Hasbro Competitors

Marriott International (NASDAQ:MAR) and Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Marriott International and Hasbro, as reported by MarketBeat.

Marriott International currently has a consensus target price of $123.4444, suggesting a potential downside of 16.86%. Hasbro has a consensus target price of $94.3810, suggesting a potential downside of 0.90%. Given Hasbro's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hasbro is more favorable than Marriott International.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Marriott International and Hasbro's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Marriott International has higher revenue and earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marriott International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

57.7% of Marriott International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Hasbro shares are held by institutional investors. 12.8% of Marriott International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Hasbro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Marriott International and Hasbro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Marriott International has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its share price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hasbro has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) and Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Roku and Hasbro, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Roku presently has a consensus price target of $386.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 3.46%. Hasbro has a consensus price target of $94.3810, suggesting a potential downside of 0.90%. Given Roku's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Roku is more favorable than Hasbro.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Roku and Hasbro's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Hasbro has higher revenue and earnings than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hasbro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

64.2% of Roku shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Roku shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Hasbro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Roku and Hasbro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Roku has a beta of 1.95, indicating that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hasbro has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hasbro beats Roku on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) and Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Las Vegas Sands and Hasbro, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Las Vegas Sands presently has a consensus price target of $58.0938, suggesting a potential downside of 6.21%. Hasbro has a consensus price target of $94.3810, suggesting a potential downside of 0.90%. Given Hasbro's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hasbro is more favorable than Las Vegas Sands.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Hasbro's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Las Vegas Sands has higher revenue and earnings than Hasbro. Las Vegas Sands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hasbro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

37.3% of Las Vegas Sands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.8% of Las Vegas Sands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Hasbro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Hasbro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its share price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hasbro has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Hasbro beats Las Vegas Sands on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ:LULU) and Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Lululemon Athletica and Hasbro, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Lululemon Athletica presently has a consensus price target of $385.3548, suggesting a potential upside of 21.14%. Hasbro has a consensus price target of $94.3810, suggesting a potential downside of 0.90%. Given Lululemon Athletica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Lululemon Athletica is more favorable than Hasbro.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lululemon Athletica and Hasbro's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lululemon Athletica has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lululemon Athletica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.0% of Lululemon Athletica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lululemon Athletica shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Hasbro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Lululemon Athletica and Hasbro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hasbro has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lululemon Athletica beats Hasbro on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) and Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Electronic Arts and Hasbro's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Electronic Arts has higher revenue and earnings than Hasbro. Hasbro is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Electronic Arts and Hasbro, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Electronic Arts presently has a consensus price target of $153.3448, suggesting a potential upside of 9.17%. Hasbro has a consensus price target of $94.3810, suggesting a potential downside of 0.90%. Given Electronic Arts' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Electronic Arts is more favorable than Hasbro.

Volatility and Risk

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hasbro has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Electronic Arts pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Hasbro pays an annual dividend of $2.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Electronic Arts pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hasbro pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Electronic Arts has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Hasbro has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares Electronic Arts and Hasbro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.0% of Electronic Arts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Hasbro shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Electronic Arts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.6% of Hasbro shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Electronic Arts beats Hasbro on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Discovery (NASDAQ:DISCB) and Hasbro (NASDAQ:HAS) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Discovery and Hasbro's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Discovery has higher revenue and earnings than Hasbro.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and price targets for Discovery and Hasbro, as provided by MarketBeat.

Hasbro has a consensus price target of $94.3810, suggesting a potential downside of 0.90%. Given Hasbro's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hasbro is more favorable than Discovery.

Risk & Volatility

Discovery has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hasbro has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Discovery and Hasbro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Discovery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.3% of Hasbro shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.6% of Hasbro shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Discovery beats Hasbro on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.