S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
Log in
NYSE:DKS

DICK'S Sporting Goods Competitors

$68.12
+0.34 (+0.50 %)
(As of 01/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$65.77
Now: $68.12
$68.24
50-Day Range
$52.15
MA: $58.63
$67.78
52-Week Range
$13.46
Now: $68.12
$68.56
Volume1.78 million shs
Average Volume2.18 million shs
Market Capitalization$6.10 billion
P/E Ratio16.78
Dividend Yield1.84%
Beta1.62

Competitors

DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) Vs. TSCO, ULTA, TIF, FIVE, ODP, and SIG

Should you be buying DKS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "specialty stores" are considered alternatives and competitors to DICK'S Sporting Goods, including Tractor Supply (TSCO), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), Tiffany & Co. (TIF), Five Below (FIVE), The ODP (ODP), and Signet Jewelers (SIG).

DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) and Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Tractor Supply shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Tractor Supply shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares DICK'S Sporting Goods and Tractor Supply's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%
Tractor Supply7.62%46.65%12.23%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares DICK'S Sporting Goods and Tractor Supply's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.46
Tractor Supply$8.35 billion2.17$562.35 million$4.6833.25

Tractor Supply has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DICK'S Sporting Goods. DICK'S Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tractor Supply, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

DICK'S Sporting Goods pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Tractor Supply pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays out 33.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 34.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Tractor Supply has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. DICK'S Sporting Goods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for DICK'S Sporting Goods and Tractor Supply, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33
Tractor Supply017812.38

DICK'S Sporting Goods presently has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.79%. Tractor Supply has a consensus price target of $137.96, suggesting a potential downside of 11.35%. Given Tractor Supply's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Tractor Supply is more favorable than DICK'S Sporting Goods.

Summary

Tractor Supply beats DICK'S Sporting Goods on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Risk and Volatility

DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for DICK'S Sporting Goods and Ulta Beauty, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33
Ulta Beauty091602.64

DICK'S Sporting Goods presently has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.79%. Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $276.36, suggesting a potential downside of 7.86%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than DICK'S Sporting Goods.

Profitability

This table compares DICK'S Sporting Goods and Ulta Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%
Ulta Beauty3.63%15.94%5.59%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares DICK'S Sporting Goods and Ulta Beauty's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.46
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion2.28$705.95 million$11.9125.18

Ulta Beauty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than DICK'S Sporting Goods. DICK'S Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ulta Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats DICK'S Sporting Goods on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF) and DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Tiffany & Co. has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Tiffany & Co. and DICK'S Sporting Goods, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tiffany & Co.07002.00
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33

Tiffany & Co. presently has a consensus price target of $127.3750, suggesting a potential downside of 3.11%. DICK'S Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.79%. Given Tiffany & Co.'s higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Tiffany & Co. is more favorable than DICK'S Sporting Goods.

Dividends

Tiffany & Co. pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Tiffany & Co. pays out 50.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays out 33.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. DICK'S Sporting Goods is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Tiffany & Co. and DICK'S Sporting Goods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tiffany & Co.6.72%8.43%4.09%
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.8% of Tiffany & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Tiffany & Co. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Tiffany & Co. and DICK'S Sporting Goods' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tiffany & Co.$4.42 billion3.61$541.10 million$4.5928.64
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.46

Tiffany & Co. has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DICK'S Sporting Goods. DICK'S Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tiffany & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

DICK'S Sporting Goods beats Tiffany & Co. on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Five Below has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Five Below and DICK'S Sporting Goods, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Five Below041702.81
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33

Five Below presently has a consensus price target of $174.1364, suggesting a potential downside of 8.19%. DICK'S Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.79%. Given Five Below's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Five Below is more favorable than DICK'S Sporting Goods.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and DICK'S Sporting Goods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Five Below6.13%14.72%5.33%
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Five Below shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and DICK'S Sporting Goods' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five Below$1.85 billion5.74$175.06 million$2.9863.65
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.46

DICK'S Sporting Goods has higher revenue and earnings than Five Below. DICK'S Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

DICK'S Sporting Goods beats Five Below on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

The ODP (NASDAQ:ODP) and DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both mid-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Volatility and Risk

The ODP has a beta of 2.42, meaning that its share price is 142% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for The ODP and DICK'S Sporting Goods, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The ODP11102.00
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33

The ODP presently has a consensus price target of $30.50, suggesting a potential downside of 35.80%. DICK'S Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.79%. Given DICK'S Sporting Goods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DICK'S Sporting Goods is more favorable than The ODP.

Profitability

This table compares The ODP and DICK'S Sporting Goods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The ODP-2.84%11.61%3.58%
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

90.6% of The ODP shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of The ODP shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares The ODP and DICK'S Sporting Goods' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The ODP$10.65 billion0.24$99 million$4.1011.59
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.46

DICK'S Sporting Goods has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The ODP. The ODP is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DICK'S Sporting Goods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

DICK'S Sporting Goods beats The ODP on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Signet Jewelers (NYSE:SIG) and DICK'S Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Signet Jewelers and DICK'S Sporting Goods' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Signet Jewelers$6.14 billion0.31$105.50 million$3.889.36
DICK'S Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.70$297.46 million$3.6918.46

DICK'S Sporting Goods has higher revenue and earnings than Signet Jewelers. Signet Jewelers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DICK'S Sporting Goods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Signet Jewelers has a beta of 2.67, indicating that its stock price is 167% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, DICK'S Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

76.5% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Signet Jewelers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of DICK'S Sporting Goods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Signet Jewelers and DICK'S Sporting Goods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Signet Jewelers-1.62%9.73%1.50%
DICK'S Sporting Goods4.20%25.52%6.49%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Signet Jewelers and DICK'S Sporting Goods, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Signet Jewelers43101.63
DICK'S Sporting Goods2121002.33

Signet Jewelers presently has a consensus price target of $28.60, suggesting a potential downside of 21.23%. DICK'S Sporting Goods has a consensus price target of $56.00, suggesting a potential downside of 17.79%. Given DICK'S Sporting Goods' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe DICK'S Sporting Goods is more favorable than Signet Jewelers.

Dividends

Signet Jewelers pays an annual dividend of $0.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays an annual dividend of $1.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Signet Jewelers pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. DICK'S Sporting Goods pays out 33.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

DICK'S Sporting Goods beats Signet Jewelers on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.


DICK'S Sporting Goods Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Tractor Supply logo
TSCO
Tractor Supply
1.8$155.62+0.3%$18.13 billion$8.35 billion24.16Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Ulta Beauty logo
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
1.8$299.92+0.1%$16.90 billion$7.40 billion75.74Analyst Report
Tiffany & Co. logo
TIF
Tiffany & Co.
1.9$131.46+0.0%$15.96 billion$4.42 billion64.44
Five Below logo
FIVE
Five Below
1.4$189.67+0.5%$10.60 billion$1.85 billion97.27Analyst Report
The ODP logo
ODP
The ODP
1.3$47.51+2.3%$2.50 billion$10.65 billion-8.88
Signet Jewelers logo
SIG
Signet Jewelers
1.5$36.31+2.5%$1.90 billion$6.14 billion-15.13Analyst Revision
Sally Beauty logo
SBH
Sally Beauty
1.5$13.99+3.5%$1.58 billion$3.51 billion14.28Analyst Upgrade
Unusual Options Activity
MarineMax logo
HZO
MarineMax
1.5$44.53+3.2%$985.09 million$1.51 billion13.29Upcoming Earnings
Insider Selling
Unusual Options Activity
Hibbett Sports logo
HIBB
Hibbett Sports
1.0$54.28+0.4%$900.94 million$1.18 billion16.60
Winmark logo
WINA
Winmark
0.9$183.99+1.3%$688.12 million$73.30 million23.86
Big 5 Sporting Goods logo
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
1.6$12.13+1.4%$265.73 million$996.49 million7.44
This page was last updated on 1/22/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.