Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Lamar Advertising pays out 116.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 89.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 6 more articles in the media than Brixmor Property Group. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 8 mentions for Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.61 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus target price of $159.14, suggesting a potential downside of 1.62%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus target price of $33.14, suggesting a potential upside of 9.27%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 29.96% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.36%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 57.12% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Chatham Lodging Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Lamar Advertising pays out 116.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Chatham Lodging Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 9 more articles in the media than Chatham Lodging Trust. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 5 mentions for Chatham Lodging Trust. Chatham Lodging Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.61 indicating that Chatham Lodging Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus price target of $159.14, indicating a potential downside of 1.62%. Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus price target of $14.25, indicating a potential downside of 12.34%. Given Lamar Advertising's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lamar Advertising is more favorable than Chatham Lodging Trust.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.36% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 5.03%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 57.12% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity.

94.4% of Cousins Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cousins Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cousins Properties has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Cousins Properties presently has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.22%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $159.14, suggesting a potential downside of 1.62%. Given Cousins Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cousins Properties is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.36% compared to Cousins Properties' net margin of 1.42%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 57.12% beat Cousins Properties' return on equity.

Cousins Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Cousins Properties pays out 1,422.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 116.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Cousins Properties. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cousins Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 11 more articles in the media than Cousins Properties. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 3 mentions for Cousins Properties. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Cousins Properties' score of 0.56 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 32.60% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.36%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 57.12% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 14 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.61 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust currently has a consensus target price of $124.69, suggesting a potential upside of 10.47%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $159.14, suggesting a potential downside of 1.62%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 92.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 116.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Federal Realty Investment Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.