S&P 500   3,854.21 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,195.02 (+0.02%)
QQQ   325.83 (+0.64%)
AAPL   136.15 (+3.12%)
MSFT   225.93 (+0.71%)
FB   272.50 (+1.88%)
GOOGL   1,888.52 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,317.85 (+1.67%)
TSLA   847.40 (-0.36%)
NVDA   544.76 (+1.89%)
BABA   259.39 (-2.30%)
CGC   33.90 (+0.80%)
GE   11.12 (-2.37%)
MU   83.48 (-0.02%)
AMD   90.61 (+2.10%)
NIO   57.88 (+0.29%)
T   28.91 (-0.17%)
F   11.67 (+7.46%)
ACB   11.16 (-3.29%)
BA   207.17 (-2.02%)
DIS   172.36 (-0.74%)
NFLX   572.64 (-2.34%)
GILD   67.04 (-1.40%)
S&P 500   3,854.21 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,195.02 (+0.02%)
QQQ   325.83 (+0.64%)
AAPL   136.15 (+3.12%)
MSFT   225.93 (+0.71%)
FB   272.50 (+1.88%)
GOOGL   1,888.52 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,317.85 (+1.67%)
TSLA   847.40 (-0.36%)
NVDA   544.76 (+1.89%)
BABA   259.39 (-2.30%)
CGC   33.90 (+0.80%)
GE   11.12 (-2.37%)
MU   83.48 (-0.02%)
AMD   90.61 (+2.10%)
NIO   57.88 (+0.29%)
T   28.91 (-0.17%)
F   11.67 (+7.46%)
ACB   11.16 (-3.29%)
BA   207.17 (-2.02%)
DIS   172.36 (-0.74%)
NFLX   572.64 (-2.34%)
GILD   67.04 (-1.40%)
S&P 500   3,854.21 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,195.02 (+0.02%)
QQQ   325.83 (+0.64%)
AAPL   136.15 (+3.12%)
MSFT   225.93 (+0.71%)
FB   272.50 (+1.88%)
GOOGL   1,888.52 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,317.85 (+1.67%)
TSLA   847.40 (-0.36%)
NVDA   544.76 (+1.89%)
BABA   259.39 (-2.30%)
CGC   33.90 (+0.80%)
GE   11.12 (-2.37%)
MU   83.48 (-0.02%)
AMD   90.61 (+2.10%)
NIO   57.88 (+0.29%)
T   28.91 (-0.17%)
F   11.67 (+7.46%)
ACB   11.16 (-3.29%)
BA   207.17 (-2.02%)
DIS   172.36 (-0.74%)
NFLX   572.64 (-2.34%)
GILD   67.04 (-1.40%)
S&P 500   3,854.21 (+0.06%)
DOW   31,195.02 (+0.02%)
QQQ   325.83 (+0.64%)
AAPL   136.15 (+3.12%)
MSFT   225.93 (+0.71%)
FB   272.50 (+1.88%)
GOOGL   1,888.52 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,317.85 (+1.67%)
TSLA   847.40 (-0.36%)
NVDA   544.76 (+1.89%)
BABA   259.39 (-2.30%)
CGC   33.90 (+0.80%)
GE   11.12 (-2.37%)
MU   83.48 (-0.02%)
AMD   90.61 (+2.10%)
NIO   57.88 (+0.29%)
T   28.91 (-0.17%)
F   11.67 (+7.46%)
ACB   11.16 (-3.29%)
BA   207.17 (-2.02%)
DIS   172.36 (-0.74%)
NFLX   572.64 (-2.34%)
GILD   67.04 (-1.40%)
Log in
NASDAQ:FIVE

Five Below Competitors

$188.83
+3.85 (+2.08 %)
(As of 01/21/2021 01:27 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$185.38
Now: $188.83
$189.32
50-Day Range
$156.07
MA: $170.75
$194.53
52-Week Range
$47.53
Now: $188.83
$197.45
Volume6,996 shs
Average Volume854,314 shs
Market Capitalization$10.55 billion
P/E Ratio96.84
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.19

Competitors

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) Vs. TSCO, ULTA, TIF, DKS, ODP, and SIG

Should you be buying FIVE stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "specialty stores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Five Below, including Tractor Supply (TSCO), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), Tiffany & Co. (TIF), DICK'S Sporting Goods (DKS), The ODP (ODP), and Signet Jewelers (SIG).

Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO) and Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tractor Supply and Five Below's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tractor Supply$8.35 billion2.18$562.35 million$4.6833.32
Five Below$1.85 billion5.71$175.06 million$2.9863.37

Tractor Supply has higher revenue and earnings than Five Below. Tractor Supply is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.3% of Tractor Supply shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Tractor Supply shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Five Below shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Tractor Supply and Five Below's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tractor Supply7.62%46.65%12.23%
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%

Volatility and Risk

Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Tractor Supply and Five Below, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tractor Supply017812.38
Five Below041702.81

Tractor Supply currently has a consensus price target of $137.64, indicating a potential downside of 11.85%. Five Below has a consensus price target of $174.1364, indicating a potential downside of 7.25%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Five Below is more favorable than Tractor Supply.

Summary

Tractor Supply beats Five Below on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) and Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Ulta Beauty and Five Below, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ulta Beauty091602.64
Five Below041702.81

Ulta Beauty currently has a consensus price target of $276.36, indicating a potential downside of 8.65%. Five Below has a consensus price target of $174.1364, indicating a potential downside of 7.25%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Five Below is more favorable than Ulta Beauty.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Five Below's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion2.32$705.95 million$11.9125.54
Five Below$1.85 billion5.71$175.06 million$2.9863.37

Ulta Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Five Below. Ulta Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.8% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of Five Below shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Five Below's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ulta Beauty3.63%15.94%5.59%
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Five Below on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Five Below and Tiffany & Co., as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Five Below041702.81
Tiffany & Co.07002.00

Five Below currently has a consensus price target of $174.1364, indicating a potential downside of 7.25%. Tiffany & Co. has a consensus price target of $127.3750, indicating a potential downside of 3.11%. Given Tiffany & Co.'s higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Tiffany & Co. is more favorable than Five Below.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and Tiffany & Co.'s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five Below$1.85 billion5.71$175.06 million$2.9863.37
Tiffany & Co.$4.42 billion3.61$541.10 million$4.5928.64

Tiffany & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than Five Below. Tiffany & Co. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tiffany & Co. has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

77.8% of Tiffany & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Five Below shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Tiffany & Co. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and Tiffany & Co.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%
Tiffany & Co.6.72%8.43%4.09%

Summary

Five Below beats Tiffany & Co. on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Five Below and DICK'S Sporting Goods, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Five Below041702.81
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33

Five Below currently has a consensus price target of $174.1364, indicating a potential downside of 7.25%. DICK'S Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $56.00, indicating a potential downside of 17.31%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Five Below is more favorable than DICK'S Sporting Goods.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and DICK'S Sporting Goods' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five Below$1.85 billion5.71$175.06 million$2.9863.37
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.42

DICK'S Sporting Goods has higher revenue and earnings than Five Below. DICK'S Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Five Below shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and DICK'S Sporting Goods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%

Summary

DICK'S Sporting Goods beats Five Below on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and The ODP (NASDAQ:ODP) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Five Below and The ODP, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Five Below041702.81
The ODP11102.00

Five Below currently has a consensus price target of $174.1364, indicating a potential downside of 7.25%. The ODP has a consensus price target of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 33.84%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Five Below is more favorable than The ODP.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and The ODP's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five Below$1.85 billion5.71$175.06 million$2.9863.37
The ODP$10.65 billion0.23$99 million$4.1011.23

Five Below has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The ODP. The ODP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The ODP has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

90.6% of The ODP shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Five Below shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of The ODP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and The ODP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%
The ODP-2.84%11.61%3.58%

Summary

Five Below beats The ODP on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and Signet Jewelers (NYSE:SIG) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Five Below and Signet Jewelers, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Five Below041702.81
Signet Jewelers43101.63

Five Below currently has a consensus price target of $174.1364, indicating a potential downside of 7.25%. Signet Jewelers has a consensus price target of $28.60, indicating a potential downside of 21.26%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Five Below is more favorable than Signet Jewelers.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and Signet Jewelers' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five Below$1.85 billion5.71$175.06 million$2.9863.37
Signet Jewelers$6.14 billion0.31$105.50 million$3.889.34

Five Below has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Signet Jewelers. Signet Jewelers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Signet Jewelers has a beta of 2.67, meaning that its stock price is 167% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and Signet Jewelers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%
Signet Jewelers-1.62%9.73%1.50%

Summary

Five Below beats Signet Jewelers on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Five Below Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Tractor Supply logo
TSCO
Tractor Supply
1.8$155.94+0.4%$18.10 billion$8.35 billion24.21Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
Ulta Beauty logo
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
1.8$304.16+2.9%$16.64 billion$7.40 billion76.81Analyst Report
Tiffany & Co. logo
TIF
Tiffany & Co.
1.9$131.46+0.0%$15.96 billion$4.42 billion64.44
DICK'S Sporting Goods logo
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods
2.1$67.96+1.2%$6.02 billion$8.75 billion16.74Analyst Report
News Coverage
The ODP logo
ODP
The ODP
1.3$46.06+0.3%$2.43 billion$10.65 billion-8.61
Signet Jewelers logo
SIG
Signet Jewelers
1.5$36.25+0.3%$1.90 billion$6.14 billion-15.10Analyst Revision
Sally Beauty logo
SBH
Sally Beauty
1.5$14.55+1.0%$1.62 billion$3.51 billion14.85Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
MarineMax logo
HZO
MarineMax
1.5$43.10+0.5%$948.59 million$1.51 billion12.87Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
Unusual Options Activity
Gap Down
Hibbett Sports logo
HIBB
Hibbett Sports
1.0$54.90+2.0%$929.82 million$1.18 billion16.79News Coverage
Winmark logo
WINA
Winmark
1.0$182.30+0.2%$680.68 million$73.30 million23.64
Big 5 Sporting Goods logo
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
1.6$12.30+3.7%$259.38 million$996.49 million7.55Gap Down
This page was last updated on 1/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.