Go Pro

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

Lamar Advertising logo
$155.18 -7.07 (-4.36%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$155.21 +0.03 (+0.02%)
As of 07/10/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LAMR vs. AKR, BRX, CLDT, DRH, and FRT

Should you buy Lamar Advertising stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lamar Advertising with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lamar Advertising include Acadia Realty Trust (AKR), Brixmor Property Group (BRX), Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT), DiamondRock Hospitality (DRH), and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Acadia Realty Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Acadia Realty Trust (NYSE:AKR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus price target of $150.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.02%. Acadia Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $23.50, indicating a potential upside of 10.46%. Given Acadia Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Acadia Realty Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Acadia Realty Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Acadia Realty Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acadia Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.27B6.95$587.15M$5.4228.63
Acadia Realty Trust$410.76M6.92$16.90M$0.3070.91

In the previous week, Acadia Realty Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Acadia Realty Trust and 2 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Acadia Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.64 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.50 indicating that Acadia Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Acadia Realty Trust
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Acadia Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Acadia Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Acadia Realty Trust pays out 266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Acadia Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to Acadia Realty Trust's net margin of 9.77%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Acadia Realty Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
Acadia Realty Trust 9.77%1.51%0.84%

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acadia Realty Trust has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Acadia Realty Trust on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 3 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 2 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.50 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brixmor Property Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lamar Advertising
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.98, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brixmor Property Group$1.37B6.94$386.23M$1.4421.56
Lamar Advertising$2.27B6.95$587.15M$5.4228.63

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brixmor Property Group31.99% 14.85% 4.95%
Lamar Advertising 24.01%55.53%8.04%

Brixmor Property Group currently has a consensus price target of $33.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.11%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus price target of $150.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.02%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brixmor Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Brixmor Property Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Chatham Lodging Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Chatham Lodging Trust (NYSE:CLDT) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.27B6.95$587.15M$5.4228.63
Chatham Lodging Trust$295.08M2.03$15.05M$0.02642.70

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus target price of $150.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.02%. Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus target price of $12.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.75%. Given Chatham Lodging Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Chatham Lodging Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 2 more articles in the media than Chatham Lodging Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 0 mentions for Chatham Lodging Trust. Chatham Lodging Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.50 indicating that Chatham Lodging Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising Positive
Chatham Lodging Trust Positive

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Chatham Lodging Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Chatham Lodging Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 3.14%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
Chatham Lodging Trust 3.14%1.18%0.77%

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Chatham Lodging Trust on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to DiamondRock Hospitality?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and DiamondRock Hospitality (NYSE:DRH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than DiamondRock Hospitality. DiamondRock Hospitality is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.27B6.95$587.15M$5.4228.63
DiamondRock Hospitality$1.12B2.16$48.05M$0.4725.28

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of DiamondRock Hospitality shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to DiamondRock Hospitality's net margin of 5.69%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat DiamondRock Hospitality's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
DiamondRock Hospitality 5.69%4.04%2.05%

Lamar Advertising presently has a consensus price target of $150.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.02%. DiamondRock Hospitality has a consensus price target of $11.65, indicating a potential downside of 1.94%. Given DiamondRock Hospitality's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DiamondRock Hospitality is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
DiamondRock Hospitality
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. DiamondRock Hospitality pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DiamondRock Hospitality pays out 76.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and DiamondRock Hospitality has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DiamondRock Hospitality has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising and Lamar Advertising both had 2 articles in the media. DiamondRock Hospitality's average media sentiment score of 1.61 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.50 indicating that DiamondRock Hospitality is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DiamondRock Hospitality
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats DiamondRock Hospitality on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has increased its dividend for 58 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus target price of $150.50, indicating a potential downside of 3.02%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus target price of $125.94, indicating a potential upside of 4.15%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Federal Realty Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.27B6.95$587.15M$5.4228.63
Federal Realty Investment Trust$1.28B8.17$411.08M$5.7620.99

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
Federal Realty Investment Trust 38.63%15.99%5.67%

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 2 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Lamar Advertising's score of 0.50 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Federal Realty Investment Trust beats Lamar Advertising on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lamar Advertising News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAMR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAMR vs. The Competition

MetricLamar AdvertisingREIT IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$16.46B$10.01B$14.19B$12.61B
Dividend Yield3.94%4.89%5.71%7.83%
P/E Ratio28.6350.1320.4924.56
Price / Sales6.955.6044.78121.71
Price / Cash17.8814.7519.3060.04
Price / Book15.352.122.266.39
Net Income$587.15M$227.95M$1.14B$331.44M
7 Day Performance-1.51%-1.63%0.21%0.37%
1 Month Performance1.85%0.45%1.63%2.17%
1 Year Performance23.48%11.74%12.10%20.90%

Lamar Advertising Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAMR
Lamar Advertising
3.1265 of 5 stars
$155.18
-4.4%
$150.50
-3.0%
+23.8%$16.46B$2.27B28.633,500
AKR
Acadia Realty Trust
4.0284 of 5 stars
$21.32
+0.2%
$23.50
+10.2%
+15.4%$2.84B$410.76M71.07120
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
3.9624 of 5 stars
$31.00
-0.6%
$33.00
+6.5%
+21.2%$9.57B$1.37B21.53500
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
2.7255 of 5 stars
$12.73
-2.4%
$12.50
-1.8%
+73.7%$608.72M$295.08M636.5020
DRH
DiamondRock Hospitality
1.9624 of 5 stars
$11.92
-1.3%
$11.65
-2.3%
+45.6%$2.44B$1.12B47.6830

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LAMR) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners