Go Pro

Winmark (WINA) Competitors

Winmark logo
$332.52 -3.15 (-0.94%)
Closing price 07/24/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$331.41 -1.11 (-0.33%)
As of 07/24/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WINA vs. SIG, SBH, HZO, ULTA, and DKS

Should you buy Winmark stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Winmark with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Winmark include Signet Jewelers (SIG), Sally Beauty (SBH), MarineMax (HZO), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), and DICK'S Sporting Goods (DKS). These companies are all part of the "specialty stores" industry.

How does Winmark compare to Signet Jewelers?

Signet Jewelers (NYSE:SIG) and Winmark (NASDAQ:WINA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Signet Jewelers had 5 more articles in the media than Winmark. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Signet Jewelers and 3 mentions for Winmark. Signet Jewelers' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Winmark's score of 0.14 indicating that Signet Jewelers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Signet Jewelers
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Winmark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Winmark has a net margin of 47.09% compared to Signet Jewelers' net margin of 4.29%. Signet Jewelers' return on equity of 22.54% beat Winmark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Signet Jewelers4.29% 22.54% 7.35%
Winmark 47.09%-99.47%103.54%

Signet Jewelers pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Winmark pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Signet Jewelers pays out 13.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Winmark pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Signet Jewelers has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Winmark has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Winmark is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Signet Jewelers currently has a consensus target price of $112.00, indicating a potential upside of 22.97%. Given Signet Jewelers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Signet Jewelers is more favorable than Winmark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Signet Jewelers
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.58
Winmark
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Signet Jewelers has higher revenue and earnings than Winmark. Signet Jewelers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Signet Jewelers$6.81B0.53$294.40M$7.1312.77
Winmark$86.06M13.87$41.65M$11.0230.17

Signet Jewelers has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Winmark has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

73.3% of Winmark shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Signet Jewelers shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Winmark shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Signet Jewelers beats Winmark on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Winmark compare to Sally Beauty?

Winmark (NASDAQ:WINA) and Sally Beauty (NYSE:SBH) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

73.3% of Winmark shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.4% of Winmark shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Sally Beauty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Winmark had 2 more articles in the media than Sally Beauty. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Winmark and 1 mentions for Sally Beauty. Sally Beauty's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Winmark's score of 0.14 indicating that Sally Beauty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Winmark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Sally Beauty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Winmark has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sally Beauty has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Sally Beauty has a consensus price target of $17.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.29%. Given Sally Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sally Beauty is more favorable than Winmark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Winmark
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Sally Beauty
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Winmark has a net margin of 47.09% compared to Sally Beauty's net margin of 4.93%. Sally Beauty's return on equity of 24.95% beat Winmark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Winmark47.09% -99.47% 103.54%
Sally Beauty 4.93%24.95%7.09%

Sally Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Winmark. Sally Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Winmark$86.06M13.87$41.65M$11.0230.17
Sally Beauty$3.73B0.37$195.88M$1.818.08

Summary

Winmark and Sally Beauty tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Winmark compare to MarineMax?

Winmark (NASDAQ:WINA) and MarineMax (NYSE:HZO) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Winmark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MarineMax. MarineMax is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Winmark$86.06M13.87$41.65M$11.0230.17
MarineMax$2.31B0.35-$31.63M-$2.94N/A

73.3% of Winmark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.9% of MarineMax shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Winmark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of MarineMax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MarineMax has a consensus price target of $35.40, suggesting a potential downside of 2.72%. Given MarineMax's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MarineMax is more favorable than Winmark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Winmark
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
MarineMax
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

In the previous week, MarineMax had 13 more articles in the media than Winmark. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for MarineMax and 3 mentions for Winmark. MarineMax's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Winmark's score of 0.14 indicating that MarineMax is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Winmark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
MarineMax
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Winmark has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MarineMax has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Winmark has a net margin of 47.09% compared to MarineMax's net margin of 0.18%. MarineMax's return on equity of 1.51% beat Winmark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Winmark47.09% -99.47% 103.54%
MarineMax 0.18%1.51%0.59%

Summary

MarineMax beats Winmark on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Winmark compare to Ulta Beauty?

Winmark (NASDAQ:WINA) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $638.09, indicating a potential upside of 34.23%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Winmark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Winmark
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ulta Beauty
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
19 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.74

Winmark has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ulta Beauty had 17 more articles in the media than Winmark. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Ulta Beauty and 3 mentions for Winmark. Ulta Beauty's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Winmark's score of 0.14 indicating that Ulta Beauty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Winmark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ulta Beauty
18 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Winmark has a net margin of 47.09% compared to Ulta Beauty's net margin of 9.36%. Ulta Beauty's return on equity of 44.77% beat Winmark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Winmark47.09% -99.47% 103.54%
Ulta Beauty 9.36%44.77%17.27%

73.3% of Winmark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.4% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Winmark shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ulta Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Winmark. Ulta Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Winmark$86.06M13.87$41.65M$11.0230.17
Ulta Beauty$12.39B1.65$1.15B$26.6717.82

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Winmark on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Winmark compare to DICK'S Sporting Goods?

Winmark (NASDAQ:WINA) and DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Winmark has a net margin of 47.09% compared to DICK'S Sporting Goods' net margin of 4.71%. DICK'S Sporting Goods' return on equity of 22.22% beat Winmark's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Winmark47.09% -99.47% 103.54%
DICK'S Sporting Goods 4.71%22.22%7.02%

Winmark pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Winmark pays out 37.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays out 47.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Winmark has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and DICK'S Sporting Goods has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. DICK'S Sporting Goods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Winmark has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

DICK'S Sporting Goods has a consensus target price of $254.71, suggesting a potential upside of 23.68%. Given DICK'S Sporting Goods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DICK'S Sporting Goods is more favorable than Winmark.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Winmark
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
DICK'S Sporting Goods
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

DICK'S Sporting Goods has higher revenue and earnings than Winmark. DICK'S Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Winmark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Winmark$86.06M13.87$41.65M$11.0230.17
DICK'S Sporting Goods$17.22B1.07$849.24M$10.5219.58

In the previous week, DICK'S Sporting Goods had 7 more articles in the media than Winmark. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for DICK'S Sporting Goods and 3 mentions for Winmark. DICK'S Sporting Goods' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Winmark's score of 0.14 indicating that DICK'S Sporting Goods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Winmark
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
DICK'S Sporting Goods
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

73.3% of Winmark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.8% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by institutional investors. 10.4% of Winmark shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.9% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

DICK'S Sporting Goods beats Winmark on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Winmark News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WINA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WINA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WINA vs. The Competition

MetricWinmarkRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.21B$12.90B$26.31B$12.26B
Dividend Yield1.22%2.92%176.91%9.80%
P/E Ratio30.1733.2022.1323.71
Price / Sales13.871.693.5476.53
Price / Cash28.209.8117.3759.64
Price / Book-31.764.416.336.07
Net Income$41.65M$782.06M$954.23M$331.84M
7 Day Performance-14.32%-1.27%-2.17%-1.53%
1 Month Performance-22.47%9.74%-1.66%-2.46%
1 Year Performance-13.23%5.07%-5.35%13.66%

Winmark Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WINA
Winmark
1.3014 of 5 stars
$332.52
-0.9%
N/A-12.6%$1.21B$86.06M30.1780
SIG
Signet Jewelers
4.7558 of 5 stars
$90.39
-0.1%
$112.88
+24.9%
+8.4%$3.56B$6.81B12.6827,097
SBH
Sally Beauty
3.2352 of 5 stars
$14.87
-0.2%
$17.00
+14.4%
+43.9%$1.42B$3.70B8.2127,000
HZO
MarineMax
1.4403 of 5 stars
$33.22
-2.2%
$34.50
+3.9%
+59.2%$731.77M$2.24BN/A3,385
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
4.3619 of 5 stars
$489.47
+0.3%
$638.09
+30.4%
-7.4%$21.04B$12.39B18.3565,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:WINA) was last updated on 7/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners