NICE Competitors

NICE (NASDAQ:NICE) and CrowdStrike (NASDAQ:CRWD) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Risk and Volatility

NICE has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CrowdStrike has a beta of 1.32, suggesting that its share price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares NICE and CrowdStrike's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

NICE has higher revenue and earnings than CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NICE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for NICE and CrowdStrike, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

NICE currently has a consensus target price of $288.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 22.19%. CrowdStrike has a consensus target price of $232.8077, suggesting a potential upside of 11.14%. Given NICE's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe NICE is more favorable than CrowdStrike.

Profitability

This table compares NICE and CrowdStrike's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.9% of NICE shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.0% of CrowdStrike shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of NICE shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of CrowdStrike shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

NICE beats CrowdStrike on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

DocuSign (NASDAQ:DOCU) and NICE (NASDAQ:NICE) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares DocuSign and NICE's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

NICE has higher revenue and earnings than DocuSign. DocuSign is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NICE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares DocuSign and NICE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

DocuSign has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NICE has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for DocuSign and NICE, as provided by MarketBeat.

DocuSign currently has a consensus target price of $273.55, suggesting a potential upside of 24.47%. NICE has a consensus target price of $288.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 22.19%. Given DocuSign's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe DocuSign is more favorable than NICE.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

72.8% of DocuSign shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of NICE shares are held by institutional investors. 5.1% of DocuSign shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of NICE shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NICE beats DocuSign on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEV) and NICE (NASDAQ:NICE) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

Veeva Systems has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its share price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NICE has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Veeva Systems and NICE's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Veeva Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NICE. NICE is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Veeva Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Veeva Systems and NICE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.5% of Veeva Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of NICE shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.4% of Veeva Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of NICE shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Veeva Systems and NICE, as provided by MarketBeat.

Veeva Systems currently has a consensus price target of $299.8696, suggesting a potential upside of 9.35%. NICE has a consensus price target of $288.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 22.19%. Given NICE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe NICE is more favorable than Veeva Systems.

Summary

Veeva Systems beats NICE on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) and NICE (NASDAQ:NICE) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.0% of Electronic Arts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of NICE shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Electronic Arts shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of NICE shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NICE has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Electronic Arts and NICE, as reported by MarketBeat.

Electronic Arts currently has a consensus price target of $153.3448, indicating a potential upside of 8.92%. NICE has a consensus price target of $288.8333, indicating a potential upside of 22.19%. Given NICE's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe NICE is more favorable than Electronic Arts.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Electronic Arts and NICE's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Electronic Arts has higher revenue and earnings than NICE. Electronic Arts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NICE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Electronic Arts and NICE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Electronic Arts beats NICE on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palantir Technologies (NYSE:PLTR) and NICE (NASDAQ:NICE) are both large-cap business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and profitability.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

10.1% of Palantir Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of NICE shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of NICE shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Palantir Technologies and NICE's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

NICE has higher revenue and earnings than Palantir Technologies.

Profitability

This table compares Palantir Technologies and NICE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Palantir Technologies and NICE, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Palantir Technologies currently has a consensus target price of $23.5714, indicating a potential upside of 5.61%. NICE has a consensus target price of $288.8333, indicating a potential upside of 22.19%. Given NICE's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe NICE is more favorable than Palantir Technologies.

Summary

NICE beats Palantir Technologies on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cadence Design Systems (NASDAQ:CDNS) and NICE (NASDAQ:NICE) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

83.9% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.9% of NICE shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Cadence Design Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of NICE shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cadence Design Systems and NICE's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cadence Design Systems has higher revenue and earnings than NICE. Cadence Design Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NICE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NICE has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Cadence Design Systems and NICE's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Cadence Design Systems and NICE, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cadence Design Systems presently has a consensus target price of $141.3333, suggesting a potential downside of 0.17%. NICE has a consensus target price of $288.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 22.19%. Given NICE's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe NICE is more favorable than Cadence Design Systems.

Summary

Cadence Design Systems beats NICE on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.