Free Trial

Lamar Advertising (LAMR) Competitors

Lamar Advertising logo
$152.46 +0.34 (+0.22%)
Closing price 05/29/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$151.66 -0.81 (-0.53%)
As of 05/29/2026 06:45 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

LAMR vs. BRX, CLDT, DRH, FRT, and KIM

Should you buy Lamar Advertising stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Lamar Advertising with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Lamar Advertising include Brixmor Property Group (BRX), Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT), DiamondRock Hospitality (DRH), Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT), and Kimco Realty (KIM). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Brixmor Property Group. Brixmor Property Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.29B6.76$587.15M$5.4228.13
Brixmor Property Group$1.37B6.83$386.23M$1.4421.19

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brixmor Property Group pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Brixmor Property Group pays out 85.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Brixmor Property Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus target price of $148.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.93%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus target price of $32.64, indicating a potential upside of 6.94%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Brixmor Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Brixmor Property Group has a net margin of 31.99% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
Brixmor Property Group 31.99%14.85%4.95%

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising and Lamar Advertising both had 4 articles in the media. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Brixmor Property Group's score of 0.60 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Brixmor Property Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Brixmor Property Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Chatham Lodging Trust?

Chatham Lodging Trust (NYSE:CLDT) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to Chatham Lodging Trust's net margin of 3.14%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Chatham Lodging Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chatham Lodging Trust3.14% 1.18% 0.77%
Lamar Advertising 24.01%55.53%8.04%

88.4% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 8.1% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 3 more articles in the media than Chatham Lodging Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 1 mentions for Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Chatham Lodging Trust's score of 1.04 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chatham Lodging Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lamar Advertising
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Chatham Lodging Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chatham Lodging Trust$295.08M1.71$15.05M$0.02541.60
Lamar Advertising$2.29B6.76$587.15M$5.4228.13

Chatham Lodging Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Chatham Lodging Trust pays out 2,000.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chatham Lodging Trust has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chatham Lodging Trust currently has a consensus target price of $11.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.55%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $148.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.93%. Given Chatham Lodging Trust's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Chatham Lodging Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chatham Lodging Trust
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Chatham Lodging Trust on 17 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to DiamondRock Hospitality?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and DiamondRock Hospitality (NYSE:DRH) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus target price of $148.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.93%. DiamondRock Hospitality has a consensus target price of $10.98, suggesting a potential downside of 0.06%. Given DiamondRock Hospitality's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe DiamondRock Hospitality is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
DiamondRock Hospitality
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.30

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than DiamondRock Hospitality. DiamondRock Hospitality is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.29B6.76$587.15M$5.4228.13
DiamondRock Hospitality$1.12B2.00$48.05M$0.4723.38

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of DiamondRock Hospitality shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. DiamondRock Hospitality pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. DiamondRock Hospitality pays out 76.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and DiamondRock Hospitality has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Lamar Advertising is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Lamar Advertising has a net margin of 24.01% compared to DiamondRock Hospitality's net margin of 5.69%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat DiamondRock Hospitality's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
DiamondRock Hospitality 5.69%4.04%2.05%

In the previous week, Lamar Advertising had 1 more articles in the media than DiamondRock Hospitality. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Lamar Advertising and 3 mentions for DiamondRock Hospitality. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat DiamondRock Hospitality's score of 0.95 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
DiamondRock Hospitality
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DiamondRock Hospitality has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats DiamondRock Hospitality on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) and Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a net margin of 38.63% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lamar Advertising24.01% 55.53% 8.04%
Federal Realty Investment Trust 38.63%15.99%5.67%

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 7 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 4 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.83 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lamar Advertising
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Federal Realty Investment Trust
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lamar Advertising currently has a consensus target price of $148.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.93%. Federal Realty Investment Trust has a consensus target price of $120.14, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Federal Realty Investment Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Federal Realty Investment Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Federal Realty Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lamar Advertising$2.29B6.76$587.15M$5.4228.13
Federal Realty Investment Trust$1.31B7.88$411.08M$5.7620.75

Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years.

93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Federal Realty Investment Trust beats Lamar Advertising on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Lamar Advertising compare to Kimco Realty?

Kimco Realty (NYSE:KIM) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

89.3% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.8% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.2% of Lamar Advertising shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Kimco Realty currently has a consensus target price of $25.14, suggesting a potential upside of 4.44%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $148.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.93%. Given Kimco Realty's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kimco Realty is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimco Realty
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Lamar Advertising
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Kimco Realty had 10 more articles in the media than Lamar Advertising. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Kimco Realty and 4 mentions for Lamar Advertising. Lamar Advertising's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat Kimco Realty's score of 0.64 indicating that Lamar Advertising is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimco Realty
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Lamar Advertising
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Kimco Realty has a net margin of 28.54% compared to Lamar Advertising's net margin of 24.01%. Lamar Advertising's return on equity of 55.53% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimco Realty28.54% 5.82% 3.13%
Lamar Advertising 24.01%55.53%8.04%

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than Kimco Realty. Kimco Realty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lamar Advertising, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimco Realty$2.16B7.51$584.74M$0.8627.99
Lamar Advertising$2.29B6.76$587.15M$5.4228.13

Kimco Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $6.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Kimco Realty pays out 120.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 118.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimco Realty has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats Kimco Realty on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Lamar Advertising News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAMR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAMR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LAMR vs. The Competition

MetricLamar AdvertisingREIT IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$15.47B$9.88B$13.56B$12.56B
Dividend Yield4.21%5.04%5.76%5.31%
P/E Ratio28.1346.9424.0026.27
Price / Sales6.765.37147.19142.41
Price / Cash16.8013.4820.2456.84
Price / Book15.772.112.167.30
Net Income$587.15M$227.95M$1.13B$337.27M
7 Day Performance-0.42%0.64%0.72%3.58%
1 Month Performance10.61%3.00%0.51%5.71%
1 Year Performance26.62%12.31%12.62%39.70%

Lamar Advertising Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LAMR
Lamar Advertising
3.8767 of 5 stars
$152.46
+0.2%
$148.00
-2.9%
+26.6%$15.47B$2.29B28.133,500
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
3.5918 of 5 stars
$30.85
+0.0%
$32.45
+5.2%
+20.1%$9.46B$1.37B21.42500
CLDT
Chatham Lodging Trust
3.2859 of 5 stars
$10.69
-0.1%
$11.00
+2.9%
+51.9%$499.49M$295.08M534.6020
DRH
DiamondRock Hospitality
2.4259 of 5 stars
$10.71
flat
$10.87
+1.5%
+43.8%$2.19B$1.12B42.8430
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
3.6891 of 5 stars
$119.83
+0.1%
$116.23
-3.0%
+25.1%$10.34B$1.28B20.80320

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:LAMR) was last updated on 5/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners