Free Trial

Enterprise Financial Services (EFSC) Competitors

Enterprise Financial Services logo
$58.99 -1.77 (-2.91%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$58.99 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

EFSC vs. BUSE, CATY, FFBC, FRME, and STBA

Should you buy Enterprise Financial Services stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Enterprise Financial Services with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Enterprise Financial Services include First Busey (BUSE), Cathay General Bancorp (CATY), First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC), First Merchants (FRME), and S&T Bancorp (STBA). These companies are all part of the "regional banks" industry.

How does Enterprise Financial Services compare to First Busey?

Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) and First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Enterprise Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Enterprise Financial Services pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Busey pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enterprise Financial Services has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and First Busey has increased its dividend for 10 consecutive years.

Enterprise Financial Services has a net margin of 19.81% compared to First Busey's net margin of 19.16%. Enterprise Financial Services' return on equity of 10.35% beat First Busey's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Financial Services19.81% 10.35% 1.19%
First Busey 19.16%10.19%1.36%

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Busey has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enterprise Financial Services had 3 more articles in the media than First Busey. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enterprise Financial Services and 4 mentions for First Busey. Enterprise Financial Services' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat First Busey's score of 0.92 indicating that Enterprise Financial Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Financial Services
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
First Busey
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Enterprise Financial Services currently has a consensus target price of $66.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.88%. First Busey has a consensus target price of $27.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.44%. Given Enterprise Financial Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Enterprise Financial Services is more favorable than First Busey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Financial Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
First Busey
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Enterprise Financial Services has higher earnings, but lower revenue than First Busey. Enterprise Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Busey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Financial Services$634.39M3.40$201.37M$5.3011.13
First Busey$1.04B2.18$135.26M$2.2511.93

72.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of First Busey shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of First Busey shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Enterprise Financial Services beats First Busey on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enterprise Financial Services compare to Cathay General Bancorp?

Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) and Cathay General Bancorp (NASDAQ:CATY) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Cathay General Bancorp has a net margin of 23.79% compared to Enterprise Financial Services' net margin of 19.81%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 11.37% beat Enterprise Financial Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Financial Services19.81% 10.35% 1.19%
Cathay General Bancorp 23.79%11.37%1.38%

In the previous week, Enterprise Financial Services had 5 more articles in the media than Cathay General Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enterprise Financial Services and 2 mentions for Cathay General Bancorp. Cathay General Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Enterprise Financial Services' score of 1.41 indicating that Cathay General Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Financial Services
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cathay General Bancorp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Enterprise Financial Services currently has a consensus target price of $66.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.88%. Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus target price of $51.75, indicating a potential downside of 8.42%. Given Enterprise Financial Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enterprise Financial Services is more favorable than Cathay General Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Financial Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Cathay General Bancorp
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Enterprise Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Cathay General Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Enterprise Financial Services pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enterprise Financial Services has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Cathay General Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Enterprise Financial Services. Enterprise Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cathay General Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Financial Services$634.39M3.40$201.37M$5.3011.13
Cathay General Bancorp$1.38B2.74$315.12M$4.8511.65

72.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.0% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Cathay General Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Cathay General Bancorp beats Enterprise Financial Services on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enterprise Financial Services compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC) and Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.92% compared to Enterprise Financial Services' net margin of 19.81%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.09% beat Enterprise Financial Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Financial Bancorp.20.92% 11.09% 1.49%
Enterprise Financial Services 19.81%10.35%1.19%

In the previous week, First Financial Bancorp. and First Financial Bancorp. both had 7 articles in the media. Enterprise Financial Services' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat First Financial Bancorp.'s score of 0.86 indicating that Enterprise Financial Services is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Financial Bancorp.
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Enterprise Financial Services
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

First Financial Bancorp. presently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.85%. Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $66.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.88%. Given Enterprise Financial Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enterprise Financial Services is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Financial Bancorp.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Enterprise Financial Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Enterprise Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enterprise Financial Services pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Enterprise Financial Services has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years.

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than Enterprise Financial Services. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enterprise Financial Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Financial Bancorp.$1.26B2.48$255.60M$2.8310.52
Enterprise Financial Services$634.39M3.40$201.37M$5.3011.13

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Enterprise Financial Services beats First Financial Bancorp. on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enterprise Financial Services compare to First Merchants?

First Merchants (NASDAQ:FRME) and Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

73.9% of First Merchants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of First Merchants shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Merchants has higher revenue and earnings than Enterprise Financial Services. Enterprise Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Merchants, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Merchants$659.76M3.72$226M$3.4011.44
Enterprise Financial Services$634.39M3.40$201.37M$5.3011.13

First Merchants pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Enterprise Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. First Merchants pays out 43.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enterprise Financial Services pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Merchants has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Enterprise Financial Services has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. First Merchants is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Merchants has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

First Merchants presently has a consensus price target of $48.33, indicating a potential upside of 24.25%. Enterprise Financial Services has a consensus price target of $66.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.88%. Given First Merchants' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe First Merchants is more favorable than Enterprise Financial Services.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Merchants
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Enterprise Financial Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Enterprise Financial Services has a net margin of 19.81% compared to First Merchants' net margin of 18.87%. Enterprise Financial Services' return on equity of 10.35% beat First Merchants' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Merchants18.87% 9.58% 1.21%
Enterprise Financial Services 19.81%10.35%1.19%

In the previous week, Enterprise Financial Services had 6 more articles in the media than First Merchants. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enterprise Financial Services and 1 mentions for First Merchants. First Merchants' average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Enterprise Financial Services' score of 1.41 indicating that First Merchants is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Merchants Very Positive
Enterprise Financial Services Positive

Summary

First Merchants beats Enterprise Financial Services on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enterprise Financial Services compare to S&T Bancorp?

Enterprise Financial Services (NASDAQ:EFSC) and S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

Enterprise Financial Services presently has a consensus target price of $66.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.88%. S&T Bancorp has a consensus target price of $44.40, suggesting a potential upside of 0.75%. Given Enterprise Financial Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enterprise Financial Services is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Enterprise Financial Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
S&T Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Enterprise Financial Services pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Enterprise Financial Services pays out 25.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&T Bancorp pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enterprise Financial Services has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years and S&T Bancorp has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enterprise Financial Services has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

72.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Enterprise Financial Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 23.71% compared to Enterprise Financial Services' net margin of 19.81%. Enterprise Financial Services' return on equity of 10.35% beat S&T Bancorp's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Enterprise Financial Services19.81% 10.35% 1.19%
S&T Bancorp 23.71%9.35%1.38%

In the previous week, Enterprise Financial Services had 5 more articles in the media than S&T Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Enterprise Financial Services and 2 mentions for S&T Bancorp. Enterprise Financial Services' average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat S&T Bancorp's score of 0.94 indicating that Enterprise Financial Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Enterprise Financial Services
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
S&T Bancorp
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Enterprise Financial Services has higher revenue and earnings than S&T Bancorp. Enterprise Financial Services is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&T Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Enterprise Financial Services$634.39M3.40$201.37M$5.3011.13
S&T Bancorp$410.45M3.86$134.23M$3.5712.34

Summary

Enterprise Financial Services beats S&T Bancorp on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Enterprise Financial Services News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EFSC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EFSC vs. The Competition

MetricEnterprise Financial ServicesBANKS IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.16B$2.79B$13.39B$12.42B
Dividend Yield2.18%3.33%5.78%5.29%
P/E Ratio11.1310.5219.6724.19
Price / Sales3.402.63138.10138.32
Price / Cash10.3210.7319.9357.88
Price / Book1.111.192.176.72
Net Income$201.37M$217.16M$1.13B$337.19M
7 Day Performance-2.67%-1.62%-0.88%0.53%
1 Month Performance0.17%0.47%-0.65%5.10%
1 Year Performance11.64%21.72%10.93%34.36%

Enterprise Financial Services Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EFSC
Enterprise Financial Services
4.1873 of 5 stars
$58.99
-2.9%
$66.00
+11.9%
+16.4%$2.16B$634.39M11.131,418
BUSE
First Busey
4.2245 of 5 stars
$27.57
+1.8%
$27.50
-0.3%
+24.9%$2.29B$1.04B12.251,948
CATY
Cathay General Bancorp
2.378 of 5 stars
$58.11
+1.5%
$51.75
-10.9%
+35.4%$3.84B$844.88M11.981,268
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.
3.6523 of 5 stars
$31.15
+1.4%
$33.00
+5.9%
+28.7%$3.22B$1.26B11.012,199
FRME
First Merchants
4.6983 of 5 stars
$40.97
+2.1%
$48.33
+18.0%
+7.9%$2.53B$1.05B12.052,086

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:EFSC) was last updated on 6/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners