay Minerals beats Capstone Copper on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) (TSE:KAT) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 7 more articles in the media than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 0 mentions for Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper Positive
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) Neutral

Capstone Copper has a net margin of 17.67% compared to Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s net margin of 0.00%. Capstone Copper's return on equity of 13.69% beat Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) N/A N/A N/A

36.7% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Capstone Copper has higher revenue and earnings than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO). Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B3.19-C$14.64MC$0.6218.02
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)C$1.39B0.00-C$11.75B-C$0.19N/A

Capstone Copper presently has a consensus price target of C$17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.67%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO) on 15 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Capstone Copper compare to Ero Copper?

Capstone Copper (TSE:CS) and Ero Copper (TSE:ERO) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Capstone Copper has a beta of 2.272755, meaning that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ero Copper has a beta of 1.576894, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Capstone Copper currently has a consensus price target of C$17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 56.67%. Ero Copper has a consensus price target of C$48.67, suggesting a potential upside of 15.05%. Given Capstone Copper's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Capstone Copper is more favorable than Ero Copper.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Capstone Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.91
Ero Copper
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Ero Copper has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Capstone Copper. Ero Copper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstone Copper, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Capstone CopperC$2.68B3.19-C$14.64MC$0.6218.02
Ero CopperC$1.04B4.22C$10.88MC$2.9514.34

36.7% of Capstone Copper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Ero Copper shares are held by institutional investors. 15.4% of Capstone Copper shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Ero Copper shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Capstone Copper had 1 more articles in the media than Ero Copper. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Capstone Copper and 6 mentions for Ero Copper. Capstone Copper's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Ero Copper's score of 0.49 indicating that Capstone Copper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Capstone Copper
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ero Copper
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ero Copper has a net margin of 29.72% compared to Capstone Copper's net margin of 17.67%. Ero Copper's return on equity of 30.09% beat Capstone Copper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Capstone Copper17.67% 13.69% 0.47%
Ero Copper 29.72%30.09%3.46%

Summary

Capstone Copper beats Ero Copper on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Capstone Copper News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CS vs. The Competition

MetricCapstone CopperMetals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$8.53BC$3.63BC$4.66BC$12.83B
Dividend Yield0.07%5.27%4.79%6.34%
P/E Ratio18.0220.5620.6036.77
Price / Sales3.1925,914.0315,457.028.29
Price / Cash16.5126.8924.8182.29
Price / Book2.1010.618.874.26
Net Income-C$14.64MC$127.82MC$159.82MC$299.09M
7 Day Performance-11.77%-3.46%-2.66%-1.18%
1 Month Performance-25.33%-11.50%-9.55%-3.55%
1 Year Performance0.54%12.93%11.93%15.89%

Capstone Copper Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CS
Capstone Copper
4.198 of 5 stars
C$11.17
-5.7%
C$17.50
+56.7%
+7.6%C$8.53BC$2.68B18.021,049
FM
First Quantum Minerals
3.2201 of 5 stars
C$39.00
-0.2%
C$46.78
+19.9%
+20.6%C$32.53BC$5.75BN/A15,661
LUN
Lundin Mining
4.0125 of 5 stars
C$34.67
-1.4%
C$39.72
+14.6%
+54.4%C$29.52BC$4.63B19.816,195
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
3.6555 of 5 stars
C$36.55
-1.9%
C$42.56
+16.4%
+58.0%C$16.23BC$2.47B22.452,233
KAT
Katanga Mining Limited (KAT.TO)
N/AN/AN/AN/AC$9.79BC$1.39BN/A4,457

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:CS) was last updated on 10/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners