Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus target price of $148.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.10%. Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus target price of $12.50, suggesting a potential downside of 6.67%. Given Lamar Advertising's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lamar Advertising is more favorable than Chatham Lodging Trust.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Chatham Lodging Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Chatham Lodging Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.12, meaning that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the broader market.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 5 more articles in the media than Chatham Lodging Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 0 mentions for Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Chatham Lodging Trust's score of 1.00 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 3.14%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus target price of $148.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.10%. DiamondRock Hospitality has a consensus target price of $11.65, indicating a potential downside of 5.36%. Given Lamar Advertising's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Lamar Advertising is more favorable than DiamondRock Hospitality.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than DiamondRock Hospitality. DiamondRock Hospitality is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of DiamondRock Hospitality shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising and Lamar Advertising both had 5 articles in the media. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat DiamondRock Hospitality's score of 0.16 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DiamondRock Hospitality has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. DiamondRock Hospitality pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DiamondRock Hospitality pays out 76.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and DiamondRock Hospitality has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to DiamondRock Hospitality's net margin of 5.69%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat DiamondRock Hospitality's return on equity.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus price target of $148.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.10%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $123.21, indicating a potential upside of 2.24%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 3 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 2 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.59 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kimco Realty has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kimco Realty had 5 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Kimco Realty and 5 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Kimco Realty's score of 0.75 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus target price of $148.00, indicating a potential downside of 1.10%. Kimco Realty has a consensus target price of $25.33, indicating a potential upside of 3.83%. Given Kimco Realty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kimco Realty is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 28.54% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Kimco Realty. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimco Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Kimco Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimco Realty pays out 120.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Kimco Realty has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.