Free Trial

Mattel (MAT) Competitors

Mattel logo
$14.20 -0.66 (-4.41%)
As of 02:57 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MAT vs. HAS, JAKK, TTWO, BC, and PII

Should you buy Mattel stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Mattel with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Mattel include Hasbro (HAS), JAKKS Pacific (JAKK), Take-Two Interactive Software (TTWO), Brunswick (BC), and Polaris (PII).

How does Mattel compare to Hasbro?

Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) and Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Hasbro pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Mattel pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Hasbro pays out -168.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mattel pays out 38.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mattel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hasbro$4.81B2.46-$322.40M-$1.66N/A
Mattel$5.38B0.77$397.58M$1.588.99

Hasbro presently has a consensus price target of $113.64, indicating a potential upside of 35.76%. Mattel has a consensus price target of $18.22, indicating a potential upside of 28.28%. Given Hasbro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hasbro is more favorable than Mattel.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hasbro
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Mattel
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

91.8% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Mattel shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Hasbro shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mattel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hasbro has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattel has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Mattel has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Hasbro's net margin of -4.62%. Hasbro's return on equity of 174.64% beat Mattel's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hasbro-4.62% 174.64% 15.30%
Mattel 9.27%18.67%6.34%

In the previous week, Hasbro had 2 more articles in the media than Mattel. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Hasbro and 13 mentions for Mattel. Hasbro's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Mattel's score of 0.27 indicating that Hasbro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hasbro
5 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Mattel
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Hasbro beats Mattel on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mattel compare to JAKKS Pacific?

JAKKS Pacific (NASDAQ:JAKK) and Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than JAKKS Pacific. Mattel is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JAKKS Pacific, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
JAKKS Pacific$570.67M0.43$9.87M$0.6931.38
Mattel$5.38B0.77$397.58M$1.588.99

Mattel has a consensus price target of $18.22, suggesting a potential upside of 28.28%. Given Mattel's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Mattel is more favorable than JAKKS Pacific.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
JAKKS Pacific
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Mattel
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Mattel has a net margin of 9.27% compared to JAKKS Pacific's net margin of 1.41%. Mattel's return on equity of 18.67% beat JAKKS Pacific's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
JAKKS Pacific1.41% 3.26% 1.82%
Mattel 9.27%18.67%6.34%

44.4% of JAKKS Pacific shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Mattel shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of JAKKS Pacific shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mattel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mattel had 12 more articles in the media than JAKKS Pacific. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Mattel and 1 mentions for JAKKS Pacific. JAKKS Pacific's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Mattel's score of 0.27 indicating that JAKKS Pacific is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
JAKKS Pacific Very Positive
Mattel Neutral

JAKKS Pacific has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattel has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

JAKKS Pacific pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Mattel pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. JAKKS Pacific pays out 144.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mattel pays out 38.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Mattel beats JAKKS Pacific on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mattel compare to Take-Two Interactive Software?

Take-Two Interactive Software (NASDAQ:TTWO) and Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

Take-Two Interactive Software has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattel has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Take-Two Interactive Software currently has a consensus price target of $287.06, suggesting a potential upside of 30.41%. Mattel has a consensus price target of $18.22, suggesting a potential upside of 28.28%. Given Take-Two Interactive Software's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Take-Two Interactive Software is more favorable than Mattel.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Take-Two Interactive Software
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Mattel
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Mattel has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Take-Two Interactive Software. Take-Two Interactive Software is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mattel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Take-Two Interactive Software$6.66B6.14-$298.20M-$1.62N/A
Mattel$5.38B0.77$397.58M$1.588.99

Mattel has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Take-Two Interactive Software's net margin of -4.48%. Mattel's return on equity of 18.67% beat Take-Two Interactive Software's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Take-Two Interactive Software-4.48% 14.68% 5.22%
Mattel 9.27%18.67%6.34%

In the previous week, Take-Two Interactive Software had 1 more articles in the media than Mattel. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Take-Two Interactive Software and 13 mentions for Mattel. Take-Two Interactive Software's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Mattel's score of 0.27 indicating that Take-Two Interactive Software is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Take-Two Interactive Software
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mattel
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

95.5% of Take-Two Interactive Software shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Mattel shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Take-Two Interactive Software shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mattel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Take-Two Interactive Software and Mattel tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mattel compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Mattel has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Mattel's return on equity of 18.67% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Brunswick-2.47% 13.30% 4.09%
Mattel 9.27%18.67%6.34%

In the previous week, Mattel had 3 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Mattel and 10 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Mattel's score of 0.27 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Brunswick
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mattel
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Mattel pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mattel pays out 38.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years.

Mattel has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mattel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick$5.36B1.00-$137.30M-$2.10N/A
Mattel$5.38B0.77$397.58M$1.588.99

Brunswick presently has a consensus price target of $87.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.11%. Mattel has a consensus price target of $18.22, suggesting a potential upside of 28.28%. Given Mattel's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Mattel is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.47
Mattel
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattel has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Mattel shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mattel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mattel beats Brunswick on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mattel compare to Polaris?

Polaris (NYSE:PII) and Mattel (NASDAQ:MAT) are both mid-cap leisure products companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

Mattel has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polaris. Polaris is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mattel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polaris$7.15B0.54-$465.50M-$7.84N/A
Mattel$5.38B0.77$397.58M$1.588.99

Polaris presently has a consensus target price of $64.44, indicating a potential downside of 5.84%. Mattel has a consensus target price of $18.22, indicating a potential upside of 28.28%. Given Mattel's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Mattel is more favorable than Polaris.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Polaris
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mattel
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Polaris has a beta of 1.26, indicating that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mattel has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Polaris pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Mattel pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Polaris pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mattel pays out 38.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Polaris has raised its dividend for 30 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Mattel had 10 more articles in the media than Polaris. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Mattel and 3 mentions for Polaris. Polaris' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Mattel's score of 0.27 indicating that Polaris is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Polaris
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mattel
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Mattel has a net margin of 9.27% compared to Polaris' net margin of -6.13%. Mattel's return on equity of 18.67% beat Polaris' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polaris-6.13% 5.91% 1.12%
Mattel 9.27%18.67%6.34%

88.1% of Polaris shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.2% of Mattel shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Polaris shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of Mattel shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Mattel beats Polaris on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mattel News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MAT vs. The Competition

MetricMattelTOYS/GAME/HOBBY IndustryDiscretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$4.34B$3.36B$7.35B$12.59B
Dividend YieldN/A3.89%2.86%5.30%
P/E Ratio9.2810.1921.7226.60
Price / Sales0.770.923.9495.38
Price / Cash6.9311.1512.9937.60
Price / Book1.985.923.716.77
Net Income$397.58M$18.88M$247.47M$337.23M
7 Day Performance-5.74%-3.21%1.55%2.65%
1 Month Performance-4.86%-6.62%16.05%6.63%
1 Year Performance-23.51%-21.01%17.74%37.91%

Mattel Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MAT
Mattel
4.3884 of 5 stars
$14.21
-4.4%
$18.22
+28.3%
-21.4%$4.34B$5.38B9.2831,000
HAS
Hasbro
4.3498 of 5 stars
$88.10
flat
$113.64
+29.0%
+27.4%$12.47B$4.70BN/A4,520
JAKK
JAKKS Pacific
3.1787 of 5 stars
$22.18
flat
N/A+9.8%$253.83M$570.67M32.15580
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software
4.4535 of 5 stars
$227.55
flat
$287.53
+26.4%
+0.6%$42.14B$6.66BN/A12,928
BC
Brunswick
3.717 of 5 stars
$80.95
0.0%
$87.00
+7.5%
+62.8%$5.26B$5.36BN/A14,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:MAT) was last updated on 6/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners