Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

$151.71 -6.22 (-3.94%)

As of 03:51 PM Eastern

LAMR vs. AKR, BRX, CLDT, FRT, and KIM

Should you be buying Lamar Advertising stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Lamar Advertising include Acadia Realty Trust (AKR), Brixmor Property Group (BRX), Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT), Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT), and Kimco Realty (KIM). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising	$2.27B	6.78	$587.15M	$5.42	27.99
Acadia Realty Trust	$410.76M	7.09	$16.90M	$0.30	72.72

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 9.77%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising	24.01%	55.53%	8.04%
Acadia Realty Trust	9.77%	1.51%	0.84%

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus price target of $143.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.35%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $23.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.43%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lamar Advertising	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Acadia Realty Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 12 more articles in the media than Acadia Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 5 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Acadia Realty Trust's score of 0.85 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Acadia Realty Trust	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Acadia Realty Trust on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brixmor Property Group	31.99%	14.85%	4.95%
Lamar Advertising	24.01%	55.53%	8.04%

Brixmor Property Group presently has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.47%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $143.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.35%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brixmor Property Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.91
Lamar Advertising	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brixmor Property Group	$1.39B	6.58	$386.23M	$1.44	20.68
Lamar Advertising	$2.27B	6.78	$587.15M	$5.42	27.99

Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 8 more articles in the media than Brixmor Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 9 mentions for Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.87 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brixmor Property Group	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lamar Advertising	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Brixmor Property Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Chatham Lodging Trust?

Chatham Lodging Trust (NYSE:CLDT) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

88.4% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 8 more articles in the media than Chatham Lodging Trust. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 9 mentions for Chatham Lodging Trust. Chatham Lodging Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.87 indicating that Chatham Lodging Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Chatham Lodging Trust	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Lamar Advertising	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Chatham Lodging Trust currently has a consensus price target of $11.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.51%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $143.60, indicating a potential downside of 5.35%. Given Chatham Lodging Trust's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Chatham Lodging Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Lamar Advertising	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Chatham Lodging Trust	$293.94M	1.58	$15.05M	$0.02	493.25
Lamar Advertising	$2.27B	6.78	$587.15M	$5.42	27.99

Chatham Lodging Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chatham Lodging Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 3.14%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Chatham Lodging Trust	3.14%	1.18%	0.77%
Lamar Advertising	24.01%	55.53%	8.04%

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Chatham Lodging Trust on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising	24.01%	55.53%	8.04%
Federal Realty Investment Trust	38.63%	15.99%	5.67%

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus price target of $143.60, suggesting a potential downside of 5.35%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $113.13, suggesting a potential downside of 2.03%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lamar Advertising	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Federal Realty Investment Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.59

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising	$2.27B	6.78	$587.15M	$5.42	27.99
Federal Realty Investment Trust	$1.28B	7.80	$411.08M	$5.76	20.05

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 7 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 10 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.87 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Federal Realty Investment Trust	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Federal Realty Investment Trust beats Lamar Advertising on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Kimco Realty?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Kimco Realty (NYSE:KIM) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Kimco Realty shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kimco Realty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 28.54% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising	24.01%	55.53%	8.04%
Kimco Realty	28.54%	5.82%	3.13%

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Kimco Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimco Realty pays out 120.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Kimco Realty has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus price target of $143.60, suggesting a potential downside of 5.35%. Kimco Realty has a consensus price target of $24.71, suggesting a potential upside of 5.59%. Given Kimco Realty's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kimco Realty is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lamar Advertising	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Kimco Realty	0 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Kimco Realty. Kimco Realty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising	$2.27B	6.78	$587.15M	$5.42	27.99
Kimco Realty	$2.14B	7.38	$584.74M	$0.86	27.22

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 7 more articles in the media than Kimco Realty. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 10 mentions for Kimco Realty. Kimco Realty's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.87 indicating that Kimco Realty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Kimco Realty	7 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kimco Realty has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Kimco Realty on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lamar Advertising News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

LAMR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Lamar Advertising	REIT Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$15.35B	$9.80B	$13.48B	$12.28B
Dividend Yield	4.05%	5.08%	5.75%	5.22%
P/E Ratio	27.95	46.91	23.25	25.72
Price / Sales	6.78	5.24	179.03	65.20
Price / Cash	17.40	14.16	20.30	36.27
Price / Book	15.01	2.01	2.21	6.76
Net Income	$587.15M	$222.69M	$1.11B	$333.20M
7 Day Performance	N/A	N/A	N/A	0.52%
1 Month Performance	13.70%	6.21%	2.21%	9.27%
1 Year Performance	32.14%	12.56%	13.12%	42.97%

Lamar Advertising Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
LAMR Lamar Advertising	3.286 of 5 stars	$151.71 -3.9%	$143.60 -5.3%	+37.6%	$15.35B	$2.27B	27.95	3,500	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
AKR Acadia Realty Trust	2.9115 of 5 stars	$21.23 +1.5%	$22.25 +4.8%	+11.1%	$2.74B	$410.76M	235.88	120	Positive News
BRX Brixmor Property Group	4.5601 of 5 stars	$30.51 +0.5%	$31.55 +3.4%	+18.6%	$9.31B	$1.37B	24.22	500	Positive News
CLDT Chatham Lodging Trust	4.3256 of 5 stars	$8.59 -0.3%	$11.00 +28.1%	+41.8%	$405.01M	$295.08M	61.34	20	Positive News Analyst Forecast
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust	4.2803 of 5 stars	$111.23 +0.2%	$112.43 +1.1%	+23.7%	$9.59B	$1.28B	23.82	320	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:LAMR) was last updated on 5/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

LAMR vs. AKR, BRX, CLDT, FRT, and KIM

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Chatham Lodging Trust?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Kimco Realty?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LAMR vs. The Competition

Lamar Advertising Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

LAMR vs. AKR, BRX, CLDT, FRT, and KIM

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LAMR or AKR?

Is LAMR or AKR a better dividend stock?

Is LAMR or AKR more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of LAMR or AKR?

Do analysts rate LAMR or AKR?

Which has more risk & volatility, LAMR or AKR?

Does the media prefer LAMR or AKR?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Is BRX or LAMR more profitable?

Do analysts prefer BRX or LAMR?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BRX or LAMR?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BRX or LAMR?

Is BRX or LAMR a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to BRX or LAMR?

Which has more volatility and risk, BRX or LAMR?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Chatham Lodging Trust?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in CLDT or LAMR?

Does the media refer more to CLDT or LAMR?

Do analysts recommend CLDT or LAMR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CLDT or LAMR?

Is CLDT or LAMR a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility and risk, CLDT or LAMR?

Is CLDT or LAMR more profitable?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LAMR or FRT?

Is LAMR or FRT more profitable?

Is LAMR or FRT a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate LAMR or FRT?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, LAMR or FRT?

Does the media refer more to LAMR or FRT?

Which has more volatility & risk, LAMR or FRT?

Summary

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Kimco Realty?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LAMR or KIM?

Is LAMR or KIM more profitable?

Is LAMR or KIM a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate LAMR or KIM?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, LAMR or KIM?

Does the media refer more to LAMR or KIM?

Which has more risk and volatility, LAMR or KIM?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

LAMR vs. The Competition

Lamar Advertising Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools