Go Pro

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

Lamar Advertising logo
$148.86 -1.08 (-0.72%)
As of 02:51 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LAMR vs. AKR, BRX, CLDT, CUZ, and FRT

Should you buy Lamar Advertising stock or one of its competitors? Lamar Advertising's main competitors and comparable companies include Acadia Realty Trust (AKR), Brixmor Property Group (BRX), Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT), Cousins Properties (CUZ), and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "real estate" sector.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both real estate companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 235.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 120.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Acadia Realty Trust$404.19M6.85$16.90M$0.3459.34
Lamar Advertising$2.33B6.50$587.15M$5.4827.16

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 3 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.81 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Acadia Realty Trust
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Lamar Advertising
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 23.90% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 12.14%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 54.94% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Acadia Realty Trust12.14% 1.85% 1.04%
Lamar Advertising 23.90%54.94%8.04%

Acadia Realty Trust presently has a consensus target price of $24.20, suggesting a potential upside of 19.95%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $160.17, suggesting a potential upside of 7.61%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Acadia Realty Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Acadia Realty Trust on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both real estate companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Brixmor Property Group presently has a consensus target price of $34.55, indicating a potential upside of 19.27%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $160.17, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brixmor Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 2 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 3 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.81 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brixmor Property Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lamar Advertising
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Brixmor Property Group pays out 87.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 120.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 30.82% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 23.90%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 54.94% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brixmor Property Group30.82% 14.38% 4.77%
Lamar Advertising 23.90%54.94%8.04%

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brixmor Property Group$1.37B6.48$386.23M$1.4020.69
Lamar Advertising$2.33B6.50$587.15M$5.4827.16

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Brixmor Property Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Chatham Lodging Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Chatham Lodging Trust (NYSE:CLDT) are both real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its stock price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.33B6.50$587.15M$5.4827.16
Chatham Lodging Trust$295.08M2.03$15.05M$0.08160.56

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Chatham Lodging Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Lamar Advertising pays out 120.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Chatham Lodging Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 23.90% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 4.00%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 54.94% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising23.90% 54.94% 8.04%
Chatham Lodging Trust 4.00%1.56%1.00%

In the previous week, Chatham Lodging Trust had 3 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Chatham Lodging Trust and 3 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Chatham Lodging Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.81 indicating that Chatham Lodging Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chatham Lodging Trust
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus price target of $160.17, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 1.21%. Given Lamar Advertising's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lamar Advertising is more favorable than Chatham Lodging Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Chatham Lodging Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Chatham Lodging Trust on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Cousins Properties?

Cousins Properties (NYSE:CUZ) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both real estate companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Cousins Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Cousins Properties pays out 3,200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 120.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Cousins Properties. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cousins Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cousins Properties$1.03B4.41$40.50M$0.04694.00
Lamar Advertising$2.33B6.50$587.15M$5.4827.16

Cousins Properties currently has a consensus target price of $31.18, indicating a potential upside of 12.33%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $160.17, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Given Cousins Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Cousins Properties is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cousins Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 23.90% compared to Cousins Properties' net margin of 0.62%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 54.94% beat Cousins Properties' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cousins Properties0.62% 0.14% 0.07%
Lamar Advertising 23.90%54.94%8.04%

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 2 more articles in the media than Cousins Properties. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 1 mentions for Cousins Properties. Cousins Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.81 indicating that Cousins Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cousins Properties
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lamar Advertising
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

94.4% of Cousins Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cousins Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Cousins Properties has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Cousins Properties on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) are both real estate companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Lamar Advertising pays out 120.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 91.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 3 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.75 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 32.67% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 23.90%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 54.94% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising23.90% 54.94% 8.04%
Federal Realty Investment Trust 32.67%13.65%4.83%

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.33B6.50$587.15M$5.4827.16
Federal Realty Investment Trust$1.28B7.81$411.08M$4.9523.35

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus price target of $160.17, suggesting a potential upside of 7.61%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus price target of $128.75, suggesting a potential upside of 11.41%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Federal Realty Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lamar Advertising and Federal Realty Investment Trust tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lamar Advertising News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAMR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAMR vs. The Competition

MetricLamar AdvertisingSpecialized REITs IndustryReal Estate SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$15.10B$19.09B$5.48B$12.79B
Dividend Yield4.25%5.13%6.42%9.15%
P/E Ratio27.1426.4928.2225.27
Price / Sales6.506.34126.06108.08
Price / Cash16.6182.1634.5452.39
Price / Book14.723.181.836.34
Net Income$587.15M$575.26M-$64.10M$357.86M
7 Day Performance-1.75%-0.08%-1.06%-0.06%
1 Month Performance-7.51%-2.82%-3.18%-0.94%
1 Year Performance16.34%-0.86%7.16%11.89%

Lamar Advertising Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAMR
Lamar Advertising
4.0865 of 5 stars
$148.86
-0.7%
$160.17
+7.6%
+16.9%$15.11B$2.33B27.163,500
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
3.2596 of 5 stars
$20.46
-1.3%
$24.20
+18.3%
+3.3%$2.85B$410.76M60.18120
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
4.5575 of 5 stars
$28.88
-1.0%
$34.33
+18.9%
+5.0%$8.95B$1.37B20.63500
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
2.5591 of 5 stars
$13.06
-4.5%
$13.00
-0.5%
+72.9%$638.13M$295.08M163.2720
CUZ
Cousins Properties
2.8422 of 5 stars
$29.00
-1.5%
$31.09
+7.2%
-2.2%$4.85B$993.82M725.18256,131

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LAMR) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners